Nikhil B

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nikhil B!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 15:58, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Nikhil B!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:37, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

• Image:Sunset at Cherai beach.JPG was uncategorized on 11 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:37, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Nikhil B, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 00:27, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

en:Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/shutter_speed

Thank you for nomination. :) I answered the question on nomination page. Best regards, --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 15:08, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Common Blackbird.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Common Blackbird.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Namaqua Chamäleon-01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Namaqua Chamäleon-01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:San Francisco Ferry Building (cropped).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Francisco Ferry Building (cropped).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:RENFE Class 730 Viaducto Martin Gil.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RENFE Class 730 Viaducto Martin Gil.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:49, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Accnis edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Accnis edit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:RhB ABe 4-4 III Kreisviadukt Brusio.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RhB ABe 4-4 III Kreisviadukt Brusio.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:WayneRooney MLSvsMANU edit.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:WayneRooney MLSvsMANU edit.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 20:28, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Common Redshank Tringa totanus.jpg, uploaded by Merops and nominated by you on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Common Redshank Tringa totanus.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 06:24, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:File:San Francisco City Hall.jpg

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:File:San Francisco City Hall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JKadavoor Jee 11:30, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:The Day the Earth Smiled - PIA17172.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Day the Earth Smiled - PIA17172.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:05, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Antidorcas marsupialis, female (Etosha, 2012).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Antidorcas marsupialis, female (Etosha, 2012).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Nikhil B⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Men triple jump French Athletics Championships 2013 t160700.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Men triple jump French Athletics Championships 2013 t160700.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Psarisomus dalhousiae - Kaeng Krachan.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Psarisomus dalhousiae - Kaeng Krachan.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Nikhil B,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Categories for your kind information

Hi, some categories have been tagged as {categorize}, therefore p.e. that edit has been fixed, please see also Commons:Categories. Best regards Roland zh (talk) 23:14, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Threskiornis molucca - Perth.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Threskiornis molucca - Perth.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Czech-2013-Prague-Street performers (crop).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Czech-2013-Prague-Street performers.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sukhoi SuperJet 100 (5114478300).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sukhoi SuperJet 100 (5114478300).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Borgund Stave Chuch in Lærdalen, 2013 June.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Borgund Stave Chuch in Lærdalen, 2013 June.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:David - The Death of Socrates.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:David - The Death of Socrates.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sarcoramphus papa (Königsgeier - King Vulture) - Weltvogelpark Walsrode 2013-01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sarcoramphus papa (Königsgeier - King Vulture) - Weltvogelpark Walsrode 2013-01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:12, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WDP4 TKD NDLS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --PetarM 18:22, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cell tower tdocomo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted cw --Cccefalon 11:11, 4 November 2014 (UTC) Tilt corrected. Thanks. --Nikhil 12:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC) ok --Cccefalon 08:36, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diwali Light painting.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:51, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:SQM GE 289A Boxcab Carmelita - Reverso.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SQM GE 289A Boxcab Carmelita - Reverso.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:22, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Light painting diwali.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:44, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Telangana State Road Transport Corporation bus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Info Insufficient categorization (I made no photographic review) --Cccefalon 07:11, 15 December 2014 (UTC) OK, though a bit noisy. Mattbuck 10:12, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TempleTank.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Christiansborg Slot Copenhagen 2014 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Christiansborg Slot Copenhagen 2014 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/KTC (talk) 23:33, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manair Reservoir, India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good imo concidering the weather conditions. The horizon might be leaning towards right just a little bit. --Ximonic 07:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buddha Statue, Hussain Sagar, Hyd.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 05:10, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birla Mandir, Hyderabad, India.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted ccw. Too much dark sky and dominant bottom lights, please consider another crop. --Cccefalon 18:51, 1 April 2015 (UTC)@Cccefalon Tilt corrected, cropped and higher resolution. thanks --Nikhilb239 14:02, 2 April 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residential area, Vaishali, Delhi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lingampally rail station WDM4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:48, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birla Mandir in Hyderabad, 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail and well composed --Daniel Case 23:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hussain Sagar Buddha Statue.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:06, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Laon Cathedral East Window, Picardy, France - Diliff.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laon Cathedral East Window, Picardy, France - Diliff.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:St Paul's Cathedral Interior Dome 3, London, UK - Diliff.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Paul's Cathedral Interior Dome 3, London, UK - Diliff.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sansad bhavan, Delhi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments weak  Support the sharpness is pretty low. --Hubertl 04:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal near Rajpath.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice perspective --Daniel Case 05:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sansad Bhavan, Delhi, BNK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail on a large subject --Daniel Case 05:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scadoxus Multiforus 13062015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Focused on the subject, as it should be --Daniel Case 05:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tirumala Venkateswara temple entrance 09062015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very well done --Daniel Case 05:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAG7 of ED BHEL make close-up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:30, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAG7 of ED BHEL make.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 20:03, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAG9 of Ajni Jn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 20:03, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyd Metro Bharat Nagar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapthagiri Hills Tirumala.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapthagiri hills Tirumala Tirupati.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAG5 NDLS.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:07, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapora River BNK.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City Bus Hyd.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Central Jail, Goa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! India Gate, New Delhi from West.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

ISO - File:Basilica of Bom Jesus, Goa, India.jpg

Hi Nikhilb239. I am used to take my first photo in auto exposure to find out how high the ISO will be. If it is more than 400 I will reduce my ISO manual to 200, 320 reduce to 160, 250 reduce to 125 and 200 or less to 100. I won't reduce ISO too much if I am making a photo with a large contrast (too much shadows in narrow streets). Darker areas needs a higher ISO. I think for your composition a ISO=125 and a lower f-value (=5) would have been much better. And please wait a moment for making this kind of photo because those people in the foreground are spoiling your artwork. Just try and find out how you have to install your camera exactly for making Q1photos. Success! Greetings, --Michielverbeek (talk) 23:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC) BTW: I am offline from 1 to 13 August.

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:From Tennfjorden towards Raftsundet, Hinnøya, Norway, 2015 September - 4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:From Tennfjorden towards Raftsundet, Hinnøya, Norway, 2015 September - 4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gastdozentenhaus Universität Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gastdozentenhaus Universität Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Shrinika performing Abhinaya (Kede Chhanda Janilu Tuhi).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shrinika performing Abhinaya (Kede Chhanda Janilu Tuhi).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jog Falls, Sep, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There are chromatic aberrations. I'm no expert, but isn't this photo actually something for WLE rather than WLM? --A.Savin 16:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)  Comment Hi I too was not sure whether this should be for WLE or WLM. I thought India did not participate in WLE, so uploaded it through WLM. Regarding CAs, I'll get back on this very soon. --Nikhilb239 01:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC) After correction, OK --A.Savin 01:16, 28 September 2016 (UTC) The previous version with CA was restored, therefore  Oppose --A.Savin 04:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC) New version uploaded with improved contrast. --Nikhilb239 06:48, 29 September 2016 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 15:50, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WDM4 Agra.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:42, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coracles, Karnataka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:52, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! India Gate 2014-11-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Hazy light but decent quality and, I think, acceptable for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:57, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tirumala 090615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:48, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gopurams of the Tirumala Venkateswara Temple.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

• Done. --Nikhil (talk) 14:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ghatkesar Railway Station 16102016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:53, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAP7 AP SKE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, but quiet noisy (why ISO 360) so a week support --Michielverbeek 05:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buddha statue 11102016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Check the sky at the very top, right half --A.Savin 02:28, 20 October 2016 (UTC) A.Savin Rectified. Thanks. --Nikhilb239 11:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC) GQ --A.Savin 12:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ghatkesar train station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 00:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buddha Statue (Hussain Sagar) illuminated (Blue Hour).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:32, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LDH PF4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some green CA in the pic. It looks like you've already removed some, but there is still a lot of it left, pic is also a bit dark, think you can fix this? W.carter 08:54, 26 October 2016 (UTC) @W.carter Tried fixing the CAs and uploaded new version. Is this ok?Nikhilb239 12:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC) It's better, but you missed a few spots. I've marked them with notes on the pic for you. :) W.carter 20:16, 26 October 2016 (UTC) @W.carter Done. Thanks a lot! Nikhilb239 14:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC) Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 18:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khammam Town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 10:42, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ludhiana Railway Station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 07:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Microsoft Lumia 430.jpg

File:Microsoft Lumia 430.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

lNeverCry 08:48, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Essar Petrol Bunk 31102016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is still a bit of CA, but not significant, QI to me --Poco a poco 17:34, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Birla Mandir, Hyderabad.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Our Lady of Ranson, Kanyakumari - view from south east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAP7 05112016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:47, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WDP4D 05112016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:47, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAP7 2 05112016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please add category of the location. Why do you never add them? --A.Savin 04:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC) Done. The train did not have a category. So did not add them. Nikhilb239 06:23, 6 November 2016 (UTC) OK --A.Savin 16:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapora River - View from Chapora Fort.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

---

Scope changed from Category:Chapora - View of Chapora River from Chapora Fort to Category:Chapora River - View from Chapora Fort --Nikhil (talk) 03:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birla Mandir Remote View 050402015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residential Building, Hyderabad, 20022015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HP Petrol Bunk 31102016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LPI RLY STN 20022015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kazipet Railway Station - View of Main Entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Look syntax, of scope. Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:53, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 03:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! APSRTC Bus 07122014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness could be better, but it´s ok for me --Hubertl 05:09, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! More 11122014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAP4 WAG7 02112014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Here we go again: categories? Please, can you tell me why you refuse to add categories? --A.Savin 09:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC) @A.Savin-Apologies for not doing it as I was in some kind of rush. Done now. Thanks. --Nikhilb239 01:55, 11 November 2016 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 16:06, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OHE KZJ 02112014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --The Photographer 13:27, 13 November 2016 (UTC)  Comment A lot of sky with no information ... --XRay 14:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gachibowli 15022015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:53, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Konark Express - view of full train.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 02:22, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The image lacks geocoordinates. Martinvl (talk) 15:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)  Support For the record, I have Wikilinked the text. Martinvl (talk) 12:03, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

@Martinvl Apologies for not adding geocoding. Added now. Thanks. Nikhil (talk) 06:52, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

 Comment: When I checkled the coordinates using Google Earth, I could not find Secunderabad. I eventually found the junction by visiting en:Secunderabad Junction railway station on the English Wikipedia. The coordinates that you gave map onto a spot 16 km from Secunderabad Junction railway station. I suggest that the text be revised to read "16 km east of Secunderabad", rather than "near Secunderabad". Martinvl (talk) 13:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

• @Martinvl Done. Thanks. Nikhil (talk) 02:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Support: Good-quality image and best in scope. --DAJF (talk) 11:20, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting picture and scope. Yann (talk) 19:08, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kaghaznagar Express - view of full train.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 02:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The image lacks geo-coordinates. Martinvl (talk) 15:24, 15 November 2016 (UTC)  Support Supported now. (I have also Wikilinked the text)Martinvl (talk) 12:15, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

@Martinvl. Apologies for not adding geocoding. Added now. Thanks. Nikhil (talk) 06:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

 Comment: When I checkled the coordinates using Google Earth, I could not find Secunderabad. I eventually found the junction by visiting en:Secunderabad Junction railway station on the English Wikipedia. The coordinates that you gave map onto a spot 16 km from Secunderabad Junction railway station. I suggest that the text be revised to read "16 km east of Secunderabad", rather than "near Secunderabad". Martinvl (talk) 13:40, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

@Martinvl Done. Nikhil (talk) 02:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

• @lNeverCry, Martinvl Scope changed as the train's old name was Telangana express. Now changed to new category. Please check and vote. Thanks. Nikhil (talk) 02:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Question: Shouldn't the scope be Category:Kaghaznagar Express? --DAJF (talk) 11:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

• DAJF Yes, but I could only find the category for Telangana Express which now runs between Secunderabad and New Delhi. Telangana express was an old name for the Kaghaznagar intercity express. Thanks for bringing this category to my notice. Changed to correct scope. Please check and vote. Nikhil (talk) 02:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Category:Telangana Express - view of full train to Category:Kaghaznagar Express - view of full train --Nikhil (talk) 02:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support: Best in scope (now that scope has been amended). --DAJF (talk) 05:24, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting picture and scope. Yann (talk) 19:09, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yeshvantapur railway station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 20:41, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:37, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AK Rajdhani 042016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit hazy and noisy, but this might be smog. A week support --Michielverbeek 06:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vagator pano 26012016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Horizon needs correction. There are several stitching errors and it´s not straight. --Milseburg 17:14, 15 November 2016 (UTC) @Milseburg Thanks for reviewing. Can you annotate the places where you see stitching errors? Thanks. --Nikhilb239 01:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC) I´ve done so. Following the horizon they are quite obvious. --Milseburg 12:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC) @Milseburg Thanks for annotating. I checked and observed that the left most one is not a stitching error because the image did not get stitched there while I'll work on rectifying the other two stitching errors. Thanks--Nikhilb239 02:27, 17 November 2016 (UTC) Hm. I can´t believe that the very left marked problem is anything else than a stitching error. --Milseburg 13:25, 17 November 2016 (UTC) @Milseburg new version uploaded. Could you please check? Thanks in advance. Nikhilb239 02:21, 18 November 2016 (UTC) Better. The main problems are solved. Smaller ones remain. I´ve made some notes. --Milseburg 20:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC)} @Milseburg Thanks for pointing out the flaws. Tried fixing those. Hope I have addressed those flaws. --Nikhilb239 02:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)  Support I think it´s good enough for QI now. But you should add the color space in metadata and the coordinates. --Milseburg 09:13, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vagator - View from Fort Chapora.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Look at the changes made to your appointment.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
August Kranti Rajdhani Express.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 17:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Central Jail Goa 012016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, but I'd increase contrast a bit --Poco a poco 10:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Central Jail Goa-1 012016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:35, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khammam 15122015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This has too much uninteresting sky at the top and foliage at the bottom. I suggest you crop it in a panorama format instead. See note. It is rather hazy, but it is sharp enough and the details are there. W.carter 21:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)@W.carter: Done. Thanks for the review. --Nikhilb239 15:08, 26 November 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --W.carter 08:49, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Babina Railway Station PF1 042016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gwalior Jn PF1 042016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:45, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khammam town-14-12-2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miramar Beach 012016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:29, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vagator Beach 25012016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crops are a bit random, but this is a crowd scene. Looks OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 04:45, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walls of Fort Chapora 26012016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walls of Fort Chapora 2 26012016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:51, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapora fort 25012016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:30, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House in Nerul Goa 25012016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAG9 TKD 042016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some noise, but still: Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:43, 29 November 2016 (UTC)  Oppose for now: we need location (at least category, maybe also geotag) --A.Savin 15:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC)@A.Savin: Done. Thanks. --Nikhilb239 02:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC) OK now. --A.Savin 04:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WL railway stn-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WL railway stn-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birlanagar Railway Station.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parliament House, Delhi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:18, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Babina Rly Station.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's very distracting that the right side of the tilework and other adjacent parts of the platform are sharp, but in the center and left, they are not. If you can fix that, this can be a QI. Otherwise, although the name board itself is fine, I would have to decline the nomination. -- Ikan Kekek 08:42, 2 December 2016 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: Thanks for the review. New version uploaded. I cropped out the unnecessary things like the train and the platform. --Nikhilb239 00:54, 3 December 2016 (UTC) But it's still less sharp in the center and left than it is on the right. Do you know why? -- Ikan Kekek 03:53, 3 December 2016 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: Sorry, I really can't explain why is that so. If you feel its quality is not good enough, kindly decline it. Thanks. :). --Nikhilb239 07:45, 3 December 2016 (UTC) On balance, I think it passes the QI threshold, I suppose. -- Ikan Kekek 08:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baga Beach 25012016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK as is but could probably benefit from being cropped in more tightly on the parasailers and the boats beneath them --Daniel Case 01:42, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Chapora 26012016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:02, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Aguada Remote view 25012016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:27, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazipet Railway Station.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bhadrachalam temple 04122016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:47, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:RB BDhe 2-4 II Rigi Staffel - Rigi Kulm.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RB BDhe 2-4 II Rigi Staffel - Rigi Kulm.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Secunderabad pano 18082017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jog Falls 05092016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:51, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! APSRTC BUS 25062016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Support -- Johann Jaritz 08:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Honda Jazz India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Albury railway station, Australia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Albury railway station, Australia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Secunderabad Junction railway station - Front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Seems a little dark, but definitely best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ikkeri temple 04092016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely temple, but what's the weird area of blurred grass on the bottom of the picture frame almost directly down from the elephant (Ganesha?) sculptures? Can you fix that, or does this otherwise good photo have to be declined? -- Ikan Kekek 02:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC) Yes I see it. I am not sure what that is, but I'll try to fix it. Thanks for the review. --Nikhilb239 02:36, 23 August 2017 (UTC) I don't know if this was focus stacked, but it looks like a focus stacking error by the stacking software. Could be something else too. PumpkinSky 02:43, 23 August 2017 (UTC) I don't know focus stacking technique. So it can't be focus stacking. I think it might be moisture on the lens. Would you be ok if I clone it out or crop the pic?--Nikhilb239 02:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC) I think no one would object. PumpkinSky 02:53, 23 August 2017 (UTC) Sure, go ahead and crop or whatever. -- Ikan Kekek 06:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: @PumpkinSky: Cropped and uploaded a new version. I hope it is ok now.--Nikhilb239 17:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)  Support - I think this is good enough now. Do you agree,PumpkinSky? -- Ikan Kekek 07:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC) Yes, I do. Ikan Kekek. PumpkinSky 01:53, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aghoreshwara Temple 04092016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 07:15, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NH 65 Hyd.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lower left corner could be sharper but good quality overall. --King of Hearts 20:24, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Delhi Municipal Corporation - Remote view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Lack geocoding. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:08, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

@Jacek Halicki: Sorry, I didn't see. Done now. Thanks. Nikhil (talk) 09:23, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 18:09, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAP4 Utkal Express.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 10:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indian Oil Petrol Bunk 06122016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 13:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Babina Railway Station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:54, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Indian coracle.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Indian coracle.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BPCL Petrol Station 07122014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WL KMM Border 07122014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:29, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAG 7 KZJ ED.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 22:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAP4 Konark 10092017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC-PUNE Shatabdi 31082017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAP4 30082017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shivana Samudra Falls 26122014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Not the best one, but it may be QI. But first please improve the image: It's too dark. May sharpness could be improved too. And please check for perspective correction (see the building bottom right), but if a correction isn't an improvement, it is acceptable. --XRay 08:08, 17 September 2017 (UTC) @XRay New version uploaded after perspective correction. Thanks for the review--Nikhil B 04:00, 19 September 2017 (UTC) Weak  Support Still not the best, but acceptable. --XRay 06:48, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Secunderabad Shatabdi Express.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question I don't think the scope needs to be refined down too much, we don't need a scope for each train on a 6 stop route, but wouldn't Pune Secunderabad Shatabdi Express be more accurate? Beyond that I think this is good. Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:42, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

That would mean renaming the category. You want the category to be renamed?--Nikhil B (talk) 04:17, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support I'm not going to say the category needs to be renamed just so that the first stop is in the category name. Now someone may say i'm wrong and that's ok, but beyond 'what should the category be called' this is a VI. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:06, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12213 TPR DEE1 17122017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12213 TPR DEE2 17122017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I assume that there was really some kind of haze in the air. Please give always geolocation and EXIF data if you can. Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TATA Hitachi excavator.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11308 Gulbarga express-2 290318.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11308 Gulbarga express 290318.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11308 HYB-GULBARGA EXPRESS 030418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 09:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAG7 030418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAG7 LGD 130418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:32, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 22691 WAP7 130418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:32, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11308 WAP7 030418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12621 TN Express 23 09 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is a little bit noisy and please check for CAs, for example at the wires. --XRay 04:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC) @XRay Thank you for the review. Removed the CAs and noise slightly reduced. --Nikhil B 03:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:51, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12701 Hussain Sagar Express.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Problems with noise and sharpness and CAs too. --XRay 04:04, 24 October 2018 (UTC) @XRay Thank you for the review. Removed the CAs and noise slightly reduced. --Nikhil B 03:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:51, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12738 Gowthami Express 13052018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAP7 Rayalseema express 03092017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Coordinates are missing. But good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wonderla entrance bangalore 26122014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAP4 LGD KZJ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IKEA showroom, Hyderabad 17032019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David Coulthard Red Bull Donut 20015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kerala-Express-11042019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyderabad Metro Blue Line 14042019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Hellish smog! Looks like good quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Hi Nikhil B!

You are receiving this message because you have previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in India. We would be very delighted if you would do so again this year, help record our monuments for future generations and win exciting prizes.

You can find more details in this page. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in India team)--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Humsafar 02102019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TPTY JAT Humsafar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A bit noisy but acceptable --DXR 18:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Humsafar Express TPTY JAMMU TAWI 02102019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Please ad geo tag --Podzemnik 23:29, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TG Exp 02102019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Please ad geo tag --Podzemnik 23:29, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Welcome to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 ­ India

Hello Nikhil B!

From September 1 to September 30, 2020, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the tenth time. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year. You might remember this event as you had participated in one of the previous editions. We will be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record our monuments for future generations and win exciting prizes! You can find more details in this page.

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:29, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

It's Wiki Loves Food time!

Wiki Loves Food 2021 ­ India

Hello Nikhil B!

Do you roam around in search of delicious mouth-watering foods and take photographs of them before you put them into your mouth? Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India photo-competition is then waiting for you! Participate in the competition from March 15 to April 14 this year, photograph and upload all kinds of foods and beverages originated from or found in Indian sub-continent and get a chance to win exciting prizes!

-- Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India team
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:37, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Welcome to Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 ­ India

Hello Nikhil B!

We are excited again to let you know that, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the 12th time this year. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year from September 1 to September 30, 2021. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record and digitally document our monuments for future generations and get a chance to win exciting prizes! You can find more details about the Indian part of the competition in this page. See you in action in few hours!!

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:20, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RGIA 26112021 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Welcome to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 India

Hello Nikhil B!

We are excited again to let you know that, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the 13th time this year. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year from September 1 to September 30, 2022. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record and digitally document our monuments for future generations and get a chance to win exciting prizes!!!

You can find more details about the Indian edition of the competition in this event page. See you in action in few hours!!

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Welcome to Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 India

Hello Nikhil B!

We are excited again to let you know that, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the 14th time this year. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year from September 1 to September 30, 2023. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record and digitally document our monuments for future generations and get a chance to win exciting prizes!!!

You can find more details about the Indian edition of the competition in this event page. See you in action soon!!

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of the Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:21, 31 August 2023 (UTC)