Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/12/23

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 23rd, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vigard-Vadim (talk · contribs)

edit

Very low resolution images that on their own might fall outside our scope due to their very small size limiting their educational use. However, per their usage on ru:Zombies Ate My Neighbors, they appear to be icons from a video game and thus would be copyrighted.

Mifter (talk) 02:59, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, appears to be a clear copyvio. --Tabercil (talk) 03:30, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image. Part of cross-wiki spam campaign by multiple sockpuppets of the Prince-au-Léogâne LTA. Hiàn (talk) 00:44, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Used by the same LTA sockdrawer on multiple wikis. DMacks (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. One has an OTRS permission, and it is used. --Yann (talk) 09:11, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrongly created. そらみみ (talk) 15:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty, cross-ns redir, authors request. --Achim (talk) 19:51, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrongly created. そらみみ (talk) 15:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Should have been a category, author's request. --Achim (talk) 20:36, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fontaine Clémence-Isaure - Detail

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sannisaha (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused images of non-notable person: out of project scope; COM:HOST

Rrburke (talk) 15:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sannisaha (talk · contribs)

edit

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - re-uploads. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sannisaha (talk · contribs)

edit

All images out of COM:SCOPE, periodically re-uploaded after deletion.

Ariadacapo (talk) 17:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; G4 as well. --Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source flickr image is tagged as having a non-commercial restriction (not permitted on Commons). No evidence that the Commons uploader is the Flickr user or that the image ever was under an acceptable license. B (talk) 13:12, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:29, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC) see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Damian filomeno jugador de futbol argentino‎ and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Damian filomeno ex jugador de futbol argentina‎.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:19, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:11, 23 December 2018 (UTC) See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Preparador fisico f.c.jpg[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:18, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial flag. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 17:39, 25 Dezember 2018 UTC: No license since 2018-12-23. For more information read the introduction of COM:L, about essential information and about Internet images. --Krdbot 20:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lowest quality nonsense upload. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:43, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:47, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tetzemann as no license (No license since) Mhhossein talk 10:22, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - should have been deleted 23 December, tag was correct. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logo for an organization with no legitimate educational use (and thus outside of project scope). The real logo is at [1]. This logo replaces their flame (which is presumably copyrighted) with a public domain flame. But that makes it not an actual organizational logo - just something Commons made up one day. B (talk) 16:55, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is currently in use on es:Acción Chaqueña. Commons policy is that files that are legitimately in use on another project are considered automatically of educational use even if they're inaccurate (see COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV). --bjh21 (talk) 17:53, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is/was in use only because the uploader put it there. The image was uploaded today. It's not a real logo and shouldn't be in use. --B (talk) 19:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
... and now it isn't. As long as it stays unused, then obviously COM:INUSE doesn't apply. --bjh21 (talk) 19:03, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Per COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV. Also, not all flames are the same 1, 2. --Yilku1 (talk) 01:05, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the organization logo. By keeping this file we are actively promoting false information, that's the exact opposite of our goals. The inuse argument is silly, it's like if I drew a picture of some other mouse, called it Mickey Mouse, and stuck it on the Mickey Mouse article. GRuban (talk) 00:17, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But this isn't the Action Chaqueda logo! Isn't that the most important thing? --GRuban (talk) 04:34, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's "realistically useful for an educational purpose" per COM:NOTUSED --Yilku1 (talk) 17:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sheesh. Then we should at least rename it to "Feeble imitation of AC logo.png", and make as much clear in the description. But honestly, I think it should be deleted; we are not benefiting our users by making our own versions of logos. --GRuban (talk) 20:32, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You can, of course, request renaming of the file on Commons (see COM:FR). The file is already marked with {{Factual accuracy}}. --bjh21 (talk) 18:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@GRuban: The most important thing (in this case) is to serve the needs of Spanish Wikipedia. If there is a consensus on Spanish Wikipedia that this file is inappropriate for use on es:Acción Chaqueña, then it would probably be reasonable to delete it from Commons. The place to have that discussion is on Spanish Wikipedia, at es:Talk:Acción Chaqueña, not here. --bjh21 (talk) 18:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that
  1. there is no such talk page. We could certainly create it, I guess, but
  2. the only people who have ever edited es:Acción Chaqueña are Yilku1, and B, who are already here. Is there such a thing as a Request for Comments on the Spanish Wikipedia?
  3. Meanwhile Commons:Deletion requests/File:Partido Colorado.png which is an almost exact parallel to this situation: an image, uploaded by Yilku1, who apparently made another political logo on their own, incorrectly, which was deleted for being incorrect. @Taivo: who deleted that file - could you please weigh in here? --GRuban (talk) 19:59, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The file is used and obviously in scope, but I'll delete it as copyright violation. The logo is complex and needs OTRS-permission from organization representative. The file has incorrect Pixabay license: source link is not into Pixabay and license review failed (source site is "Todos derechos reservados", which means "All rights reserved.") "License review failed" is enough for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspicious flickr image - it was uploaded to Flickr the same day it was uploaded here and the flickr account has no other uploads. A statement of permission from the copyright holder would be needed to accept this. B (talk) 13:05, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@B: Hi! It's Bosioc himself who uploaded the image. He will send you a statement of permission in the following days. Best regards; Cartoon network freak (talk) 13:13, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Cartoon network freak: FYI, since the person depicted is also the person claiming to be the copyright holder, please note that in his email, he should specify how he became the copyright holder. Normally, the copyright holder is the photographer unless the photo is a work product taken by his employee or the copyright was transferred contractually. If the copyright was not transferred contractually, then he will need to have the photographer send in a statement of permission. --B (talk) 13:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@B: Will make sure that is being done. Cartoon network freak (talk) 13:28, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2018122310002845 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:00, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: low quality photo of domesticated animal. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is tagged as "all rights reserved" on Flickr. The commons uploader claimed to be the author of it and several years later, another user added the flickr link. But the camera of this upload matches none of the commons users' other uploads ... and matches all of the Flickr user's other uploads from this time period. There is no evidence that they are the same person and it is most likely a copyright violation. --B (talk) 00:21, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Wikimedia's scope, just a random selfie. Veracious (talk) 08:09, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:58, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Civitas13

edit

These images were all uploaded by User:Civitas13 (that is me). I ask the deletion of the image (uploader request for courtesy deletion); in the following lines I will explain the reason of my request. Civitas13 (talk) 13:38, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These image are a part of a set of images that I uploaded from Flickr a month ago and they are almost all the images that are contained in Category:2012 Austrian junior American football team tryout and are picture about the national team of American football of Austria. About a month ago I was making order if a lot of photos related to American football in Austria (categorizing them by match, by team, ...); almost all were uploaded from a Flickr account. Seeing that there were other images with free license from the same account I decided to upload some of other pictures from the same account, without reflecting enough. When I uploaded the images of which now I ask the deletion my intention was to categorize them by name of the people; however when I started the research of informations in order to categorize the photo I realized that I had made a mistake. In fact these images are about a preliminary selection of the national junior team; so most of the people of these image are not important sportmen (probably only a few of the passed the selection), even in the context of yuth sport. However, the fact that was a junior team means the probably most of these people may not be adult (at the time when the photo was taken) and this make me worries about privacy problem: in fact most jurisdictions have stricer rules about photo of not adult people (even if taken in pubblic).

When I realized this fact I asked and obtained the deletion of the images using the speedy deletion tag since it weren't yet passed 7 days of the upload (I can make a screenshot of the cronology page of my "special observed page" if necessary to prove that); since the upload was very big (> 700 images) and to tag more than 400 photos for "speedy deletion" it was a long process, I gave preference to the photo in which faces of people were well visible. So at the beginning I didn't ask the deletion of images in which people wear a football helmet and so the face was not completely visible. However nowdays, considering with more judgment and attention my uploads and having more time available, I thought on my uploads and I figured that I feel very uncomfortable to have left these images on Commons, because of privacy concerns. Probably some people will think that I am a lot paranoiac about this (considering that most of faces are not well visible because of the helmets) but sincerely I prefer to be rigid about this iusses. Note that even if for external people could be difficult to identify, people who know the subject can be able to do it (and so I prefer to be cautious -considering that it is possible to find full face image of the people watching on Flickr the files that I have already seedy deleted). In fact I have to admit that I made two mistake: the first when I uploaded the images and the second when I didn't ask for the speedy deletion of all in the first seven days. For these reason I ask the deletion. Since I know that we are outiside the "seven day period of grace for the uploader", I know that there is not obligation to delete the images and all depends on the courtesy of administrators and community consensus. However, considering the indication contained in Commons:Courtesy deletions I will make note that:

  • The file was updated about 1 month ago and so, even, (as I alredy pointed out) I should have speedy deleted all the file at the beginning it is not passed such a long time from the upload.
  • The events (tryout of a junior teams -so not all the people even became member of the national team-) is not a particular enciclopedic subject; making a reserch on the web about this specifical event I was not able to find specifical articles about it.
  • Considering the not particular relevance of the event someone can still object that the image can be useful to show tryout of American football players; even if I have to admit that this is true I will make note the Commons have a lot a images of football training, usually of people who are adult, famous and compete at high-level. So for this use there are good substitutes.
  • Quality level of the photo: to be sincere the quality of the photo is good, even I think the they will not be considered "quality images".
  • None of this files is in use on a Wikimedia Project (at the time of the starting of deletion request); the only usage is in gallery made by bot (Images about ballsport, images about Vienna, ...).
  • Consider my concern about privacy.

I hope that considering these elements my courtesy deletion request will be satisfied; I will gladly appreciate this gesture even if I know that there is no obligation to satisfy my request and the files involved are a lot (about 250) and I should have had more careful about my usage of Flickr images. --Civitas13 (talk) 13:38, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:03, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrongly created. そらみみ (talk) 15:24, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 09:47, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complete nonsense / impossible chemical structure. Ed (Edgar181) 12:46, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 12:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Morijoana (talk · contribs)

edit

Not own work - no EXIF data present and reverse Google of various images show they are widely used. Some are watermarked or derivative works of what appear to be music albums. No evidence of free licensing.

Mifter (talk) 02:39, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:20, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Engineer.alimallah (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Engineer.alimallah (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:27, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:27, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Black skills (talk · contribs)

edit

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:26, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:26, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:26, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:21, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahmoud Albouzan (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:30, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahmoud Albouzan (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:21, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:21, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jvand58 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:25, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:25, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sanjay jacob007 (talk · contribs)

edit

Relatively low quality COM:SELFIE images from a user with no other uploads or global contributions. Outside our COM:SCOPE as minimal educational value/use.

Mifter (talk) 02:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:49, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no permission. Anyone know about a forgotten OTRS-ticket? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:39, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:11, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shekar malyala (talk · contribs)

edit

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:50, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, just a random selfie. Veracious (talk) 08:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yang tidak masuk kategori selfie seperti apa ?,mohon di jelaskan,karena gambar yang saya ambil adalah hasil dari kamera seperti orang lain yang menggunakan kamera

Esgete.satu (talk) 08:21, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:50, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Wikimedia's scope, just a random selfie. Veracious (talk) 08:10, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yang tidak masuk kategori selfie seperti apa ?,mohon di jelaskan,karena gambar yang saya ambil adalah hasil dari kamera seperti orang lain yang menggunakan kamera

Esgete.satu (talk) 08:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:50, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sachin bairagi (talk · contribs)

edit

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:51, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sachin bairagi (talk · contribs)

edit

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atef bentahar (talk · contribs)

edit

OOS unused personal photos, one already used for vandalism.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:24, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:52, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Wikimedia Project's scope, just a random selfie. Veracious (talk) 15:46, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:51, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

jordanian pic, unclear should probably delete E.3 (talk) 12:21, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:01, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With the shading in the symbols and the design of the background flowers (left side), I believe that this likely passes the threshold of originality and thus would be eligible for copyright protection as more than simple geometry (also see Commons:Precautionary principle). Mifter (talk) 02:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reverse Google shows widespread useage, no evidence of own work. Mifter (talk) 03:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage of copyrighted CD covers (even if most are unlicensed bootlegs). Retired electrician (talk) 09:01, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unhelpful (unused) images and an incomprehensible description

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:13, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unhelpful (unused) images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:14, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:01, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:01, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:02, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:02, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fery Taufik (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:02, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:03, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jacqueline Brown (talk · contribs)

edit

https://www.misscaribbeanuk.com/reigning-queen?attachment_id=1177

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found on the given source. 4nn1l2 (talk) 22:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found on the given source. 4nn1l2 (talk) 22:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE, private image Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:00, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:03, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:22, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement- someone else work, look at google images. Thank you, Matankic (talk) 01:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:38, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work (see logo in upper left and reverse Google) - no evidence of a free license. Mifter (talk) 02:30, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:38, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A Poster of TV anime “My Hero Academia” AlexLeeCN (talk) 05:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:37, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

similar image on the web, scope? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:20, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:37, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The image is cropped from a poster promoting the Indonesian band Seventeen's performance on 9 December. Proof it's the poster: (https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1155450167944902&id=599960503493874). Clearly not the uploader's own work and there is no permission from the band shown. Please also delete the original file on the Indonesian Wiki, from where this has been cross-uploaded. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 12:11, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:36, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Web-quality image of a very old photograph. Uploader is almost certainly not the copyright holder. J Milburn (talk) 12:18, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:36, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, promotional Kritzolina (talk) 12:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:33, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:31, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:31, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BlueFire10 (talk · contribs)

edit

I disagree that the logo is below ToO, I think we need a permission

Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:57, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:30, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can be replaced by color code CeeGee (talk) 17:13, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:29, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

can be replaced by color code CeeGee (talk) 17:14, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:29, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a professional image, but it is the only file uploaded by the user. This image is found on other sides like [2], there are apparently other images of this series like [3], [4] or [5] Avron (talk) 17:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:28, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reverse image search reveals that this image is not owned by the uploader. Basilosauridae (talk) 18:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:27, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from https://www.allezlestademontois.fr/forum/sujet/la-parole-a-marie-gourgues/ and https://www.allezlestademontois.fr/marie-gourgues-nous-cause/ ? - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 19:35, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:25, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no metadata, low resolution : probably a copyvio ? - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 19:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:25, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Front page of a newspaper from 2016 most likely is copyright protected. Archie02 (talk) 20:06, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused image, likely showing the uploader herself. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 21:18, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private picture; out of scope Poecilotheria36 (talk) 21:40, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello i need to clarify westbank freedom of panorama and jordanian E.3 (talk) 12:10, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: {{Non-free graffiti}}. --Yann (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What are author date of life? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep} Malik Mohammad Jayasi (1477-1542). Yann (talk) 05:53, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 05:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrongly created. そらみみ (talk) 15:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Should have been a category, author's req. --Achim (talk) 09:36, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Phinaeus (talk · contribs)

edit

Phinaeus wants them deleted per this edit.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:08, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Phinaeus

edit

Reasons for deletion request: When uploaded, public domain of uploaded files was agreed on but only verbally. It seems the person with the voice in the audio I uploaded has changed her mind. I need to remove all files I have uploaded here --PhinaeusPhinaeus (talk) 14:52, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ошибочное перенаправление Панн (talk) 17:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hilltoptc (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope files. Files illustrate a non-notable photographer; the article for the subject at enwiki was deleted and the corresponding Wikidata item is under deletion discussions. Please see en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowley Baldwin and d:Wikidata:Requests for deletions#Q53870605.

Hiàn (talk) 23:09, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: One kept as INUSE and one deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 20:46, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 20:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:20, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 20:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:20, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, seems out of scope. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:10, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK Let's wait a little so scope can be established, if possible. --03:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Kept: Has an article on FR WP. --Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source of explosion missing, image source is from comedy license laundering website. User:User456541 removed the template with edit summary "Nope". BevinKacon (talk) 12:41, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vage, onscherpe foto JopkeB (talk) 16:09, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vage, onscherpe foto JopkeB (talk) 16:11, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exactly same as File:Wolverine (5249640494).jpg - lower resolution. 93.28.59.176 18:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a party flag with party logo on it . could never be a non free own work- for wikicommom purpose the flag must be reuploaded in appropriate way — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A0A:A540:C39A:0:9C7C:3C4E:C752:156 (talk) 15:26, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This file is quite clearly not made by the party itself judging by the poor quality. The idea that the uploader acctually drew this him/herself is quite likely! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:21, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
but the party logo definitely copyrighted by the party and stolen from online and not properly attributed here — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.79.172.22 (talk) 01:45, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - The party owns the copyright to the logo and the flag. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright is reserved. (I thought the image was so ancient 1770 or thereabouts that copyright was ok. It is not.) MargaretRDonald (talk) 03:13, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - see Bridgeman. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source cited in the file (http://prism.oregonstate.edu/) is copyrighted. Furthermore, the source and the licence contradict one and the other: it cannot be from that site and be at the same time the uploader production. Pierre cb (talk) 06:13, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Wikimedia Project's scope, just a random selfie. Veracious (talk) 08:13, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Alasan: gambar seperti apa yang di kategorikan memenuhi syarat ?


Eshape.satu (talk) 12:05, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gu7y (talk · contribs)

edit

Small images without EXIF data + logo + graphic, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 10:18, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gu7y (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:27, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file will become public domain in its source country 1 January 2033. The artist died in 1962 Coldcreation (talk) 10:51, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - It is possible that this is a work done while she was in the USA, but that must be proven. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:50, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toy/design by Radio Shack. Copyright not owned by flickr user/museum Kungfuman (talk) 12:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:52, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems like an obvious copyvio (also for extracted files). FoP may not apply to that case. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:37, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TwoWings: Hello TwoWings, can it not be qualified as Liberty of Panorama ? Tnak you in advance for your answer. Best regards,--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:43, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - FOP cannot apply to images where the principal subject is copyrighted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the sign depicted. No freedom of panorama in Romania. B (talk) 13:06, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon de Logo Carrefour 1966.svg en jpg JessydeVilly (talk) 13:07, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Version jpg de Carrefour 1966.svg JessydeVilly (talk) 13:13, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon de File:Dia Logo.svg JessydeVilly (talk) 13:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, not own work, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:01, 23 December 2018 (UT

It is my own photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleli Pomares (talk • contribs)
@Aleli Pomares: What do you mean by "It is my own photo"? Are you the person pictured or are you the photographer? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:25, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The person in the picture is my father, and the photo is mine. I am not a specialist in these things, I do not know what permission you are referring to. Aleli Pomares (talk) 30 December 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleli Pomares (talk • contribs) 05:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the person in the picture is my father and this picture belongs to my family archive, my father passed away and I kept the picture. I am not sure what permission are you referring to, as this picture has been in my family since it was taken Silvia Maria Domenech Nieves


Deleted: per nomination - As a general rule, owning a paper or digital copy of a photograph does not give you the right to freely license its use any more than owning a paper copy of a book gives you the right to reproduce it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:55, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr image tagged with the PD mark (not CC-zero). It is almost certainly a copyright violation - the flickr user's images don't seem to be of their own authorship. B (talk) 14:12, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The PD mark is not acceptable on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These artworks made by Éva Lőte who died in 1966. Made in 1934, PD in USA in 2030, in Hungary 2037. Regasterios (talk) 14:16, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This indoor statue made by Ohmann Béla who died in 1968. Made in 1934, PD in USA in 2030, in Hungary 2039. Regasterios (talk) 14:19, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work from advertisement. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is a picture from a sign in a public street. But if must be removed, then ok. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FlippyFlink (talk • contribs) 10:44, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright © Nobel Media AB 2018 — Racconish💬 15:36, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DejaVu: where do you see that photographer died before 1948? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - The subject received a Nobel in 1966. It seems very unlikely that the photographer died 18 years earlier. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elaid khalida (talk · contribs)

edit

Commons:Derivative work from non-trivial logos.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Da mein Artikel über diese Firma gelöscht wurde besteht auch kein Grund mehr dazu, dass dieses Bild hier aufscheint. Daher bitte löschen! MartinSchmidhoferTransporte (talk) 15:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't seem to be a valid reason for deletion - the photo appears to be freely licensed, and is of sufficient quality that it may be of some use if someone wants a photo of a generic white van. Therefore Keep.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:29, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per comment. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:01, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This person is not the person with this name. Sick joke by the uploader. Elly (talk) 16:34, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No useful cats or description. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:01, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licence cited is related to US government products. As this crest is Canadian, the licence clearly doesn't apply. Further, its original source is http://reg.gg.ca/heraldry/pub-reg/project.asp?lang=e&ProjectID=2933 and contains the statement "The contents of this Register are intended for research purposes only. The heraldic emblems found in the Register may not be reproduced in any form or in any media without the written consent of the Canadian Heraldic Authority and/or the recipient." J Costello (talk) 18:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licence cited is related to US government products. As this crest is Canadian, the licence clearly doesn't apply. Further, its original source page has the statement "Copyright © 33 Signal Regiment Foundation 2011 - 2015. All rights reserved." J Costello (talk) 18:44, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The little mermaid is still copyright protected, no FOP for sculptures in Denmark Pugilist (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar (same session, same angle) to https://www.facebook.com/YourTicketToTheUniverse/photos/a.491352034213620/1340635785951903/?type=3&theater Besides user has an history of copyvios at English Wikipedia Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:47, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick! This image of *Kimberly Kowal Arcand at TEDx Providence Rhode Island.jpg* is my own work! I attended Arcand's TEDx Presentation and took this image with my own camera Canon EOS 70D along with several hundred other images that day. I had posted this image on my Facebook page and I gave Arcand permission to use it. Why are you marking my own work for deletion? I do not have a history of intentional copyright violation. Two images, one being my own work and one in question that I am currently working on to resolve (Subject Matter X) image is not what I consider a history. Please remove the tag for deletion from my own work *Kimberly Kowal Arcand at TEDx Providence Rhode Island.jpg* Thank you Tracykarin (talk) 16:15, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Tracy. Facebook images are not free of use. You must add a valid license under the image at your Facebook page and give us the link. As a side note I was talking about your copyvios at Wikipedia, not Commons. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:24, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Patrick, I don't understand, this is my image, my own work. I can post it anywhere for anyone to use with or without written permission or I can just ask them to provide image credit. I completely understand that if I post my own work on Commons or Wikipedia, I need to provide the required license for its use on these two platforms. But why do I need to add the Wikimedia Commons/Wikipedia license to every other online website or social media page where I share these same images? My images are used at NASA and Brown University and all I ask them to do is provide image credit which they do. Here is the image in question posted on NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory website and you'll use they have provide me credit for this image - scroll down to 2nd image. This image was posted long before I posted on Commons or Facebook! It's most likely on Twitter as well since it was taken in 2016. http://chandra.si.edu/blog/node/607 Arcand also uses my image on her website, same place Brittany Taylor's image is located https://www.arcandwatzke.com/kim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tracykarin (talk • contribs) 17:54, 22 December 2018 (UTC) Does this suffice? Thank you Roger Tracykarin (talk) 17:25, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Kimberly Arcand & Megan Watzke's Facebook image has been published April 12 and the one you are talking about 1st August so Chandra X-ray Center's one is not the original one. Besides https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kTMr5LqIBQ is not a free video. So, as for File:Kim Arcand Subject Matter X Podcast.png, and as already said to you Arkand's permission via OTRS is needed. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:09, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Patrick, I added the one and only comment with link to license for my image: This image is of my own work and licensed under Creative Commons License and that links to the page *Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0)* https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/ https://www.facebook.com/YourTicketToTheUniverse/photos/a.491352034213620/1340635785951903/?type=3&theater Tracykarin (talk) 18:37, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick!

Thank you for withdrawing your nomination of deleting my image. I'm fairly new on Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons and have to learn the rules and there are lots of them and sometimes it can become real frustrating especially when your own images get marked for deletion.

To make it clear. All images that I have used on Wikipedia, I had permission to use by the owner, but both the owner and I were not familiar with all of the rules in uploading those two other images and how to provide the required permissions. As you can see, those were the very first two images I uploaded. I don't blatantly take an image an upload without an owner's permission. New people like myself have a learning curve and the seasoned editors like yourself take a lot for granted and assume newbie's know everything.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Tracykarin (talk) 19:42, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I Read you joined Wikipedia five (!) years ago... but it's never too late to learn about our policies and I'm glad you finaly comply with them. By the way and since you have been able to modify Kimberly Arcand & Megan Watzke's Facebook page, you should reread this warning about conflicts of interest and declare it. Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:38, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick!

Kimberly Arcand & Megan Watzke's Facebook page is in the public domain and anyone can make a public comment without logging into Kimberly Arcand & Megan Watzke's Facebook account. I added the Wikimedia Commons license as you instructed me to do, but only as a public comment. I'm unable to *modify* as you stated to their original post of my image since I do not have their login credentials for their Facebook account. Hence there's no conflict of interest.

Also, as far as The Mars Generation page on Wikipedia, I am not a part of this organization, I have never met any of the members of the organization, I am not paid or compensated by The Mars Generation in anyway and only write about references to this organization that I find online which I cite or provide links from reputable sources. I have never cut and paste any copyrighted material - My contributions are my own. I have never added any links to my online presence to any Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons page. I had edited comments added by other contributors that I did not know was or could have been copyrighted or suspected of being copyrighted material. A wiki editor had then accused me of having a COI because I had edited the possibly copyrighted material that I did not add to this page.

BTW, I might have signed up on Wikipedia 5-years ago to make monetary contributions to this organization, but if you check my history, last year was the first year I created a page spending a small percentage of days contributing and not the entire year. Since then I've only experienced a lot of unnecessary stress and frustration with this whole process. I'm seriously considering deleting my account and providing no further contributions...I wasted this whole day on these issues with you. As a disabled 20+ year USAF vet and unable to work, I thought being a contributor to Wikipedia and Commons would be good for me. Evidently, I was wrong.

Good day

Tracykarin (talk) 22:40, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn by nominator. Huntster (t @ c) 23:28, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I withdrew my nomination too early. Permission was not given at all; user just added a message to the Facebook account. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tracykarin: Can you upload or point us to an online copy of the original 5,472 × 3,648 px photo?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick and Jeff,

This is getting ridiculous...really! This is my own image, my own work. My personal camera data was uploaded along with the original image.

Show me a Wikimedia Common rule that I'm violating.

I feel this is just plain harassment.

Tracykarin (talk) 19:28, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: It's the same event but the Commons photo is not the same photo as the one in the facebook page linked by the deletion nominator. Unless the Commons photo was previously published, the principle of assuming good faith would stand. It was published in a flickr stream, there, where it is tagged as all rights reserved, without mention of a free license. Considering that the username of the Commons account and the username of the flickr account suggest that they may be owned by the same person, the situation would be easily clarified if that person added a CC-by-sa license to the page of this photo on flickr, or if she mentioned her Wikimedia account in her flickr user page. -- Asclepias (talk) 03:01, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Agree entirely there appears to be failure to assume good faith. very poor advert for the project. Some apologies to Tracy should be made Victuallers (talk) 10:21, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick and Jeff!

  • Comment: I took over 200 images at the TEXx Providence Event where Arcand was one of the presenters in 2016. I spent plenty of wasted time today reviewing my images on my NAS and my Flickr account and changed the rights on my image that I uploaded to my Flickr account from *all rights reserved* to one of the Commons Licenses that Flickr provides as option to select - Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0). Since Flickr does not provide the most recent updated version of the Wikimedia Commons License Version 4.0, I added in the comment section of my image that this image falls under the updated 4.0 version of aforementioned license to match the license I selected on Wikimedia Commons when I uploaded my Arcand TEDx Providence image.

Here is a link to my own work, my image of Kim Arcand at TEDx Providence on my Flickr account. This is the same image I uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I have created an album for these photos so there are new links to this image below:

for those that they Flickr accounts

for those without Flickr accounts

Patrick and Jeff, you have caused me to spent countless wasted hours with back and forth comments causing me unneeded stress, anxiety and frustration arguing over my own work. This ordeal has become a fiasco especially when Patrick the deletion nominator mistakenly identified my image on Arcand's Facebook page as the same image I uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

Patrick would you please remove the deletion nomination tag for my image!

Thank you Asclepias and Victuallers for your assistance in this matter.

Tracykarin (talk) 18:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. Patrick Rogel you were quick enough to nominate my own work for deletion without having the courtesy of first contacting me. Why didn't you contact me first by following the Commons *Good Faith* rules? Patrick, request you take responsibility and remove your nomination for deletion? I've went above and beyond to prove this image is of my own work so the deletion debate can now be closed. I feel an apology is in order from both you and Jeff G.

Request deletion request be removed.

Tracykarin (talk) 16:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tracykarin: I'm sorry I doubted you. Only an Admin or uninvolved user can close this DR and remove the delete tag and per COM:DR that shouldn't happen until 7 days have elapsed (please wait for 17:08, 30 December 2018 (UTC)).   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:29, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
:@Tracykarin: I'm sorry I doubted of your COM:GOODFAITH. Nevertheless this guideline doesn't requires patrollers to give you a personal message instead of the automated one you received. I think we all have be patient with you and spent a lot of our volunteer's time with your files (an user even contacting Arcand in place of you). So for the future and instead of complaing about "harassment" or creating Internet drama please familiarize with the project rules and perform the task which is intented of you (link to your webpage, not someone else's) before uploading. Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:57, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Patrick Rogel and Jeff G. - Thank you for your apologies and I would also like to apologize to the both of you for causing unnecessary drama. I'm going through a learning curve and your comments along with Asclepias and Victuallers assistance have helped me considerably in understanding Wikimedia Commons rules. I was just so perplexed after using the simple upload wizard, reading and responding appropriately to each and every question, but only afterwards finding my own work was tagged for deletion, I just couldn't understand why? During my 20+ year tenure in the USAF when an issue occurred we worked as a team to resolve it. Afterwards we'd say *Lessons Learned* and move on! Let's reboot our relationship on a *Good* note for the New Year - Best!

Tracykarin (talk) 16:53, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 14:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of licence. FunkMonk (talk) 12:52, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Drezewica Formation:https://www.deviantart.com/lucas-attwell/art/Drezewica-Formation-remake-755164983 (Read the begining of the description) Post on "Source"

Yewtharaptor
There is no licence given, so there is effectively no permission. You can list licences on Deviantart, such as on the lower right here:[7] FunkMonk (talk) 13:52, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SOLVED Yewtharaptor (talk) 19:18, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yewtharaptor: see my reply at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emausaurus Hagen Theropod.jpg—this one is not sufficiently free either, showing CC BY-NC-ND 3.0. The Noncommercial condition is an additional problem; see COM:CLIC for which CC licences are acceptable and why. Disclosure: I was directed here from a posting by the uploader on my Talk.Odysseus1479 (talk) 20:45, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License changed to CC-BY-SA 3.0. Page cleaned up. No valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 03:09, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

перенаправление ошибочное Панн (talk) 13:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 23:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://news.bigmir.net/ukraine/711474-Ministr-ekonomiki-poobeshal-viychit-ykrainskii-yazik копиво Панн (talk) 18:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, though images are similar and surely shot at the same event, they are not identical, as the facial expression of the depicted man is quite different between both images.[8] --Túrelio (talk) 19:37, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Likely copyvio, dubious claim of own work. --Gbawden (talk) 13:25, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Strakhov as no source (No source since). After that the uploader claimed that the permission was provided through gmail. The "permission process" must comply with COM:OTRS requirements. though. Strakhov (talk) 18:57, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; permission to be provided through OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 13:25, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Piolodiusz as Fair use (Fairuse) Ankry (talk) 17:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

* File:Google Chrome icon (2011).svg
* File:Chrome Canary.png
* File:Google Chrome icon and wordmark (2011).svg
* File:Google logo and Chrome wordmark.svg
* File:Google logo (pre-2010) and Chrome wordmark.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domdomegg (talk • contribs) 
  • I am withdrawing from my previous application. After analyzing
Public domain This image of simple geometry is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship.
Heptagon
Heptagon
, I think this should be in correct with US law. Piolodiusz (talk) 19:10, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep imho below COM:TO. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:35, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I have already indicated here some elements on the complexity and originality of the combination of the geometric elements in this logo. Of course, I agree it is composed of simple geometric shapes. But per Atari Games Corp. v. Oman and similar decisions "simple shapes, when selected or combined in a distinctive manner indicating some ingenuity [are entitled to] copyright protection" [9]. In other words, simple shapes are not protectable individually, but can be protected as a whole. See e.g. Glasscraft Door I LP v. Seybro Door & Weathership Co. Inc. : "a work comprising uncopyrightable elements may, through original organization and presentation, be protected by copyright law." According to section 906.1 of the US Copyright Office, a work is entitled to copyright if "author's use of [simple] shapes results in a work that, as a whole, is sufficiently creative" [10]. In general, the Copyright Office has a more restrictive approach than courts. Therefore, it is important to point out that Google's filing for protection of its Chrome logo has not been refused [11]. — Racconish💬 19:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • When you say "has not been refused", do you mean a copyright application is pending or that none has been submitted? If it is pending, I certainly think we should delete it unless/until it is refused. If Google has submitted no application, I would probably still lean delete - copyright wouldn't prohibit someone from making a very similar logo from scratch (trademark would, of course, but that's a different story). But for "actual copying", there needs only be a modicum of creativity to be a bar to that. And I think this logo is probably going to qualify. --B (talk) 00:10, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    B, apologies for not being clear enough. There are two US filings.
    • US serial number 85984328, active ("Issued and Active"), filed on 03.11.2011. Description: "The mark consists of the word "CHROME" in gray. A circular design appears to the left of the word "CHROME" and around the circle the colors green, red, and yellow appear. The color blue appears in the middle of the circle." Colors claimed: "The color(s) green, red, blue, yellow and gray is/are claimed as a feature of the mark." [12]
    • US serial number 85463991, pending ("accepted by the [Copyright] [Patent and Trademark] Office (has met the minimum filing requirements) and [...] has been assigned to an examiner"), filed on 03.11.2011. Same description and same colors claimed as the previous one. [13]
    — Racconish💬 09:46, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I assume this should be read: "[US Patent and Trademark] Office, not [Copyright] Office. Trademark restriction is not copyright restriction. And we accept media trademark-restricted here. Ankry (talk) 11:46, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Duly corrected. Thanks, — Racconish💬 12:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For trademarks please see Commons:Non-copyright restrictions. Apart from that, the above cited case law cannot be used in the underlying context imho, the whole work is imho below the TO. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:47, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The basic reference here is Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co. according to which "the sine qua non of copyright is originality. To qualify for copyright protection, a work must be original to the author. [...] Original, as the term is used in copyright, means only that the work was independently created by the author (as opposed to copied from other works), and that it possesses at least some minimal degree of creativity." The key point for copyright protection is not the nature of the graphic elements of the logo but the overall effect. My understanding of the US case law is that the appreciation of the originality of a logo composed of geometric shapes is essentially relying on two criteria, the number of elements and their arrangement (see meta:Wikilegal/Copyright threshold of originality for logos#Copyrightability under American law). I therefore suggest these are the aspects to focus on, instead of merely rejecting the copyrightability of such a logo because of the nature of its components. — Racconish💬 13:01, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I know that, see also the cases cited in Commons:Threshold_of_originality#United_States. I cannot give legal advice, but i see no issue with hosting it here on commons because it is (likely) covered by COM:TO. It is always a case by case issue. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There you go! In such an uncertain situation, I think we should apply COM:PCP instead of claiming that the geometric nature of the components is sufficient to exclude copyrightability. — Racconish💬 13:34, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
To apply COM:PCP we need a significant doubt that the image is copyrighted. Not just any doubt. The significant doubt may be that a court decided that an image of similar complexity is copyrightable. I did not found a positive court decision with a so simple image be copyrighted, however. Ankry (talk) 14:46, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Image consists only of simple geometric shapes Piotr Bart (talk) 14:11, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously! Keep. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, as deletion request withdrawn by original tagger domdomegg (talk) 10:03, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsely claimed to be selfmade. No proof of licence. FunkMonk (talk) 12:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SOLVED: https://www.deviantart.com/lucas-attwell/art/Drzewica-Formation-2-738552029 Yewtharaptor (talk) 20:18, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As stated elsewhere, non commercial licences are not allowed here. FunkMonk (talk) 20:53, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: CC-BY-SA-3.0-licensed at source. --Strakhov (talk) 04:31, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Wikimedia Project's scope. Veracious (talk) 08:14, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Alasan: gambar seperti apa yang di kategorikan memenuhi syarat ?

Eshape.satu (talk) 12:03, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 00:43, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted logo Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:21, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems below TOO to me. @Fry1989: Am I missing something here? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:22, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't look anything special to me. Maybe the C/A monogram, but I doubt it. Fry1989 eh? 23:56, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Club Africain has publish an official statement in March 4th, 2018 inviting the media to use the official version of the club logo, since there was multiple unofficial versions of Club Africain's logo. Since March 2018, the club logo is "officialized" and unified. Any version besides the one showed in the photo isn't official. Now about my contribution: Club Africain logo is under the public domain. What I have done here is taken the official version of the logo and vectorizing it to create a High quality image that respect the official club request. --Feroukb (talk) 01:48, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. We are not the media and I'm not seeing any proof that this was placed into the public domain by the copyright owners of the image. --Majora (talk) 19:22, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MifterBot as no license (No license since). Uploader added a PD-old later. Put the named en: user as author cant be dead for more than 70 years. JuTa 08:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:20, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks strongly like an official US Military image and not own work of the uploader as claimed. We sould need a proper source. JuTa 09:11, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:20, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon de Carrefour C.svg en jpg JessydeVilly (talk) 12:44, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon de File:Dia Logo.svg JessydeVilly (talk) 13:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a logo with the letters DIA and the simbol %. I think that should be preserved with the templates textlogo and trademarked.--CarlosVdeHabsburgo (talk) 19:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon de Dia old logo.svg JessydeVilly (talk) 13:51, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inutile car doublon JessydeVilly (talk) 14:00, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great!  Delete --EEIM (talk) 03:37, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because it isn't useful for representation of accurate position of bridge, and don't have all copyrights Croatiafirst (talk) 10:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OOS. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:32, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear permission. Don't upload images before you have proof of permission. FunkMonk (talk) 11:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Emausaurus: https://www.deviantart.com/lucas-attwell/art/Emausaurus-and-ceratosaur-777406728 (Read the description)

Post the two on "Source" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yewtharaptor (talk • contribs) 13:33, 25 December 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yewtharaptor (talk • contribs) 13:41, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SOLVED: https://www.deviantart.com/lucas-attwell/art/Emausaurus-and-ceratosaur-777406728 Yewtharaptor (talk) 19:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yewtharaptor: sorry, the licence I see there, CC BY-ND 3.0, is not sufficiently free. Commons requires permission to modify & remix, which is denied by the “No Derivative” condition. I would have to say Delete unless or until the source page shows a free licence (a CC BY-SA, for example, as on the file page) or permission is sent to OTRS for verification. Disclosure: I was directed here from a posting by the uploader on my Talk.Odysseus1479 (talk) 20:32, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Looks OK now. --JuTa 07:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

banknotes of peso is copyright Szajci pošta 19:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)


Deleted: COM:CUR Dominican Republic. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:42, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]