Wikidata:Property proposal/salary level
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Salary level
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person
Not done
Description | level of someone's salary |
---|---|
Data type | Item |
Example 1 | Ronald Moultrie (Q106355213) => ES Level 3 Pay (Q116156299) |
Example 2 | Azyumardi Azra (Q4216351) => IV/e (Q116033467) Source |
Example 3 | Komaruddin Hidayat (Q6428174) => IV/e (Q116033467) Source |
Example 4 | Kay Scheller (Q16219274) => Salary grade B 11 (Q116156278) (als Präsident des Bundesrechnungshofes) |
Example 5 | Eva Högl (Q1379228) => Salary grade B 11 (Q116156278) (als Wehrbeauftragte des Deutschen Bundestages) |
Motivation
[edit]In many countries government staff have salary levels, this would be nice to categorize in Wikidata Germartin1 (talk) 14:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Support --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 00:34, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Wouldn't it be better to link the salary grade to the itens about the staff position? e.g. Präsident des Bundesrechnungshofes --> Salary grade B 11? TiagoLubiana (talk) 12:22, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yes good idea, however some positions don't have specific pay-grades or multiple ones. Germartin1 (talk) 14:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose to the proposed model. Having the information for staff positions would make more sense. Otherwise, having it as a qualiifer would be better than as a main statement. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 20:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Conditional support Having this property seems useful, but it shouldn’t be used on instances of human (Q5). Rather, its uses should be limited to
• instances of position (Q4164871) or similar (How much does anyone holding that kind of position (typically) make?), or else
• in contexts that establish the connection between those and their position-holders: either
• instances of term of office (Q524572) or similar (How much does this term entitle its appointee to?), or
• as qualifiers on statements on instances of human (Q5) with position held (P39) or similar (How much does the person make from that employment?).
―BlaueBlüte (talk) 08:51, 1 February 2023 (UTC)- @Germartin1:, could you please clarify all the comments above. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Not done, @Germartin1, Tinker Bell, ChristianKl, BlaueBlüte: no consensus of proposed property at this time. Also, didn't response the comments above. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)