Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/07/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Original.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Doesn't look like qualify as Pd-textlogo. -- Geagea (talk) 12:24, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Obviously. −ebrahimtalk 12:38, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Commons is not Wikipedia or free web host. Wikicology (talk) 14:34, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Bo jak jest logo, to nie powinno być napisu Wir leben Autos, i to logo nie jest na przezroczystym tle. 77.254.61.186 14:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep, per my comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Opel logo 2011.png. Tbhotch™ 04:52, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones (Talk) 23:06, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Bo pod logiem jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos i nie jest ono na przezroczystym tle. 87.105.137.253 19:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason – his reason translated into English is "Because under the logo there is unnecessary phrase Wir leben Autos and the background is not transparent". Also this and other nominations of this guy look like vandalism to me so I've already reverted them. --jdx Re: 19:25, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism (and edition reverted by Jdx and IP blocked). --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Bo pod logiem jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos i to logo nie ma przezroczystego tła. 78.10.135.248 12:08, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: As before: no valid reason for deletion. This is a photo of some trade fair or similar, so obviously the slogan was used there. --Rosenzweig τ 12:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Dennis Kucinich- Bernie's Treatment by DNC Unacceptable.webm; I was unaware it had been uploaded already MB298 (talk) 22:24, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:21, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
The same as File:נאור ביטון.jpg, without OTRS permission Hanay (talk) 16:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate. -- Geagea (talk) 10:32, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Delete per COM:PRP. Wikicology (talk) 14:29, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd: Mass deletion of pages added by Nuranhısım
Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Delete per COM:PRP. Wikicology (talk) 14:29, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd: Mass deletion of pages added by Nuranhısım
Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Delete per COM:PRP. Wikicology (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd: Mass deletion of pages added by Nuranhısım
Third party logo above threshold of originality, claimed as self which is wrong. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:45, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Billinghurst: Copyright violation: This image is the logo of Make It Pop. It is non-free and copyright-eligible.
out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:54, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:55, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 18:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
I have all permissions to share this pic (from photographer and model), please close the request--Bx67212 (talk) 09:21, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Please follow these instructions to have the photographer provide a written licensing statement. Thanks, —LX (talk, contribs) 10:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, I ask photographer to submit a lecense--Bx67212 (talk) 16:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I confirmed Ticket:2016073110008785. --sasha (krassotkin) 10:01, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, the permission was succesfully confirmed can now close the deletion request? Best --Bx67212 (talk) 10:06, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
See also. --sasha (krassotkin) 10:46, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept, permission confirmed. --sasha (krassotkin) 10:46, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
When I almost passed this image, I got a message that this flickr account is blacklisted. Is this right? This would be an important image for this wikipedia article. I don't know who owns the copyright. Leoboudv (talk) 08:12, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Comment: From the metadata, the copyright owner is 'Photo Division, Ministry of I & B, Govt. of India.' Did they donate the copyright of this image into the public domain? Hopefully they did but I don't know. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete the photo seems indeed to come from photodivision.gov.in (full image) and seems not to be free. If deleted then delete File:Leong Mun Yee during the 2010 Commonwealth Games.jpg as well. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)- Delete Christian Ferrer is right. The image is All Rights Reserved at the Government of India website unfortunately. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:58, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:34, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
I uploaded this corrected version but after 12 hours some sizes including thumbnail not updated - so loaded corrected version under a new file name - File:2016_Nice_attack_route_annotated.jpeg. The file here is no longer needed and has been removed from the category Mathsci (talk) 07:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Processed as duplicate. --Reventtalk 13:36, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
The glycoside is drawn in a way that obscures its specific identity. Per filename, the use-case would be as an example of a glycoside, so having its details "correct" is important. File is unused, and Category:Anthocyanins (and its subcats) have several well-drawn examples. DMacks (talk) 21:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 16:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused dup of File:Hydrohalogenation alkenes scheme1.png (jpg worse than png as filetype) DMacks (talk) 21:17, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 16:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
COM:OTRS permission from the artist is needed to retain the larger of these two images.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
It is highly unlikely that the uploader took this image in 1941. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: It is from a newsreel from Die Deutsche Wochenschau: [1]. The Wikipedia article says that most films are under copyright. A few extracts are on Commons, maybe with disputable license tags: Category:Deutsche Wochenschau. The achive.org collection is not considered free by the German Archives: Commons:Deletion requests/Deutsche Wochenschau films. -- Asclepias (talk) 05:36, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Obviously a book (including cover), but not so obvious why it has the current license. It may also be out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Currently, under the second picture, there's a gallery, and this picture is #7 in the gallery, and it says that the photo belongs to UNIAN. I can't find a direct link, unfortunately [2]. Dontreader (talk) 02:52, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Please look at the deletion nomination page for File:Протест 6 липня.jpg. This picture is in the same gallery. Dontreader (talk) 02:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Was already deleted once at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monuments and memorials to Jo Cox. --ghouston (talk) 03:03, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- The version at File:Jo Cox MP Memorial 3.jpg is more likely to be accepted as de minimis. --ghouston (talk) 03:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- And perhaps this one: File:Jo Cox memorial Parliament Square, London (4).jpg. --ghouston (talk) 03:11, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
It would be hard for an average civilian to take this picture. It's in a gallery (second picture of the gallery) under the first picture on this page [3]. Notice the logo at the bottom, right side. Dontreader (talk) 03:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete for the reason mentioned in the second and third sentences of the nomination and in the discussion of Commons:Deletion requests/File:КВПУ.jpg: the photo was on the internet and there is no proof of own work by the uploader. This photo is also on the facebook page of the trade union: [4], published on 5 November 2015. However, I disagree with the rationale expressed in the first sentence of the nomination. It wouldn't be, and likely wasn't, hard to take this picture. From the context of the other photos of the event, it looks like it was a peaceful demonstration by trade unionists. No forces, no barriers, just a small plastic ribbon on one side, and the photo is even taken from the demonstration side of the ribbon, probably by someone with the trade union. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:12, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Photo of non-notable subject deleted from Wikipedia. Jujutacular (talk) 03:38, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Violación de derechos de autor flagrante, es un imagen propiedad de una página web del estado sin dudarlo. Carlos (talk) 04:43, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Uploader's request. Not useful for encyclopedia. Regards, KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 05:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related eswiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 06:10, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF (1 original, 3 derivates). Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.
- File:100´5 ARENA bei den Öcher Wiesn.jpg
- File:Halle3 neu.jpg
- File:Halle2 neu.jpg
- File:Öcher Wiesn.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 06:29, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.
Gunnex (talk) 06:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work: I would think this image is copyrighted Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:37, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Junaidehrar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, found elsewhere on the web. per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Junaidehrar/logs. Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status.
- File:Shaykh-ul-islam Imam hafidh Muhammad anwarullah farooqi alayhir rahmah ( founder jamia nizamia ).jpg
- File:1193525654 ash shaykh-ul-islam hafidh anwarullah farooqi alayhir rahmah ( founder jamia nizamia ).jpg
- File:Fazlul Mateen Moini Chishti Sahab.jpg
- File:Shaykh-ul-islam hafidh anwarullah farooqi alayhir rahmah ( founder jamia nizamia ).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 06:37, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.
- File:Promotions.gif.png
- File:1000 x 90.jpg
- File:128x90.jpg
- File:MIGMAGING.jpg
- File:VMBS Migmaging Logo.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 06:40, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Smalkmus0211 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF. File:Dunham Laboratory.jpg = copyrighted work by "Carl Kaufman", needing permission. Uploaded on 22.07.2016.
Gunnex (talk) 06:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Clearly not created by the uploader, copied from http://lajmi.net/arena-kombetare-stadiumi-i-ri-i-shqiperise-foto/, among others 23 editor (talk) 06:58, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Historical photos and magazine scans may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status.
Gunnex (talk) 06:58, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo is dated 1973, but needs to have been taken in 1957 or earlier, or published commercially prior to 1966 for this licence to be valid and the photo to be public domain. Nigel Ish (talk) 07:00, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Undeleted It is now 2024. Abzeronow (talk) 21:03, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 07:00, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
derivative work of book cover Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
_Original.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Original.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:User3094209/logs = 3 uploads on 22.07.2016 = 2x copyvio Gunnex (talk) 07:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
_Original.jpg){kind=link}
- Most likely sock of Kevin169ny (talk · contributions · Statistics) (using same enwiki user space). Gunnex (talk) 07:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
_Original.jpg){kind=link}
I don't think the right area with the painting is above TOO, therefore I think it's a copyvio Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Why are you thinking this? It's an official station logo of sky Deutschland and the licence is correct for this logo. It's a legal logo with a legal licence and so your deletion request is absurd and baseless.Lukeskywalker1978 (talk) 23:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: right side of logo is complex/above COM:TOO. --INeverCry 00:14, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
The image was deleted as incorrectly licensed as public domain. Now it is uploaded as incorrectly public domain here (i.e. Commons). See w:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 May 9#File:Colorado Springs Shield.jpg. George Ho (talk) 07:50, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry 4x speedy deleted.
Gunnex (talk) 08:26, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Image has been published previously in several websites, one example: http://nation.com.pk/featured/04-Jul-2016/josh-to-release-new-track-kama-this-eid. MKFI (talk) 08:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
ashamed of this picture due to its poor color and its wrong exposure Busbahnhof (talk) 07:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously photoshopped (navi elements) Gunnex (talk) 07:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Photo dated 2009 so {{PD-UK-unknown}} obviously does not apply. January (talk) 07:29, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 07:31, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guillaume Penon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like photos of photos, especially File:CE Lahaye 3.jpg so I doubt the uploader is the author.
Avron (talk) 07:34, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 07:36, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 07:39, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 07:42, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:58, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
After updating the image an old version with messed up aspect ratio is displayed. Maybe a bug; therefore I reuploaded the new version under a new name. Yukterez (talk) 07:47, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Questionable own work claim, watermarked image. MKFI (talk) 08:31, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Photographed by Hanno Hummel, OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 08:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
odnxtfjhjhtwyeopo-59878( 123.108.244.184 08:42, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Vandalism. --jdx Re: 08:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:17, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal picture of unimported selfproclaimed rapper Lymantria (talk) 08:44, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Baikespwiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of individuals and a book cover associated with a Chinese avant-garde movement. EXIF data shows various webclips and several different cameras. Unlikely for the uploader, a new user, to be the common author (listed as "own work"). All of the photos duplicated at http://catherineink.blogchina.com/3078866.html
- File:Zhao Shuyi.jpg
- File:Xia Wencheng.jpg
- File:Sun Qian.jpg
- File:Langjitianya.jpg
- File:Shan Shui.jpg
- File:Xiang Yixian.jpg
- File:Hai Shang.jpg
- File:Yin Xiaoyuan(Poet).jpg
- File:Wang Ziliang.jpg
- File:Avant-garde Trilogy.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
czar 08:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
404 page without any identifying information. Unlikely to be of future/educational use. czar 08:58, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused, low-quality personal image, not useful for illustrating "facial expressions" or for any other educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:58, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused, low-quality personal snapshot, not useful for any educational purpose, out of scope Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:00, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused, low-quality personal snapshot not useful for any educational purpose, out of scope Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:11, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
L'image est beaucoup trop volumineuse en entrée de page et ce n'est pas le bon soulier d'or ! 81.49.121.133 09:31, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Quelle page? But anyway, I saw that the file from where I cropped this was already deleted citing "derivative of non-free work". So, I agree that this file is also deleted. --Sentausa (talk) 08:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Michelle Fields
[edit]Unless I'm missing something, this is private footage from a news conference. The police might have shared the footage but it doesn't mean they own the copyright to the private security footage as they did not "create" the footage.
czar 09:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bot upload of Facebook-style personal artwork not useful for educational purposes, and a derivative work with no indication of the copyright status of the original image Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete agree to the proposant Olivier LPB (talk) 23:59, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The article has been deleted because of non notability. As a copyright holder of this image I personally do not like this image to be here. Subhashish Panigrahi (talk) 09:59, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
The article has been deleted because of non notability. As a copyright holder of this image I personally do not like this image to be here. Subhashish Panigrahi (talk) 10:00, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
The article has been deleted because of non notability. As a copyright holder of this image I personally do not like this image to be here. Subhashish Panigrahi (talk) 10:01, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Wrong author (the real author, Elliot Aubin, is in the description field instead of the author one); Come from Adèle Castillon's and Elliot Aubin's social network (Google Image has caches about it's use on Castillon's Twitter account, Aubin share it here) where I hadn't find any licence (compatible or not); May be out of scope, her article was deleted from French Wikipedia as out of criteria. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:03, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
The article has been deleted because of non notability. As a copyright holder of this image I personally do not like this image to be here. Subhashish Panigrahi (talk) 09:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: self-created artwork which prominently includes webpage of company.
Takeaway (talk) 10:25, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Most stamps issusd by USPS post 1978 are copyright. These ATM and coil stamps were issued in 1989 and 1992 respectively so are likely copyright violations. Perhaps the upper section ATMs could be considered to be TOO comprising basically text but the coil stamps below probably don't quality. Originally uploaded by a blocked dewiki user. Ww2censor (talk) 10:48, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
obviously a cropped print screen S. Plaine (talk) 11:03, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Debaranjan Pegu (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal work/photo, but no educational content
- File:Deba IMPORTANT Macros- Code 19 April 2013 Modified - Notepad.pdf
- File:Debaranjan.jpg
- File:Debaranjan Pegu Signature.png
Avron (talk) 11:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
persononal artwork, based on a professional photo . I doubt the original photo is the work of the uploader Avron (talk) 11:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo has pd-gov-uk license tag, but is dated to December 1971 (according to the caption and the source [5]. While the photo is a UK government work, pd-gov-uk requires the photo to have been taken prior to 1 June 1957 or published commercially prior to 1966. Neither of these alternatives is possible for a photo taken in 1971. Nigel Ish (talk) 11:28, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused, low-quality selfie with no potential educational uses, out of project scope Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:29, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
UK government work taken in November 1972, so the pd-gov-uk tag is unsuitable (requires the photo to be taken prior to 1 June 1957 or published commercially prior to 1966). Source [6] gives a non-commercial licence for the photo, which is unsuitable for Commons. Nigel Ish (talk) 11:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Comment Before this gets undeleted due to the PD day category, please see Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. De728631 (talk) 14:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
UK government photo dated 5 December 1974, which has a pd-gov-uk tag. This licence requires the photo to have been taken prior to 1 June 1957, or published commercially prior to 1966, neither of which is possible for this photo. Stated as having a non-commercial licence on the source website [7] which is unsuitable for Commons. Nigel Ish (talk) 11:39, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files of User:Seven shine
[edit]
Advertising. The only contributions by this user. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:01, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Preet Group of Companies
[edit]- File:Preet - 949 TAF track combine harvester.jpg
- File:Preet - 949 Track type.jpg
- File:Preet - 7049 Maize Combine harvester.png
- File:Preet 849-Maize Combine.png
- File:Preet - 849 Mini combine harvester.jpg
- File:Preet - 987 (AC- Combine harvester ).jpg
- File:Preet -987-Combine harvester.png
- File:Preet - 9049 (new model).jpg
- File:Preet - 9049 (4wd).png
- File:Preet - 7549 (4wd).png
- File:Preet - 6549.png
- File:Preet - 6549-4WD.png
- File:Preet - 6049.png
- File:Preet- 3549.png
- File:Preet - 955.png
- File:Preet - 4549.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Advertising by a single-purpose account. These pictures belong on the company's website; Commons is not free web space for businesses. There was one file that is in use on a project so I did not nominate that one for deletion. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
copyvio: http://www.bnipolska.pl/8-lecie-grupy-bni-kings-z-krakowa/ WTM (talk) 13:31, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
copyvio: http://www.bnipolska.pl/bni-zaczyna-dzialac-w-nowym-regionie/ WTM (talk) 13:31, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
copyvio: http://konferencjabni.pl/en/gallery/ WTM (talk) 13:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
copyvio: http://www.bnipolska.pl/czym-roznia-sie-dni-branzowe-od-dni-goscia/ WTM (talk) 13:34, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
copyvio: https://www.facebook.com/bnivikingspolska/photos/a.783872675049266.1073741840.376247205811817/783872795049254/?type=1&theater WTM (talk) 13:36, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
useless redirrection Quahadi Añtó 13:45, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Historical drawing, maps and book page. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Beato Giacomo Illirico Bitetto.jpg
- File:Volpi - Resolutiones.png
- File:Bitetto - Borgo Antico.jpg
- File:Bitetto-Pacichelli.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gregjarlot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused maps of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:ABU Cup TV Song Contest country.png
- File:ABU Cup TV Song Contest 2017 map.png
- File:Unions des Pays Européens carte.png
- File:Union des pays européen map.png
- File:ESC 2017 Map.jpg
- File:2016 Map.png
- File:FileJESC 2016 Map.svg.png
- File:Map europe Eurovision australia.png
- File:JESC 2016 Map.svg.png
- File:JESC 2016 Map.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nahid.rajbd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Local, not-notable ceremony/event photos have no uses and I believe in future will not be used. Possibly out of scope.
~ Moheen (talk) 14:03, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nahid.rajbd (talk · contribs)
[edit]I suppose those include signatures are copyrighted.
- File:Signature-of-S.-M.-A-Qader 02.jpg
- File:Signature-of-S.-M.-A-Qader.png
- File:Signature-of-AHM-Abdul-Hadi 02.jpg
- File:Signature-of-AHM-Abdul-Hadi.png
- File:Abney Golam Samad Signature.png
~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nahid.rajbd (talk · contribs)
[edit]The article was deleted in bn and en wiki per notability. Out of project scope.
~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:29, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nahid.rajbd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:PACKAGING. Not in {{PD-self}} licence.
- File:Xiaomi Mi band 2 Package Box 3.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Mi band 2 Package Box 2.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Mi band 2 Package Box 1.jpg
~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:37, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:09, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
عکس تکراری است عارون (talk) 14:11, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chiefgarcia74 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 14:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Umphotography (talk · contribs)
[edit]Video clips. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Gerua - Shah Rukh Khan Kajol Dilwale Pritam SRK Kajol Official New S.webm.ogg
- File:B.o.B Summers Day (WSHH Exclusive - Official Music Video).ogg
- File:CAN T STOP THE FEELING! (From DreamWorks Animation s Trolls ) (Official Video).ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
No inrfomation about copyright status. Delete per COM:PRP Wikicology (talk) 14:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. (The links refer to an older deleted file) Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:17, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
dutch file describing somebody being appointed to "gerechtsdeurwaarder". Out of scope and personal information. Usage is based on the generic filename Basvb (talk) 16:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. Basically per nomination. Out of scope personal file; see also COM:NOTHOST. Usage unrelated to the contents of the file. odder (talk) 21:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Used only because of previously deleted uploads. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:35, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment this page should be salted after deletion. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:36, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - protected against recreation. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
No educational value. Unused bad quality/bad composition personal images. Out of scope.
Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. This is probably the uploader himself. Wikicology (talk) 14:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Newspapers and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Outlook Splurge 3.jpg
- File:Radhika Batra Shah.jpg
- File:Loksatta July 2016.pdf
- File:Girish Shah.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private video collection. Not used. Commons:Derivative works from non-free software screenshots and music.
- File:DeryhVP8.webm
- File:DsVP8.webm
- File:Xcdreh.webm
- File:SimocVP8.webm
- File:Sibogt.webm
- File:Simo123VP8.webm
- File:GhVP8.webm
- File:SimoCVN VP8.webm
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alikhani98 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
It is incorrect lowercase form of latin letter TP. Person or Persons Unknown (talk) 14:29, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://diyshare.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/11-11-home-remedies-for-a-toothache-pressure-points.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Image is previously published and is of the photographer, not the alleged subject. See http://usvsth3m.com/post/88657870323/wikipedia-autofellatio-selfies-and-one-mans-quest-to C.Fred (talk) 14:31, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 14:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/01/03/article-2256369-02189344000004B0-703_634x462.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by David Sors (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams and trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Circuit3-A.gif
- File:Circuit3.gif
- File:Emv4.png
- File:Emv3.png
- File:Miranda1.jpg
- File:Varuna.jpg
- File:EMV system.png
- File:Electromagnetic system.png
- File:Circuit2.png
- File:Emv123.png
- File:Emv.png
- File:Galpath5.png
- File:Ac003-Asteroid Vesta-sm.jpg
- File:Ac002-comet-sm.jpg
- File:Ac001-Asteroid Juno-sm.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://sportssahara.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Bs3OFMNCQAII1z4-300x296.jpg.
- File:Habib Jafar lifting the 2001 Baghdad Cup.jpg
- File:Ayoub Odisho, October 2015.jpg
- File:Humam Tariq in 2014.jpg
- File:Noor Sabri with Al-Kadhimiya in 1999.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnAM6WnXEAA0Tiv.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://blog-imgs-50.fc2.com/s/a/n/santeplus/201401070303343ad.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Tetiana Chornovol images taken from Facebook
[edit]The following images appear to have been taken from the Facebook page of Тетяна Чорновол (Tetiana Chornovol).
- File:Під час Революції.jpg, uploaded 11:24, 24 February 2016 by Старкон. It is 2,048 × 1,366 pixels and has no Exif data produced by the camera. It is a copy of a 2,048 × 1,366 pixels picture[8] posted by Галина Млиниська on 2 December 2013.
- File:У кмда.jpg, uploaded 11:24, 24 February 2016 by Старкон. It is 2048 x 1536 pixels and has no Exif data produced by the camera. It is a copy of [9] a 2048 x 1536 pixel picture posted by Igor Lutsenko on 16 August 2013.
- File: В_КМДА.jpg, uploaded 11:59, 12 February 2016 by Старкон. It is 729 × 547 pixels and has no Exif data produced by the camera. It is a smaller version of the same photo
- File:Чорновол під Маріуполем.jpg, uploaded 11:59, 12 February 2016 by Старкон. It is 753 × 503 pixels and has no Exif data produced by the camera. It is a copy of a 2048 x 1368 pixel picture[10] posted by Piotr Andrusieczko on 5 September 2014.
- File:З чоловіком.jpg, uploaded 11:59, 12 February 2016 by Старкон. It is 537 × 490 pixels and has no Exif data produced by the camera. It is a copy of a 537 × 490 pixel picture[11] posted by Сагайдак Илья on 10 August 2014.
When images are uploaded on to Facebook, it seems to remove the Exif data about the camera. The uploader's claim that he/she was the creator appears to be false. The images seem to have been copied from Facebook, and then republished here without the copyright-owners' permission. --Toddy1 (talk) 15:04, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khushbooagarwal9 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own works, the same person (Ritu Beri) at two very different times....
Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
unusable because of low quality Kopiersperre (talk) 15:10, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- Work has been undeleted. It is required by enWS for its reproduction of the PSM. All images subsidiary to Category:Popular Science Monthly illustrations will be utilised enWS as part of the reproduction of PSM and ideally would neither be nominated or deleted as low quality. Unfortunately, they are what they are. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:24, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Viel zu niedrige Auflösung Joschi71 (talk) 15:12, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Viel zu geringe Auflösung Joschi71 (talk) 15:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep kein Löschgrund, zudem mehrfach verwendet (in use) --Didym (talk) 15:50, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Didym. --INeverCry 00:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Copyright holder www.estebanwautier.com in metadata Ariam (talk) 15:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Likely to be license laundering, OTRS permission given by someone with no authority to do it. Photographer's permission needed.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sealle (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 7Hillsmisic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the watermarks, missing/inconsistent metadata, inconsistent resolutions, and previous publications found elsewhere.
- File:Price1.jpg – watermarked "nightout.ru"
- File:Price2.jpg
- File:Price3.jpg – watermarked "Kazarinov" and "Geometria"
- File:Price4.jpg – watermarked "photo by JackNickPro"
- File:Price5.jpg
- File:Price6.jpg
- File:Price7.jpg – watermarked Ekaterina Osina and "radioradio.ru"
—LX (talk, contribs) 15:35, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
not PD : Author dead 51 years ago Irønie (talk) 15:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Difficult-to-modify JPG map with some weird errors. Newport News and Rutland service are not shown, cities are inconsistently shown, Alabama is highlighted, and for some horrifying reason Maine has slid off into the ocean. No possible educational use for this map when other better maps are already on Commons. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:19, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on these two files. Seems like something from television.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Would appear to be an image from https://twikingfuture.com/tag/twike-iceland-2015/, where a cropped version is found on the main page. And it also appears on the cover of this book: https://www.amazon.com/First-Electric-Surrounding-Iceland-Pioneering/dp/1325046795?ie=UTF8&*Version*=1&*entries*=0 Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused image of person, doesn't look like a selfie, no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Small unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal image, no apparent educational utility as it's unused for multiple years post creation. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is unused, and despite the large size and large number of pixels, is more of a personal image than anything educationally useful. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Despite the large size of this file, it is not particularly educationally useful as it is a personal image of a photographer who posts his work to flickr and which has been copied over here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused poor quality selfie. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Small size, low quality, personal image, not a selfie. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this image scanned/copied from some other source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
https://www.google.com.tr/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiuRKPXbvAk6LUgaw8ZpCRdfe0Gj1wNV17B1NpIY226GItmQTV6rSr0A9H4AJAuB1FKzuULaNtz16Fnn4WiFckGlpd-5aSiwLT_1OZ1sTM2qdSk3mgcg_18Bg-XU93JK9Fg8my4zooznkI3dN-ukxG8iOauDIK15e56BtlfPfwjZApCNSsTF3W6iun7-93u3Z1qglw5UtUIkcwfhKiByEdWozHgrOHLxp3QnNxWRmdxf17zxP-ZmXiwXb05-XN74D0lRDUtJ6wrkbhvDnGcnpLoj4JF71tA7OnJyztriDq_1_1pOCdqyA-xpGjO0_1-IF6s7zRosHT_1fTLRPjJVaSy9EN2g3JeBVKWF0Jzo0K7bnKbUlKSu3N0TjsmtYQNbBqj_1nG1juJR9b34lZeaZpCB383pYi1KSJMOoviJOl8UHUgjoINPa95ssf3V0kIpUyqmYP3VGSPPZxYkEcnf21aTWehVNx1RZ1St0PxXK1-jVoW9YlTtc_1k46WxUDFgl4nrW0XM_1EOnEQBgSGtBl3Ilil_1S9a5556BMvipWMtS2tNvt71vYzn2qQWh4fsWSTuu8hL8JNnmsIjBEr61irWeajE-iW0dlCPidryO-62wD8-wtbk5oXs0szsHyhwp6HaCHwjrnt0dLt8LFF2PmGfxILfGnUcoxDeyuQQc_1wDUaGgQuIQ_11j1uiB5xl3lRyrsP04sdcRK4ljC6qxMgzAt6h0A9Zvs9pL7vJXdPPoKwEb6KdUzic66MAQA88YZvbl7OzfrIku9QgR03a4_1pvKw86_1VcO7MurNdcTh1QmEu0YAfAx2uOKrW2G-x93j-gqPUb6KvbJECaFY_18LAgydXTE68_19_1y5FyHLMW3VqQJYPYV6Re2w34XlzVXsDMUP2nNI8qqd7HbRmPHVbdC7ASrDFpO0FpbnN_1L8VCMGVhTipjllXA7hWfGzxOmuTlxwM9qLPiYdqT72Oq41oIuA0JbGRkqYI7LNUe7fJTrJceUXPvWbX9U7w55-aQqB2rcyvqDV2Gwi7ZdosRv-Pu5WK2Vq-Y6YYewBoLHoeuUj1yQqBnGO6E9cjt5hWbCj0qhKn67Kk60uzxEi6iorTnMqLzB7sJSI4-jpndZ6GM5RjF8Lte7ZcJr3_1E8Iv5A6vviNmduhk0tqbarQQm1h0f5WCEoqeF3PxZR7CnMSaxO3N2xrT6TKmMzVUAChzG3TejJTk48myHC7HPCqyNYe-x-eJCWQ4RpGD4hZequuhnhec1T6l96FxxAH9qAzD1NmSzNv1h4aHIu-s6feuqQA9cGxOIWEfLYBNFpMPeKdrCy-VF1TG1r1oD-nEEzPzVT246W18mAYYRAGPu4YVto4Ey0HxeJyy5yLCunSLT-uOc74H-JNb3QSzAhSgbsj7i9-UUnzK17drEI4yTmEUFskgFN3E2J2iZza8W08NSBVyEaoxzqXUcHlRoWhIAWtcFV4hOBp6PpmznXG0ClfBotwxcI6dXPf2wgxmpNwBkbKJKLKulWhe0B16jLRv9TxbOJ6UBfgh6FHZhZdwMoDcaB8uyF4mn3nvFmiQq9PTKOXHmPKZzMVSGJG608GZf4iRsWxg2bUBwECFadKU79CR-XkxGxBwjKcMX2zdA8WKk8iBS0YIHKqohym78TD_1ddzI1nY0BxuOzBWQ6o5ovSsx63zOuLxWeNcJs4_1_1ReJTMkU_1y7A&btnG=G%C3%B6rselle%20ara&hl=tr 78.177.6.231 16:47, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adam Chalecki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two unused copies of an en:wiki user pick, for a user who has only uploaded pictures of himself and written apparently his own bio on wiki.[12] No need to keep these two, even if a reason is found to keep the one in use, File:Good pic - Copy (2).JPG.
.JPG){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not educationally useful. More than half of this image is pureblack and whatever is in the background is burned out. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
In reviewing something else related to this image, I discovered that OTRS permission was not appropriate. See OTRS Ticket#: 2007043010005758. BU Rob13 (talk) 16:53, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
In reviewing something else related to this image, I discovered that OTRS permission was not appropriate. See OTRS Ticket#: 2007043010005758. BU Rob13 (talk) 16:53, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Permission from the photographer of the Eagle would be needed to retain this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Here is a problem of ownership and permission. Metadata says "Author Mike DeDecker", but it was uploaded to flickr by Zach Dischner. I think COM:PRP needs to be applied to this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
cover in violazione di copyright. Danyele (talk) 16:55, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused sketch art, no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims. Clearly a scan or photo of a pre-existing work, whose copyright status is unclear. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:59, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Non-credible claim of own work on this drawing or painting. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this small, blurry portrait. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Non credible claim of own work, see other works by this user. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as promotional. Rebbing 17:47, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as it is not a promotional. Except being edited, the picture is just a memorable photograph taken during the compilation of Nepali academic session. Though the photograph is not taken by me, I do possess the copyright along with its low resolution electronically transferred file. User:GB Ryan771 21:14, 30 July, 2016 (UTC +3:00)
- Comment If you didn't take the photograph it's not your own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 17:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Keep Essa foto foi publicada no perfil do Facebook dele, Whindersson Nunes, publicamente, ou seja, é de Domínio público e sem restrições de uso. (Link da publicação: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1111605058913570&set=pb.100001922591273.-2207520000.1469941481.&type=3&theater) --Eduardo Vinicius Lopes Saraiva (talk) 04:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete, the fact that it was published does not mean it is free and that does not have copyright. Fabiano msg 23:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted image. Uploader is not the original photographer. Wikicology (talk) 17:43, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I'm not as familiar with Arabic/Persian script, but I received a talk page message suggesting that this might be above the threshold of originality (that is, more original than {{Pd-text}}). Would appreciate other opinions. I've seen some examples of Chinese/Japanese thresholds for pd-text but none for Arabic/Persian, if you can link to prior precedent. czar 17:46, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- This would be significant move, since many categories such as category:Flags with shahada feature flags with creative Arabic calligraphy, most of which are labelled as PD. Editor abcdef (talk) 01:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep This is still just a collection of words written in an unusual manner. I've seen longer chunks of English text written so that it produces a shape (e.g. the block of text appears as a pyramid), and as long as the text itself is in the public domain, there's no copyright issue. This not being long enough to make the text itself copyrightable, there's no issue with the manner of writing it either. Nyttend (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- But the question is whether it's unusual enough to warrant copyright protection. If this were a standard text/font written in a shape, the creative expression would be the shape, but in this case it's the text itself that's stylized—not in a font—as its own creative expression. And it's certainly more intricate than our Commons:Threshold of originality#Logos and flags examples. Every deletion discussion I could find on Arabic calligraphy points towards deletion: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Osamaalsaadi, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Malikhash. It would be helpful to hear from someone familiar with legal precedent in this regard czar 17:45, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This is certainly a designed logo and the unusual style of writing is clearly seen. As a bilingual, this is something beyond a collection of standard fonts. It's a designed logo which is eligible for copyright protection. --Mhhossein (talk) 11:53, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyrighted image. Uploader claimed own work but I don't see how they are the original photographer. Wikicology (talk) 17:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyrighted image. Uploader claimed own work but I don't see how they are the original photographer. Wikicology (talk) 17:50, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyrighted material. Delete per COM:PRP Wikicology (talk) 18:00, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyrighted image. It's not clear how this is uploader's own work considering the fact that the image has been published elsewhere such as this Wikicology (talk) 18:03, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Михаил Гузь (talk · contribs)
[edit]No metadata, small dimensions. As all other uploads of user are copyvio from web or as minimum without permission, I think, this are too, but can't find source.
- File:Знаменная сошка на командном пункте войсковой части 73727.jpg
- File:Вымпел МО СССР войсковой части 44197.jpg
Dmitry89 (talk) 18:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no metadata, potential copyvio.
- File:Ulitka(1).jpg
- File:Smirchinskii(1).jpg
- File:Cheban(1).jpg
- File:Ivlev1(1).jpg
- File:Argunov new1(1).jpg
- File:Juravlev(1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Dmitry89 (talk) 18:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. I found the image here Wikicology (talk) 18:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 18:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no metadat. Copyvio? Dmitry89 (talk) 18:27, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no metada. Potential copyvio. Dmitry89 (talk) 18:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio. Taken from wwe.com Oknazevad (talk) 18:36, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, obvious {{copyvio}} by copyvio-only uploader. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Too sophisticated for PD-German-logo? If yes, we need permission. RE rillke questions? 15:15, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Opel logo 2009 .png -- RE rillke questions? 15:24, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Per my comments at C:DR/File:Opel logo 2009.png. Also, this has to be mergeed there since it is basically the same logo. Tbhotch (talk) 05:23, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Opel logo 2009 .png RE rillke questions? 15:28, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Does not meet the threshold of originality? You're kidding me. False license. Woodcutterty (talk) 18:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- Striked out the nomination for now, might get back on it later. Image does not qualify for use on nl-wiki though. Woodcutterty (talk) 01:41, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Withdrawn --Denniss (talk) 18:35, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Bo jak jest logo, to nie powinno być napisu Wir leben Autos. 77.254.61.186 14:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- It has been suggested in earlier deletion discussions that this logo is not copyrighted, because it's just a combination of a circle and a blitz and therefore does not meet the threshold of originality. This is obviously false: not only is it not just a combination of a circle and a blitz (it's a circle, a blitz, the words 'opel' and the slogan 'Wir Leben Autos' in a chrome design), it is generally accepted (at least in European jurisprudence) that even though the individual elements of a work might not be eligible for copyright protection, the combination of these elements may constitute a work of art. I believe that is the case here, so I propose to delete it, taking into account the precautionary principle. Woodcutterty (talk) 15:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- It is a German logo, where the threshold is not as high as the UK or East European countries. This has been renominated ad nauseum (this logo and other similars) that frankly there is no valid reason for users to nominate it over and over again; the only valid reason to nominate it is because an Adam Opel AG legal representant makes a complain, and that would be through WMF legal department, not here. Tbhotch™ 16:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- (1) The threshold of originality is the same across the European Union and has been at least since the Court of Justice determined in 2009 that it's been harmonized; COM:TOO is outdated to the point of being preposterous. (2) The fact that it is a German logo does not mean German law dictates the threshold of originality. That is to say, if it doesn't meet the threshold in Germany (which it does), that doesn't mean it's not protected anywhere else in the world. Anyone with a basic understanding of international private law will tell you that. Waiting for the copyright holder to complain is obviously contrary to the precautionary principle. Woodcutterty (talk) 16:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Nominating the same logo for 5 years in a row is obviously disruptive for the project. From Commons:Threshold of originality#Germany: Note: Some of the information in this section may be outdated due to a 2013 German Federal Supreme court ruling on the TOO for applied art; see this English summary for details." This logo was published way before the 2013 ruling, whichever this is, and this logo is clearly not "applied art". Whichever the ruling is now for Germany, the ruling at the time of the creation was that simple logos were not copyrighted, ergo, this is not grandfathered to copyright by default. Also, "doesn't mean it's not protected anywhere else in the world" is irrelevant. Commons allows to host logos that are in the public domain/free licensed in both, the country of origin and the US ("Wikimedia Commons only accepts media {...} that are explicitly freely licensed, or {...} that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work.") And finally, the precautionary principle states, and I cite: "where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted." You haven't provided minimal evidence that there is "significant doubt about the freedom" of German laws at the time of the publication (a 1968 emblem) of the Opel bolt logo (or all the Opel-logos that where nominated by the same IP editor). Tbhotch™ 04:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- If you don't know that a finding by a court that the threshold of originality is lower than was previously assumed works retroactively, then there's really no point in explaining anything to you. Whether or not a creation is eligible for copyright protection is not solely determined by the standards at the time of creation. Woodcutterty (talk) 10:58, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- Nominating the same logo for 5 years in a row is obviously disruptive for the project. From Commons:Threshold of originality#Germany: Note: Some of the information in this section may be outdated due to a 2013 German Federal Supreme court ruling on the TOO for applied art; see this English summary for details." This logo was published way before the 2013 ruling, whichever this is, and this logo is clearly not "applied art". Whichever the ruling is now for Germany, the ruling at the time of the creation was that simple logos were not copyrighted, ergo, this is not grandfathered to copyright by default. Also, "doesn't mean it's not protected anywhere else in the world" is irrelevant. Commons allows to host logos that are in the public domain/free licensed in both, the country of origin and the US ("Wikimedia Commons only accepts media {...} that are explicitly freely licensed, or {...} that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work.") And finally, the precautionary principle states, and I cite: "where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted." You haven't provided minimal evidence that there is "significant doubt about the freedom" of German laws at the time of the publication (a 1968 emblem) of the Opel bolt logo (or all the Opel-logos that where nominated by the same IP editor). Tbhotch™ 04:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- (1) The threshold of originality is the same across the European Union and has been at least since the Court of Justice determined in 2009 that it's been harmonized; COM:TOO is outdated to the point of being preposterous. (2) The fact that it is a German logo does not mean German law dictates the threshold of originality. That is to say, if it doesn't meet the threshold in Germany (which it does), that doesn't mean it's not protected anywhere else in the world. Anyone with a basic understanding of international private law will tell you that. Waiting for the copyright holder to complain is obviously contrary to the precautionary principle. Woodcutterty (talk) 16:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- It is a German logo, where the threshold is not as high as the UK or East European countries. This has been renominated ad nauseum (this logo and other similars) that frankly there is no valid reason for users to nominate it over and over again; the only valid reason to nominate it is because an Adam Opel AG legal representant makes a complain, and that would be through WMF legal department, not here. Tbhotch™ 16:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
_pic2_Logo-only.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep, per before, before, before, my comment above, and that the reason for being nominated (translated from Polish) is not a valid delete reason. Tbhotch™ 16:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: As per others. --Ronhjones (Talk) 23:05, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Bo pod logiem nie powinno być napisu Wir leben Autos. 87.105.137.253 18:39, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Bo pod logiem jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos. 87.105.137.253 18:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason – his reason translated into English is "Because under the logo there is unnecessary phrase Wir leben Autos". Also this and other nominations of this guy look like vandalism to me so I've already reverted them. --jdx Re: 19:17, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:31, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Bo pod logiem jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos. 78.10.135.248 12:04, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Vandalism – no valid reason. --jdx Re: 12:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones (Talk) 16:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no metadata. Most of other uploads of user were copyvio. Dmitry89 (talk) 18:40, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
This is an album cover, so I fail to see how it can be licensed as self work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:45, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
This is an album cover, I fail to see how it can be 'self work'. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:46, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Bo jak jest logo, to nie powinno być napisu Wir leben Autos. 77.254.61.186 14:57, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, per my comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Opel logo 2011.png. Tbhotch™ 04:51, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones (Talk) 23:06, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Bo obok loga jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos. 87.105.137.253 18:48, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Bo obok loga jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos. 87.105.137.253 18:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason – his reason translated into English is "Because beside the logo there is unnecessary phrase Wir leben Autos". Also this and other nominations of this guy look like vandalism to me so I've already reverted them. --jdx Re: 19:12, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:33, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Bo obok loga jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos. 78.10.135.248 12:03, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Was just kept, the exact same reasoning was deemed "no valid reason for deletion". --Rosenzweig τ 12:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Bo jak jest logo, to nie powinno być napisu Wir leben Autos. 77.254.61.186 14:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, per my comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Opel logo 2011.png. Tbhotch™ 04:51, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Opel logo 2011.png. --Ronhjones (Talk) 23:03, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Bo pod logiem jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos. 87.105.137.253 18:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Bo pod logiem jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos. 87.105.137.253 18:52, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason – his reason translated into English is "Because under the logo there is unnecessary phrase Wir leben Autos". Also this and other nominations of this guy look like vandalism to me so I've already reverted them. --jdx Re: 19:19, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:35, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Bo pod logiem jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos. 78.10.135.248 12:06, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: As before: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 12:13, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mitzubiska (talk · contribs)
[edit]Watermark of RADIO ROCK ONLINE like in this gallery and of author Mitzubiska. In gallery author of photos Дария Мицубиська = Daria Mitzubiska. Uploader name is Mitzubiska, but anyone can register as Mitzubiska or even Daria Mitzubiska and upload these photos. So need permissions or originals without watermarks and maybe with original dimensions.
Dmitry89 (talk) 18:59, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Scans of documents and newspapers are without permission (as minimum no cc-by-sa-self). Scans of old photos - doubtful authorship. File:Войтенко Иван Иванович.jpg - the only file of user, where all seems ok.
- File:Рассказ 4 стр Войтенко.jpg
- File:Рассказ 3 стр Войтенко.jpg
- File:Рассказ 2 стр Войтенко.jpg
- File:Рассказ 1 стр Войтенко.jpg
- File:Газета статья Украина.jpg
- File:Статья газета 30 лет апобеды.jpg
- File:Поздравление Громова и Минина 2.jpg
- File:Поздравление Громова и Минина 1.jpg
- File:Характеристика Войтенко.jpg
- File:Ветераны 1-й гв..jpg
- File:Войтенко.jpg
- File:Войтенко И.И..jpg
Dmitry89 (talk) 19:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unusual dimension, no metadata, web-style, seems like copyvio. Dmitry89 (talk) 19:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Misleading summary; not the uploader's own work. The image is a video snapshot that can be found on other websites, as evidenced by a simple Google search. 23 editor (talk) 19:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
While the image does appear in the stated source (on page 728), there is, as far as I can tell, no information to support the uploader's claims that this was created in 1728 or that the author died more than 100 years ago. The source is a secondary source, as can be seen by the fouman.com notice in the bottom of the image. The specific source page in question is http://fouman.com/Y/Picture_View-Nader_Shah_Afshar_Rendering.htm. That server seems to be down, but archive.org has an archived copy. It credits Reza Forouzi as the author, but does not contain any information supporting the uploader's claim that the author died more than 100 years ago. According to this article, a Reza Forouzi described as an Iranian master painter was apparently alive to teach his technique to someone born in 1945. He is mentioned along with Mahmoud Farshchian, who is still alive. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:22, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No authorship. No reason to believe that this performance art piece was released under the GFDL. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:45, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Cover art. No indication that it was truly released under the mentioned license. Victor Lopes (talk) 19:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Not in the PD, since Artist died in 1960. The dates 1850-1870 here are probably wrong (the painter painted in a somewhat old-fashioned style for the 20th century). For the date 1960 see https://rkd.nl/en/explore/artists/46475 or w:sv:Franz Krischke. AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Сомение в авторстве и лицензии, см. источник переноса на Склад из Рувики https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Бугера_В._Е..jpg. Автор фото и изображённое лицо-один и тот же человек Dogad75 (talk) 20:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
The screenshot of the iPhone contains copyrighted content. This image was also uploaded for self-promotional purposes. Sunmist3 (talk) 20:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
I'm nominating this file as a precaution because although a version on Facebook [13] is a cropped version of this one, that Facebook page is associated with this website [14]. Also, I think the uploader has other files here without permission. The original full picture might have been taken down from the site. Another editor disagrees with me, but reading Commons:How to detect copyright violations I feel that this might be a case of "Photographs of items or from angles not accessible to the general public". Dontreader (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
don't look as an own work, almost all other uploads from the user were speedy deleted Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:45, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted image of Mark Hamill from The Force Awakens. TAnthony (talk) 22:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: I appreciate the upload, but Commons is the wrong place for what is, as far as I can tell, a copyrighted image that hasn't been released for free use. I'm open to maybe using a Force Awakens image if everyone else agress, though not in the infobox, later on in the article, if only to demonstrate how the character's changed -- but any image should be uploaded on Wikipedia, not here, and with proper licensing. @Jasonwilliamedwards: , if it'd be easier I can probably do the licensing and upload if you link me the source of whatever image. The Millionth One (talk) 02:48, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. This copyrighted image shouldn't even be up for discussion - it's a clear-cut copyvio case and should have been tagged with Speedy Delete.Cnbrb (talk) 12:46, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted image of Harrison Ford from The Force Awakens. TAnthony (talk) 22:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I think it might be best if we just discuss these three images, and any more that are uploaded here, in one place. My response is going to be virtually the same for all of them, and honestly, I think a speedy deletion might've been appropriate anyway. The Millionth One (talk) 02:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
imho copyright issues, rather 'profiling' 'family album' advertisements, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 22:28, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Author is probably the man next to Ban Ki-moon Velocitas (talk) 22:54, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
DR started to ask your opinions: nice image, but imho having seriously personality rights and copyright issues as showong females, but missing their permission for publication, hence imho out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 23:01, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
imho seriously personality rights and copyright issues as showing girls who are clearly identifiable as individual human beings, but missing their permission for publication, hence imho out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 23:23, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
sehr unschön wegen des eingeblendeten Datums Joschi71 (talk) 00:00, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
wrong author: user at project|Parys|wikipedia|cs; wrong date Goesseln (talk) 08:36, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 03:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mateusz Opasiński as Speedy (ek) and the most recent rationale was: reklama INeverCry 03:11, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 23:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
This page does not need to be deleted, but the photograph does. I lent that photograph to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library.. for their publication of "Dignity of Duty: The Journals of Erasmus Corwin Gilbreath, 1861-1898, Edited by Susan Gilbreath Lane with an Introduction by Carlo D'Este" ... and someone has copied it and published on Wiki. Take this photograph down. 71.179.251.8 13:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
The page was published by an intern FOR THE MUSEUM and was published WITH THE MUSEUM'S PERMISSION when the book was first published. Furthermore the photograph pre-dates copyright laws of 1923, as well as being a photograph of a government official (in this case a military officer) and is therefore public record.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:23, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
No permission. Please read OTRS and provide a valid permission
Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:48, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Please wait a few days before to close this DR, as a permission will be maybe send. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS Pending, Ticket in Queue. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:28, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Probable copyvio; looks like a screenshot of a news-station interview with the individual Veggies (talk) 20:02, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
I am Greg Feith, and any photos taken by the media or tv networks are mine and free to use. If you need to contact me, do so at [email protected] Thank You.
Deleted: per nomination - would need OTRS ticket to stay. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Not useful, unable to categorize. All the the aircraft carriers of the Indian Navy have good number of images for themselves. Regards, KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 06:10, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: It's the INS Viraat (R22). And it's an unusual perspecitive. So keep. --Sanandros (talk) 22:09, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Infineon 4MB DDR-SGRAM.png, which was taken from my old Flickr portfolio along with the biased (i.e. unsuitable for Wikipedia) description. Trio3D (talk) 19:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Actually, it is not a duplicate.
Yes, same photo cropped and rotated.
Kept: Not exact or scaled down duplicate. --Sanandros (talk) 22:23, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
This old photo was sourced from my discontinued flickr account back in the day. I've since uploaded a higher-res PNG on white background (File:ASUS V6800 Deluxe (Infineon DDR-SGRAM).png, and I kindly request this version to be considered obsolete and superseded. Trio3D (talk) 08:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Keep Not exact or scaled down duplicate. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.110.55.143 (talk) 04:50, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope per "Placeholder picture to be replaced with something better, later.": Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 08:31, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Response to deletion
The artwork used is the actual album cover of an album by the group which the article refers to - therefore it does have eductional purpose.
The copyright is held by Mr Richie George Turnbull who has given permission in writing for it to be used in this article.
I am not an experienced user of Wikipedia and I am trying to learn so please explain to me, someone, what happens next.
—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.106.12.22 (talk) 12:10, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Comment somehow discogs doesen't have that album. But the text would be probably even in UK be TOO as it is 2D white text on black background.--Sanandros (talk) 22:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Has a PD-GOV-UK licence tag but is dated September 1971. According to the terms of that licence, it needs to have been taken in 1957 or earlier, or commercially published prior to 1966 for it to be public domain. The source website [15] claims a non-commercial licence for the photo, which makes the photo unsuitable for commons.Nigel Ish (talk) 06:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC) Nigel Ish (talk) 06:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Thanks - you're right under the terms of the license which I can see isn't applicable to this image (or the others you have tagged for deletion. As a Crown Copyright image this image can be tagged with a UK Open Government License {{OGL}} - which I have done, and this will address the issue. Many thanks.
- From [16] "The OGL does not automatically supersede other licences, such as Crown Copyright, so if the OGL is not quoted covering the published material, this requires written confirmation before reuse under the OGL." Someone needs to show that this photo has been released under the OGL before this can be used here.Nigel Ish (talk) 08:42, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: © IWM Crown Copyright (HU 129804), OGL does not apply. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
1982 UK Government photo, with pd-gov-uk license tag. This requires the photo to have been taken before 1 June 1957 or published prior to 1966, neither of which is possible for a photo of this ship, which was launched in 1977 and completed in 1980. Source website gives a non-commercial license, which is incompatible with Commons. Nigel Ish (talk) 12:17, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Licence tag modified to UK Open Govenment License
_(St_Edwards_Crown).svg)
|
This file is licensed under the Open Government Licence version 1.0 (OGL v1.0).
|
|---|---|
|
You are free to:
See the Open Government Licence page on Meta-Wiki for more information.
|
- From [17] "The OGL does not automatically supersede other licences, such as Crown Copyright, so if the OGL is not quoted covering the published material, this requires written confirmation before reuse under the OGL." While current photos are released under the OGL, there is no guarantee that existing photos have been released. Someone needs to show that this photo has been released under the OGL before this can be used here.Nigel Ish (talk) 08:48, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: © IWM Crown Copyright (HU 129804), OGL does not apply. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Sehe keinen Sinn für das Vorhalten einer XCF-Datei (natives GIMP-Format), ein JPG ist ebenfalls vorhanden. Joschi71 (talk) 23:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: This image is uncropped (and XFC is allowed in Commons). --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete The pic contains copyrighted material which is not de minimis.--Sanandros (talk) 22:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete clearly of the advertisement — billinghurst sDrewth 11:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: contains copyrighted material not within de minimis clause. --Pitke (talk) 02:08, 16 August 2016 (UTC)