Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, UpdateNerd!

File:Universal Studios Hollywood fountain.jpg

edit
 
File:Universal Studios Hollywood fountain.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 14:37, 9 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 14:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Gamorrean drawing.png

edit
 
File:Gamorrean drawing.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TAnthony (talk) 16:09, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Trade Federation droid control ship.png

edit
 
File:Trade Federation droid control ship.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TAnthony (talk) 17:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Darth Vader's advanced TIE fighter.png

edit
 
File:Darth Vader's advanced TIE fighter.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TAnthony (talk) 17:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Tauntaun drawing.png

edit
 
File:Tauntaun drawing.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TAnthony (talk) 17:42, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:AT-AT walker.png

edit
 
File:AT-AT walker.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TAnthony (talk) 17:43, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Subject-matter dispute of File:Eve and Her Two Boys.jpg

edit

Please see the tag I added and help clarify who is portrayed and how you know. DMacks (talk) 14:30, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:50, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Vitruvian Man by Giacomo Andrea.jpg

edit

Correction: According to the library (Biblioteca Comunale Ariostea, Ferrara/Italy) where the original illustration is located the codex is "Vitruvius Pollio, Architectura, ms. cart., (1490-1518), Classe II 176, folio c. 78v" and it is attributed to Pellegrino Prisciani. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dagmarilse (talk • contribs) 11:19, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Dagmarilse: Interesting. That's not what most of the sources say, but that's not entirely unusual for an unsigned work. Is there an online source for the attribution? UpdateNerd (talk) 11:36, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:18, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:FredTrump1940.jpg was recently deleted

edit

File:FredTrump1940.jpg was recently deleted by Magog the Ogre for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): copyright renewed http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/cce/firstperiod.html

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 21:13, 8 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:FredTrump1950-02.png was recently deleted

edit

File:FredTrump1950-02.png was recently deleted by Magog the Ogre for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): copyright renewed http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/cce/firstperiod.html

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 21:13, 8 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, King of ♥ 01:34, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Beast Glen Keane.jpg

edit
 
File:Beast Glen Keane.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dream out loud (talk) 22:28, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Julius Schaub and Adolf Hitler at the Reich Chancellery.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

file:Laroucheobamahitler.JPG

edit

It isn's satire or a protest, it was a recruiting propaganda poster for the extremist LaRouche organization. They aren't known for their humor or satire, even if their whole organization toon is considered a bit of a joke by many. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Jewish Charities 1941-12-22.jpg

edit
 
File:Jewish Charities 1941-12-22.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Bust of Jupiter from Frederick II's triumphal arch in Capua.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 20:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply