Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/09/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Not anyhow useful fo an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Delete deleted beforeMotopark (talk) 13:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Advertising, out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:31, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Not anyhow useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. It's the same file that was deleted several times already and now uploaded again by "another" user! Ies (talk) 03:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: spam, vandalism --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:52, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Not anyhow useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. It's the same file that was deleted times and again now uploaded again by another sock puppet. Ies (talk) 15:29, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Advertising, out of scope. Gone again, file protected, user blocked. Thanks Ies --Herby talk thyme 15:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Files_by_User:JSDX_from_fr.wikipedia#mediaviewer/File:Logojsdx.png 93.15.243.242 19:31, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy-closed as being without valid rationale. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Essendone il proprietario ne chiedo la cancellazione grazie Alematrox (talk) 12:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%B1%84%EC%9D%80%EC%A0%95
this is me. im chae eun jung (real name is Lee eun jung i hate this photo here. please delete it
Enjel8238 (talk) 14:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- The photo is File:이지혜, 채은정 출연 58년 전통의 양념 소갈비 중구 을지로 맛집 조선옥 (식신로드 Gourmet Road) eps 21-2 채은정.jpg and was uploaded by Puramyun31. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: nominate the picture, not the policy page. --Jcb (talk) 22:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Its a disturbing image which holds back all my work and private life. Melissa sneekes (talk) 22:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, page is not an image. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:59, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hybrid_image_decomposition.jpg 2601:42:702:2B5B:516F:7ED9:57D2:1CC2 20:21, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
cessation d'activité Sauvageot (talk) 13:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Well, it's a proposal/draft, which doesn't necessarily require "activity", but still has value per the ideas/rules drafted by its editors. Where is the need to delete it? --Túrelio (talk) 13:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded incorrect file/video and this is not my own work- ie. copyright violation Stuart Anthony Halpin (talk) 11:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: kept this page, but deleted File:Educational video of interracial oral sex.webm (this user's only upload), as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Also copyvio. Yann (talk) 20:16, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Redundant and low quality file (File:Facebook New Logo (2015).svg is a better and more accurate version) Formica rufa (talk) 16:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:55, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
keine ausreichenden Urheberrechtsinformationen Ralph Schmidt FT (talk) 23:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders request on upload day JuTa 21:15, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Actor praveen kumar (talk · contribs)
editPrivate / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Received 911049278961655.jpeg
- File:FB IMG 1441119403059.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1439737617746.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1439737593212.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1439737564418.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1439737559229.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1439737554298.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1439737549698.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1439737544558.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1439737536436.jpg
Ies (talk) 05:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:31, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hemalathavj (talk · contribs)
editPrivate image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 05:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:35, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Physics Point (talk · contribs)
editPrivate image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 05:58, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE — regards, Revi 07:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kulwant Raj Singh Rathore (talk · contribs)
edit- File:KULWANT RAJ SINGH RATHORE(R).jpg
- File:KULWANT RAJ SINGH RATHORE(2).jpg
- File:KULWANT RAJ SINGH RATHORE(K).jpg
- File:KULWANT RAJ SINGH RATHORE(1).jpg
- File:Kulwant Raj Singh Rathore.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:56, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:47, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
This is an unremarkable individual Hermera34 (talk) 23:06, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Dieses Bild ist ein professionelles Pressefoto und stammt nicht von T. E. Ryen. Ἀστερίσκος (talk) 08:13, 19 September 2015 (UTC) This picture is an official journalistic photograph and was not taken by T. E. Reyen! Please delete quickly (Copyright infringement).--Ἀστερίσκος (talk) 08:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Ich bin mit der Löschung des Bildes einverstanden!--T. E. Ryen (talk) 10:57, 19 September 2015 (UTC) This picture is an official journalistic photograph. Although I have uploaded it, I have not taken it. Please delete; it is a copyright infringment! KR--T. E. Ryen (talk) 17:42, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. and comment of the uploader. JuTa 14:00, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Low quality, nowhere used. Minihaa (talk) 01:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:09, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 07:57, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. --Pokéfan95 (talk) 23:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:13, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:26, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:15, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Self-promotion, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:26, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused test image. GKFXtalk 18:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: test upload, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Seems to be from shutterstock and not own work Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:43, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Post Race Agentan France, June 2015.jpg
- File:British 110M Hurdler Joseph Hylton.jpg
- File:110m hurdles Athlete Joseph Hylton.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused copy of Wikitravel article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- also file:Brooks eventoODCR.jpg
file:Leonardo Ecokids.jpg
This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload a bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 22:11, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Of course it's not a picture from Salonica ! It's taken from this company controlled twitter account... Glorious 93 (talk) 16:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 15:31, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Obviously NOT an original creation. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:19, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:42, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Obviously NOT an original creation. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:20, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 15:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Obviously NOT an original creation. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 15:45, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Photo without any educational purpose. (also, seems like it's taken from an external source) Glorious 93 (talk) 16:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 15:43, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Wrong licence: Not allowed on commons... Minihaa (talk) 00:25, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Has dual licencing. GFDL 1.2 is a free use licence that is allowed, even though CC-BY-NC isn't. Bidgee (talk) 00:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Keep: See this and this DRs. Multi-licensing with at least one allowed license is right. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:26, 19 September 2015 (UTC)- Keep To the nominator: FYI, multi-licensing is allowed on Commons. GFDL 1.2 is a free license, so it is allowed in Commons, although it has CC-BY-NC. It said that, you can license your image under a non-free license if you will multi-license it with another free license. --Pokéfan95 (talk) 23:15, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 17:38, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
As can been seen, scanned from a book, still some remanings of the last text line on the upper side. Metadata tell you 100 dpi, very unlikly to be "own work". Druschba 4 (talk) 01:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:39, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
No metadata at all, very unlikely to be "own work", seems to be scanned from a book (notice "Fig. 62"), just the same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:8g1.jpg. Druschba 4 (talk) 01:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:39, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
The discription allready says "scanned picture", metadata also, most likely from a book. Small resolution, quite old, unlikely to be "own work". See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:8g1.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:ТУ6.jpg. Druschba 4 (talk) 01:34, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:39, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Low quality. Minihaa (talk) 01:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- It is of quality high enough and is used in Malayalam Wikipedia Fire more than one year.--♥Aswini (talk) 03:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 17:40, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by TherasTaneel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no permission stated, taken from their website. Sport logos usually copyrighted Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:45, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 17:40, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by TherasTaneel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no permission stated, taken from their website. Sport logos usually copyrighted Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:46, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 17:41, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by TherasTaneel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no permission stated, taken from their website. Sport logos usually copyrighted Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:46, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 17:42, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Very low resolution, metadata tell you that it is scanned. Most likely from a book, see the numbers inside the picture and "Pec. 1" (russian for "Picture 1). Several other simular cases just as Commons:Deletion requests/File:8g1.jpg, unlikely "own work". Druschba 4 (talk) 01:48, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:43, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Low resolution, looks old, metadata tell you that it is scanned. Most likely from a book. Several other simular cases just as Commons:Deletion requests/File:8g1.jpg, unlikely "own work". Druschba 4 (talk) 01:50, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:43, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Low resolution, looks old, metadata tell you that it is scanned. Most likely from a book, see the numbers inside the picture. Several other simular cases just as Commons:Deletion requests/File:8g1.jpg, unlikely "own work". Druschba 4 (talk) 01:52, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:43, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Bad quality, metadata tell you that it is scanned. Most likely from a book, see the numbers inside the picture. Several other simular cases just as Commons:Deletion requests/File:8g1.jpg, unlikely "own work". Druschba 4 (talk) 01:54, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:43, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
IMHO out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 17:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Mire Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:43, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by Denniss. Yann (talk) 17:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A.zagorski (talk · contribs)
editNon-free logos, no permission.
Sealle (talk) 04:19, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo, one duplicate. Yann (talk) 17:49, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sealle as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © “All reproduction and representation rights reserved” Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:34, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Hedwig in Washington: I see no reason to discuss anything while other 11 images from this particular website have been already deleted. Sealle (talk) 20:35, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- The disclaimer on the website is:
© Council of Europe
Unless otherwise indicated, reproduction of material posted on Council of Europe websites, and reproduction of photographs for which the Council of Europe holds copyright – see legal notice “photo credits” – is authorised for private use and for informational and educational uses relating to the Council of Europe’s work. This authorisation is subject to the condition that the source be indicated and no charge made for reproduction.
Persons wishing to make some other use than those specified above, including commercial use, of information and text posted on these sites are asked to apply for prior written authorisation to the Council of Europe, Directorate of Communication.
© Photo credit - “All reproduction and representation rights reserved”
Photographs marked ©AFP or ©GAMMA – or Shutterstock - are protected by intellectual property rights vested in these agencies. Similarly, photographs marked © or DR (Droits réservés), followed by the name of an agency or freelance photographer, are protected by intellectual property rights vested in the agencies or persons concerned.
Consequently, none of these photographs may be reproduced, modified, re-circulated, commercially exploited or re-used in any form whatsoever without the prior written consent of the agencies or persons concerned.
Since this is not a photograph, we can at least have a peek. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:44, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- ...reproduction of material posted on Council of Europe websites... covers both texts and images. Sealle (talk) 04:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Read first, c&p later. Need more coffee,
--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:46, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2012.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_eps_21-2_%EC%B1%84%EC%9D%80%EC%A0%95.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:47, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
This is neither a sound as described nor a photograph as categorized: Seemingly it's a nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:07, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:49, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Possible COM:COPYVIO: small size, no EXIF metadata, unlikely to be own work. KurodaSho (talk) 07:56, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|I followed the rules as best as possible. I am a bit confused here to be honest}}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:50, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
No indication that the uploader is the copyright owner; please see the background image at http://chenghawchien.com/ Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:02, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:50, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
I suspect Disney's copyright infringement. Taivo (talk) 09:16, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like not own work. --Pokéfan95 (talk) 13:00, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:51, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
COM:DW of unfree content A.Savin 09:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- read Russian words on plate! Everybody can use this figure and clients are ASKED to photo it! Savin is not right.--1Goldberg (talk) 17:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Я фотографировал лично, какие претензии?--1Goldberg (talk) 17:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- А вот такие-с. У фигуры этой тоже наверняка автор есть, нужно его разрешение. --A.Savin 17:22, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- А у памятников есть скульпторы. Фигура - экспонат для привлечения посетителей. Ее явно можно всем фоткать и вроде на ней это даже написано если я верно помню.--1Goldberg (talk) 17:26, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Фоткать-то можно, а вот заливать на Викисклад - это вряд ли. --A.Savin 17:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Правило я перечитал, оно абсурдно. Если фотку удалят, раз к моим десяткам уже фоток такое отношение, я не буду больше бесплатно заливать что-либо на викисклад и уйду нафиг. ЗЫ: вне зависимости от наших разногласий, приходите завтра к 17-00 на Марьино, если вы человек чести, а не прихлебатель Путина.--1Goldberg (talk) 17:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Фоткать-то можно, а вот заливать на Викисклад - это вряд ли. --A.Savin 17:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Ваши претензии высосаны из пальца. На табличке явно предлагается фоткать и использовать. Нечем было заняться, как удалять чужой труд? В ВП тоже вместо создания статей на КУ пасетесь?--1Goldberg (talk) 17:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Я в Википедии малоактивен. В основном - на Викискладе. Чем именно я здесь занимаюсь, вы можете без труда увидеть по моему вкладу. Уж какие выводы вы для себя из этого сделаете - это ваше личное дело, и не сказать, чтобы это меня особо волновало. --A.Savin 18:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
I am not copyright specialist, so maybe the following arguments are not valid, but nethertheless:
- The subject of the foto hardly can be classified as 3D Work. If i understand correctly it is a Golda Meir reproduction on a carton stand - perfectly 2D, only standing upwards.
- The note near the work invites everybody to take a picture of/with the stand and to publish it in social networks, mentioning the museum. No prohibition of commercial use is mentioned. So in a nutshell it is CC-SA - "you may freely distribute it, but mention us" when you do it. Sir Shurf (talk) 20:50, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- 1) 2D works are as copyrightable as 3D works. 2) If the "license" you refer to explicitly allows a usage in social networks (and no other usages are mentioned), then it is clearly an invalid license for Commons. --A.Savin 09:01, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- I sent a message to Museum about using this image and waiting for the answer. If image will be removed I shall never give any of my photos to public domain in my entire life - sure Mr. Savin will easily visit all places I usually upload here--1Goldberg (talk) 17:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Caution please! The museum is not necessarily the author/photographer (probably it isn't). --A.Savin 21:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:52, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Delete while the photo is freely licenced, 2D "graphic works" in the UK are not given the freedom of panorama exception, so permission is also required from the artist for this derivative work. Ww2censor (talk) 11:47, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:52, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Deletion Proposed by Author Krishna Chaitanya Velaga(Indian) Talk 15:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:53, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Obviously NOT an original work. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:16, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:54, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Obviously NOT an original creation. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:54, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Since I was able to find it with a better resolution on this site, I strongly doubt if it's an original creation. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 17:54, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
NOT an original creation. Picture taken from this blog. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:31, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:55, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Useless and out of scope material. Glorious 93 (talk) 09:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Hedwig in Washington mass deleted all his/her uploads. Taivo (talk) 14:28, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Obvioulsy NOT an original creation. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:55, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Picture appears on various blogs and this since 2011, so I strongly doubt if it's an original creation. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:56, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
I was unable to find this image at the source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Keep: Here is the page (and image) in 2007 from Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. Life of Web pages in general are something like 3 months; please try to use Wayback Machine if possible. --dsprc (talk) 19:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Comment Thank you for your help! Good find! Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Already published in 1906 (as it's seen clearly in the LA Daily Times issue scan), undoubtedly {{PD-US-1923}}. A source of a recent scan (of a PD work) is dessirable, but the lack of that is clearly not a valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:44, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 18:01, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Likely non-free screenshot of proprietary Microsoft software. Contains no content except for Microsoft's interface. Some individual elements may be OK but pretty sure this whole presentation is protected. --dsprc (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, this is copyvio; will just tag as speedy deletion. See: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/Permissions/default.aspx --dsprc (talk) 17:51, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 21:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
These screenshots of Microsoft Excel seem like copyvio when taken as a whole. The presentation, layout and structure of the user interface, combined with the text documentation (and their layout as well) seems like it would be protected by copyright when taken as a whole.
- File:2ème étape convertir.png
- File:3ème étape convertir.png
- File:4ème étape convertir.png
- File:Scénarios.JPG
- File:Gestionnaire de scénarios.JPG
- File:Variable scénario.JPG
- File:Étape 2.2.png
- File:Capture d’écran (11).png
- File:Capture d’écran (15).png
- File:Capture d’écran (13).png
- File:Capture d’écran (9).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--dsprc (talk) 17:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- These files are in use on French Wikiversity. However, this other file also used on that page (but uploaded by different user) clearly state the image is non-free. Am not 100% sure if "threshold of originality" criteria plays here for above nom files or not as they're basically just boxes, but it seems like they would. Also, here are Microsoft's licensing restrictions for screenshots and so on. --dsprc (talk) 17:46, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:31, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Yann: I could have moved these images to the Wikiversity thanks to its fair use. Today the course must be rewritten without a Commons administrator to get them. JackPotte (talk) 15:44, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leaderboard (talk · contribs)
editScreenshots of user interface elements of Microsoft's proprietary software. Screenshots of works by Microsoft are non-free per their licensing requirements here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/Permissions/default.aspx (screenshots listed near bottom)
- File:Tools menu in IE11.png
- File:View menu in IE11.png
- File:Edit menu in IE11.png
- File:File menu in IE11.png
--dsprc (talk) 18:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Also:
- File:Filezilla configuation.png
- File:Developer Tools UI in IE9.png
- File:Warning difficulty in Wikibooks.png
Need to be cropped to remove the non-free interface elements. --dsprc (talk) 18:19, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep File:View menu in IE11.png, File:Edit menu in IE11.png and File:File menu in IE11.png seems too simple (just text), ineligible for copyright (regardless that are part of non-free software). Keep File:Filezilla configuation.png (GPL), File:Developer Tools UI in IE9.png and File:Warning difficulty in Wikibooks.png cropped;
Speedy delete the previous versions with non-free elements. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:20, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for contacting me. I am fine with your changes , they do not affect the user experience significantly. Is there any other issue? --Leaderboard (talk) 12:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Normally these editions are enough. The Threshold of originality in the US is quite clear about screenshots. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for contacting me. I am fine with your changes , they do not affect the user experience significantly. Is there any other issue? --Leaderboard (talk) 12:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 21:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:59, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 21:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sheralitiwana (talk · contribs)
editlikely copyvio.. no meta data. small resolutions. file names gives impression that they were took from FB
Saqib (talk) 19:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by P199. Yann (talk) 21:14, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
non-free logo (as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:John Deere Water.svg) Kopiersperre (talk) 20:07, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: FoP-Germany covers this. Yann (talk) 21:43, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Files of Bypapa
edit- File:00001img(1).jpg
- File:00001img(2).jpg
- File:00001sled.jpg
- File:00002img(1).jpg
- File:00002sled.jpg
- File:00003sled.jpg
- File:00004sled.jpg
- File:00005sled.jpg
- File:00006sled.jpg
- File:00007sled.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
All of these images are uploaded by Bypapa. I nominate these images for deletion because they have no educational purpose. Also, it may be possibly fair use, because it is a screenshot of a video game. --Pokéfan95 (talk) 22:59, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. Yann (talk) 21:43, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
document plus recent en remplacement ad16 (talk) 23:46, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use, no reason to delete. Yann (talk) 21:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
The page listed as source for this does not exist. I google & tineye searched and found no exact matches except for this image on Commons. See [1] or
[2] for the search results. COM:EVID requires valid source information for all images uploaded to or transferred to Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Your link doesn't show any outside copy of this. Beside, if the design is indeed from the US Army, I think it is fine. However this is of poor quality, and should be recreated as SVG. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- I added source information to the file. It is indeed from The Institute of Heraldry, and blanket permission is granted for official, non-commercial use. I'm not familiar enough with Wikimedia licensing to understand if the reproduction here falls into that category. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 15:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment "Official non-commercial use" falls outside the available COM:L licenses. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: This file has a source now. Yann (talk) 18:30, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all JuTa 05:52, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 06:03, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The uploader requested deletion of the file within a few hours after the upload. See [3]. The reason is that there was a misunderstanding in the communication between the uploader and the author, which led the author to make a temporary tagging mistake of this photo on Flickr. It appears that the author did not want to release the photo under a free license. He quickly corrected his tagging mistake. Commons does not hold people responsible for such mistakes. No intention to release means no valid license. To keep the file on Commons in such a situation would be a copyvio. Besides, the author has actually accepted to provide other photos under a free license. Keeping this one against his will would hurt possible future collaboration with him. I suggest a speedy delete. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:15, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete The image is "All rights reserved", and is not accepted in Commons. Use {{copyvio}} instead. --Pokéfan95 (talk) 09:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Pokéfan95: Did you even read the rationale? Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Asclepias. Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:37, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Obviously NOT an original creation. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:22, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, the logo does not surpass threshold of originality, but I delete it nevertheless as unused logo of non-notable thing. File description is inadequate and the uploader is indefinitely blocked, so we do not know, which logo is it. Taivo (talk) 15:55, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Doubtful if it's an original work, but since there's no Metadata for this file and it's of low graphical resolution... Could be book scanned material ? Glorious 93 (talk) 16:25, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader is forever blocked for copyvios and sockpuppetry and I delete all his uploads. Taivo (talk) 15:57, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Photo without any educational purpose. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry and uploading copyvios. I delete all his uploads. Taivo (talk) 16:08, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Photo without any educational purpose. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry and uploading copyvios. I delete all his uploads. Taivo (talk) 16:02, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Photo without any educational purpose. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry and uploading copyvios. I delete all his uploads. Taivo (talk) 16:01, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Photo without any educational purpose. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry and uploading copyvios. I delete all his uploads. Taivo (talk) 16:07, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Photo without any educational purpose. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry and uploading copyvios. I delete all his uploads. Taivo (talk) 16:06, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Photo without any educational purpose. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry and uploading copyvios. I delete all his uploads. Taivo (talk) 16:05, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Photo without any educational purpose. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry and uploading copyvios. I delete all his uploads. Taivo (talk) 16:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Photo without any educational purpose. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry and uploading copyvios. I delete all his uploads. Taivo (talk) 16:00, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Photo without any educational purpose. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry and uploading copyvios. I delete all his uploads. Taivo (talk) 15:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Makayla Telfer (talk · contribs)
editUnlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:33, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Advertising, out of scope.
- File:Ezytrail off road camper trailer Tarwin lx.jpg
- File:Ezytrail off road camper trailer Tarwin.jpg
- File:Ezytrail off road camper trailer Tambo se.jpg
- File:Ezytrail off road camper trailer Tambo.jpg
- File:Ezytrail off road camper trailer Mawson-se.jpg
- File:Ezytrail off road camper trailer Mawson-lx.jpg
- File:Ezytrail off road camper trailer EZPXI.jpg
- File:Ezytrail off road camper trailer EZPUG.jpg
- File:Ezytrail Hard floor off road camper trailer Eden lx.jpg
- File:Ezytrail Hard floor off road camper trailer Cooper-se.jpg
- File:Ezytrail Hard floor off road camper trailer Cooper.jpg
- File:Ezytrail off road camper trailer Buckland-se.jpg
- File:Ezytrail off road camper trailer Buckland-lx.jpg
- File:Ezytrail off road camper trailer Buckland.jpg
- File:Ezytrail Hard floor off road camper trailer cooper lx.jpg
- File:Ezytrail Camper Trailers Logo.jpg
Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:46, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- How about just cropping out the advert portions? Are fine otherwise. --dsprc (talk) 19:51, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- The pictures are not out of scope. Like dsprc just crop the advert portions. Can that be done during the deletion procedure, or not? Traumrune (talk) 20:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Traumrune You may do it at anytime. Can tag it with one of the crop templates (such as {{Trimming}} etc) and wait for a contributor to come along and crop it, use COM:CropTool for lossless crop (recommended) or can do on local machine if you really know what you're doing (above template has more info on that). --dsprc (talk) 06:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Done Images cropped. Thibaut120094 (talk) 09:31, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Traumrune You may do it at anytime. Can tag it with one of the crop templates (such as {{Trimming}} etc) and wait for a contributor to come along and crop it, use COM:CropTool for lossless crop (recommended) or can do on local machine if you really know what you're doing (above template has more info on that). --dsprc (talk) 06:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- The pictures are not out of scope. Like dsprc just crop the advert portions. Can that be done during the deletion procedure, or not? Traumrune (talk) 20:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Judyannemendoza109
edit- File:Ejlive2013.jpg
- File:Lolitacarbon1983.jpg
- File:Eriksantos.jpg
- File:Lolitacarbonasin.jpg
- File:Ejsselfie.jpg
- File:Ejemoselfie.jpg
- File:Dj.Jimboradyobulacan.jpg
- File:MessesaryMist.jpg
- File:Afterotso.jpg
As confirmed from a sockpuppet investigation done to en:User:AfterOtso6, User:Judyannemendoza109 is confirmed as a sockpuppet of the former user. The sockpuppet uploaded the following photos and adds them on several articles in English and Tagalog Wikipedias. Two of the photos are a possible copyvios being an album cover of some sorts, while the other photos are either for personal use or being used to vandalize en.wiki and tl.wiki articles such as en:Yano and en:Asin (band). Three of the photos (File:Ejselfie.jpg, Eriksantos.jpg and Ejemoselfie.jpg) are being used by AfterOtos6 and his sockpuppets for a Wikipedia article for a certain Eric Santos and/or EJ Santos, which is most likely the sockmaster's autobiography. --WayKurat (talk) 23:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 05:26, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:44, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raianick95 (talk · contribs)
editUnlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:44, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
empty duplicate of category:Wiesenbacher Kerwe 2015 ThomasPusch (talk) 17:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:42, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
I do not see the release of license on the source website (which is shown in the permission, not source). File needs more information to be retained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused, unsourced image overprinted with a nasa logo.... I don't really see the educational value of this image, it seems too blurry and dark to be carrying useful information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused duplicate of File:Defense.gov_News_Photo_110113-A-1182G-014_-_U.S._Army_Sgt._James_Vanveldhulzen_left_an_infantryman_with_Alpha_Troop_1st_Squadron_113th_Cavalry_Regiment_2nd_Brigade_Combat_Team_34th.jpg . The larger file also has metadata missing in this thumbnail version. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:42, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
All of this user's uploads to date have been confirmed as copyvios except these. These are low resolution, likely crops or screencaps, unlikely to be have been self-created.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:46, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:41, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Flickrwashing: found at https://www.flickr.com/photos/60245686@N08/21349780698/, but found elsewhere on the internet first. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:56, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Sufficient doubt. In addition it seems to have now been removed from Flickr not long after upload here. Flagged at User:Faebot/Flickrstreams_of_concern based on dates. --Fæ (talk) 09:10, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:41, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Images upladed by Daniel Gallardo
editI nominate the files uploaded by User:Dan Gallard and User:Castelan00, all related to Hotel Regis:
- File:Emblema regis.jpg
- File:Hotel Regis durante las fiestas patrias de 1984.jpg
- File:Hotel Regis destruido.jpg
- File:Original Hotel Regis.JPG
- File:Los Invitados y empleados durante el evento Día del Huésped, 12 de Septiembre de 1985..jpg
Most of the images seem to be copyrighted (photos taken in 1984-1985). The image File:Original Hotel Regis.JPG does not have source or author. --Warko (talk) 19:26, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:40, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Pillars constructed in the memory of anglo sikh war memorial Matyrs at Anglo sikh war memorial Ferozeshah.jpg
- File:Gurudwara Jaamni Sahib Bazidpur.JPG
- File:Signboard at the Firozpur Cantt railway station entrance gate.JPG
- File:The entrance gate of Ferozepur.JPG
- File:Bus stand ferozepur city.JPG
Yann (talk) 20:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:40, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Low quality, not used. Minihaa (talk) 00:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- By the way: There are many better pictures in Category:Campfires. --Minihaa (talk) 06:14, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope because of the low quality. BrightRaven (talk) 11:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused, replaced by SVG. Illegitimate Barrister 03:55, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Superseded image. BrightRaven (talk) 11:11, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
unused, replaced with SVG. Illegitimate Barrister 04:02, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Superseded image. BrightRaven (talk) 11:12, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 11:13, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
I believe this image has false authorship information and is most likely a copyright violation. Uploader's history includes many such violations, image lacks any EXIF information, image is clearly professionally generated but uploader does not appear to be a professional photographer and no OTRS ticket was generated to verify uploader's claim of ownership of image copyright. The preponderance of evidence is that the image lacks correct source and authorship information— without these, it should be deleted as a likely copyvio in accordance with COM:PRP. KDS4444 (talk) 06:57, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP. BrightRaven (talk) 11:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gdgourou as no license. Well, there is a CC license tag, but thats not own work of the uploader as claimed, but a copyighted Disney comic character. JuTa 07:45, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio BrightRaven (talk) 11:15, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gdgourou as no license. Well, there is a CC license tag, but thats not own work of the uploader as claimed, but a copyighted Disney comic character. JuTa 07:46, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio BrightRaven (talk) 11:15, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Replaced by SVG vesion. Ditinili (talk) 09:51, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Superseded by File:Great Moravian basilica in Mikulčice - footprint.svg BrightRaven (talk) 11:16, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. BrightRaven (talk) 11:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Highly unlikely that this image from 1974 is user's own work, more likely - as with some of user's other uploads - it was grabbed from the web. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP BrightRaven (talk) 11:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
I don't believe this is own work. No meta data and the only contribution of this user. Google gives many hits. filmvz.com gives also a png image and in their terms of service is mentioned that it may be used "solely for personal, non-commercial purposes". Wouter (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. BrightRaven (talk) 11:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Low quality. Minihaa (talk) 00:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Same here: There are many good pictures with same motif in Category:Campfires. --Minihaa (talk) 06:15, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:36, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Possible non-free image. Authenticity is also in question. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emblem of Islamic State in Iraq and Sham.jpg Taxell (talk) 01:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Consists of shapes and Arabic text, so public domain. Illegitimate Barrister 03:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo Alan (talk) 18:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:36, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
zdjecia z kolekcji prywatnej Okno2011 (talk) 10:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Andrzej Gąsiorowski,Steven Spielberg, 27.01.2015 Auschwitz-Birkenau,70. rocznica wyzwolenia Auschwitz.jpg
edit
zdjecie z kolecji prywatnej Okno2011 (talk) 10:31, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
zdjecie z kolecji prywatnej Okno2011 (talk) 10:31, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:45, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
zdjecie z kolecji prywatnej Okno2011 (talk) 10:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:45, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_2012.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2012.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
zdjecie z kolecji prywatnej Okno2011 (talk) 10:34, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
_2012.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:45, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
_2012.jpg){kind=link}
moje zdjecie jest nie aktualne i nie chce dalej publikowac tego zdjecia Okno2011 (talk) 12:22, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep This is en:Małgorzata Gryniewicz, notable person. There is 7 photos in Category:Małgorzata Gryniewicz. Uploader requested deletion of unused file 2 years after uploading. This is not the best photo, but totally usable and free licenses are irrevokable. Taivo (talk) 18:45, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
zdjecia nie aktualne prywatne Okno2011 (talk) 10:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
prosze o usuniecie mojego zdj, jest nieaktualne, slabej jakosci. Malgorzata Gryniewicz 83.26.244.36 14:54, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per statement above; No new reasons. --Wdwd (talk) 12:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
prosze o usuniecie mojego prywatnego zdjecia Okno2011 (talk) 16:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Speedy kept per previous listings, no reason for deletion -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
No permission. Please send the author's permission to the OTRS team. Brackenheim (talk) 11:48, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:45, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
No permission. Please send the author's permission to the OTRS team. Brackenheim (talk) 11:48, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
No permission. Please send the author's permission to the OTRS team. Brackenheim (talk) 11:48, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
No permission. Please send the author's permission to the OTRS team. Brackenheim (talk) 11:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
This photo have been previously published at http://ask.fm/liza_puris4. There is no evidence for authorship of Liza Puris (object of the photo; thou she still can be owner) or right of uploader Maxim Shabanov to release it as free content. Tatewaki (talk) 12:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- And the other photos by this user: [4]. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:56, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
The film poster depicted is from a 1981 Libya-US co-production, certainly neither anonymous nor out of copyright. The image here furthermore is the cover of a German magazine, and hence irrelevant to Libyan copyright law Constantine ✍ 12:50, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC) Suposso que la valoració per eliminar el video es basa en l'existència d'una banda sonora amb drets d'autor. Si és aixì, no es podria fer com fa youtube, que filtra si existeix música amb drest d'autor i eliminar-la i deixar les imatges de vídeo? Gràcies. Bipuigcerda (Discussió)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from music and modern art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:49, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:49, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Three of the images used for this collage have been deleted. These need to be either removed or the entire collage deleted. As it is not in use, the latter is probably the more sensible course of action. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:20, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:49, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
This is NOT a 16th century painting, but a modern (most likely 21st century) copy of an old painting. The "copy" differs noticeably from the original however, so this painting is original enough IMO to be protected by copyright. As the painter isn't dead, the painting therefore isn't in the public domain. Rosenzweig τ 17:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Keep the authorship of Christian Goller and NOT a 16th century paintingseems to be disputed and part of further investigations. So we can only discuss about the DR if the facts are clear after the official court decision is held. see Commons:Forum#Löschanträge für Kunstfälschungen von Christian Goller--Oursana (talk) 18:49, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- The Precautionary principle says otherwise: “where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file it should be deleted.” I'd say there is significant doubt. --Rosenzweig τ 21:33, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- What are the facts to justify significant doubts ? You cannot assume Goller as author of the painting.--Oursana (talk) 17:09, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Why not? The Süddeutsche Zeitung says so and apparently Goller was even credited as the artist in the catalog of the 2014 auction where this painting was offered. And even if it's not Goller, it is pretty sure the author is a contemporary artist who is either alive or not yet dead for at least 70 years. Either way the painting is not in the public domain. --Rosenzweig τ 19:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- What are the facts to justify significant doubts ? You cannot assume Goller as author of the painting.--Oursana (talk) 17:09, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- There is no evidence that the painting was painted by Goller. Jackson's International Auctioneers has the painting among followers of Cranach I offered. With this name, the image was also uploaded and it was later renamed by someone in „Christian Goller - Madonna mit Kind unter einem Apfelbaum.jpg“. --Trzęsacz (talk) 23:23, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- This is not a criminal trial. We don't need evidence, significant doubt suffices. And from what I've written above it should be pretty clear that there is significant doubt. See the Süddeutsche Zeitung article for details. --Rosenzweig τ 22:26, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- I deny if significant doubts are sufficient, and second I do not see these doubts. Precautionary principle just gives different examples. And Süddeutsche says unter seinem Namen= under the name, and Da hat irgendjemand einen Fehler gemacht, dass das Bild unter dem Namen Christian Goller in den Verkauf kam= Somebody has made a mistake that the painting was sold under the name of Christian Goller. see Commons:Forum#Löschanträge für Kunstfälschungen von Christian Goller--Oursana (talk) 21:32, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- As I have written several times by now: Even if it's not by Goller, it's by somebody else from the 20th or 21st century. If you don't see the doubt here, that's too bad for you, because it is quite plain and open. And, by the way, it is not your call to "deny if significant doubts are sufficient". They are as per Commons policy. --Rosenzweig τ 23:01, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- I deny if significant doubts are sufficient, and second I do not see these doubts. Precautionary principle just gives different examples. And Süddeutsche says unter seinem Namen= under the name, and Da hat irgendjemand einen Fehler gemacht, dass das Bild unter dem Namen Christian Goller in den Verkauf kam= Somebody has made a mistake that the painting was sold under the name of Christian Goller. see Commons:Forum#Löschanträge für Kunstfälschungen von Christian Goller--Oursana (talk) 21:32, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- This is not a criminal trial. We don't need evidence, significant doubt suffices. And from what I've written above it should be pretty clear that there is significant doubt. See the Süddeutsche Zeitung article for details. --Rosenzweig τ 22:26, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- There is no evidence that the painting was painted by Goller. Jackson's International Auctioneers has the painting among followers of Cranach I offered. With this name, the image was also uploaded and it was later renamed by someone in „Christian Goller - Madonna mit Kind unter einem Apfelbaum.jpg“. --Trzęsacz (talk) 23:23, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Apparently NOT an old Cranach painting, but a 21st century fake. Therefore not in the public domain, as the artist who most likely faked it is alive. Even if someone else faked it, that someone is most likely not dead for at least 70 years. Rosenzweig τ 17:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Included: Different version
- @Rosenzweig: Please elaborate why the reproduction (?) by Goller is above threshold of originality. Thanks. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- It's not a reproduction, but an original painting painted in a Cranach-like style. An original painting should certainly be above the threshold of originality. --Rosenzweig τ 21:31, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: Please elaborate why the reproduction (?) by Goller is above threshold of originality. Thanks. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep the authorship of Christian Goller and Apparently NOT an old Cranach paintingseems to be disputed and part of further investigations. So we can only discuss about the DR if the fact are clear after the official court decision is held. see Commons:Forum#Löschanträge für Kunstfälschungen von Christian Goller--Oursana (talk) 18:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- The Precautionary principle says otherwise: “where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file it should be deleted.” I'd say there is significant doubt. --Rosenzweig τ 21:31, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Rosenzweig Alan (talk) 00:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
this now empty category is labelled Gemaindehaus, misspelled for Gemeindehaus (=community administration building), but before hosted 3 pics of the lutheran church in Wiesenbach, which now are correctly stored in a category named "evangelische Kirche in Wiesenbach" (=lutheran church in Wiesenbach). The empty and misspelled category ".. Gemaindehaus .." isn't and won't be needed. ThomasPusch (talk) 17:27, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Butko Alan (talk) 00:50, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
And a third recently painted Cranach fake which is not in the PD. Rosenzweig τ 17:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep the authorship of Christian Goller and seems to be disputed and part of further investigations. So we can only discuss about the DR if the fact are clear after the official court decision is held. see Commons:Forum#Löschanträge für Kunstfälschungen von Christian Goller--Oursana (talk) 18:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- The Precautionary principle says otherwise: “where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file it should be deleted.” I'd say there is significant doubt. --Rosenzweig τ 21:33, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP Alan (talk) 00:50, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Scaled down duplicate of File:Volksbank Vilshofen Stadtplatz 12.jpg 88.64.191.173 17:51, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:50, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:11, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:50, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Doubtful that uploader is copyright holder 124.178.128.180 19:00, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Doubtful that uploader is copyright holder 124.178.128.180 19:00, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Doubtful that uploader is copyright holder 124.178.128.180 19:01, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Doubtful that uploader is copyright holder 124.178.128.180 19:02, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
suspected copyvio. uploaded by a copyvio guy Saqib (talk) 19:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
suspected copyvio.. no meta data.. user uploaded one copyvio Saqib (talk) 19:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
suspected copyvio.. no meta data.. user uploaded one copyvio Saqib (talk) 19:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Is it used as spam of some mobile application "Jelen Pivo App"/"Jelen Beer Sobriety Test App"? Is the picture free (main object of photo is the image of Apple iOs screen which may contain some copyrighted elements)? Is this image in Project Scope of commons? A5b (talk) 20:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:52, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ho sbagliato caricando un svg, ho visto dopo che è meglio caricarlo in formato png, perché non perda l'impaginazione. Calànch (talk) 21:47, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:52, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
The photo is made between 1928–1935. If the photographer is unknown, then we cannot be sure, that he is dead more than 70 years and the photo is free from copyright. Taivo (talk) 22:06, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:52, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
