1997kB

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 1997kB!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 01:33, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Please don't overuse copyvio

I've noticed you have marked some files with the {{Copyvio}} template. Please use {{Copyvio}} only when an image is a copyright violation beyond any doubt. When there is any doubt, use the "Nominate for deletion" link or {{Delete}} template so the deletion can be discussed. W3ird N3rd (talk) 09:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

@W3ird N3rd: Hi, i don't think that's an overuse of copyvio, because that file is copyright violation. So I restored the cv tag with better edit summary. Thank you! 1997kB (talk) 13:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

@1997kB: Changing "possible" to "suspected" changes nothing. And "suspected" is still not good enough. Copyvio should not be used for anything less than "certain copyvio". I only mentioned it to clarify that even to the person tagging it it wasn't obvious. And it still isn't. We assume good faith here and the username is the same as the name of the person in that picture. That same user is also working on a Wikipedia article about herself. We have no reason whatsoever to believe she doesn't have the rights to that picture. Your deeplink to the image being hosted somewhere on a blog of some kind (as suggested by the wp-content in the link) proves absolutely nothing. Copyvio is for obvious cases. If you spot Mickey Mouse or Donald Duck, copyvio. You spot something and you can provide a link that clearly states/proves the user did not make that picture? Copyvio. This? Not copyvio. You could nominate it deletion, which will fail without more information proving this is copyvio.

I will once more undo your copyvio. Please do not start an edit war. If you are hellbent on getting this picture removed from Commons, nominate it for deletion. Do not use copyvio for this. W3ird N3rd (talk) 13:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I think you are right and I am not hell-bent on removing this picture from Commons. Thank you! 1997kB (talk) 15:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Leopard Lake.jpg

File:Leopard Lake.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.facebook.com/leopardlake/photos/a.571180803084993.1073741826.531040263765714/827854074084330/?type=3&theater Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

File:2018.03.18 sydney temperatures report.png

File:2018.03.18 sydney temperatures report.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:29, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --4nn1l2 (talk) 15:13, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Suzann Christine.jpg

File:Suzann Christine.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo by William Harper per https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7943571/mediaviewer/rm2819838208 Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Gbawden, I think Whitevwins is the one who should be notified. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 09:52, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

File renaming of Duberria lutrix lutrix

Hi 1997kB, when you requested the renaming of this image file, what was the "obvious error" in the filename? Was the image not of the nominate subspecies Duberria lutrix lutrix as the original uploader stated? Or did you identify it as a different subspecies? Loopy30 (talk) 01:57, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Loopy30, Isn't it's name is Duberria lutrix instead of Duberria lutrix lutrix? ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Broadly yes, but precisely - no. When a species has two or more subspecies, they are written as a trinomial. In this case Duberria lutrix has five subspecies, including the nominate subspecies: [1]

• Duberria lutrix abyssinica
• Duberria lutrix atriventris
• Duberria lutrix basilewskyi
• Duberria lutrix currylindahli
• Duberria lutrix lutrix

Whereas each of these subspecies can be rightly called a common slug eater (Duberria lutrix), the trinomial distinguishes each subspecies from the others. See this English Wikipedia article for more detail.

Unless you have some evidence that the identification given by the original uploader was incorrect, you should now seek to revert the filename change. 'Cheers, Loopy30 (talk) 13:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

@Richardkiwi: Would you mind reverting the file renaming; it looks like there was a mistake at my end. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 03:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

جا افتادن شهر مرو در قلمرو درانی‌ها

در کتاب افغانستان در مسیر تاریخ گفته شده مرو در جنگ با روسیه از خاک درانی جدا شده پس چرا در نقشه نیست A.person4301 (talk) 14:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)