The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Hi! These days four months passed since my initial request. Not sure How to renew this request. I mainly work about minority language topics. Regards לערי ריינהארט (talk) 11:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Sysop in eowp, eowt, yiwp, yiwp, yiws, rowt, iswt, pswp, tnwp, and very active here, but have few RfDs and rollbacking. If possible, please be a rollbacker and property creater first. I may change the vote to support or oppose when necessary. @לערי_ריינהארט: If there has been a past request, successful or unsuccessful, please follow add a number – "Example 2" for a second request, "Example 3" for a third, and so on.--GZWDer (talk) 12:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Lots of contributions; but not to many to admin areas. @לערי ריינהארט: I would give you property creator rights if you want, though, as you do good work at WD:PP. --Jakob (talk) 13:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
When creating / buildin the Nukawiki / Betawiki community, when working at Yiddish WMF projects, test.Wikipedia etc. It was required to assist in creating special:MyPage/common.js, MediaWiki messages for creating, activating, updating gadgets etc. Sometimes a it was required to create users via Special:CreateAccount. Page protection was an issue for very popular templates (with heavy "load"). לערי ריינהארט (talk) 14:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, nothing personal, but I feel like you don't know enough of Wikidata (especially of community related things). Also seems like you don't know for what are RFC's meant for. --Stryn (talk) 15:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I know that you didn't apply for these things, but it's important to know also how things are working on here. I mean where we should discuss etc. Communication is one of the most important things of an administrator, though, this is just my opinion. --Stryn (talk) 17:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
How can you judge about someones skills? Maybe you should pay attention that data (Wikidata) are not corrupted. I posted more then thousand MediaZilla bug reports in early days. Today I realized that rendering goes mad. If you look at diff=108863499&oldid=108820060 you could see that the diff shows another content then the rendered page. לערי ריינהארט (talk) 02:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Poor communication skills still showing in user's above comments. I suggest that this be withdrawn and that the candidate waits no less than six months before another RfA. Also, the user clearly doesn't understand the purpose of an RfA like this one (improperly initiating this second one and posting irrelevant content in the comments section).--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What means no communication? What is with [1]? The timestamp is 22:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC). I can show and provide other examples. BTW: The Request for Comment page is boken since month. לערי ריינהארט (talk) 05:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Poor communication isn't the same as a lack of communication - I don't deny that you do make an effort to communicate, and I thank you for that. But as pointed out by others, you haven't addressed the communication issues that came up in your last RfP here.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
wmf:Non discrimination policy: "The Wikimedia Foundation prohibits discrimination against current or prospective users and employees on the basis of race, color, gender, religion, national origin, age, disability, sexual orientation, or any other legally protected characteristics. The Wikimedia Foundation commits to the principle of equal opportunity, especially in all aspects of employee relations, including employment, salary administration, employee development, promotion, and transfer."
Comment [eo] Mi ŝatus scii kiel vi utiligadus administrajn rajtojn, ĉar de la unua, kaj precipe de tiu ĉi, peto tute ne klaras por kio vi ilin bezonus. --KuboF (talk) 20:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Mi sxatus havi plenajn administrajn rajtojn ne subaron. Mi ja tajpas per dek fingroj ne per unu aux du. farendajxoj: Special%3AAllMessages|prefix=Wikibase&filter=all&lang=eo&limit=250 listigas kaj netradukitajn MediaWiki mesagxojn kaj mesagxojn kiuj devus esti malgrandliteraj kiel
Since summer 2011 I worked mainly about VIAF inter project linking a predecessor of Wikidata. It attracted all my working pover.
After getting Nukawiki started I worked on books editions an transalations crwating ~80 thousand pages at test.Wikipedia beginning from March 2006. This was in parallel to my virtual library collection at LibraryThing with ~2o thousand items and 200 thousand tags. See pages still there. Why " many admin flags in various projects" are important? My main focus is here. לערי ריינהארט (talk) 18:49, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: a) This seems to be common practice. People with less the 250 edits during last month (February 2014) have a strong opinion about all the "to dos" for particular projects (languages) they where never involved. I am no able to count my (manual) contributions for February but these have been more then ten thousand. Apparently they where all garbage.
Comment: Is there a statistic which can show how many different properties, qualifiers, labels, descriptions I have added (and how many {{delete:foo|bar}}?
Because SUL used here did never work during the time of this poll (it failed because of an UTF-8 inconsistency, now if fails for all ASCII user account names regardless if SPACES are used or not) I post here an official WMF tool link: meta:Special:CentralAuth/לערי ריינהארט.
Neutral Sysop in eowp, eowt, yiwp, yiwp, yiws, rowt, iswt, pswp, tnwp, and very active here, but have few RfDs and rollbacking. If possible, please be a rollbacker and property creater first. I may change the vote to support or oppose when necessary. @לערי_ריינהארט: If there has been a past request, successful or unsuccessful, please follow add a number – "Example 2" for a second request, "Example 3" for a third, and so on.--GZWDer (talk) 12:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Weak oppose Lots of contributions; but not to many to admin areas. @לערי ריינהארט: I would give you property creator rights if you want, though, as you do good work at WD:PP. --Jakob (talk) 13:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Oppose, nothing personal, but I feel like you don't know enough of Wikidata (especially of community related things). Also seems like you don't know for what are RFC's meant for. --Stryn (talk) 15:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Support Marek Mazurkiewicz (talk) 21:35, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Strong oppose Poor communication skills still showing in user's above comments. I suggest that this be withdrawn and that the candidate waits no less than six months before another RfA. Also, the user clearly doesn't understand the purpose of an RfA like this one (improperly initiating this second one and posting irrelevant content in the comments section).--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment [eo] Mi ŝatus scii kiel vi utiligadus administrajn rajtojn, ĉar de la unua, kaj precipe de tiu ĉi, peto tute ne klaras por kio vi ilin bezonus. --KuboF (talk) 20:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)