Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/07/16
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Because it is Nonsense, Blurry Oscarito (talk) 00:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
KEEP, nonsense no. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.125.180.82 (talk) 02:34, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Keep It's a perfectly viewable photo that includes a sculpture, and it's not blurry as a thumbnail for possible use in articles. How the hell is it "nonsense"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism: Clear case of revenge nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 08:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
G8: Redirect to deleted page "File:Bicycle evolution.png" Мельников Мадина (talk) 10:40, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, broken redirect. --Achim55 (talk) 11:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Mojo Mona Mojo Mona Team (talk) 20:03, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Mojo Mona Team: You don't have to nominate the same file twice! It looks like your own upload and you give no reason here why this should be deleted..? There was also a rename request declined, with a weird name to rename it to.. Please be clear and tell what you mean. Thanks! - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 20:20, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Mojo Mona Team: An IP-user, probably you, replied at my talk page. Please provide information, so we can see it's copyright violation, like a link, with the photo on a website. I can't remove it, an admin has to do that, and if you can link to a page where it is clear the photo is not free, it can be deleted very quick by an admin. This procedure takes a week. A quick delete can take one minute to approx. one day. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 20:49, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Mojo Mona Team: Please don't make new request, but reply here and read what I said above. Thanks. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Mojo Mona Team: An IP-user, probably you, replied at my talk page. Please provide information, so we can see it's copyright violation, like a link, with the photo on a website. I can't remove it, an admin has to do that, and if you can link to a page where it is clear the photo is not free, it can be deleted very quick by an admin. This procedure takes a week. A quick delete can take one minute to approx. one day. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 20:49, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- kept, no good reason given, no link to a site provided
-
- Nomination on file removed by Jeff. G - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Done - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:33, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as copyright violation. Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Uploader is globally locked. Also the uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 15:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
It's an image that is not useful for educational purposes, so it's out of scope - a photo of a commode with decorations meant to represent the uploader's private interest in dolphins. Pius (talk) 10:10, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:44, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Broken redirect Мельников Мадина (talk) 11:45, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 13:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
The source site (archived link:[1]) does not use GFDL. The original size image is marked on Flickr as "All rights reserved". Joofjoof (talk) 12:48, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- The photograph is released on Flickr with cc-by-sa-2.0 licence, thus the issue is over. -- Blackcat
14:53, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: The photograph is validly licenced. Blackcat 15:12, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Broken redirect Мельников Мадина (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 15:23, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Broken redirect Мельников Мадина (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 15:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Broken redirect Мельников Мадина (talk) 12:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- This redirect cauld be eliminate by the criterio G2 of Criteria for speedy deletion and was marked.Althair Talk 17:05, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be from https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=orQdgzgHWUw and status is unclear. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 04:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:59, 16 July 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: --Krdbot 19:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Child porn; caption says elementary schooler Dronebogus (talk) 11:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Strakhov at 11:24, 16 July 2022 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:초등학생의 음모가 난 성기.jpg: Child porn; caption says elementary schooler --Krdbot 19:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Useless generic photo of com:nudity, also it’s amusing how the uploader went so far as to blur out his damn shoes— maybe don’t upload pics of yourself naked if you’re paranoid about your privacy being violated? Dronebogus (talk) 10:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- photo includes the human body in nature, an example of naturalism. the photo is a good example of nudity in a non-erotic sense. Dronebogus resorts to cursing in order to make a point, what care is it of his of my privacy. he also resorts to an angry word like paranoid, when you have to assume motives in making your point, your point is rather weak. Thomas3David (talk) 11:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- We have plenty of considerably better photos in Category:naturism and subcategories, thanks. My “point” is your photo is not good and is weirdly censored, I feign no hypotheses about your motivation. I’ll give you credit for taking the time to respond but being offended by the words “damn” and “paranoid” in a half-joking context isn’t helping your case either. Dronebogus (talk) 14:10, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- I don't care about "I give you credit," your a troll spreading their unsolicited opinion and trying to downplay your hostility calling it "half-joking." I'm sure there are more important places for you to troll on the internet. Thomas3David (talk) 16:52, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- You seem to be convinced this is some kind of free speech platform where you are protected from scrutiny by others, yet simultaneously can insult people with baseless claims of “trolling”. You are w:responding to tone, not stating why your photo fills a meaningful gap in this collection that could justify its fairly low quality. Dronebogus (talk) 17:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- I don't care about "I give you credit," your a troll spreading their unsolicited opinion and trying to downplay your hostility calling it "half-joking." I'm sure there are more important places for you to troll on the internet. Thomas3David (talk) 16:52, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- We have plenty of considerably better photos in Category:naturism and subcategories, thanks. My “point” is your photo is not good and is weirdly censored, I feign no hypotheses about your motivation. I’ll give you credit for taking the time to respond but being offended by the words “damn” and “paranoid” in a half-joking context isn’t helping your case either. Dronebogus (talk) 14:10, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Dronbogus started with hostility, when called out for it they tried to cover with calling it "half-joking." Drobogus offers their unsolicited opinion, venturing that they are the judge on correct censorship. Bottom line, photo contains merit. A Caucasian American, uncircumcised, in nature. Examples of the human body in nature. Of an overweight male accepting his body. Re-connection with the Adam principle of our humanity. Drobogus should take their hostility and troll another part of the internet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas3David (talk • contribs) 16:50, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- And you can take your “re-connection with the Adam principle of our humanity” and annoy another part of the internet because you do not seem to understand that WMC is not a free web host and we have more than enough pictures of naked people that are better lit, in higher resolution, not covered with blur boxes, taken at notable nude recreational facilities, by professional photographers. Dronebogus (talk) 17:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:10, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Broken redirect Мельников Мадина (talk) 15:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:28, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - laut Bildtitel jedoch "Stephan Grunwald (c) Patrick Knittler-8737.jpg" Lutheraner (talk) 10:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Das ist so offensichtlich, das müsste man doch auch schnell erledigen können, oder? --217.239.3.204 23:53, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
GoogleEarth CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 17:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:31, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
GoogleEarth CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 17:37, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:31, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
And the following close-up images as well:
- File:Inuit engraved walrus tusk IMG 1248.jpg
- File:Inuit engraved walrus tusk IMG 1249.jpg
- File:Inuit engraved walrus tusk IMG 1250.jpg
Per the museum website, this object was created in the Soviet Union in 1971. Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Soviet_Union and Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia, that means it will still be under copyright, as it is too new to meet any of the PD exemptions listed there. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 03:53, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete good catch! Rama (talk) 20:06, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:58, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wildhorse3 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own works, per [2].
- File:Skining Pakistani goat on Eid ul Azha.jpg
- File:Pakistani Sikh celebrating Eid ul Azha.jpg
- File:Women from Pakistan 466.jpg
- File:Street vendors in Pakistan.jpg
- File:Street in Pakistan.jpg
- File:Small local market exit in Pakistan.jpg
- File:Small local market entrance in Pakistan.jpg
- File:Safa Gold Mall in Pakistan.jpg
- File:Road in Pakistan.jpg
- File:Local market in Pakistan.jpg
- File:Parking in Pakistan.jpg
- File:Bazaar street in Pakistan.jpg
- File:Carpet shop in Pakistan.jpg
- File:Greasy spoon in Pakistan.jpg
- File:Pakistani Earthenware Plate.jpg
- File:DHQ front.jpg
- File:DHQ Bhakkar 2.jpg
- File:DPO Bhakkar.jpg
- File:LSE Cultural Day.jpg
- File:LSE Aud A.jpg
- File:LSE football ground.jpg
- File:Banadi Shehak.png
- File:Pakistani musicians playing Daf.png
- File:Shrine of Syed Khair ud Din.jpg
Yann (talk) 11:35, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, most of my work has already been deleted, most probably because of copyright right issues. If you want to delete these files, you can, but all of these files are my own work. I didn't liked there at wikipedia because the users bite you there, when I started contributing on commons, I really liked the place. People are nice here, they don't bite. I observed that people here are polite and politely tells you how things should be done. I guess I was wrong, the first message which I received on my talk page was from you and it was a block warning. You could have left a message telling me about the copyright issues and I myself would have putted those files for deletion or would have explained to you about how I posses their copyright. Anyhow, I will be using wiki platforms very rarely from now on. If you don't want my own work, then you are free to delete these files. --Wildhorse3 (talk) 14:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- File:DHQ front.jpg has been copyvioed from here. Gotitbro (talk) 15:46, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
_Patrick_Knittler-8737.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![39 File:"Hadi.jpg".jpg](#File:"Hadi.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Alexander_Franchuk's_proposal_to_the_flag_of_Planet_Earth.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
![88 File:"Bria Janelle Atlanta Dream Red Carpet.jpg".jpg](#File:"Bria_Janelle_Atlanta_Dream_Red_Carpet.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Spain.svg){kind=link}
_Patrick_Knittler-8737.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Patrick_Knittler-8737.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Patrick_Knittler-8737.jpg){kind=link}
_Patrick_Knittler-8737.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:59, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal pic of very low quality, bot import Fl.schmitt (talk) 08:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:57, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Md Abu Yusuf Monna (talk · contribs)
[edit]SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
JopkeB (talk) 15:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:58, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
unused photo, no indication of notability, appears personal photo Oaktree b (talk) 15:16, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:58, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused picture of an unknown place; the original home page (www.lacioccolata.com) no longer exists; no educational value, unusable, out of scope COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 01:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete All that's needed for deletion is that it has a watermark. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:48, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused picture of an unknown place, no explanatory description, no educational value, unusable, out of scope COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 01:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
No own foto, belongs to Minube. Deletion OK. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.125.180.82 (talk) 02:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Watermark. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused picture of an unknown place, no explanatory description, no educational value, unusable, out of scope COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 01:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
No own foto, belongs to Minube. Deletion OK. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.125.180.82 (talk) 12:23, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused picture of an unknown place, no explanatory description, no educational value, unusable, out of scope COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 01:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo without further description, no educational value, out of scope COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 01:14, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:50, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of a non-notable person with no explanatory description, no educational value, out of scope; COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 01:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Own not. Deletion OK. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.125.180.82 (talk) 01:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:50, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused low res image without explanatory description, no educational value, unusable, out of scope COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 01:49, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:50, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused low res image without explanatory description, no educational value, unusable, out of scope COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 01:49, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:51, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Dukovina river does not exist, experiments, no usage Gampe (talk) 05:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination --Gampe (talk) 05:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:51, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, experiments, source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pc3Ui1aGDpI Gampe (talk) 05:27, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:51, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused pic of very low quality, unusable without context Fl.schmitt (talk) 08:50, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:52, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Trolling, no educational use Dronebogus (talk) 10:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Not educationally useful, OOS Dronebogus (talk) 10:37, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Useless low quality personal photos
- File:On vacation.jpg
- File:Hiking youtube.jpg
- File:Feet outdoors.jpg
- File:Travel hiking.jpg
- File:Naked hiking while traveling.jpg
- File:Naked hiking trail.jpg
- File:Penis outdoors.jpg
- File:Caught naked guy on woods cam.jpg
- File:Naked hiking.jpg
- File:Penis naked on trail.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 15:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:21, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Exhibitionistic garbage, low quality and no obvious use; also why is File:Erect penis hiking.jpg have his chest erased?
Dronebogus (talk) 10:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:54, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
The images here > https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/amogus < likely do not have a free license. The original image comes from https://www.reddit.com/r/antifastonetoss/comments/kyna35/stonetoss_is_sus_lets_vote_him_off/. that image is a photo shopped image from a political webcomic called "StoneToss", and they are believed to be copyrighted. Original unedited comic here > http://stonetoss.com/comic/little-bit/ 2601:40:C003:9550:C025:8328:2ABD:C8B3 01:26, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 01:38, 16 April 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1) --Krdbot 08:52, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, not own work (same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sus imposter ( meme image ).png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Medijed.png) Nutshinou Talk! 12:27, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:56, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
self-promotion, non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 15:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
![15:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/07/16#c-Oaktree_b-20220716152000-File:"Hadi.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:58, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
![19:58, 28 July 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/07/16#c-George_Chernilevsky-20220728195800-File:"Hadi.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: Advertising, the image as well as the description. JopkeB (talk) 16:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
G8: Redirect to a never existed or has been deleted Мельников Мадина (talk) 11:40, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete yes; it was a duplicate of another file, which I later discovered was a copyvio and deleted, so this redirect should go too - MPF (talk) 13:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Redirect to deleted page Мельников Мадина (talk) 11:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:54, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Broken redirect Мельников Мадина (talk) 14:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- This redirect cauld be eliminate by the criterio G2 of Criteria for speedy deletion and was marked.Althair Talk 16:49, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination / already done. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Broken redirect Мельников Мадина (talk) 15:07, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:54, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
This image is owned by the associated press, including according to the link provided as the source. It is not a work of the federal government. The website that this image comes from makes no such statement to its resources being in the public domain. -Aplucas0703 (talk) 22:32, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Images on the Senate.gov page tend to be public domain. Nevertheless, you are right, and I might just be the worst reader in the world. I will not contest. Mycranthebigman (talk) 15:24, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Turns out Associated Press's limit is 1963 as well. So close. Mycranthebigman (talk) 15:25, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- UPDATE: An email to the webmaster of the page confirms that the image comes from the Associated Press and is not in the public domain. Aplucas0703 (talk) 00:43, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- The Associated Press rarely registered for copyright, even for their most iconic images, and never renewed copyrights according to the LOC.
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:33, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Not Creative Common content Librero2109 (talk) 16:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Copyrighted by El Siglo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:16, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:34, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused image with the chronology of an unknown company, no explanatory description, no educational value, unusable, out of scope COM:HOST Feyth (talk) 22:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:16, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused image with an unspecified scheme, no educational value, out of scope COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 23:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:17, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
This is my photo. Poster does not have my permission. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=134059823349266&set=pb.100002357463551.-2207520000..&type=3 47.156.228.189 05:42, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No evidence of a free license. --Achim55 (talk) 08:40, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
this is mine JustinStanfield (talk) 08:50, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- What do you mean? The copyrights belong to you? Can you provide a link to a website or something else, where we can verify that? - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:11, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributor (F10), see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/block?page=User:JustinStanfield. --Wutsje 05:34, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ernesto Rosales 1103 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All of these files are certainly not the uploader's "own work" from 2022 as claimed. They need proper sources, authors, dates and rationales why they are either in the public domain or under a free license. If these things are not provided or not satisfactory, the files should all be deleted per the precautionary principle.
- File:Fernando Uribe Restrepo.png
- File:Humberto Murcia Ballén.png
- File:Alfonso López Echandía.png
- File:Toma CSJ 1985.png
- File:CSJ Alfonso López Echandía.png
- File:Gaitán en Moneda.png
- File:Bogotanos alzados en armas.png
- File:Muerte de Gaitán.png
- File:Gaitán en la Plaza de Bolívar.png
- File:Gaitán y su Campaña Presidencial.png
- File:Gaitán ante el Gongreso Liberal.png
- File:Eduardo Santos.jpg
- File:Enrique-olaya-herrera-1930-1934.jpg
- File:Pumarejo1940.png
- File:Marroquín XIX.png
- File:Pumarejo1930.png
- File:J.Holguín Maranillo.jpg
- File:SanclementeXIX.png
- File:Ospina Pérez 1946.jpg
- File:José Manuel Marroquín 1900-1904.png
- File:Sanclemente1898.png
- File:Ramón González Valencia Black&White.png
Rosenzweig τ 18:53, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep All images prior to 1942 as PD-Colombia. --RAN (talk) 04:37, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- That is not true. Images that have "1946" or "1985" in the file name are almost certainly not prior to 1942. The images with "Alfonso López Echandía" in the file name show a man who was born in 1932 and is certainly older than nine years in the images. Also, even if you don't write it, you treat them all as if they were anonymous. Without any sources, original publication etc. we cannot at all tell if that is actually the case. --Rosenzweig τ 11:51, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry if my words are ambiguous. I am trying to say "Keep all images [that are] prior to 1942 as PD-Colombia" not "Keep all. All images are prior to 1942 as per PD-Colombia". Several have the names of the author on the image, but they are pseudonyms. If they can be traced to a person, we can find a death date. Wiki Commons rules allow us to scan images, if they were pulled from the Internet they should be able to be found using the standard reverse image search and standard image search by name. The are several billion images online to match to. --RAN (talk) 01:54, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- I see. So you just volunteered to do these searches and find authors and death dates? --Rosenzweig τ 11:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry if my words are ambiguous. I am trying to say "Keep all images [that are] prior to 1942 as PD-Colombia" not "Keep all. All images are prior to 1942 as per PD-Colombia". Several have the names of the author on the image, but they are pseudonyms. If they can be traced to a person, we can find a death date. Wiki Commons rules allow us to scan images, if they were pulled from the Internet they should be able to be found using the standard reverse image search and standard image search by name. The are several billion images online to match to. --RAN (talk) 01:54, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- That is not true. Images that have "1946" or "1985" in the file name are almost certainly not prior to 1942. The images with "Alfonso López Echandía" in the file name show a man who was born in 1932 and is certainly older than nine years in the images. Also, even if you don't write it, you treat them all as if they were anonymous. Without any sources, original publication etc. we cannot at all tell if that is actually the case. --Rosenzweig τ 11:51, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- I already have performed the search and have not been able to match the pseudonym to a known photographer, I even posted at a Facebook group that specializes on photographers. --RAN (talk) 17:05, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete It's hard to tell for all the files, but most of them are certainly from after 1942. So they should all be deleted as copyvio per the precautionary principle. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:03, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Columbia is 80 years pma, so in order to beat the URAA, images must be prior to 1927. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:54, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ernesto Rosales 1103 (talk · contribs)
[edit]New uploads with the same problems. As before: The files need proper sources, authors, dates and rationales why they are either in the public domain or under a free license. If these things are not provided or not satisfactory, the files should all be deleted per the precautionary principle.
- File:Miguel Abadía Méndez.png
- File:Roberto Urdaneta 1951-1953.png
- File:Laureano Gómez.jpg
- File:GustavoPetro 2022.jpg
- File:Pedro Nel Ospina Vásquez.jpg
- File:Rafael Reyes Prieto1904-1909.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 23:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
These images are PD-Colombia as prior to 1942 and should not be deleted
[edit]- File:Pedro Nel Ospina Vásquez.jpg
- File:Rafael Reyes Prieto1904-1909.jpg
- File:José Manuel Marroquín 1900-1904.png
- File:Sanclemente1898.png
- File:Pumarejo1940.png author listed under a pseudonym "Ngala"
- File:Eduardo Santos.jpg author listed under a pseudonym "Panna"
- File:Miguel Abadía Méndez.png
- File:Pumarejo1930.png
- File:Enrique-olaya-herrera-1930-1934.jpg
- File:Sanclemente1898.png
- File:Ramón González Valencia Black&White.png
- File:J.Holguín Maranillo.jpg
Question So why are they on the Deletion requests page? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- These are the ones nominated for deletion that are PD-Colombia because they were created prior to 1942. They should not be deleted. --RAN (talk) 04:15, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- I see. I think the usual procedure is to put a strikethrough through whichever images in a group should not be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- These are the ones nominated for deletion that are PD-Colombia because they were created prior to 1942. They should not be deleted. --RAN (talk) 04:15, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Strikethroughs can only be done by the nominator to withdraw their deletion nomination. --RAN (talk) 17:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Only anonymous images published before 1942 are in the PD in Colombia. Not just any image created before 1942 as implied above. So we still need sources and first publication to be able to (perhaps) determine that they are anonymous. OR they can be kept with {{PD-old-assumed}} if they are at least 130 years old (template adjusted with the duration=80 parameter to accomodate Colombia's 80 years pma term). --Rosenzweig τ 11:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Comment For anybody deciding this, please also note that some file descriptions were changed by User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ), claiming that the author is anonymous and changing years without giving any evidence. So please check what was changed before deciding anything. --Rosenzweig τ 13:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Our rules allow you to scan an original image, it doesn't have to be downloaded from the internet. There are 750 billion images are on the internet, if you can't match one of these images with a reverse image search, or a simple name search, to the name of a photographer, you have performed all of the due diligence that can possibly be accomplished. --RAN (talk) 17:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:54, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ernesto Rosales 1103 (talk · contribs)
[edit]And another one. I will warn the uploader one last time; the next time it's a block.
Rosenzweig τ 15:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:55, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ernesto Rosales 1103 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Another batch of files related to politics of Venezuela, taken from various web sites, uploaded with CC licenses. File:Laidy Gómez.png is taken from a site called Poderopedia, which claims to be under a CC 3.0 license [3], but a reverse image search with TinEye and Google Images shows that this image was used on Twitter and various web sites since at least 2019, also in larger versions, so I highly doubt it originated from that Poderopedia site. I also can't find CC licenses for the others, and File:Freddy Bernal Gobernador.jpg I can't find at all at the source page that is named. So all those files should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless convincingly shown to be either under a free license or in the public domain.
- File:Laidy Gómez.png
- File:Freddy Bernal (2021).jpg
- File:Freddy Bernal Gobernador.jpg
- File:Escudo Estado La Guaira (2019).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 17:25, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:54, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
I don't see a CC BY license at the image source [4], and {{PD-Australia}} doesn't apply here. Materialscientist (talk) 03:22, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, you're right. I completely misread the NAA copyright guidelines. After reviewing them again I can see this image isn't going to leave copyright until 2028 at the earliest. Jimmyjrg (talk) 01:15, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- I've replaced it with a smaller version while the deletion takes place. I realise Commons doesn't allow Fair Use for copyrighted images, but figure it's better than nothing until it's deleted. Jimmyjrg (talk) 09:05, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:04, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Not own work. Librero2109 (talk) 05:40, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Question How do you know? Whose work is it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Foto of foto? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.125.180.82 (talk) 12:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Pic from here [5] Librero2109 (talk) 16:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. Delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:32, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you.
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
There's a copyright notice at the source and no evidence that this has been previously published or the copyright not renewed. DrKay (talk) 06:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
It's not clear from some inital searches if the agency that produced this is 'Federal' , The publication date is too recent to assume it's no-noticeor unrenewed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:05, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Query: Isn't this en:Northwest Power and Conservation Council? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:08, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
I understand there to be no FoP for 2D artwork as opposed to graffiti on buildings, underpasses etc in the UK Djm-leighpark (talk) 07:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: It's a painting so no FoP, and COM:DM and COM:TOO don't help either. --bjh21 (talk) 12:29, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:09, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
It's not clear from some intial searches if the agency that authored this 1994 publciation is Federal. 1994 is too recent to convert to a non-noticed work.
- File:1994 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program overview (1994) (16051929753).jpg
- File:1994 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program overview (IA 1994columbiarive00nortrich).pdf
_(16051929753).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:11, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Query: Isn't this en:Northwest Power and Conservation Council? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:51, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- It is , However I couldn't determine from the linked article if it's a federal agency as opposed to a regional one.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:44, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:09, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
imaginery flag masqarading as real/official on wikipedia 117.197.85.190 08:32, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:09, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Also:
I presume that this is an image that is not useful for educational purposes, therefore it's out of scope — a photograph of an unidentified location meant to somehow represent editing on Wikipedia. Pius (talk) 13:53, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment added additional images from this user with same issue; poor quality, random cat/apartment shots with no apparent educational value. Эlcobbola talk 14:07, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello,
There is little educational value in Wikipedia I'm thinking that all three pictures were entered at the same time that is rare that because the Bug looks totaled that it is not clear that little education is learned in Wikipedia is good reason for deletion of this picture!
I was not aware of this and Thank you for bringing this to my attention it is very sad when you loose your car and it brings a perk to my life to know it was a VW Bug! The New Volkswagen Bugs are not close to this type of Bug that had a sun roof. The Automatic Bugs that have sun roofs may be a little less accurate as far as Bugs are concerned! I did drive it to the Modeling Agency in Los Angeles that may be why I liked this advertisement that looked like a VW Bug!
Thank you, Laura I Redsecker — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:8801:3501:1600:9434:5CC3:6799:2C17 (talk) 14:47, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Эlcobbola talk 14:07, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:15, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Metadata credits RICCARDO CALLEGARI, doesn’t appear to be the same as the uploader. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:15, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Delete The work is not the work of the uploader but that of the town, which holds copyright. There is no evidence at the town's website that their works are available under any license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 14:12, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- This file is the reason why I added a disclaimer about copyrighted flags. I am going to be speak to the town about this and I will post their response. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 03:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- @SpinnerLaserzthe2nd: Please understand that it isn't enough to get their permission to use this work on Commons. You must ask them to explicitly release rights, and provide a means of confirming such, under a license compatible with Commons. See Commons:Email templates for more direction. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:33, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- I also asked them about that too and send them the link. UPDATE: I had asked the uploader if they emailed the town for permission. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 18:04, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- @SpinnerLaserzthe2nd: Please understand that it isn't enough to get their permission to use this work on Commons. You must ask them to explicitly release rights, and provide a means of confirming such, under a license compatible with Commons. See Commons:Email templates for more direction. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:33, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
_Alexander_Franchuk%27s_proposal_to_the_flag_of_Planet_Earth.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Alexander_Franchuk%27s_proposal_to_the_flag_of_Planet_Earth.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not within project scope DS (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
_Alexander_Franchuk's_proposal_to_the_flag_of_Planet_Earth.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
_Alexander_Franchuk's_proposal_to_the_flag_of_Planet_Earth.png){kind=link}
not within project scope - barely describable, and there's some attack material DS (talk) 15:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
These photos show works of a French designer named Jean-Louis Barrault, born in 1938. They look like they were scanned from some publications (or one from a Polaroid it seems), and unlike the photo of Barrault himself also uploaded by the same user they are not explicitely claimed to be taken by that user himself. So they should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless somehow convincingly shown to be either in the public domain or under a free license.
Rosenzweig τ 15:52, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
appears to be the professional image used at https://www.luxury-travels.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Amanera-Resort%E2%80%93Dominican-Republic-Casita-View.jpg Commons needs evidence that the uploader is the photographer or has rights to it Bri (talk) 16:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Wikimedia image filter
[edit]Not in use, out of scope. Self-vandalism protest images for long-irrelevant issue created by user who sadly vanished years ago
- File:Anime Girl upright censored for WMF.jpg
- File:Anime Girl-censored for WMF.png
- File:Figure in Manga style variation 1-censored for WMF.png
- File:Figure in Manga style-censored for WMF.png
- File:Fuwafuwa-chan-censored for WMF.jpg
- File:Mahuri-censored for WMF.jpg
- File:On the edge - free world version censored for WMF.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 17:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:19, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jayhai10
[edit]
First photo is copyrighted by Reuters, as seen on the bottom left of the image. Second photo is a low-quality profile picture, which is probably copyvio and not own work, as claimed. --reppoptalk 20:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:19, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry, poor composition, no conceivable use MPF (talk) 20:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:20, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Qatar does not allow freedom of panorama. JalenFolf (talk) 20:23, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- It's not a real photo but an image made with the computer graphics. Does it obey the rule about panorama? Илья Яковлев (talk) 10:18, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - either way it infringes on the architect's copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
File:The practical study of malaria and other blood parasites (IA practicalstudyof1908step).pdf
[edit]Christophers, S. R. (Samuel Rickard), 1873-1978, and this is a London published edition. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:51, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
This is a work by Fuller, J. F. C. (John Frederick Charles), 1878-1966, Published in London - It is not a work of the US federal Govt. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:51, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Published in London and the author died in 1966; not PD. Ciridae (talk) 07:37, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. 88.250.210.100 22:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep What do you think the limitations are in the scope of the repository of images for the entire Wiki family? They're clearly broader than you think. The smallest carillon in the world is out of scope for you? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:12, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:22, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
uploaded from offical website, no evidence of permission 웃OO 03:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
non free picture see metadata that read Author DIRK ANNEMANS Copyright holder DIRK.ANNEMANS@SKYNET.BE Hoyanova (talk) 08:33, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Hoyanova: uploaded by Dirk Annemans, so I don't see necessarily a problem in that? Encycloon (talk) 09:35, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- The CC license doesn't mean there is no copyright holder at all, that is only the case for public domain. Encycloon (talk) 09:37, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- What is the problem? Dirk Annemans (talk) 18:42, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Uploader is Annemans. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Com:penis Dronebogus (talk) 10:48, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Decent quality, been on commons for 10 years. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Dubious own work claims. The photos have a wide range of resolution and EXIF, unlikely for own work. Many, like File:Vivian Borgo.jpg and File:Claude Reynaud à la batterie.jpg, seem to be copies of other photos (possibly originally film). Some of this uploader's own work uploads (including File:(CreditPhatTran) ALEX.jpg nominated here) have copyright credits in EXIF. If the uploader is the photographer of any of these images, they should provide permission to COM:VRT.
_ALEX.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:Bessèges bis.jpg
- File:Bessèges 06.jpg
- File:Coriandre-2.jpg
- File:Vivian Borgo.jpg
- File:Denis Méd.jpg
- File:Phil Méd.jpg
- File:Résidence Kab'oc56.jpg
- File:(CreditPhatTran) ALEX.jpg
- File:JPG à la console.jpg
- File:Claude Reynaud à la batterie.jpg
- File:CORIANDRE 03.jpg
- File:Claude Reynaud.jpg
-M.nelson (talk) 10:53, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:08, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pmilanogj2016 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution and watermarks indicate these photos are not the uploader’s work.
- File:JOSE M MORENO.png
- File:Pza de Mayo coche 106.jpg
- File:ESTACION PIEDRAS.jpg
- File:ESTACION SUBTERRANEA.jpg
- File:PZA DE MAYO TERMINAL.jpg
- File:METROVIAS.jpg
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 11:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Светлана Жуляева (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works according to descriptions. May be out of scope also. File 5 has a watermark.
- File:Свадебный образ клиентки Wedding-stile 3.jpg
- File:Свадебный образ клиентки Wedding-stile 1.jpg
- File:Свадебный образ клиентки Wedding-stile 2.jpg
- File:Свадебный образ от Wedding-stile 1.jpg
- File:Свадебный образ клиентки Wedding-stile.jpg
- File:Свадебный образ от Wedding-stile.jpg
Юрий Д.К. (talk) 12:29, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:06, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Molgreen (talk) 12:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Bitte erst einmal nicht löschen: Ich will das als Beispiel für den nicht gegebenen Duplikatshochladeschutz der Commons-App nutzen --Molgreen (talk) 15:12, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ich habe den selbst gestellten Löschantrag entfernt und würde ihn wieder neu stellen, wenn ich es für richtig halte. (Ich nutze die Datei für eine Diskussion zur Commons App.) Wenn das okay ist, wäre hier nichts mehr zu machen. --Molgreen (talk) 15:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Processed as a duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE fantasy flags and symbols ("proposed" and "unofficial" mean simply "made-up"); violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". Heraldrist (talk) 13:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: Keep for now. This file is heavily INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
France does not have Freedom of Panorama, and the most prominent subject of the image is an architecutal artwork of recent construction in which copyright has not yet necessarily expired. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:10, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and PCP as there is no exif. --Gbawden (talk) 13:03, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
France does not have Freedom of Panorama, The right hand portion image prominently focuses on a work of sculpture ( the dragons head) , highly stylised and in which copyright has not yet necessarily expired. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- The person in the photo is the artist with her animatronic (robotic) figure. Supermanfan1979 (talk) 23:27, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Did you have a confirmed written permission of the artist to include their creation in the photo you uploaded? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:42, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 13:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
OTRS verification is needed to verify that the uploader is the copyright holder. Larryasou (talk) 13:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of SD Deixebre Brgesto (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 15:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
![15:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/07/16#c-Oaktree_b-20220716151900-File:"Bria_Janelle_Atlanta_Dream_Red_Carpet.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:59, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
![12:59, 1 September 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/07/16#c-Gbawden-20220901125900-File:"Bria_Janelle_Atlanta_Dream_Red_Carpet.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unidentified building, unidentified location, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 15:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This is an abandoned house in Vietnam. I've just added some categories. I don't think a photo which depicts an abandoned house is uneducational. See Category:Abandoned houses. ⁂๖ۣۜJon ♥ ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 15:50, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I agree, but there should be a file description and an approximate location. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:22, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: I added a file description. The photo was taken in Vietnam, that's all I know. The author didn't provide much information so it's hard to know an approximate location, but it's not a big problem. We know this photo shows an abandoned house and it was taken in Vietnam. See the same case: File:Abandoned house1.jpg. ⁂๖ۣۜJon ♥ ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 00:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Alright, the documentation is a little thin, but I think it's sufficient to Keep. The next step should be to change the filename to something meaningful. How about AbandonedBuildingInVietnam.jpg? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:44, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: Okay. I will rename it when the discussion is done. ⁂๖ۣۜJon ♥ ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 14:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Alright, the documentation is a little thin, but I think it's sufficient to
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:59, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation; can usually be uploaded to your local Wikipedia as fair use if an article exists (F1)
- File:المطاردة فيلم.jpg
- File:الطارمية.jpg
- File:جامعة الفلوجة.png
- File:كلية التربية ابن رشد.jpg
- File:كلية التربية قائم.jpg
--Karim talk to me :)..! 21:14, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:59, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Not own works, and no evidence of a free license.
- File:خلط العملات المشفرة1.jpg
- File:خلط العملات المشفرة.jpg
- File:CoinMarketCap1.jpg
- File:CoinMarketCap.jpg
- File:حياة الطيور كتاب.jpg
- File:أمين رغيب.jpg
- File:بيدء خضر السلمان.jpg
- File:ابراهيم العلاف.jpg
Yann (talk) 17:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
The double bond in 7-PET cannot be in the trans configuration chemically/geometrically (it’s like a trans cyclohexene, but much worse because of more constraint). Also, in both files stereochemical information is missing or ambiguous at some chiral centers. I have created File:7-PET.svg with the cis double bond as a replacement. Innerstream (talk) 21:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Innerstream: I informed the original author at User_talk:Meodipt#File:7-PET_structure.png of this deletion request. Let's wait for a response. Multichill (talk) 09:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sure, it is more accurate drawn the way you have done it - my intention was not that the double bond be trans, I just drew it that zig zag way so the picture looks less crowded but I can see that makes it look like a trans bond, which as you say it clearly isn't. Meodipt (talk) 07:14, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The "zig-zag ethene so it fits" bridge style is common in some sources, but clearly misleading. If we have a version that is visually clear and correct, should scrap the one that's not. DMacks (talk) 13:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:58, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
In these two structures, the position where there should be a cis double bond, there is a saturated group instead. Innerstream (talk) 21:35, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. There appears to be a contradiction among the various databases. In en:7-PET, the IUPAC name is "...-ethano..." but the linked CASNo 13965-63-4 says "...-etheno..." in the systematic names and draws an alkene, as does linked PubChem 203125. Conversely, ChemSpider 21106246 (cited ref for the nominated PNG) uses the "ene" name but draws a single-bond and has a molecualr formula with two more hydrogen atoms. UNII EA1GYF2V3I includes both "ene" and "ane" names, but has a molecular formula that matches the alkene. But ChemThe lead ref in the enwiki article appears to be doi:10.1021/ja00989a030, which uses the "ene" name and clearly illustrates an alkene. My older version of ChemDraw makes multiple mistakes in the hydrogenation level of compounds with these sorts of names. I give weight to CAS database and to ACS publication, rather than potential echo-chamber of databases. DMacks (talk) 13:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:58, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Doublon accidentel avec Commons:Valued image candidates/Anna De Noailles - Vevey - 03.jpg H2O(talk) 11:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:34, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2806:105E:14:73F4:9588:67B1:C635:DCB1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.boodhaer.top/ProductDetail.aspx?iid=140093551&pr=57.88. Transferred in 2020 from Flickr with successful review, but Flickr page is now dead. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Link given is dead. --Yann (talk) 12:20, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Turini2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: uses Tour de France logo, not in public domain (also it's not the official logo of Tour de France Femmes, anyway)|source=https://www.letour.fr/en/. Claimed to be PD-textlogo by well-established user, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:35, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts it clearly uses the official logo?! [6] The file claims to be based upon [7] this, which is clearly a copyright violation. I will be nominating that shortly.
- Regardless, the descriptions claims it to be "Logo officieux du Tour de France Femmes" - it isn't, that's also on wikipedia only here [8]. Finally, the author has been given a final warning for copyright, which should be noted. Turini2 (talk) 08:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- In fact, I can't create anything on Wikimedia Commons !!!! I'm shoking !!!! --ComputerHotline (talk) 15:37, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
![[6]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tour_de_France#/media/File:Tour_de_France_logo.svg){kind=link}
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tour_de_France_logo.svg){kind=link}
![[8]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tour_de_France_Femmes#/media/File:Tour_de_France_Femmes_logo.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 12:22, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused pic of very low quality, useless without context. Fl.schmitt (talk) 08:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete OOS. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:58, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:23, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Turini2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It's the official logo of the Tour de France, it's copyrighted [9]. The French wikipedia has not moved their image to Commons for this reason [10] . Ineligible for speedy per COM:CSD#F1: "This does not apply whenever there is ... a plausible argument that it is below the threshold of originality." Should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
![[10]](https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Tour_de_France_logo.svg){kind=link}
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 12:21, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
This is not a text logo. French admin favoring French logo. Let an impartial admin see this. 186.172.94.178 23:48, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think admin-shopping is appreciated, nor that it's appreciated to stereotype people based on nationality. And I'm pinging Yann. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:40, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Just text and a yellow circle. Yann (talk) 06:40, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I tend to agree that this is below COM:TOO France. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 09:32, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:24, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
wrong date (he died in 1982), could be copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 09:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:25, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
As per talk page, I can't believe that the uploader is the rightful holder of rights to the football club's logo. KPX8 (talk) 09:49, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 12:25, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Sicherlich kein eigenes Foto des Dargestellten, sondern aus einer Publikation abgescannt. Jbergner (talk) 10:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Aus meiner Erinnerung:
- Vor geraumer Zeit gab es einen Wikipedia Artikel über mich (Sukadev Bretz oder Sukadev Volker Bretz oder Volker Bretz), den eine Frau erstellt hat, die sehr umfangreich in Sekundärquellen sowie auf den Internetseiten von Yoga Vidya recherchiert hat.
- Dafür wurde ich gebeten, Fotos hochzuladen, damit diese eingebunden werden.
- Später wurde der Artikel gelöscht, weil ich angeblich irrelevant bin (Kleiner Hinweis: Ich bin Autor von über 10 Büchern, Gründer der größten Europäischen Yoga Bewegung, Influencer mit Zig-Millionen-Aufrufen von Videos auf Youtube und TikTok habe viele Vorwörter zu Büchern geschrieben; es gibt zahllose Zeitungsartikel über mich; ich werde zitiert in wissenschaftlichen Studien).
- Vermutlich sind nach Löschung des Artikels diese Fotos übrig geblieben, die anscheinend jetzt in keinem Wiki Artikel verwendet werden.
- Zu diesem Foto:
- Aufgenommen wurde es 1999 in Döttesfeld, von einer Ehrenamtlichen bei Yoga Vidya, die namentlich nicht in Erscheinung treten will. Sukadev (talk) 11:51, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uncertain copyright, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 12:26, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seru na to ty vyči (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyvios or useless porn
Dronebogus (talk) 10:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:29, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Managing agricultural greenhouse gases - coordinated agricultural research through GRACEnet to address our changing climate (IA Cat31100046).pdf
[edit]This appears to be an extract from a larger document, and it would be more appropriate to have that uploaded if there is a compatible license. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep unless we already have the larger document, this is not a valid reason for deletion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:49, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:30, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
1928 Work by a UK local government entity, Not a work of US federal Govt. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as {{PD-UK-anon}} (although signed by the committee chairman, he is almost certainly not the actual author). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:40, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:30, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
These are not works of the US Federal Govt... At best they are UK Gov comissioned artworks... Delete unless further information as to artists lifetimes can be found.
- File:Save the wheat and help the fleet eat less bread (IA CAT31127676).pdf
- File:Yes- complete victory if you eat less bread - the food Controller's ration is 4 lbs. of bread, per person, per week (IA CAT31127723).pdf
- File:Save the nation's bread national ration 4 lb each per week (IA CAT31127695).pdf
- File:"I risked my life" to bring you bread. " Use it carefully-save"One piece every day" keep to your rations!" (IA CAT31127719).pdf
- File:Eat less bread (IA CAT31127714).pdf
- File:Save the nation's bread national ration 4 lb. each per week (IA CAT31127693).pdf
- File:The_Kitchen_is_the_(key)_to_victory_eat_less_bread_(IA_CAT31125937).pdf
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:27, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as {{PD-UK-anon}} or possibly {{PD-UK-Gov}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-UK-unknown would still apply even if PD-UK-Gov does not apply, I would use both licenses until legal clarification takes place, for instance in the US stamp designs were public domain until the law was changed to allow the stamp designer to retain copyrights and sell signed prints of the stamp design, I think that was started in 1971. As to: "Delete unless further information as to artists lifetimes can be found" We already have all the tools needed to determine if an artist has been named, we have reverse image search and we have several billion images available through the Internet, if you can't find a name, no one else can either. --RAN (talk) 20:42, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:59, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Joofjoof as no permission (No permission since) Trockennasenaffe (talk) 11:28, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- This file was published by the creator under cc-by-2.0 on flicker, as documented by File Upload Bot
Speedy keep Trockennasenaffe (talk) 11:32, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This file was posted by the Flickr account of Werbeplanung.at, but the description says "(c) Bernhard Bergmann". Joofjoof (talk) 11:33, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:36, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
This is not a work of the US Federal Govt. 1929 UK publication. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as {{PD-UK-anon}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:33, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Renamed. --Yann (talk) 12:37, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
1933 British publication, Not a work of the US Federal Government. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as {{PD-UK-anon}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:38, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KotikJirdyai (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused photos of unknown people. 4th file likely isn't an uploader's own work.
- File:Чаша, полная любви.jpg
- File:Взгляды полные любви.jpg
- File:Береза и девушка.jpg
- File:Хлеб да соль по-русски.jpg
Юрий Д.К. (talk) 11:50, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. What's the evidence of an issue?. --Yann (talk) 12:41, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality dupe of File:Calmevening.jpg Юрий Д.К. (talk) 11:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Not the same image. --Yann (talk) 12:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by José Silva Azevedo (talk · contribs)
[edit]User has uploaded multiple images from different social media sources and claimed them as their own. Unlikely that these are own work.
- File:Estádio Hailé Pinheiro 2022.jpg
- File:Estádio da Serrinha (Canto Superior).jpg
- File:Estádio da Serrinha.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 11:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:58, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Only Template:Dati.camera.it is under a compatible license. The source link follows the default license. Joofjoof (talk) 12:07, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Request withdrawn This file is available at http://dati.camera.it/ocd/deputato.rdf/d22710_10 . Joofjoof (talk) 12:16, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Some of user' images stolen frow various websites prior to upload date. As all of the images has small size an no EXIF I think that all of them copyvios.
- File:Экскурсия в историческом парке "Россия - Моя история".jpg
- File:Экскурсия на выставке "Романовы" в Центральном Манеже Москвы.jpg
- File:Гости исторического парка "Россия - Моя история".jpg
- File:Атриум исторического парка "Россия - Моя история".jpg
- File:Интерактивная "Лента истории" в историческом парке "Россия - Моя история".jpg
- File:Интерактив "Крепости Древней Руси" в историческом парке.jpg
- File:Концерт для гостей исторического парка "Россия - Моя история".jpg
- File:Интерактив "Промышленность" на экспозиции исторического парка "Россия - Моя история".jpg
- File:Интерактив виртуальной реальности в историческом парке.jpg
- File:Дети на мероприятии в историческом парке "Россия - Моя история".jpg
- File:Гости исторического парка "Россия - Моя история" у интерактивов.jpg
- File:Юные гости исторического парка.jpg
Юрий Д.К. (talk) 12:11, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:57, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Une photo de meilleure qualité a été réalisée. Ltqphg (talk) 12:47, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Files by leader.ir are not CC HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:07, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 14:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:43, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Duplicated and low-quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Escudo-c.d._gares.jpg Brgesto (talk) 14:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Old jpg version of Ciclista-FC.png Brgesto (talk) 14:45, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:44, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of RCD Mallorca Brgesto (talk) 14:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:44, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of Onuba FC Brgesto (talk) 14:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:44, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of Llagostera CF Brgesto (talk) 14:47, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:44, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of Burgos CF Brgesto (talk) 14:48, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:44, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of Cordoba CF Brgesto (talk) 14:49, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of CF Rayo Majadahonda Brgesto (talk) 14:49, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of CD Ariznabarra Brgesto (talk) 14:49, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of Alhama CF Brgesto (talk) 14:50, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of CF Mentrida Brgesto (talk) 14:50, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of Cultural Leonesa Brgesto (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Duplicated https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Escut_Junior_FC.png Brgesto (talk) 14:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of UD Gornal Brgesto (talk) 14:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:47, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of UD Alzira Brgesto (talk) 14:55, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:47, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of CF Sant Julio Brgesto (talk) 14:57, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:47, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of CA Alpicat Brgesto (talk) 14:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:47, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Escudo del club en España y Escudo de la academia de futbol en Egipto.Ignaugurada hace 1 año..jpg
[edit]
Copyright violation property of CE Congres Brgesto (talk) 14:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:48, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Old jpg version of PNG version https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_Segunda_RFEF.png Brgesto (talk) 15:04, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:48, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
_Spain.svg){kind=link}
_Spain.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It looks like variant of flag of Madrid. sorry about that TucsonMager79 (talk) 21:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
_Spain.svg){kind=link}
- Keep Do you mean you think it looks like the former flag of Madrid? [11]. This is not the former flag of Madrid. We can clearly see the flag in [12], with the municipal council of Madrid.
- Or perhaps you are talking about the flag of the Community of Madrid? It is right beside the flag of the European Union. The Community of Madrid is a region, with many cities, etc., not just Madrid.
- Pointless nomination. If it were a variant flag, renaming the file would be the correct solution. And I believe it says somewhere that a supposedly incorrect file cannot be deleted, unless it is clearly out of scope. Flagvisioner (talk) 03:29, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
![[11]](https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/e/es-m-m_o.gif){kind=link}
![[12]](https://www.administracionpublicadigital.es/files/202204/almeida-y-alberto-microsoft.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:51, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
_Spain.svg){kind=link}
File:Barr's autumn and winter-flowering bulbs - July-September, 1933 - Barr & Sons. (IA CAT31340132).pdf
[edit]This is a 1933 wotk of British origin, It is not a work of US origin or US Federak Govt ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:48, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-UK-anon. --Yann (talk) 12:53, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Because it is Logo Caoimheen3 (talk) 22:48, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Caoimheen3 (talk · contribs) Yes, it is, but the fact it's a logo doesn't necessarily mean it breaches copyright, there are many more logo images on Commons that do not and they stay here for that very reason, besides, I created this image and I put the license that I decided because I am the author, so in conclusion there is no reason to remove it. Hunab 21 (talk) 01:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Did you create the logo, Hunab 21? The issue isn't whether you took a photo of it, but who has the copyright for the logo and whether the logo reaches the legal threshold of originality in the relevant country. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No, Ikan Kekek, I actually didn't, but I just corrected the license. This international organization is headquartered in Mexico, and according to mexican laws it's not eligible for copyright protection, therefore it must not be deleted. Problem solved. Hunab 21 (talk) 03:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- That's interesting. But how did you get the image? The Exif is just a bunch of weird numbers and letters. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- It was provided by the ALCE and is available here. Hunab 21 (talk) 06:44, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- That's interesting. But how did you get the image? The Exif is just a bunch of weird numbers and letters. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Did you create the logo, Hunab 21? The issue isn't whether you took a photo of it, but who has the copyright for the logo and whether the logo reaches the legal threshold of originality in the relevant country. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This logo has a background of some space photography, without determining if it has authorship, which makes it a derivative work of it. Taichi (talk) 05:30, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Oppose It's an official logo, it's assumed that the organization is the author of the entire composition, in addition, many images of space are from NASA, which release them to the public domain. Hunab 21 (talk) 06:44, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Hunab 21: You don't have to put up a confusing template like {{En contra}} to answer my argument, and I'd appreciate it if you'd refrain from sabotaging the process by removing the deletion request template or threatening users as here. I ask you then to reveal the original source (not a confusing link) of the original image if you presume that you took it from NASA. Taichi (talk) 09:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Taichi: Oh, sorry then, I didn't know it wasn't necessary to put a template like that, I'm new here, that's also why I removed the request, as I thought the problem was already solved, I'm innocent. And I put the source in the picture's description and in an answer above, but don't know whether the backround image is from NASA or not, just as you're not sure if it's a derivative work. Hunab 21 (talk) 15:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Hunab 21: You don't have to put up a confusing template like {{En contra}} to answer my argument, and I'd appreciate it if you'd refrain from sabotaging the process by removing the deletion request template or threatening users as here. I ask you then to reveal the original source (not a confusing link) of the original image if you presume that you took it from NASA. Taichi (talk) 09:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uncertain copyright, unless we know the source of the background. --Yann (talk) 12:55, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Sicherlich kein eigenes Foto des Dargestellten, sondern von jemand Fremden fotografiert, der hier verschwiegen wird. Jbergner (talk) 10:22, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Antwort:
- Aus meiner Erinnerung:
- Vor geraumer Zeit gab es einen Wikipedia Artikel über mich (Sukadev Bretz oder Sukadev Volker Bretz oder Volker Bretz), den eine Frau erstellt hat, die sehr umfangreich in Sekundärquellen sowie auf den Internetseiten von Yoga Vidya recherchiert hat.
- Dafür wurde ich gebeten, Fotos hochzuladen, damit diese eingebunden werden.
- Später wurde der Artikel gelöscht, weil ich angeblich irrelevant bin (Kleiner Hinweis: Ich bin Autor von über 10 Büchern, Gründer der größten Europäischen Yoga Bewegung, Influencer mit Zig-Millionen-Aufrufen von Videos auf Youtube und TikTok habe viele Vorwörter zu Büchern geschrieben; es gibt zahllose Zeitungsartikel über mich; ich werde zitiert in wissenschaftlichen Studien).
- Vermutlich sind nach Löschung des Artikels diese Fotos übrig geblieben, die anscheinend jetzt in keinem Wiki Artikel verwendet werden.
- Zu diesem Foto:
- Aufgenommen wurde es 1986 in Bayona bei Vigo in Spanien, von Madhana Mohan. Sukadev (talk) 11:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Sicherlich kein eigenes Foto des Dargestellten, sondern von jemand Fremden fotografiert, der hier verschwiegen wird. Jbergner (talk) 10:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Zu diesem Foto:
- Aufgenommen wurde es 2007 in Horn-Bad Meinberg, von einer Ehrenamtlichen bei Yoga Vidya, die namentlich nicht in Erscheinung treten will.
- Der Dargestellte bin ich, Sukadev Volker Bretz, geboren 3.2.1963
- Antwort:
- Aus meiner Erinnerung:
- Vor geraumer Zeit gab es einen Wikipedia Artikel über mich (Sukadev Bretz oder Sukadev Volker Bretz oder Volker Bretz), den eine Frau erstellt hat, die sehr umfangreich in Sekundärquellen sowie auf den Internetseiten von Yoga Vidya recherchiert hat.
- Dafür wurde ich gebeten, Fotos hochzuladen, damit diese eingebunden werden.
- Später wurde der Artikel gelöscht, weil ich angeblich irrelevant bin (Kleiner Hinweis: Ich bin Autor von über 10 Büchern, Gründer der größten Europäischen Yoga Bewegung, Influencer mit Zig-Millionen-Aufrufen von Videos auf Youtube und TikTok habe viele Vorwörter zu Büchern geschrieben; es gibt zahllose Zeitungsartikel über mich; ich werde zitiert in wissenschaftlichen Studien).
- Vermutlich sind nach Löschung des Artikels diese Fotos übrig geblieben, die anscheinend jetzt in keinem Wiki Artikel verwendet werden. Sukadev (talk) 11:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Sicherlich kein eigenes Foto des Dargestellten, sondern von jemand Fremden fotografiert, der hier verschwiegen wird. Jbergner (talk) 10:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Zu diesem Foto:
- Aufgenommen wurde es 2008 in Horn-Bad Meinberg, von einer Ehrenamtlichen bei Yoga Vidya, die namentlich nicht in Erscheinung treten will.
- Der Dargestellte bin ich, Sukadev Volker Bretz, geboren 3.2.1963
- Antwort:
- Aus meiner Erinnerung:
- Vor geraumer Zeit gab es einen Wikipedia Artikel über mich (Sukadev Bretz oder Sukadev Volker Bretz oder Volker Bretz), den eine Frau erstellt hat, die sehr umfangreich in Sekundärquellen sowie auf den Internetseiten von Yoga Vidya recherchiert hat.
- Dafür wurde ich gebeten, Fotos hochzuladen, damit diese eingebunden werden.
- Später wurde der Artikel gelöscht, weil ich angeblich irrelevant bin (Kleiner Hinweis: Ich bin Autor von über 10 Büchern, Gründer der größten Europäischen Yoga Bewegung, Influencer mit Zig-Millionen-Aufrufen von Videos auf Youtube und TikTok habe viele Vorwörter zu Büchern geschrieben; es gibt zahllose Zeitungsartikel über mich; ich werde zitiert in wissenschaftlichen Studien).
- Vermutlich sind nach Löschung des Artikels diese Fotos übrig geblieben, die anscheinend jetzt in keinem Wiki Artikel verwendet werden. Sukadev (talk) 11:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Wie auch immer, das Foto wird auf der Website reichlich verwendet, und die Bilder auf der Website stehen laut Impressum nicht unter CC-Lizenz. --217.239.3.204 23:48, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Sicherlich kein eigenes Foto des Dargestellten, sondern von jemand Fremden fotografiert, der hier verschwiegen wird. Jbergner (talk) 10:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Zu diesem Foto:
- Aufgenommen wurde es 2007 in Horn-Bad Meinberg, von einer Ehrenamtlichen bei Yoga Vidya, die namentlich nicht in Erscheinung treten will.
- Der Dargestellte bin ich, Sukadev Volker Bretz, geboren 3.2.1963
- Antwort:
- Aus meiner Erinnerung:
- Vor geraumer Zeit gab es einen Wikipedia Artikel über mich (Sukadev Bretz oder Sukadev Volker Bretz oder Volker Bretz), den eine Frau erstellt hat, die sehr umfangreich in Sekundärquellen sowie auf den Internetseiten von Yoga Vidya recherchiert hat.
- Dafür wurde ich gebeten, Fotos hochzuladen, damit diese eingebunden werden.
- Später wurde der Artikel gelöscht, weil ich angeblich irrelevant bin (Kleiner Hinweis: Ich bin Autor von über 10 Büchern, Gründer der größten Europäischen Yoga Bewegung, Influencer mit Zig-Millionen-Aufrufen von Videos auf Youtube und TikTok habe viele Vorwörter zu Büchern geschrieben; es gibt zahllose Zeitungsartikel über mich; ich werde zitiert in wissenschaftlichen Studien).
- Vermutlich sind nach Löschung des Artikels diese Fotos übrig geblieben, die anscheinend jetzt in keinem Wiki Artikel verwendet werden. Sukadev (talk) 11:57, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Although this is clealr a VA produced document, it may contains portion by employees that are not part of the Federal government. 1998 is too recent to consider the lack of any notice. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 06:50, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. This is
PD-USGovper page iii of the document. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)- That page says "Contents of this Monogrpah are within the public domain with the exception of material which was alreayd under copyright when received and appears here with the permission of the copyright owner. No portions may be reproduced in any form without the permission of the copyright holders." So there ARE portions of this that are NOT covered by the PD-US-Gov license. So it's a case of someone finding out which papers were already in copyright. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- That’s just a boilerplate message, like the one in the Congressional Record. Unless there is some specific work which is copyrighted within this work, that message is irrelevant. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:20, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- That page says "Contents of this Monogrpah are within the public domain with the exception of material which was alreayd under copyright when received and appears here with the permission of the copyright owner. No portions may be reproduced in any form without the permission of the copyright holders." So there ARE portions of this that are NOT covered by the PD-US-Gov license. So it's a case of someone finding out which papers were already in copyright. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Each listed author worked for the VA; no evidence of any non-USGov authors or material provided. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:41, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: File:Mapam 1988.png per nomination, kept File:Haavodameretz.png per COM:INUSE. --ƏXPLICIT 08:37, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
I take for granted that the licenses are incorrect, however are these below or above COM:TOO Israel. They are farily simple, by the US standards I would keep them all however by UK's standards some might be deleted. Can we get some clarity regarding Israel's TOO? I'm nominating both some of the simpler and more complex logos uploaded by Rh0809.
- File:Kahol Lavan Hatikva Hadasha.png
- File:National Union Jewish Home.png
- File:Dash1977.png
- File:Movement for the Renewal of Social Zionism.png
- File:Likud-Tzomet.png
- File:AliyahHadasha.png
- File:Halochamim.png
- File:Progressivit2.png
- File:LikudGesherTzomet.png
- File:Labor-Meimad.png
- File:Alignment (1977).png
- File:Shlomtzion.png
- File:Havoda (2016).png
- File:Havoda (1977-1992).png
- File:Shinui - 1977.png
- File:HaPoel HaMizrachi.png
- File:FightersList.png
- File:NatUnionMafdal.png
- File:Alignment.png
- File:TehiyaTzomet.png
- File:Libralit-Logo.png
- File:Dash Logo.png
- File:Telem (1981) Logo.png
- File:Ahdut HaAvoda Logo.png
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_Logo.png){kind=link}
Jonteemil (talk) 14:04, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Israel's TOO is American-standard at least since the Interlego A/S v. Exin-Lines Bros. SA ruling in 1989 , and certainly since the adoption of a new copyright law in 2007 (which replaced the 1911 British copyright act inherited from the British Mandate's lawbooks). Glide08 (talk) 22:09, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: below COM:TOO Israel per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 08:37, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect, and no longer in use. Oalexander (talk) 03:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:25, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of Real Betis Balompie Brgesto (talk) 14:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Sicherlich kein eigenes Foto des Dargestellten, sondern aus einer Publikation abgescannt. Jbergner (talk) 10:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Antwort:
Aus meiner Erinnerung: Vor geraumer Zeit gab es einen Wikipedia Artikel über mich (Sukadev Bretz oder Sukadev Volker Bretz oder Volker Bretz), den eine Frau erstellt hat, die sehr umfangreich in Sekundärquellen sowie auf den Internetseiten von Yoga Vidya recherchiert hat. Dafür wurde ich gebeten, Fotos hochzuladen, damit diese eingebunden werden. Später wurde der Artikel gelöscht, weil ich angeblich irrelevant bin (Kleiner Hinweis: Ich bin Autor von über 10 Büchern, Gründer der größten Europäischen Yoga Bewegung, Influencer mit Zig-Millionen-Aufrufen von Videos auf Youtube und TikTok habe viele Vorwörter zu Büchern geschrieben; es gibt zahllose Zeitungsartikel über mich; ich werde zitiert in wissenschaftlichen Studien). Vermutlich sind nach Löschung des Artikels diese Fotos übrig geblieben, die anscheinend jetzt in keinem Wiki Artikel verwendet werden.
Zu diesem Foto: Aufgenommen wurde es 1999 in Döttesfeld, von einer Ehrenamtlichen bei Yoga Vidya, die namentlich nicht in Erscheinung treten will. (Sukadev Volker Bretz) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sukadev (talk • contribs) 11:52, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not the uploader's own work per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 21:31, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
publiée sans mon consentement 2A01:CB1C:1A4:BB00:809A:F30D:CAA9:69D9 11:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Et vous êtes qui pour que votre consentement soit nécessaire à la publication ?
- Vous n'êtes certainement pas l'auteur de la photo. C'est moi qui l'ai faite. Bernard Grychowski (talk) 00:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, nominator's identity is unknown. --Rosenzweig τ 21:33, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission).
No rationale provided for speedy deletion. File has been hosted on Commons since 2012 and there is no external link provided on the description page, and so not eligible for speedy deletion. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:50, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Question Is there any deletion rationale? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek let's ping the speedy deletion nominator @Sahaib: . JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Info this file is also the subject of a Village Pump discussion (see this) with regards to a certain Leonel Sohns (talk · contribs) doing an easy yet destructive way to bring down this image file, by uploading blank white files and adding a {{Deletion error}} notice to look like the file cannot be deleted due to an error and must be deleted by admins in technical field. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:32, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
I will lean to Speedy keep as Sahaib hasn't responded for 5 days on why they tagged this file for speedy deletion. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:13, 21 July 2022 (UTC)But, delete the counterproductive file overwrites made by certain User:Leonel Sohns. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)- Slashing my input, as according to JMabel at Village pump this image may not be own work. I'm beginning to suspect that it is an official / professional one in which it cannot be easily self-photographed. This is the only upload of Reznickoff (talk · contribs). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:03, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per the precautionary principle, as it does seem very unlikely indeed that this was the uploader's own work. I couldn't delete the file as such because its first version cannot be deleted due to some technical error; I deleted the versions I could and moved the file to File:Deletion error 092.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 20:28, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Luis1944MX as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:08, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Slywriter as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: SiliconAngle Site has clear copyright reserved notice
From the talk page:
The source owner shared the summit content with CC-BY, including the image in discussion in the cover of an interview with Matt Hicks as you can see here: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=s2EeQChBGRc&feature=youtu.be
I hope that is enough evidence for you that there is no copyright violation as suspected. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 21:13, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- As I stated in the discussion page, same image asset is used in the stated YouTube video's thumbnail by the same company which specifically licensed it as CC-BY. The copyright notice on the blog doesn't target the assets but the overall blog content and brand, while the CC-BY notice on video covers the thumbnail.--Comrade-yutyo (talk) 09:11, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The video is under a valid Creative Commons licence.--Kadı Message 20:36, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Comrade-yutyo, please upload a screenshot from the video. Best, Kadı Message 20:41, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Comment There is no doubt the high-res photo and the video were created on the same day. But looking at the background, the currently uploaded version is just a degraded version of the photograph. It is not a a screenshot from the video. SVTCobra 03:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete After further investigation, the only connection with the YouTube video is as a thumbnail, which at best was fair use. I watched the video and tried to make the best screenshot I could, and it was this: File:Matt Hicks - Red Hat summit 2022 (cropped).jpg. While I am sure someone can find a better freeze-frame, it doesn't mean the subject of this discussion is not a copyvio. I believe it is a copyvio. And it is easily replaceable with free media. YouTubers often use stock footage or other high-res images for their thumbnails without owning the rights to do so. Mid-video screenshots are assuredly the work of SiliconANGLE theCUBE. P.S. I created Category:Matt Hicks Cheers, --SVTCobra 03:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:11, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Unpublished work where the death date of the author is not known. Per COM:HIRTLE, such work can be undeleted 120 years after creation. Joofjoof (talk) 10:21, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:11, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
МИД России не разрешает использование материалов в коммерческих целях MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 13:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:13, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
