Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/03/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
I want to renamet ゲルマニウム (talk) 06:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
I want to rename this file. ゲルマニウム (talk) 06:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Is this free image? 2600:100C:A206:F6CD:F45E:D13B:5FF4:7735 00:12, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep Yes, it was approved by COM:VRT. Please withdraw this deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:39, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: speedily. --Achim55 (talk) 11:31, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
license plates not blurred Alex Shhhh (talk) 10:18, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:37, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely own work tag and probable copyright violation. While during a brief search I have not been able to find this exact high resolution version, this image is used on companies homepage and also on the cover of their catalogue DJ EV (talk) 11:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 12:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Unused file Batarajafat (talk) 12:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Sekda Kota Depok Supian Suri menghadiri acara Penghargaan Pajak Daerah Tahun 2022 di Jakarta Global University.png
[edit]file tidak digunakan Batarajafat (talk) 12:31, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
tidak dipergunakan Batarajafat (talk) 12:36, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
F1. Clear copyright violation; Source has no free licensing available. The same image was uploaded in the year 2014, which is 7 years prior when this file has published. See [1]. Rejoy2003(talk) 11:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Hey. Gbty # 2600:1014:B062:2E42:983B:34C0:5DAD:AB45 14:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim55 (talk) 14:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
The picture is not of good quality, I will look for a better one. In addition, the Wikipedia article on "Berliner Zimmer" has a second picture. Auguste de Gouges (talk) 00:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Keep Generally you come up with the better image first. We don't delete images that are in use because someone might find a better one in the future. --RAN (talk) 04:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)- Außerdem wird durch das Löschen nichts gewonnen - gelöschte Dateien bleiben intern erhalten und werden nur unsichtbar. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 15:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 15:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Please delete because of the personal information in the meta data. Sorry, I'm not that good technically and have only now changed it and uploaded it again Auguste de Gouges (talk) 16:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, now at File:Grundriss Berliner Miethaus um 1896.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 20:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
After contact with the copyright holder: they explicitly changed their licensing from something vague that could be interpreted as public domain to a CC-BY-NC-ND license, which is forbidden on Wikimedia. Liolegionellab (talk) 14:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:37, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Он вредный 2A00:1FA1:431E:E44B:2523:84E:2ECE:6609 18:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Can you elaborate a bit? What it harmful about it? #!George Shuklin (talk) 18:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 19:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Please delete because of the personal information in the meta data. Sorry, I'm not that good technically and have only now changed it and uploaded it again Auguste de Gouges (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, now at File:Aline Hundt.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 20:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
File has an error and will not load on page RachelHAllen (talk) 18:37, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
I don't see any error or malfunction.--Achim55 (talk) 19:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)- I do, but not just for this file, but for many files. Apparently there is some server trouble going on. But I don't think this file is to blame or has an error. --Rosenzweig τ 19:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- That's weird: Some resolutions work, others do not. 100px or 240px are displayed, 90 or 160 or 180px are not. Not sure if that's because of the image itself. --Achim55 (talk) 20:07, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- What a miracle, now it works, as if by magic... --Achim55 (talk) 20:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- I do, but not just for this file, but for many files. Apparently there is some server trouble going on. But I don't think this file is to blame or has an error. --Rosenzweig τ 19:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, apparently there were some server problems. --Rosenzweig τ 20:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
mistake in type Cinascorp (talk) 20:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 21:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joeri.Steegmans (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright has not expired, erroneous upload
- File:Kerstdag, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0772.II.jpg
- File:Muzikanten, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0771.II.jpg
- File:Verso Kantklossers, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0770.II.jpg
- File:Recto Interieur met trap en kast, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0770.II.jpg
- File:Geboorte van Christus, verso, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0769.II.jpg
- File:Geboorte van Christus, recto, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0769.II.jpg
- File:Verso Visitatie van een engel, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0768.II.jpg
- File:Studie van tegels, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0767.II.jpg
- File:Recto Christus en pontius Pilatus, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0768.II.jpg
- File:Studie van een laken, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0766.II.jpg
- File:Schetsjes van vrouwenhoofden, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0765.II.jpg
- File:Christus aan het kruis, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0764.II.jpg
- File:Linkerbeen, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0763.II.jpg
- File:Verso Meisje met brood in profiel, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0762.II.jpg
- File:Recto Zittende vrouw en jongeling, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0762.II.jpg
- File:Marabout, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0761.II.jpg
- File:Verso Man in toga, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0760.II.jpg
- File:Recto Bijbels tafereel, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0760.II.jpg
- File:Verso Portret van een vrouw met sluier, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0759.II.jpg
- File:Recto Portret van een kalende man, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0759.II.jpg
- File:Uitbundige vrouw, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0758.II.jpg
- File:Verso Geadresseerde enveloppe, 1914, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0757.II.jpg
- File:Detailstudie van zadeldak, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0756.II.jpg
- File:Detailstudie van stof, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0755.II.jpg
- File:Haardtoebehoren, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0754.II.jpg
- File:Dood paard, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0753.II.jpg
- File:Architectuurontwerp voor Engels klooster, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0703.II.jpg
- File:Bloeiende boom, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0701.II.jpg
- File:Bloeiende boom en rozenstruik, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0702.II.jpg
- File:Bloeiende boom, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0700.II.jpg
- File:Processie, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0699.II.jpg
- File:Christus rust, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0695.II.jpg
- File:Engel, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0694.II.jpg
- File:Christus wordt aan het kruis genageld, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0692.II.jpg
- File:Achtergevel, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0693.II.jpg
- File:Religieuze figuur omringd door mensen, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0691.II.jpg
- File:Verso Jozef, Maria en Christus, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0690.II.jpg
- File:Recto De aanbidding der herders, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0690.II.jpg
- File:Volkse optocht in de sneeuw, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0689.II.jpg
- File:Verso Studie van Bijbelse figuren, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0686.II.jpg
- File:Recto Gevangenen, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0686.II.jpg
- File:Zittende naakte vrouw, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0685.II.jpg
- File:Britse soldaat met geweer, 1892, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0684.II.jpg
- File:Studie voor Kerstnacht, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0683.II.jpg
- File:Britse soldaat, 1892, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0682.II.jpg
- File:Studie van handen en liggende hond, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0681.II.jpg
- File:Portret van een oude vrouw met pijpmuts, 1892, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0680.II.jpg
- File:Studie voor glasramen van het stadhuis (Brugge), verso, 1895, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0679.II.jpg
- File:Studie voor glasramen van het stadhuis (Brugge), recto, 1895, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0679.II.jpg
- File:Verso Studie van twee naakte mannen, een naakte vrouw en een hoofd van een vrouw, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0678.II.jpg
- File:Recto Studie van moeder met kind en naakte man, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0678.II.jpg
- File:Verso Stadsgezicht met kerktoren, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0676.II.jpg
- File:Recto Biddend meisje, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0676.II.jpg
- File:Romeinse soldaat met kortzwaard, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0674.II.jpg
- File:Man vastgebonden aan boom, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0673.II.jpg
- File:Stilleven van een dode vogel, 1887, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0672.II.jpg
- File:Verso Man in militair uniform, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0671.II.jpg
- File:Recto Man in militair uniform, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0671.II.jpg
- File:Verso Eenlaagshuisje met bomen voor, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0670.II.jpg
- File:Recto Portret van een onbekende vrouw, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0670.II.jpg
- File:Boomlandschap met figurant, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0669.II.jpg
- File:Studie van handen, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0752.II.jpg
- File:Naakte vrouw, 1891, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0751.II.jpg
- File:Studie van hoofden, voeten en honden, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0750.II.jpg
- File:Witte bloesems, 1902, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0749.II.jpg
- File:Portret van een jongeman, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0748.II.jpg
- File:Jongen met pet, 1892, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0747.II.jpg
- File:Naakte vrouw vooroverbuigend, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0746.II.jpg
- File:Profiel van een vrouw, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0745.II.jpg
- File:Knielende vrouw, 1892, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0744.II.jpg
- File:Vijf zusters, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0743.II.jpg
- File:Poortgebouw met traptoren, 1887, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0742.II.jpg
- File:Drie kantklossers, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0741.II.jpg
- File:Studie voor kapsels en hoofddeksels, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0740.II.jpg
- File:Verso Herberg 't Onze Vrouwtje, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0739.II.jpg
- File:Recto Portret van een zuster, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0739.II.jpg
- File:Spyskaart, 1892, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0738.II.jpg
- File:Portret van een naakte zittende vrouw, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0736.II.jpg
- File:Liggende naakte vrouw, 1891, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0737.II.jpg
- File:Portret van vrouw die iets aanbiedt, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0735.II.jpg
- File:Portret van vrouw in kapmantel, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0734.II.jpg
- File:Verso Schets van een tafereel, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0733.II.jpg
- File:Recto Hurkende man, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0733.II.jpg
- File:Staand naaktmodel, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0732.II.jpg
- File:Verso Staand naakt, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0731.II.jpg
- File:Recto Staand vrouwelijk naakt, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0731.II.jpg
- File:Zittende zuster, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0730.II.jpg
- File:Staande naakte vrouw, 1891, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0729.II.jpg
- File:Studie voor engelen met kleuraanduiding, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0728.II.jpg
- File:Liggende naakte vrouw, 1891, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0727.II.jpg
- File:Twee engelen, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0726.II.jpg
- File:Staande naakte vrouw, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0725.II.jpg
- File:Soldaat met geweer, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0724.II.jpg
- File:Maria met kind en man met staf, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0723.II.jpg
- File:Luchtbogen en spitsboogvensters van een kerk, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0722.II.jpg
- File:Brugsche Vischvrouwen, 1887, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0721.II.jpg
- File:Winterlandschap met boer, 1887, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0720.II.jpg
- File:Duiventoren De Zeven Torentjes, 1887, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0719.II.jpg
- File:Bouwval van Dudzeele, 1887, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0718.II.jpg
- File:Verso Het offer van Noach, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0717.II.jpg
- File:Recto Man met blik ten hemel gericht, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0717.II.jpg
- File:Vrouw met pijpmuts, 1892, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0715.II.jpg
- File:Verwonderde jongen op klompen, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0716.II.jpg
- File:Soldaat met bajonetgeweer, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0714.II.jpg
- File:Studie van het Engels klooster, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0713.II.jpg
- File:Wandelende putti, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0712.II.jpg
- File:Portret van een man in profiel, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0710.II.jpg
- File:Christus wordt aan het kruis genageld, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0711.II.jpg
- File:Aanbiddende vrouw, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0709.II.jpg
- File:De doop van Christus, 1894, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0708.II.jpg
- File:Rivierlandschap, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0707.II.jpg
- File:Witte bloesems, 1902, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0705.II.jpg
- File:Rivier in boslandschap, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0706.II.jpg
- File:Interieurstudie voor Engels klooster, 1884, Musea Brugge, 0020.GRO0704.II.jpg
Joeri.Steegmans (talk) 11:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Please remove these files, as they were wrongfully uploaded. Joeri.Steegmans (talk) 11:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jarekt (talk) 03:15, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joeri.Steegmans (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violations, please remove
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2472 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2373 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2372 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2371 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2370 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2369 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2368 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2367 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2366 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2365 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2364 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2363 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2362 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2361 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2347 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2346 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2345 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2344 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2343 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2342 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2341 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2340 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2339 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2338 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2337 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2336 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2335 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2334 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2306 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2305 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2304 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2303 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2302 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2300 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2299 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2298 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2297 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2296 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2295 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2294 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2293 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2292 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2291 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2290 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2252 XXXI.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2251 XXXI.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2250 XXXI.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2249 XXXI.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2248 XXXI.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2246 XXXI.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1465 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1451 I.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1450 I.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1449 I.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1427 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1116 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1115 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1111 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1110 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1109 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1057 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1056 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1055 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1053 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1052 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1051 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1050 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1049 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1048 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1048-1053 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1047 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1046 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1041 II.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1039 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1033 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1032 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1031 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1030 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1029 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1028 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1027 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1026 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1025 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1024 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1023 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1022 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1021 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1020 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1014 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1011 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1010 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1009 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1005 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1001 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1000 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0999 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0998 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0997 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0995 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0992 II.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0949 II.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0948 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0934 II.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0928 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0927 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0914 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0913 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0911 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0910 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0904 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0901 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0897 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0895 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0894 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0893 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0892 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0891 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0889 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0888 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0887 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0886 II.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0885 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0884 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0883 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0882 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0881 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0880 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0879 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0878 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0876 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0873 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0872 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0871 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0870 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0869 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0868 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0867 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0857 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0856 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0855 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0854 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0853 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0852 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0851 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0850 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0849 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0848 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0847 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0846 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0738 II.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0732 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0731 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0720 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0713 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0712 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0711 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0710 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0709 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0708 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0707 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0706 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0705 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0704 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0703 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0641 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0635 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0591 II.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0573 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0571 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0544 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0543 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0542 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0541 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0531 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0530 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0529 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0528 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0527 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0526 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0525 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0524 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0521 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0521 05 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0521 04 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0521 03 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0521 02 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0521 01 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0520 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0519 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0515 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0510 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0499 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0498 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0497 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0495 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0494 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0493 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0492 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0491 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0481 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0479 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0478 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0477 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0476 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0475 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0474 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0473 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0472 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0471 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0470 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0465 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0464 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0462 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0461 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0459 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0458 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0457 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0456 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0452 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0451 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0450 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0448 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0447 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0446 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0445 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0441 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0440 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0432 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0415 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0406 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0405 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0399 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0391 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0390 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0389 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0388 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0387 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0384 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0383 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0382 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0381 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0380 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0379 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0365 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0364 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0363 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0360 II.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0347 II.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO0345 III.jpg
Joeri.Steegmans (talk) 14:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please remove these files, as they were wrongfully uploaded. Joeri.Steegmans (talk) 15:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete IIANM these files were all uploaded on Feb. 22 and therefore would have qualified for SD at the time this request was opened, had Joeri.Steegmans instead tagged them with {{My bad upload}}. So I don’t think any discussion is required, even though the week for ‘uploader remorse’ has now passed.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 19:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your response. At the time I was not aware of the speedy deletion policy. Does that mean the files will be deleted eventually, but it might take a long time? Joeri.Steegmans (talk) 21:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joeri.Steegmans (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violations, please remove.
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO2192 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1037 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1036 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1035 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1034 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1019 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1018 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1017 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1016 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1015 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1013 III.jpg
- File:Musea Brugge, HUB, 2014 GRO1012 III.jpg
Joeri.Steegmans (talk) 15:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please remove these files, as they were wrongfully uploaded. Joeri.Steegmans (talk) 15:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
this painting by Lui Shou-Kwan (d. 1975) will not be subject to PD-China until 2026 DS (talk) 19:31, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:17, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
this artwork by Irene Chou-Lu-Yun (d.2011) (see File:HK TST 尖沙咀 Tsim Sha Tsui HKMOA 香港藝術館 Hong Kong Museum of Art December 2021 Px3 067.jpg for metadata) will not be subject to PD-China until 2062 DS (talk) 20:06, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Picture by Karl Lagerfeld, according to the uploader on the draft. Yann (talk) 22:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Lagerfeld having died in 2019, there is no chance that he uploaded one of his photos to Commons under a pdeudonym in 2023. Obvious copyvio. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:17, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:19, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
This is not a 1904 photograph. This was probably taken in either the 1920s or the 1930s and the source has a copyright notice next to the photograph. Delete per COM:PCP. Abzeronow (talk) 16:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
1940s German photograph. It could be public domain in Germany but U.S. copyright for it was likely restored by URAA as there is no indication this was seized during the war. Abzeronow (talk) 16:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; lacking info needed to determine actual copyright status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:13, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Low quality and missing lots of stereochemistry; have File:Bufotoxin.svg as replacement. DMacks (talk) 22:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Delete. Stereochemistry is key to the properties of biological molecules such as this, so this depiction is incomplete without it. There is a high quality alternative with stereochemcial information that should be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 12:43, 15 March 2023 (UTC)- Delete, new one is nice enough. I do like the charges on the nice COO- and =NH2+ bits, but for that we can edit the SVG. --Artoria2e5 contribs 05:58, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:30, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 13:18, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep all. You don't have the right to have all your uploads deleted after 8 years, when they include useful images, and requesting deletion based on a vague assertion of a personal reason is not going to do it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:03, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
there are other much better crop photos of this politician with the same proportions Przelijpdahl (talk) 00:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Usable, and having 17 photos of this man, only 6 of which show him by himself, is hardly overwhelming. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:18, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Source is https://www.instagram.com/p/CHvcHZiFoF7/, which is not licensed under any reasonable license for the project. Brunnaiz (talk) 01:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Image is found in other places online, uploader is not likely the owner. discospinster (talk) 02:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
File:President Joe Biden and Prime Minister Rishi Sunak participate in a bilateral meeting.png
[edit]Unused PNG files superseded by JPG files A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No need to delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING issues. Hog Farm (talk) 04:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Its my upload and I don't want to have the picture up here anymore. Rsuvnaarrt (talk) 23:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- KeepLuckily Wikimedia Commons is not a private webhost, your desire to host it here is not relevant. The only important factor is the educational value (which it has) and the licence (which is free). VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 14:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - such poor quality that it has no potential educational uses. --Claritas (talk) 23:00, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - Per authors request/unused. Tiptoety talk 00:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete i say if the uploader wants it removed, remove it. Besides there's tons of explicit photos of all sorts of genitalia here. Not like we need more.PumpkinSky talk 01:01, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete user request. Beta M's statement about about Commons not being a private webhost is why we should respect self-nom deletions. This not being a private webhost is a reason to delete and not to keep. Commons' philosophy is that we should never feel like we are forced into a situation with ethical concerns, and keeping images against the will of an individual really crosses into one. Ottava Rima (talk) 05:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- That may be some "philosophy" but it surely isn't a policy. The policy doesn't allow people to stop commercial use or use to promote some cause they disagree with. And saying that because i said that Commons isn't a private webhost (which it isn't) and therefore we must become one because you found some philosophy page (could you provide a link please) really amazes me. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 16:05, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- The Commons considers ethical concerns, and keeping an easily replaceable file just because would go against what would seem to be ethical. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:08, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- That may be some "philosophy" but it surely isn't a policy. The policy doesn't allow people to stop commercial use or use to promote some cause they disagree with. And saying that because i said that Commons isn't a private webhost (which it isn't) and therefore we must become one because you found some philosophy page (could you provide a link please) really amazes me. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 16:05, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per consensus. --ZooFari 01:44, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by D. Benjamin Miller as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo of copyrighted text. Copyright notice is even present on the sign itself. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Photo of non-free text. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:54, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
copyvio, Bracque did 1963, no permission 95.116.152.202 09:39, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
no permission from author copyrighted image see metadata - " "koen broos www.koenbroos.be mail@koenbrlos.be 0032477281130 " Copyright holder 0477281130 mobil" Hoyanova (talk) 09:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:34, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:36, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:36, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability https://www.youtube.com/user/dmc4293 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:37, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability https://www.instagram.com/dj.bvdab/ , Unrecognizable person CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability https://www.instagram.com/dj.bvdab/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:39, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability https://www.instagram.com/dj.bvdab/ , Unrecognizable person CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:39, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Selfie of non-notable subject, out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Probably too small for an own work, poor quality. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 13:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Pre-1951 photograph, likely taken sometime between 1925 and 1935. Would need information on the provenance of this photograph to determine its copyright status. Abzeronow (talk) 16:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: low quality artwork with no foreseeable education value. Mys_721tx (talk) 16:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Violation of architect's copyright! There is no freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia; therefore, this photo under a commercial license violates architect's copyright. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Abraj Al Bait Towers. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Violation of architect's copyright! There is no freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia; therefore, this photo under a commercial license violates architect's copyright. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Abraj Al Bait Towers. This photo is a submission under Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 – Saudi Arabian leg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Failed blurred photo, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Unused failed blurry photo, nothing distinguishable, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
out of com:PS Hanooz 20:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Previously published at https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2929029140575028. Please see COM:VRT for directions in verifying the license. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 11:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: this PDF has an "All rights reserved" disclaimer on page 2. MKFI (talk) 11:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality fan art Trade (talk) 16:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 16:52, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 16:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
From Facebook 181.43.4.47 18:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No evidence that this 1980s popstar photo from an unknown photographer is in the public domain. Belbury (talk) 18:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- When I did a reverse image search of this image, it didn't catch any results, so I figured that the original copyright holder no longer had the photo. Misterspaceman (talk) 18:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- An image failing to return results in a reverse image search is not evidence that it is public domain. Belbury (talk) 18:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you for the insight. Misterspaceman (talk) 19:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- An image failing to return results in a reverse image search is not evidence that it is public domain. Belbury (talk) 18:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be taken from https://hiyamaya.net/photographs/, not freely licensed Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of free license. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Category:Burned dolma? 181.43.4.47 19:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a deletion reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Authentic representation of the cooking in Kosovo. --Arianit (talk) 10:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry for the people of Kosovo. Please be careful, burned food may cause cáncer. 181.43.4.47 12:37, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Now you're trolling. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:54, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Can you cook them again, without burning, and then take a photo? 181.43.4.47 19:51, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Some people like seared peppers. Anyway, aesthetic disagreements or other matters of taste are not deletion reasons. Post to the photographer's user talk page with a request, if you like. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This is how they are cooked. Please don't delete the photo. --Arianit (talk) 09:49, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This is how my mom cooks dolmas all the time, why would that be a reason for the photo to be deleted? -- Berishasinan (talk) 11:00, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- So you eat burned food all the time or is it only about dolmas? 181.43.4.47 12:34, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
out of com:PS.
Hanooz 20:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
User has uploaded various medium-resolution, no-EXIF images which exist elsewhere online all credited to different photographers. I started searching and flagging them individually but every single one has been a copyvio.
- File:Gushengerera no kubaza abakuru.jpg
- File:Umupfumu.jpg
- File:Guterekera.jpg
- File:Ibibindi.jpg
- File:Isombe itetse.jpg
- File:Gusekura isombe.jpg
- File:Gutera Intambwe.jpg
- File:Kwitaza cyangwa kwikanga.jpg
- File:Umushumba wamatungo.jpg
- File:Gukurikirana Urutoki.jpg
- File:Gukurikirana Umurima.jpg
- File:Kwihengeka ufashwe nagatotsi.jpg
- File:Inzu ya kinyarwanda 02.jpg
- File:Inzu ya kinyarwanda 01.jpg
Belbury (talk) 13:10, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Some of the files were already speedily deleted by Túrelio: File:Ibibindi.jpg, File:Inzu ya kinyarwanda 02.jpg, and Inzu ya kinyarwanda 01.jpg. The remaining images appear to be copyvios as well. File:Gushengerera no kubaza abakuru.jpg has been published one day before at twitter.com, likewise File:Umupfumu.jpg at twitter.com. File:Guterekera.jpg is a stock photo attributed to Thomas Mukoya. Etc. Deleted the whole remaining lot. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
All credited to "Lion Portraits" in the EXIF, which doesn't match the uploader name.
- File:Umuco wo Kwihengeka agatotsi kaje.jpg
- File:Umuco wo Kuragira umushumba yitwaza inkoni.jpg
- File:Umuco wo kwitaza.jpg
- File:Umuco wo Gukurikirana umurima.jpg
- File:Umuco wo gukaraba 01.jpg
Belbury (talk) 20:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Promo photo, very unlikely own work, here's another photo from same photoshoot: https://www.medcom.id/hiburan/selebritas/VNxoaJDK-ayu-ting-ting-masih-dendam-disebut-artis-tak-terkenal-saat-ospek Renata3 (talk) 21:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete It's also from Facebook. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:17, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Unrecognisable persons, No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:36, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is unlikely to be the author of the photograph CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Margot1934 (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Affiche du Championnat du Monde de l'œuf en meurette 2021 ©Jean Julien.jpg
- File:Affiche officielle du Championnat du Monde de l'œuf en meurette 2021 ©Jean Julien.png
- File:Affiche officielle du Championnat du Monde de l'œuf en meurette 2020 ©Christian Heinrich.jpg
- File:Affiche Officielle de la 4ème édition du Championnat du Monde de l’œuf en meurette.jpg
- File:Affiche 1er Championnat du Monde de l'œuf en meurette Guillaume Long.jpg
- File:Affiche officielle du 1er Championnat du Monde de l'oeuf en meurette.jpg
Syunsyunminmin (talk) 08:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:34, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Missing source, missing evidence for the license: Looks like a selfie and the name of the person depicted doesn't match the username of the uploader. TilmannR (talk) 14:18, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 10:00, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
I represent the subject of the photo (Mystery Author Jane K. Cleland) and she wanted me to ask if this photo could be deleted. She knows it does not violate image use policies in any way but finds the photograph unflattering. I've informed her that it has rights to exist here as it was captured at a public event and uploaded by the creator, but she has asked that I request deletion to see if her personal aversion to the image showing up in web searches would facilitate grounds for removal since it's also not in use on any Wikimedia or Wikipedia entires that we could find. Jonstonewrites (talk) 16:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Comment It's sharper and a larger file than File:Jane Cleland, Author and Teacher.jpg and File:Jane Cleland Teaching.jpg. Moreover, the larger of those two files has speedy deletion tags as missing permission and the other is very small and therefore also suspect. So the problem is, right now, this is the only photo we have of her that we can be fairly confident is properly licensed. I wouldn't oppose deleting this file if another better properly licensed photo could be uploaded first. Is that a possibility? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)- Keep The picture will have historical value in time. Also, contrary to what's stated in the nomination, the picture is used here in the Wikidata record. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 10:56, 15 March 2023 (UTC).
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file is in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Copied from here, copyright ArianeGroup, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 17:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:57, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Copied from here, copyright Keka Aerospace, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 17:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Lyokoï (talk) 12:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:57, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Not own work. 181.43.4.47 17:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- It's not claimed to be own work. But the source given is marked "Copyright © 2020 KSBSI.ORG", so Delete as a copyright violation. Marbletan (talk) 13:58, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for explaining my point. 181.43.4.47 12:42, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of permission. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:56, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No permission 181.43.4.47 18:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, copyvio of television series cover art (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0229405/mediaviewer/rm279390208/) Belbury (talk) 18:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:55, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Own work? 181.43.4.47 18:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Already published on sevetal other websites, including https://lebouthillier.org/media/ and https://ecole-ete.hec.ca/conferenciers-2020/ -- Habertix (talk) 18:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:54, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Already on the internet in 2020 according to TinEye https://tineye.com/search/5da9cbd0d6f05f0c2f92b694d454156d75015a8b?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:54, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:19, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:19, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:20, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:20, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:13, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion, probably not in scope. --Rosenzweig τ 10:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:14, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:15, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Could be cropped to remove the person at the left if it is deemed necessary. --Rosenzweig τ 10:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:17, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 18:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 18:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 18:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 17:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason (especially after 6 years), as before. — Draceane talkcontrib. 18:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 14:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 18:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:19, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 17:59, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 18:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 18:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:20, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 17:59, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 17:59, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 17:59, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 17:59, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 18:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 18:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 18:00, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Motivo pessoal Cristine Huff (talk) 00:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. File is within scope and no license issues. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 18:00, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyviol da www.storiaememoriadibologna.it/fava-ghisilieri-brigida-481357-persona Emmepici (talk) 16:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: Date is old. Could be perceived as public domain. --Kadı Message 18:01, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
out of scope`? Trade (talk) 17:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 18:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Source: Fotografie! F1 181.43.4.47 18:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- The Original File has an OTRS permission, I can't say anything about the source, I was only cropping. Bigbossfarin (talk) 18:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- It looks like you're right. Keep it. 181.43.4.47 18:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 18:03, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by پارسا سیاوشان (talk · contribs)
[edit]This file does not belong to the uploader and is from the images available on the Internet
- File:تانک ایرانی کرار.webp
- File:تکاوران نیروی ویژه صابرین سپاه.png
- File:تکاوران صابرین سپاه در رزمایش پیامبر اعظم 17.jpg
- File:تکاوران صابرین سپاه.png
- File:نیروی صابرین.jpg
- File:بابک خُرَمدین.jpg
- File:سرباز پیاده نظام دیلمی ارتش ساسانی.jpg
- File:گارد جاویدان ساسانی.png
- File:سرباز پُشتیگبان.jpg
- File:کاتافراکت پُشتیگبان.jpg
- File:پوشتیگبان.png
- File:سواره نظام پُشتیگبان.png
- File:گارد پشتیگبان.jpg
- File:کاتافراکت پشتیگبان.png
- File:پشتیگبان ساسانی.png
- File:Buyid map.jpg
- File:سوار زره پوش ساسانی.jpg
- File:Sassanid Cavalry6124.jpg
- File:سواره نظام ساسانی.jpg CaesarIran (talk) 18:18, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all. HeminKurdistan (talk) 22:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:03, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Bevvibez
[edit]- File:Bevvibez.jpg
- File:Bevvibez working.jpg
- File:Bevvibez portrait.jpg
- File:Bevvibez & yungk4teen.jpg
- File:Bevvibez & yungk4teen!.jpg
The subject is on the photograph, most likely not own work, Personal picture, No proven notability https://www.instagram.com/bevvibez/ --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 22:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted Materials Michel Bakni (talk) 22:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability, Possible ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:07, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 18:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
This is a follow up to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maia Chiburdanidze 2001 Yugoslavia stamp.jpg. Essentially the license is wrong and in the meantime the copyright status of stamps of Yugoslavia either isn't clear or they are copyrighted until 70 years after the death of the stamps designer. Which in this case would be at an undetermined point in the future since the designer, Radomir Bojanić, appears to still be alive. So the image of the stamp are clearly copyrighted for at least the near future, if not longer. Adamant1 (talk) 02:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per the earlier decisions in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maia Chiburdanidze 2001 Yugoslavia stamp.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Famous personalities 1999 Yugoslavia stamp.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 20:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung. Kein eigenes Werk sondern Autogrammkarte des Sportvereins für den er spielte, siehe https://www.google.com/search?q=autogrammkarte+SG+Hameln&client=firefox-b-d&sxsrf=AJOqlzUA-UNc1-AJREXaOcatT19Armtwjw:1678781981536&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj2q6id_tr9AhWpNOwKHamkCVMQ_AUoAXoECAEQAw&biw=1444&bih=918&dpr=1 2A01:5241:64F:6100:0:0:0:57B3 08:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:47, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation 2A00:23C5:FF94:6F01:4097:B53C:DB9:D257 15:31, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Personal video with no obvious education value Malyacko (talk) 09:18, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 14:00, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Möglicherweise Urheberrechtsverletzung Lutheraner (talk) 14:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- there is a statement in the photo description: "Разрешаю использование фотографии на правах лицензии Creative Commons 4.0" which means "I allow usage of the photo under Creative Commons 4.0". The statement is incorrect, it should be something like Creative Common Share-Alike 4.0, as CC-4.0 license doesn't exist rubin16 (talk) 13:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- The photograph gave her permission to use this photo on CC 4.0 license. SergioOren (talk) 08:50, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- There is no such license, please, see my message above rubin16 (talk) 10:08, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ох. А теперь? SergioOren (talk) 17:56, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- There is no such license, please, see my message above rubin16 (talk) 10:08, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: License in the source updated, confirmed from my side. --rubin16 (talk) 09:27, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Image is still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 08:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:35, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Image is still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 08:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:35, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Per [2] (initials PP) and [3] (apparently from the same photo session, given that he's wearing the exact same tie) the photographer was Paul Popper, who died in 1969. So still protected in the UK until the end of 2039. (Thanks to Thuresson for spotting the initials and connecting them to Popper.) --Rosenzweig τ 19:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Own work? The only contribution of the user. Copyright? Wouter (talk) 08:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 08:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 08:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes by Lippert, Willi H.
[edit]These files use the outdated {{PD-GermanGov-currency}} license tag, which claims that German "units of currency" are official works in the public domain. That is what was assumed over 10 years ago, but discussions after that resulted in what we have at COM:CUR Germany today: only Deutsche Mark banknotes from 1949 to 2001 are considered to be in the public domain, not any other banknotes, not coins. Which means these ca. 1920 German Notgeld bills are not official works. The designer of these, de:Willi H. Lippert, died in 1981. Which means these bills are still protected by copyright in Germany until the end of 2051, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2052.
- File:Gleiwitz - 2Mark.jpg
- File:Gleiwitz - 75Pf.jpg
- File:Grünberg - 1,50Mark I ND.png
- File:Grünberg - 1Mark K ND.png
- File:Grünberg - 25Pf. K ND.png
- File:Grünberg - 50Pf. G ND.png
- File:Grünberg - 75Pf. K ND.png
- File:Guhrau - 1Mark ND.png
- File:Guhrau - 25Pf. ND.png
- File:Guhrau - 50Pf. ND.png
- File:Guhrau - 75Pf. ND.png
- File:Kreuzburg - 1Mark ND (1).png
- File:Kreuzburg - 1Mark ND (2).jpg
- File:Kreuzburg - 1Mark ND (3).jpg
- File:Stolp - 75Pf. ND.jpg
- File:Stolp i.Pom. - 1Mark.jpg
- File:Stolp i.Pom. - 2Mark.jpg
- File:Stolp i.Pom. - 50Pf.jpg
- File:Stolp i.Pom. - 75Pf.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 09:51, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes by Schleinitz, Georg
[edit]These files use the outdated {{PD-GermanGov-currency}} license tag, which claims that German "units of currency" are official works in the public domain. That is what was assumed over 10 years ago, but discussions after that resulted in what we have at COM:CUR Germany today: only Deutsche Mark banknotes from 1949 to 2001 are considered to be in the public domain, not any other banknotes, not coins. Which means these 1921 German Notgeld bills are not official works. The designer of these, Georg Schleinitz, died in 1969. Which means these bills are still protected by copyright in Germany until the end of 2039, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2040.
- File:Döbeln - 50Pf. 1921 (1).png
- File:Döbeln - 50Pf. 1921 (2).png
- File:Döbeln - 50Pf. 1921 (3).png
- File:Döbeln - 50Pf. 1921 (4).png
- File:Döbeln - 50Pf. 1921 (5).png
- File:Döbeln - 50Pf. 1921 (6).png
- File:Döbeln - 50Pf. 1921 (7).png
- File:Döbeln - 50Pf. 1921 (8).png
Rosenzweig τ 10:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes by Supan, Ernst
[edit]These files use the outdated {{PD-GermanGov-currency}} license tag, which claims that German "units of currency" are official works in the public domain. That is what was assumed over 10 years ago, but discussions after that resulted in what we have at COM:CUR Germany today: only Deutsche Mark banknotes from 1949 to 2001 are considered to be in the public domain, not any other banknotes, not coins. Which means these 1921 German Notgeld bills are not official works. The designer of these, de:Ernst Supan, died in 1966. Which means these bills are still protected by copyright in Germany until the end of 2036, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2037.
Rosenzweig τ 10:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes by Weber, A. Paul
[edit]These files use the outdated {{PD-GermanGov-currency}} license tag, which claims that German "units of currency" are official works in the public domain. That is what was assumed over 10 years ago, but discussions after that resulted in what we have at COM:CUR Germany today: only Deutsche Mark banknotes from 1949 to 2001 are considered to be in the public domain, not any other banknotes, not coins. Which means these 1921 German Notgeld bills are not official works. The designer of these, de:A. Paul Weber, died in 1980. Which means these bills are still protected by copyright in Germany until the end of 2050, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2051.
- File:Arnstadt - 25Pf. 1921 .A.png
- File:Arnstadt - 25Pf. 1921 a.png
- File:Arnstadt - 25Pf. 1921 a2.png
- File:Arnstadt - 25Pf. 1921 dt.png
- File:Arnstadt - 25Pf. 1921 n.png
- File:Arnstadt - 25Pf. 1921 n2.png
- File:Arnstadt - 25Pf. 1921 r.png
- File:Arnstadt - 25Pf. 1921 st.png
- File:Arnstadt - 50Pf. 1921 a.png
- File:Arnstadt - 50Pf. 1921 dt.png
- File:Arnstadt - 50Pf. 1921 n.png
- File:Arnstadt - 50Pf. r 1921.png
- File:Arnstadt .A - 10Pf. 1921.png
- File:Arnstadt a - 10Pf. 1921.png
- File:Arnstadt dt - 10Pf. 1921.jpg
- File:Arnstadt n - 10Pf. 1921.jpg
- File:Arnstadt r - 10Pf. 1921.png
- File:Arnstadt st - 10Pf. 1921.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 10:12, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes by Zscheked, Richard
[edit]These files use the outdated {{PD-GermanGov-currency}} license tag, which claims that German "units of currency" are official works in the public domain. That is what was assumed over 10 years ago, but discussions after that resulted in what we have at COM:CUR Germany today: only Deutsche Mark banknotes from 1949 to 2001 are considered to be in the public domain, not any other banknotes, not coins. Which means these ca. 1921 German Notgeld bills are not official works. The designer of these, de:Richard Zscheked, died in 1954. Which means these bills are still protected by copyright in Germany until the end of 2024, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2025.
- File:Dassow - 10Pf. ND.jpg
- File:Dassow - 25Pf. ND.jpg
- File:Dassow - 50Pf. ND.jpg
- File:Dömitz - 10Pf. ND.jpg
- File:Dömitz, Reutergeld - 25Pf. ND.png
- File:Lübz - 10Pf. ND.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 10:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Karl Sterrer
[edit]These photos of Austrian banknotes use the {{PD-AustrianGov}} license tag, claiming that they are official works in the public domain. COM:CUR Austria is however very clear that Austrian "bank notes and coins do not constitute official works under s 7 of the Austrian Copyright Act and are therefore not freely usable". There are two designers here, de:Rudolf Junk (who died in 1943) and de:Karl Sterrer (Maler) (who died in 1972), so they are still protected by copyright in Austria until the end of 2042, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2043.
- File:5 Schilling 1945-avers.jpg
- File:5 Schilling 1945-revers.jpg
- File:Austria 10 S 1925 - 27.4.25-31.1.28.jpg
- File:Austria 100 S 1925 - 26.3.25-30.6.29.jpg
- File:Austria 1000 S 1925 - 11.5.25-31.3.32.jpg
- File:Austria 20 S 1925 - 1.7.25-30.6.29.jpg
- File:Austria 5 S 1925 - 8.6.25-31.7.28.jpg
- File:Austria 5 S 1927 - 24.10.27-31.1.36.jpg
- File:Austria 5 S 1945 - 11.12.47-27.2.54.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes by Seger, Josef
[edit]These photos of Austrian banknotes use the {{PD-AustrianGov}} license tag, claiming that they are official works in the public domain. COM:CUR Austria is however very clear that Austrian "bank notes and coins do not constitute official works under s 7 of the Austrian Copyright Act and are therefore not freely usable". The designers of these, Josef Seger, died in 1998, so they are still protected by copyright in Austria until the end of 2068, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2069.
Rosenzweig τ 19:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
These photos of an Austrian banknote use the {{PD-AustrianGov}} license tag, claiming that it is an official work in the public domain. COM:CUR Austria is however very clear that Austrian "bank notes and coins do not constitute official works under s 7 of the Austrian Copyright Act and are therefore not freely usable". The designer of this banknote, de:Bertold Löffler, died in 1960, so it is still protected by copyright in Austria until the end of 2030, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2031. Rosenzweig τ 19:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes by Zerritsch, Fritz
[edit]Some of these photos of Austrian banknotes use the {{PD-AustrianGov}} license tag, claiming that they are official works in the public domain. COM:CUR Austria is however very clear that Austrian "bank notes and coins do not constitute official works under s 7 of the Austrian Copyright Act and are therefore not freely usable". Others use CC Zero and FAL license tags, which are complete nonsense. The designer of these, de:Fritz Zerritsch der Jüngere, died in 1985, so they are still protected by copyright in Austria until the end of 2055, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2056.
- File:Austria 1000 S 1930 - 15.5.31-15.5.38.jpg
- File:Austria 1000 S 1945 1.Aufl. - 13.12.45-29.6.57.jpg
- File:Austria 1000 Schilling 1947-2.jpg
- File:Austria 1000 Schilling 1947.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 19:31, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Not in public domain as recorded less than 100 years ago, although author died more than 70 years ago SuperMug (talk) 20:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
I am very doubtful that this image is Own Work, as claimed. It has been uploaded by a user who has had multiple images deleted as lacking proper licensing, both here and on en Wikipedia. The image has no useful metadata. It was uploaded today (14 March), with a statement that the photo was taken tomorrow (15 March). MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of jpg by Russavia brought over from my old Flickr account. Peter Glyn (talk) 22:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Dev kharoud (cropped).jpg but not as clear, uploaded by sockpuppet of Jagdeep singh bittu Ravensfire (talk) 13:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 13:10, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Não tem autorização para uso da minha imagem 192.141.204.243 20:00, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- A solicitação de exclusão deve ser seguida. A imagem foi adicionada erroneamente. Ilzemelo (talk) 20:10, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Oficial picture without clear permission, uploader himself requests deletion. Ilzemelo, no futuro, ao carregar arquivos oficiais ao Wikimedia Commons, por favor leia pt:Wikipédia:VRT. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 20:41, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Não deletar. A usuária carregou a imagem espontaneamente como trabalho próprio. Se queria fazer alguma brincadeira, não deu certo. Yanguas (talk) 00:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Né não, gente! É que eu ainda não sei usar a plataforma direito. Achei que tava fazendo certo. Coloquei texto e imagem, a imagem foi e o texto não. Aí tá errado! Eu preciso tirar para colocar corretamente. Ilzemelo (talk) 12:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Yanguas e Épico, isso é caso para eliminação (rápida) por cortesia, já que ainda não se passou uma semana desde o carregamento do ficheiro. Esta nomeação é de todo desarrazoada; bastaria que Ilzemelo enviasse a imagem para eliminação rápida, e espero que envie, porque ninguém precisa de mais um político irrelevante buscando na Wikipédia uma plataforma de divulgação. Saudações, RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Só pra esclarecer: a imagem aparenta ser genuína. Não é caso para eliminação por violação de direitos autorais, a não ser que se ache uma idêntica, inclusive com metadados, dando mole por aí. RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- @RodRabelo7: Exigir metadados você está sendo estrito demais. É a foto oficial da prefeitura, de divulgação, a presunção é claramente contrária a quem fez o carregamento. Daí a necessidade, mesmo que eventualmente esse projeto de divulgação se faça de acordo com as nossas regras, que a foto passe pelo OTRS. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 12:59, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Entendo seu argumento, mas creio que, se todas as fotos encontradas na Internet são de qualidade inferior, inclusive no que diz respeito aos metadados, então se assuma a boa-fé do uploader. RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:24, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- O uploader foi realizado por mim, faz parte do meu trabalho realizá-lo. Deixando claro que a fotografia não é de minha autoria. Estou buscando corrigir para, possivelmente, acrescentar a mesma imagem, mas com o texto que acredito ser relevante. Agradeço a sua orientação. Ilzemelo (talk) 15:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Ilzemelo, não dá para adicionar a mesma imagem se você mesmo confessa tratar-se de uma violação de direito autoral. RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:17, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- @RodRabelo7: Exigir metadados você está sendo estrito demais. É a foto oficial da prefeitura, de divulgação, a presunção é claramente contrária a quem fez o carregamento. Daí a necessidade, mesmo que eventualmente esse projeto de divulgação se faça de acordo com as nossas regras, que a foto passe pelo OTRS. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 12:59, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Só pra esclarecer: a imagem aparenta ser genuína. Não é caso para eliminação por violação de direitos autorais, a não ser que se ache uma idêntica, inclusive com metadados, dando mole por aí. RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
A fotografia foi adicionada erroneamente sem o texto bibliográfico Ilzemelo (talk) 14:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, copyvio, admitted by uploader. RodRabelo7 (talk) 11:18, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not own work. Needs permission via COM:VRT from photographer. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes by Hellmann, Roman
[edit]These photos of Austrian banknotes use the {{PD-AustrianGov}} license tag, claiming that they are official works in the public domain. COM:CUR Austria is however very clear that Austrian "bank notes and coins do not constitute official works under s 7 of the Austrian Copyright Act and are therefore not freely usable". The designer of these, de:Roman Hellmann, died in 2012, so they are still protected by copyright in Austria until the end of 2082, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2083.
- File:100 Schilling 1969 2.Auflage Rückseite.jpg
- File:100 Schilling 1969 2.Auflage Vorderseite.jpg
- File:100 Schilling 1969 Rückseite.jpg
- File:100 Schilling 1969 Vorderseite.jpg
- File:1000 Schilling 1966 Rückseite.jpg
- File:1000 Schilling 1966 Vorderseite.jpg
- File:20 Schilling 1967 Rückseite.jpg
- File:20 Schilling 1967 Vorderseite.jpg
- File:50 Schilling 1970 2.Auflage Rückseite.jpg
- File:50 Schilling 1970 2.Auflage Vorderseite.jpg
- File:50 Schilling 1970 Rückseite.jpg
- File:50 Schilling 1970 Vorderseite.jpg
- File:500 Schilling 1965 RS.jpg
- File:500 Schilling 1965 VS.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 08:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Wo liegt der Unterschied zu den Banknoten
- Wer kann hier weiterhelfen? KenzoMogi (talk) 14:14, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Die wurden nicht von Roman Hellmann gestaltet. Was nicht notwendigerweise heißt, dass sie ok sind. --Rosenzweig τ 15:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Jetzt sind diese Banknoten seit 2011 in der Wikimedia Commons und nach 12 Jahren kommt man drauf, dass was nicht stimmt.
- Anstatt hier zu unterstützen wird auf diverse Hinweise verwiesen, es wird nicht gesagt, wie man es macht. Dann lassen wir es halt. Mir passt das auch so.
- Vielleicht ändern sich einmal diese Regeln, die anscheinend 12 Jahre egal waren. KenzoMogi (talk) 20:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Am besten liest du mal Commons:Licensing (oder auf Deutsch, Commons:Licensing/de) und die zutreffenden Länderseiten Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany und Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Austria (gibt's jeweils auch auf Deutsch). Jede Menge Hinweise und Links hast du auch ganz oben auf User talk:KenzoMogi, schon seit fast 10 Jahren. Lesen musst du's halt. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 22:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Die wurden nicht von Roman Hellmann gestaltet. Was nicht notwendigerweise heißt, dass sie ok sind. --Rosenzweig τ 15:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 07:57, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes by Kalina, Robert
[edit]These photos of Austrian banknotes use the {{PD-AustrianGov}} license tag, claiming that they are official works in the public domain. COM:CUR Austria is however very clear that Austrian "bank notes and coins do not constitute official works under s 7 of the Austrian Copyright Act and are therefore not freely usable". The designer of these, de:Robert Kalina, is alive, so they are still protected by copyright in Austria for the foreseeable future, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored 70 years after Kalina's death.
- File:100 Schilling 1984 Rückseite.jpg
- File:100 Schilling 1984 Vorderseite.jpg
- File:1000 Schilling 1983 Rückseite.jpg
- File:1000 Schilling 1983 Vorderseite.jpg
- File:1000 Schilling 1997 Rückseite.jpg
- File:1000 Schilling 1997 Vorderseite.jpg
- File:20 Schilling 1986 Rückseite.jpg
- File:20 Schilling 1986 Vorderseite.jpg
- File:50 Schilling 1986 Rückseite.jpg
- File:50 Schilling 1986 Vorderseite.jpg
- File:500 Schilling 1985 Rückseite.jpg
- File:500 Schilling 1985 Vorderseite.jpg
- File:500 Schilling 1997 Rückseite.jpg
- File:500 Schilling 1997 Vorderseite.jpg
- File:5000 Schilling 1988 Rückseite.jpg
- File:5000 Schilling 1988 Vorderseite.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 08:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Recreated already deleted content: Commons:Deletion requests/Banknotes of Austria by User:KenzoMogi. --Wdwd (talk) 08:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Erhard Amadeus-Dier
[edit]per Commons:Currency#Austria, missing permission for original work. Designs by Erhard Amadeus-Dier (1893-1969), österreichischer Grafiker. Could be restored as PD in 2040
- File:10 Schilling Lipizzaner obverse.jpg
- File:10 Schilling Lipizzaner reverse.jpg
- File:20 Schilling Joseph Haydn obverse.JPG
- File:20 Schilling Joseph Haydn reverse.JPG
Wdwd (talk) 17:42, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete per the nominator. Currency in Austria isn't PD and enough time hasn't passed since the artist died for the copyright to lapse either. So these images are clearly copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:19, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:36, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Erhard Amadeus-Dier
[edit]These photos of 1949 Austrian banknotes use the {{PD-AustrianGov}} license tag, claiming that they are official works in the public domain. COM:CUR Austria is however very clear that Austrian "bank notes and coins do not constitute official works under s 7 of the Austrian Copyright Act and are therefore not freely usable". The designer of these, de:Erhard Amadeus Dier, died in 1969, so they are still protected by copyright in Austria until the end of 2039, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2045 when their US copyrights that were restored bythe URAA will also have expired.
- File:Austria 100 S 1949 1.Aufl. - 3.11.49-15.4.59.jpg
- File:Austria 100 S 1949 2.Aufl. - 3.11.49-15.4.59.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 08:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:21, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Arthur Brusenbauch
[edit]These photos of 1933 / 1945 (reissue) Austrian banknotes use the {{PD-AustrianGov}} license tag, claiming that they are official works in the public domain. COM:CUR Austria is however very clear that Austrian "bank notes and coins do not constitute official works under s 7 of the Austrian Copyright Act and are therefore not freely usable". The designer of these, de:Arthur Brusenbauch, died in 1957, so they are still protected by copyright in Austria until the end of 2027, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2029 when their US copyright restored by the URAA will have expired as well.
- File:Austria 10 S 1933 - 9.4.34-15.5.38.jpg
- File:Austria 10 S 1945 1.Aufl. - 23.12.45-15.9.49.jpg
- File:Austria 10 S 1945 2.Aufl. - 11.12.47-15.9.49.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 09:07, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes by Krone, Otto
[edit]These files use the outdated {{PD-GermanGov-currency}} license tag, which claims that German "units of currency" are official works in the public domain. That is what was assumed over 10 years ago, but discussions after that resulted in what we have at COM:CUR Germany today: only Deutsche Mark banknotes from 1949 to 2001 are considered to be in the public domain, not any other banknotes, not coins. Which means these 1921 German Notgeld bills are not official works. The designer of these, de:Otto Krone (Heimatforscher), died in 1957. Which means these bills are still protected by copyright in Germany until the end of 2027, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2028.
Rosenzweig τ 09:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes by Kötschau, Georg
[edit]These files use the outdated {{PD-GermanGov-currency}} license tag, which claims that German "units of currency" are official works in the public domain. That is what was assumed over 10 years ago, but discussions after that resulted in what we have at COM:CUR Germany today: only Deutsche Mark banknotes from 1949 to 2001 are considered to be in the public domain, not any other banknotes, not coins. Which means these 1922 German Notgeld bills are not official works. The designer of these, de:Georg Kötschau, died in 1976. Which means these bills are still protected by copyright in Germany until the end of 2046, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2047.
- File:Goch - 50Pf. 1922 (1).jpg
- File:Goch - 75Pf. - 1922 (3).jpg
- File:Goch - 75Pf. 1922 (5).jpg
- File:Goch . 50Pf. 1922 (2).png
- File:Goch . 75Pf. 1922 (6).png
- File:Goch 75Pf. 1922 (4).jpg
- File:Rudelsburg - Burgwirt - 50Pf. ND (1).png
- File:Rudelsburg - Burgwirt - 50Pf. ND (2).png
- File:Rudelsburg - Burgwirt - 50Pf. ND (4).png
- File:Rudelsburg - Burgwirt - 50Pf. ND (5).png
- File:Schwarzburg - 25Pf. 1922 (1).png
- File:Schwarzburg - 25Pf. 1922 (2).png
- File:Schwarzburg - 50Pf. 1922 (1).png
- File:Schwarzburg - 50Pf. 1922 (2).png
- File:Schwarzburg - 50Pf. 1922 (3).png
- File:Schwarzburg - 50Pf. 1922 (4).png
- File:Schwarzburg - 50Pf. 1922 (5).png
Rosenzweig τ 09:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:16, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes by Kötschau, Georg
[edit]These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of de:Georg Kötschau, who died in 1976. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2047.
- File:Grünberg - 1,50Mark ND A.png
- File:Grünberg - 1Mark ND A.png
- File:Grünberg - 25Pf. ND A.png
- File:Grünberg - 50Pf. ND A.png
- File:Grünberg - 75Pf. ND A.png
- File:Hohndorf - 50Pf. 1921 (4).jpg
- File:Paulinzella - 25Pf. ND (1).jpg
- File:Paulinzella - 25Pf. ND (2).jpg
- File:Paulinzella - 50Pf. ND (1).png
- File:Paulinzella - 50Pf. ND (2).png
- File:Paulinzella - 50Pf. ND (3).png
- File:Paulinzella - 50Pf. ND (4).png
Rosenzweig τ 07:00, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes by Senft, Edmund
[edit]These files use the outdated {{PD-GermanGov-currency}} license tag, which claims that German "units of currency" are official works in the public domain. That is what was assumed over 10 years ago, but discussions after that resulted in what we have at COM:CUR Germany today: only Deutsche Mark banknotes from 1949 to 2001 are considered to be in the public domain, not any other banknotes, not coins. Which means these 1918/19 German Notgeld bills are not official works. The designer of these, Edmund Senft, died in 1966. Which means these bills are still protected by copyright in Germany until the end of 2036, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2037.
Rosenzweig τ 10:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:16, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
This is not Michelle Yeoh, image is not used. This is not her hair, not her eyes not her jaw line. See also Category:Michelle Yeoh in 2013 Nux (talk··dyskusja) 00:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Some images to compare:
-
eyes 2002 -
eyes and jaw line 2011 -
hair 2013
,_at_Panaji,_Goa_on_November_30,_2013.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![30 File:Gerber turkey, chicken and "meat" sticks in water, grocery store, Houston, TX.jpg](#File:Gerber_turkey,_chicken_and_"meat"_sticks_in_water,_grocery_store,_Houston,_TX.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
_State_Theatre_明信片_Postcard.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_-_étude_d'histoire_et_d'archéologie_857_Bis.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Quater.jpg){kind=link}
_-_souvenirs_de_localité,_peintures_de_moeurs_2595.jpg){kind=link}
![177 File:"Max" by Ann Barrow.jpg](#File:"Max"_by_Ann_Barrow.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_verso,_1895,_Musea_Brugge,_0020.GRO0679.II.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_recto,_1895,_Musea_Brugge,_0020.GRO0679.II.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
_State_Theatre_%E6%98%8E%E4%BF%A1%E7%89%87_Postcard.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_State_Theatre_%E6%98%8E%E4%BF%A1%E7%89%87_Postcard.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
--Nux (talk··dyskusja) 00:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
- Getty says otherwise, but even if it would be an error and I mislabelled it (upcropped version has no label), then it still would be are reason to move the file, not delete it. Mithoron (talk) 02:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
*
Delete Copyright violation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Oh, is it now? It's certainly not the same photo I found on getty (and was even unfindable via the site itself). Mithoron (talk) 14:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
- Comment You're right. A more careful comparison shows that this is not the Getty photo you linked. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:51, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
OK, I think I found who this is, and it's indeed not Yeoh, sorry! Looks like it's Rebecca Wang and getty mislabelled one of her photos. On imdb there's quite a bit of them, one taken on the same Bafta event [4], but again different, my dear copyvio hunters. So, yeah, my bad, it should be moved, but I don't see reasons to delete it. Mithoron (talk) 22:05, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no reason for deletion. For file rename/move, please see COM:MOVE. --Wdwd (talk) 11:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
No education value of a video rotated by 90 degrees. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 09:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal video with no obvious education value. --Wdwd (talk) 11:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 09:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal video with no obvious education value. --Wdwd (talk) 11:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Funeral parade Charleston Sternwheel Regatta downtown Charleston WV July 2022 edited 0.webm
[edit]No education value of an edited rotated video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Original is https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Funeral_parade_Charleston_Sternwheel_Regatta_downtown_Charleston_WV_July_2022.webm Malyacko (talk) 09:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Original is https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ana-10.ogv Malyacko (talk) 09:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 09:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 09:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Simillar with File:Fumio_Kishida_and_Joko_Widodo.jpg Whatsup236 (talk) 14:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep but its not the same, and similarity is not a deletion reason on it's own. The image also shows more of the scene which provides important context to the circumstances of the meeting. It should be renamed though. XxakixX (talk) 16:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
The source for the photo is said to be Brian Sterling, from whom we are to assume the licensing comes; however, Bill Thiess is listed at the photographer, and in whom the copyright is vested, and who would need to license it so. Fourthords | =Λ= | 15:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo by non-contributor/F10. --Wdwd (talk) 15:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
abridged version of Chopin's Waltz in E minor, not a composition by eduendesuarez. Yann (talk) 17:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Experimental musical piece written based on variations and reinterpretations of classical pieces. elduendesuarez shares piano versions of pieces by classical composers and his own original compositions, as well as variations and experimental reinterpretations of classical pieces, such as this case. Elduendesuarez (talk) 16:52, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- This piece is by NO means an abbreviated version of Chopin's Waltz in E minor.; It is a unique piece created by the author using an experimental musical composition technique consisting of: Starting from a classic work in the Public Domain, which is also honored in the new resulting piece, it is transformed and a new unique work is created with another artistic sense and different message; in this case dedicated to Julio Pardo. It is part of the work that the author altruistically shares with the entire Wikimedia Commons community, as a work of experimental musical dissemination. Elduendesuarez (talk) 12:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Elduendesuarez:
- To avoid allegations of plagiarism, you should mention in the file's description that it is derived from the Waltz in E minor. (And mention the sources of your other files in their descriptions.)
- I don't think this piece belongs in Category:Julio Pardo, because it contains no information about that person.
- Contemporary experimental art is not inherently educational and files on Wikimedia Commons "must be realistically useful for an educational purpose". Unless your works had notable cultural impact or are useful to illustrate specific creative techniques, I'm afraid many of them will have to be deleted for being out-of-scope.
- TilmannR (talk) 11:44, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Elduendesuarez:
Deleted, Elduendesuarez nominated the file (and many more) for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
File:La question de Nancy et la défense nationale - conférence faite à Nancy le dimanche 18 mars 1894 274.jpg
[edit]
image collectée par Bot sans intérêt Clhu (talk) 19:39, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
File:L'art à Nancy en 1882 - avec une lettre d'Alexandre Hepp - et 10 planches hors texte reproduisant de 1287 Bis.jpg
[edit]
image collectée par bot sans intérêt Clhu (talk) 19:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
image collectée par bot sans intérêt Clhu (talk) 19:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
image collectée par bot sans intérêt Clhu (talk) 19:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
_-_%C3%A9tude_d%27histoire_et_d%27arch%C3%A9ologie_857_Bis.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_%C3%A9tude_d%27histoire_et_d%27arch%C3%A9ologie_857_Bis.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
image collectée par bot sans intérêt Clhu (talk) 19:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
image collectée par bot sans intérêt Clhu (talk) 19:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Les archives de Nancy ou documents inédits relatifs à l'histoire de cette ville. Tome premier 2609 (1)Quater.jpg
[edit]Quater.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Quater.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
image collectée par bot sans intérêt Clhu (talk) 19:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
image collectée par bot sans intérêt Clhu (talk) 19:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
image collectée par bot sans intérêt Clhu (talk) 19:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
_-_souvenirs_de_localit%C3%A9,_peintures_de_moeurs_2595.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_souvenirs_de_localit%C3%A9,_peintures_de_moeurs_2595.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
image collectée par bot sans intérêt Clhu (talk) 19:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:50, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
image collectée par bot sans intérêt Clhu (talk) 19:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
image collectée par bot sans intérêt Clhu (talk) 19:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
image collectée par bot sans intérêt Clhu (talk) 19:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
image collectée par bot sans intérêt Clhu (talk) 19:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
image collectée par bot sans intérêt Clhu (talk) 19:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
image collectée par bot sans intérêt Clhu (talk) 19:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Although the artwork entered PD in the UK, but unknown copyright status in the USA (per warning of the template) A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Wrong template used; should be {{PD-UK-anon}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- PD in the UK but not in the USA until c 2045. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork, artist Ann Marie Barrow died in 2005. Painting is copyrighted until 2081. MKFI (talk) 09:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
![09:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/03/14#c-MKFI-20230314091900-File:"Max"_by_Ann_Barrow.jpg){kind=link}
- I posted this and I'm Ann Barrow's daughter, Gwenyth Barrow. 71.33.155.118 15:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- @GEB83: I presume this is you? Please send VRT verification so that we can confirm that you really are the current copyright owner. MKFI (talk) 19:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- needs VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
![20:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/03/14#c-Jameslwoodward-20230420203800-File:"Max"_by_Ann_Barrow.jpg){kind=link}
- also file:Joinup flota.png
Small photos without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contributions. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Marchjuly as no permission (No permission since)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Converting to DR to group related images. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I tagged these files with {{Npd}} because they like many other files uploaded by this user have questionable claims of "own work". It seems that everytime a file is tagged for one reason or another, the uploader simply uploads another one to take its place without even commenting or attempting to provide verification that they are uploading their "own work". If the uploader did take all of these photos and is willing to release them under a free-license that Commons accepts, then they can basically say as much in a single email to VRT which then can be applied to all of their current and future uploads. Just from looking at the uploader's user talk page, it appears that others have also been expressing concern over their uploads and yet no attempt seems to have been made to resolve any of these issues. Some like File:Nye Borgerliges Ungdom.png actually seem to have been resolved. So, what is needed should be clear enough to the uploader. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
--Marginataen (talk) 12:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC) Hello. It apologise for the files I have uploaded when I haven't been the creator. That dosen't change that I indeed am the creator of this image.--Marginataen (talk) 12:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Marginataen: Can you please upload a version with EXIF from the camera you used to take the photo? This will help provide evidence that you are the photographer. Just navigate to File:Nye Borgerlige, FT-gruppe 2022.jpg and click "Upload a new version of this file" at the bottom of the "File history" section. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:17, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I am no longer in possession of such, but that doesn't change the fact that I'm the author. I'm not quite sure about the reason for this deletion request. It is because someone else has claimed the ownership or because I have damaged my credibility by in the past having uploaded images not actually belonging to me? Something I deeply regret.--Marginataen (talk) 19:33, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello. 10 days have passed without a response. It would be nice for me to know wether your gonna delete my image or not?
- Weak Keep given that we have no proof of prior publication on the Internet. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:49, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I know I'm incompetent to have an opinion. This is just to make the discussion move--Marginataen (talk) 17:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- There is no reason you cannot have an opinion. If you are the photographer and rights owner, I see no reason not to keep the file. However, it would be good to have some evidence. As the group posed for you, I assume you have some relation to them, or had a special role at the event. You might not want to tell about it publicly, but you could email COM:VRT and explain it confidentially. I think you could convince them by telling the details (perhaps including why you don't have access to the EXIF any more). –LPfi (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Two months have passed with no one wanting to delete my file. So?--Marginataen (talk) 21:45, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: as per KoH. --Yann (talk) 14:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
This picture is not appropriate for the Wikimedia Commons Policy. The color is reversed, so it looks bad and is included in the deletion target. 220.77.173.83 13:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- How is it inappropriate for the Wikimedia Commons Policy? Is this file in violation of the Wikimedia Commons Policy? HOW! 170.235.204.49 18:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
per COM:PENIS ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 15:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete we have enough of this, and this topic has much better images Dronebogus (talk) 05:33, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 23:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Balakumar chinnathambi Rao (talk) 18:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- All your files will be deleted. Wanna bet 186.174.190.172 16:18, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion, still unused file and deletion request was filed only a few days after the 7 day period when COM:CSD#G7 would have been applicable anyway. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:18, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
It is a very old picture of Anders Indset. 27Greg022023.lo (talk) 09:52, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:20, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
This is not the flag of Vatican City, but a signal image that was painted and uploaded by hand. This material does not fit into the Wikimedia Commons. It must be deleted unconditionally. 223.62.222.105 17:18, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 17:11, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Marbletan; low quality drawing of unclear purpose, no useful description, out of scope. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:22, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
It's all over my account and I didn't do it 172.193.108.206 13:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Question What does that have to do with deleting the photo from Commons? If someone put a thumbnail of it or something on your user page, just remove it, and you can report whoever did it for vandalism if you like. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Herby talk thyme 12:12, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asterfromthealley (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional photos of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. Article deleted on pl.wp. Only still used on userpage of user without meaningful edits.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Those are my photos, what is the problem??? 185.21.84.15 06:21, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Potential copyright violation: The uploader changed the author to "Unknown", but did not provide a source or any evidence for the license. TilmannR (talk) 12:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: if the uploader isn't the author and doesn't know who took this recent photograph or has the rights to it, there is no base for the license. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:30, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Perohanych (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:LL. Inappropriate source. Uploaded onto http://ukrainka.org.ua/ by user:Perohanych. Authors' permissions needed.
- File:Володимир Сапон.jpg
- File:Григорій Войток.jpg
- File:Ірина Кравчук (Ярина Мавка).jpg
- File:ГОЛУБ ОЛЕНА ВОЛОДИМИРІВНА.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sealle (talk) 05:38, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- The images are properly attributed at http://ukrainka.org.ua and in fact that website is itself using the images with proper permissions from authors. That website is created and maintaned not by unonimous peple, but by me – known public person Yuri Perohanych --Perohanych (talk) 17:37, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- If so, please send those permissions to OTRS. And refrain from removing deletion tags from file pages. Sealle (talk) 18:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- I have got permissions from authors orally and then published their works on http://ukrainka.org.ua website. --Perohanych (talk) 20:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- That's not enough for Commons, see COM:PCP. Sealle (talk) 20:44, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- I have got permissions from authors orally and then published their works on http://ukrainka.org.ua website. --Perohanych (talk) 20:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- If so, please send those permissions to OTRS. And refrain from removing deletion tags from file pages. Sealle (talk) 18:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Oral permissions are not allowed anywhere in copyright law. In order to restore these the actual photographers must send free licenses to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Perohanych (talk · contribs)
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine.
Sealle (talk) 03:16, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
As for File:Arise Pysanko 01.jpg — this is photo of two persons, who are in the Ukrainian Wikipedia, and the buildings are used only as a backgroundd, which is allowed in Ukraine. See art. 21, 4) of the law --Perohanych (talk) 09:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Скумін Віктор Андрійович 02.jpg was not taken in Ukraine
For File:Хрест біля входу на кладовище у Тимках.jpg the author will send rhe necessary letter to OTRS. --Perohanych (talk) 09:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Delete
- File:Arise Pysanko 01.jpg -- the most prominent thing in the image is a large sculpture immediately behind the two people. DM cannot apply.
- File:Скумін Віктор Андрійович 02.jpg may not have been taken in Ukraine, but we do not know where it was taken, so we cannot assume that FOP applies to the monument immediately behind the subject.
- File:Хрест біля входу на кладовище у Тимках.jpg -- this can be restored when and if the creator of the monument sends an appropriate free license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:01, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and my comments above. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:17, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Perohanych (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photo and political poster. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Not sure about File:Агітаційний плакат Анатолія Погрібного.jpg, but picture at File:Orthodox priest Ioan Chekan.jpg was taken more than 100 years ago and is in Public Domain. --Perohanych (talk) 20:10, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Perohanych, so why don’t you fix description and license tag? Sealle (talk) 23:07, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Perohanych (talk · contribs)
[edit]2019 © Еліта. Ми поважаємо вашу приватність.
- File:Cover of ERC magazine No 34.jpg
- File:Cover of ERC magazine No 12.jpg
- File:Cover of ERC magazine.jpg
- File:Cover of ERC magazine No 1.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:15, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
@Patrick Rogel: Thank you for attention to the files. On http://elita.org.ua/erc-magazine/ you can find text in Ukrainian «Авторські права на фото належать групі компаній ERC. Текст і фото опубліковані на умовах CC BY 4.0 International». Rights for fotographs belong to the ERC group of companies. The text and photos are published on the terms of CC BY 4.0 International. --Perohanych (talk) 15:55, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Has license on website. --Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Perohanych (talk · contribs)
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Ahonc as no permission (No permission since). Complex case per discussion on User talk:Perohanych.
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 28.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 27.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 26.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 25.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 24.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 23.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 22.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 21.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 20.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 19.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 18.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 17.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 16.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 15.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 14.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 13.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 12.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 11.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 10.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 09.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 08.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 07.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 06.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 04.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 05.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 03.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 01.jpg
- File:Пресконференція за підсумками Тижня київських письменників у Вікіпедії, 3 березня 2023 02.jpg
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Author should send copy of copyright transfer agreement to VRT.--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 13:17, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Оскільки така угода була укладена усно, буду вдячний за письмовий зразок такої угоди, або посилання на такий зразок. --Perohanych (talk) 08:23, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- А текст з ВП:Дозволи вам чим не підходить?--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 22:51, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Оскільки така угода була укладена усно, буду вдячний за письмовий зразок такої угоди, або посилання на такий зразок. --Perohanych (talk) 08:23, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:34, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
per COM:PENIS ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 15:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep illustrates what it’s supposed to, needs a crop though Dronebogus (talk) 05:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:34, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Not really useful WikiHelper0830 (talk) 15:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 11:34, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- File:Harry and Meghan 2019.JPG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Celia Homeford (talk • contribs) 14:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
There's nothing at the source webpage or their terms and conditions at https://www.nhm.ac.uk/about-us/website-terms-conditions.html that say this is released under an open license. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- The terms of the website previously stated at the time of uploading that that "Unless otherwise stated, you may use the Information under the terms of the Open Government Licence, http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/." I'm not sure if the previous permission is still valid with the update.--Bettydaisies (talk) 21:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: When uploaded this was covered by OGL - https://web.archive.org/web/20191017211359/https://www.nhm.ac.uk/about-us/website-terms-conditions.html. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Molina Studios (talk) 16:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nesitanebticherou (talk · contribs)
[edit]Paintings by Dutch artist en:Jean Thomassen, only a few of them mentioning the artist in the description. No evidence that Thomassen has released these works under a CC-Attribution licence to be attributed to "Nesitanebticherou".
File:Last Judgement Day left.jpgFile:Last Judgement Day right back.jpg- File:Last Judgement Day left back.jpg
File:Egyptian Triptych right.jpgFile:Egyptian Triptych centre.jpgFile:Egyptian Triptych left.jpgFile:28 x Rembrandt, 100 x 150 cm, 1989, private collection ,Malaga Spain.jpgFile:1900 and Yesterday.jpg- File:Voice of Egypt No. 10.jpg
File:The Actress Ine Veen.jpgFile:Paris with 18 Napoleons,.jpgFile:Triumph of Death.jpg- File:1900 and Yesterday no.3.png
File:Last Judgement Day right.jpg- File:Last Judgement Day centre.jpg
Belbury (talk) 12:39, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Ticket:2023031410003734 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 22:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023031410012742 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 07:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023031410012751 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 08:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023031410012797 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023031410012813 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023031410012831 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 12:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023031410012868 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023031410012895 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023031410015589 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 01:00, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023031410015605 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 02:00, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023031410015614 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 03:00, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Deleted the ones without OTRS. Others already kept with thanks to KRD. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Не указано никаких других произведений в качестве источника этой работы. Крайне сомнительно, чтобы автор выполнил всю работу самостоятельно и не использовал никакиу географическую основу. Кроме того, если нет никаких источников, то данная карта является ОРИССом. — Redboston 10:52, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:00, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Agora as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Appears to be TOO. --Gbawden (talk) 11:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
The user who saved that file doesn't seem to be Eero Yrjölä, who made that work or who is in this picture. I don't think the user who saved the image has the copyright to this image. I discussed this picture with him/her and (s)he only reacted by putting Eero Yrjölä in the caption of the picture in the article (s)he created. I think (s)he saved the image in the article editing window and thus didn't really know what (s)he was doing. Luurankosoturi (talk) 09:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: taken from https://www.eeroyrjola.com/artworks - can be undeleted with permission. --Gbawden (talk) 11:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Potential copyvio: The painting in the background and its frame look sufficiently modern that they might be copyrighted. TilmannR (talk) 13:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Question De minimis? The painting is incidental, not essential to the composition, but I don't know, because we certainly do see most of it. I also did a web search, and this man is notable enough for a Wikipedia article, I think, considering the coverage he's gotten in the media, and certainly notable enough for a photo here, though if we keep this, it needs categories. If the painting is an issue, if someone would like to blur it to a greater degree, I think that would solve the problem. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't believe it's de minimis. The painting is identifiable and is not an unavoidable part of the subject. TilmannR (talk) 22:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- He's a tabla player, not a painter. Would you like to blur the painting? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:05, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Usually I edit SVGs, but I gave it a try. TilmannR (talk) 16:13, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- That should be good now. To the closing admin: If you think the painting being in the picture is likely to get the site in trouble, revision delete the original upload. In any event, we can surely Keep the image the way it is now. I'll add some categories in the coming days, if no-one beats me to it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:26, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- That should be good now. To the closing admin: If you think the painting being in the picture is likely to get the site in trouble, revision delete the original upload. In any event, we can surely
- He's a tabla player, not a painter. Would you like to blur the painting? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:05, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP. I found this on his twitter feed. May also be out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kharkivian as no permission (No permission since). Medium-res without EXIF, only upload by user, no evidence of prior publication on the Internet. As it is claimed to be own work, converting to DR to discuss whether COM:AGF applies. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- This photo was published on Lrk Hub Telegram and later on media on September 10, 2022 - e.g. there. Fyi @King of Hearts: --Kharkivian (talk) 19:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of permission. —holly {chat} 19:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 25stargeneral as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.reddit.com/r/vexillology/comments/rkj1tv/flag_of_hindu_rashtra_akhand_bharat/. COM:TOO? COM:SCOPE? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Sorry, I thought it would be clear that I meant the claimed Creative Commons license does not appear to be stated at the source provided. Unless I missed it somewhere? 25stargeneral (talk) 23:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- @25stargeneral: Right, but if it is too simple to be copyrightable, then it does not require a license; it would automatically be public domain. Separately, however, I will note that it is a flag of a fictional country which is not COM:INUSE, and therefore it might not fall within Commons' scope even if there are no copyright issues. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. —holly {chat} 19:37, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:14, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Without knowing the country of origin, there's no way to judge whether it's above TOO or not. —holly {chat} 19:38, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
There is another almsot identical version of this file (File:Table support with a Dionysiac group (2). 2nd cent. A.D.jpg). Unless you think it should be kept, I think it is obsolete. My apologies for the inconvenience. George E. Koronaios (talk) 12:37, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:29, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Txkk as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright packaging
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether the depicted label is really above threshold of originality. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Same problem with: File:KAO ATTACK CHINA VERSION.jpg
Kept: the photo of the backs of the bottles because I think the logos there are de minimis, but deleted the photo of the fronts of the bottles. Kao is a Japanese company, but these products are from either China or Taiwan; in all three countries, TOO is very low. —holly {chat} 19:55, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by LMLM as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Fair use. Book cover
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as the drawing on the cover looks to be rather old. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: This is probably OK because the illustration does look old, but without author information, we have no way of knowing for sure; it could be a modern illustration done in an old style, for all we know. —holly {chat} 19:56, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Scheinwerfermann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It has been brought to my attention that I was mistaken when I uploaded this image in 2011—it was not mine to share and was not a free image; I had it misfiled in my collection. The creator of the image has (nicely) asked me to try and have it removed, because they want to retain their copyright on it.
Converted to regular DR, as the uploader first should notify all re-users, who until now did rely on the alleged free license and might be exposed to copyright-litigation, if the image disappears with a trace. See here for some re-uses, and here. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, Túrelio. Thanks for pointing out the re-use issue. I'll search to find non-Wikipedia instances of the image and notify the re-users today. Scheinwerfermann (talk) 15:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- (And I've also passed this along to the creator of the image, who is also working on getting the image removed from wherever-all it appears) Scheinwerfermann (talk) 18:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Update: I spent a good bit of time combing the web for re-users. With one exception, it seems, they are all pointing back/mirroring the file here on Wikimedia Commons. The one exception not doing that was the kiddle.co site identified by User:Túrelio. In response to my request, kiddle.co promptly sent me a polite "no problem" note and took down the image. The other (repeater/mirror) sites, three of them responded, all saying about the same thing: if an image stops being available or changes status on Wikimedia Commons, they make the same change. No reply from the others, so don't know if they're abandoned or bots or what. What's the next step here in the deletion request? Thanks. Scheinwerfermann (talk) 21:04, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- I found 1 more re-use, here [5]. --Túrelio (talk) 06:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:57, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Not very complex. What do we know about COM:TOO in Slovakia? I don't see anything specific at the link. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Still it is not made of simple geometrical figures. Try to describe these figures! Taivo (talk) 10:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- It's a spiral that comes to a point on both ends. But that's not really the question. The question is, how strict is COM:TOO in Slovakia? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:58, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Since there is no information about TOO in Slovak law, the file should be deleted. I am not a lawyer, but the Slovak copyright law doesn't seem to mention any TOO other that the work has to be "[...] unique result of author's creative intellectual activity perceptible by the senses [...]". (Again, I am not a lawyer and this is just a lay translation.) Janhrach (talk) 08:54, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- It's a spiral that comes to a point on both ends. But that's not really the question. The question is, how strict is COM:TOO in Slovakia? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:58, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Still it is not made of simple geometrical figures. Try to describe these figures! Taivo (talk) 10:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; @Taivo: please check the rest of Category:Logos of TV JOJ. —holly {chat} 20:00, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Multiple cameras and photographers in metadata. The uploader was already blocked two times for uploading copyright violations.
- File:НВК Саха.jpg
- File:Телебашня Якутск.jpg
- File:Tuymaada stadium (Ykt).jpg
- File:Sakha family.jpg
- File:Ураса изнутри.jpg
- File:Ураса.jpg
- File:Кормление огня.jpg
- File:Осуохай.jpg
- File:Аал Луук Мас.jpg
- File:Mother yakutia.jpg
- File:Triumph Ykt.jpg
- File:Saysary lake.jpg
- File:Аэропорт Якутск.jpg
- File:Бизнес-центр.Якутск.jpg
- File:Спортивный комплекс «Триумф».jpg
- File:Tengrist temple Dom Archy in Yakutsk, Yakutia.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 13:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: I came here from a talk page (where this deletion request was notified) of a Wikipedia article where some of the listed images are used as illustrations:
- - Tengrist temple Dom Archy in Yakutsk, Yakutia.jpg
- - Аал Луук Мас.jpg
- - Кормление огня.jpg
- - Осуохай.jpg
- I've checked their use on the internet. They might well be user Uyban's own photos, since all uses on websites other than Wikmedia seem to be temporally subsequent to their upload here on Commons.
- Also notice that the user's blocks date back to about ten years ago.
- Keep at least these.--Æo (talk) 16:39, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- What makes you believe any of these files might be own work? Per metadata, some of these images are taken from Facebook and other websites. File:Saysary lake.jpg even credits Petr Venzel and File:Спортивный комплекс «Триумф».jpg Alexander Krivoshapkin. The uploader also has deleted copyright violations from 2016, 2017 and 2018. --Didym (talk) 16:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- It is possible that user Uyban had some sort of endorsement from the authors to upload the photos; maybe he was one of the photographers and the others were his friends. Notice that all the photos are about Yakutia; maybe it was a specific project to spread information about the nation. I have found that this image is also shown on Yakutsk's government's website since 2017, therefore well after the photo was uploaded here in 2014; its earliest appearance in the web outside Wikimedia dates back to 2015. Æo (talk) 20:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- What makes you believe any of these files might be own work? Per metadata, some of these images are taken from Facebook and other websites. File:Saysary lake.jpg even credits Petr Venzel and File:Спортивный комплекс «Триумф».jpg Alexander Krivoshapkin. The uploader also has deleted copyright violations from 2016, 2017 and 2018. --Didym (talk) 16:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- The user Uyban used webgrab. I watch it many years. And he does not study. Delete. Legioner2016 (talk) 00:59, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; given the uploader's past history and no subsequent indication that they learned anything, we can't trust their claim of "own work". —holly {chat} 20:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
it seems to be not free. logos that contain complex shapes are not free. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 15:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Not if their copyrights are still in force. But does this logo date from 1905? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; en:File:Korea University Global Symbol.svg is marked as non-free, and no reason to believe that it's wrong. —holly {chat} 20:05, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Works by Firelei Báez
[edit]- Clear deletions
- File:163 St-Amsterdam Av (43142723270).jpg
- File:163 St-Amsterdam Av (30018791967).jpg
- File:163 St-Amsterdam Av (43142722640).jpg
- File:163 St-Amsterdam Av (30018792047).jpg
- Unclear deletions
- File:163 St-Amsterdam Av (30018791667).jpg
- File:163 St-Amsterdam Av (44235641874).jpg
- File:Firelei Baez.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Clear deletions: Non-free content, derivative works, no FoP. Images contain copyrighted artworks by a living artist (Firelei Báez), photographed in the United States (no freedom of panorama). Photographs were made and published by the commissioner/owner of the works (the MTA), but the underlying works of art are still under copyright by the artist. Unclear deletions: Nearly identical rationales, but there is significantly less copyrighted work in these images, and the artist is visible in the shots. Definitely room for the argument that they're de minimis. Will leave to the group to decide. --19h00s (talk) 16:36, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- I looked at the first photo on the MTA's Flickr page. It has an Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) license. Don't you think if the artist were upset by that, they would have sued the MTA? Why should we not trust that such a large public institution got the artist's permission? It seems rather absurd not to. Note what the license's terms are: You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- It is MTA policy to release all content under that license - Báez undoubtedly allowed the MTA to publish these images, but the image's free license does not mean the underlying work has been released from copyright. Many public institutions post ostensibly freely licensed images of copyrighted art all the time, but those images aren't usable on Commons because the underlying works of art are still copyrighted. The MTA is no different. I'm not implying that Báez has any reason to take any action against the MTA or Commons, nor am I implying that she ever would, but per Commons rules these images are non-free. 19h00s (talk) 21:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- So you're saying this is an inflexible policy, regardless of the fact that the MTA already released the images for commercial use by anyone? Where is the logic in that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- The MTA released the photos under a free license, but we have no way of confirming if Báez released her artwork under a free license. AFAIK, that's a firm policy - it's a basic copyright issue. Commons requires proof of content "free-ness," not proof of "non-free-ness." 19h00s (talk) 21:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- No way? Here's the contact page on her website. Since you're the one who's worried about the MTA's photos, why don't you ask her whether she was OK with giving the MTA permission to allow the release of photos of her work under a license that allows commercial use of them, and whether she would object to Commons following that license by also hosting the photos with links to the MTA's Flickr page? When you find out, let us know. Otherwise, I would submit that you are just asking for photos to be hidden for the sake of being hidden. The non-MTA photos are more problematic to me because there's less reason to have confidence that she knew they would be uploaded with a CC license and approved, but since you'll be contacting her, anyway, link them in your email and ask her if she would be willing to give COM:VRT permission for their being hosted here or not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I don't know what set you off here, but you're really upset about this. I'm going to let you calm down. I hope other cooler-headed editors are able to take a look at this. Feel free to browse the multiple examples of other MTA-published photos of art that have been deleted, including at the behest of the person who uploaded them here to Commons. 19h00s (talk) 02:38, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Actually, no. You deserve a full response after your weirdly combative reply. The MTA does not have the formal legal right to publish any images of copyrighted art under a free license, unless and until the artists who own the underlying copyright explicitly release their rights. It is not the job of editors to contact the artists who own the copyright in order to prove that these photos are free - that is plainly ridiculous, and I think you know that. We don't owe it to the MTA to assume or confirm they crossed their t's and dotted their i's. We don't even owe them the courtesy of assuming that the CC-BY-2.0 tag was anything more than a random choice their photo editor made when they started the Flickr account. We do, however, have an obligation to keep Commons free. That means removing content that cannot reasonably be proven to be free. If you want to go on a wild goose chase to ask every single artist and artist's estate with work in the MTA's permanent collection if they released their copyright, then feel free! But until you do that, these images don't belong on Commons, because they are not demonstrably free content. 19h00s (talk) 03:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not particularly upset, I just don't agree that there's no way to try to find out what the artist thinks, if you're not satisfied that the MTA did due diligence. What you should have said is that you simply prefer for the photos to be hidden than to try to find out what the artist thinks, which is ultimately what you said. But yes, I think some Commons deletions are, to use your words, ridiculous, and I'd add, illogical, and that does annoy me. I'm kind of reminded of a deletion request thread in which the nominator said we shouldn't trust that UNESCO didn't violate the privacy rights of children it took photos of. Sure, there's a tiny, infinitesimal chance he's right, but no-one agreed with him, yet, sure, the MTA might be grossly violating the copyrights of the artists whose works they display with CC licenses. And on the basis of that small chance that they were presumptuous, we will make it so that people who want to see those photos can't see them here. Great. Congratulations on what I figure will be a successful deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- No, I'd prefer we didn't live in a world with such strict copyright laws. But we have what we have. I don't love every rule on this website, but I live with what I can accept and I use my energy to change what I can't. If you want less stringent derivative work copyright rules, I welcome your constructive work to get the system here to change. But this isn't the place. Thanks, and have a good one. 19h00s (talk) 03:41, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- I understand what you're saying. But I would still say that since the MTA has had these photos up for so many years with an Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) license and the artist has not demanded they be taken down or that the license be changed, we could have the discretion to let well enough alone and go after much more obvious deletion targets, because the chances that there will be an objection seem to be very low. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:27, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- No, I'd prefer we didn't live in a world with such strict copyright laws. But we have what we have. I don't love every rule on this website, but I live with what I can accept and I use my energy to change what I can't. If you want less stringent derivative work copyright rules, I welcome your constructive work to get the system here to change. But this isn't the place. Thanks, and have a good one. 19h00s (talk) 03:41, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not particularly upset, I just don't agree that there's no way to try to find out what the artist thinks, if you're not satisfied that the MTA did due diligence. What you should have said is that you simply prefer for the photos to be hidden than to try to find out what the artist thinks, which is ultimately what you said. But yes, I think some Commons deletions are, to use your words, ridiculous, and I'd add, illogical, and that does annoy me. I'm kind of reminded of a deletion request thread in which the nominator said we shouldn't trust that UNESCO didn't violate the privacy rights of children it took photos of. Sure, there's a tiny, infinitesimal chance he's right, but no-one agreed with him, yet, sure, the MTA might be grossly violating the copyrights of the artists whose works they display with CC licenses. And on the basis of that small chance that they were presumptuous, we will make it so that people who want to see those photos can't see them here. Great. Congratulations on what I figure will be a successful deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- No way? Here's the contact page on her website. Since you're the one who's worried about the MTA's photos, why don't you ask her whether she was OK with giving the MTA permission to allow the release of photos of her work under a license that allows commercial use of them, and whether she would object to Commons following that license by also hosting the photos with links to the MTA's Flickr page? When you find out, let us know. Otherwise, I would submit that you are just asking for photos to be hidden for the sake of being hidden. The non-MTA photos are more problematic to me because there's less reason to have confidence that she knew they would be uploaded with a CC license and approved, but since you'll be contacting her, anyway, link them in your email and ask her if she would be willing to give COM:VRT permission for their being hosted here or not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- The MTA released the photos under a free license, but we have no way of confirming if Báez released her artwork under a free license. AFAIK, that's a firm policy - it's a basic copyright issue. Commons requires proof of content "free-ness," not proof of "non-free-ness." 19h00s (talk) 21:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- So you're saying this is an inflexible policy, regardless of the fact that the MTA already released the images for commercial use by anyone? Where is the logic in that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- It is MTA policy to release all content under that license - Báez undoubtedly allowed the MTA to publish these images, but the image's free license does not mean the underlying work has been released from copyright. Many public institutions post ostensibly freely licensed images of copyrighted art all the time, but those images aren't usable on Commons because the underlying works of art are still copyrighted. The MTA is no different. I'm not implying that Báez has any reason to take any action against the MTA or Commons, nor am I implying that she ever would, but per Commons rules these images are non-free. 19h00s (talk) 21:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete copyrighted artwork, the free Flickr license only applies to the photo by MTA. We have no certainty if MTA did ever had the artist's consent, or if they had, the license only applies to their use (and does not apply to tertiary users like Commons users or viewers). "The artist has not demanded they be taken down or that the license be changed" is akin to number 1 statement at Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. A change of US law will permanently solve all these things. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:15, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 5 of 7 per nomination; the last two I'm going to crop them so they're just showing the artist, otherwise the artwork is not de minimis. —holly {chat} 20:13, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
JPEG basically considers that the recognition is much lower than that of image quality and sensitivity, and I think it is not necessary to preserve it in public compared to other files. 220.77.173.83 17:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Question We don't appear to have a bigger image of this flag, so why would it make any sense to delete this? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; bad format and we have SVG versions of this flag. —holly {chat} 20:27, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
No suggestion that the user who uploaded this photo to Last FM is the genuine copyright holder. Belbury (talk) 18:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- A correction regarding the image: I remember making a reverse image search on this image, and the earliest result that appeared that used the photo was a dead link. Despite this, I chose the wrong info. My apologies. Misterspaceman (talk) 18:36, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Misterspaceman: What "wrong info" do you mean? Do you still believe that The copyright holder of this work allows anyone to use it for any purpose including unrestricted redistribution, commercial use, and modification - and if so, on what grounds? Belbury (talk) 18:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- The "wrong info" was stating that Ramonzi was the original copyright holder, when in fact they weren't. I cited them initially because they were the recent Internet user to post the image publicly, from previous research involving a reverse image search engine. I believed that the original copyright holder allowed the photo to be used unrestricted, since Ramonzi was able to use the photo publicly. If I made a mistake with the three photos, I apologize and thank you for assistance. I think I will just stick with cleaning up pop culture sections of articles and other small text edits. Misterspaceman (talk) 18:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- The grounds to which I felt the image could be used was in an article like on Wikipedia. Misterspaceman (talk) 18:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Okay. This does sound like a misunderstanding of how public domain works: a musician using a photo for publicity purposes in no way means that they have released it into the public domain. Belbury (talk) 18:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you for the insight. Misterspaceman (talk) 19:18, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Okay. This does sound like a misunderstanding of how public domain works: a musician using a photo for publicity purposes in no way means that they have released it into the public domain. Belbury (talk) 18:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- The grounds to which I felt the image could be used was in an article like on Wikipedia. Misterspaceman (talk) 18:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- The "wrong info" was stating that Ramonzi was the original copyright holder, when in fact they weren't. I cited them initially because they were the recent Internet user to post the image publicly, from previous research involving a reverse image search engine. I believed that the original copyright holder allowed the photo to be used unrestricted, since Ramonzi was able to use the photo publicly. If I made a mistake with the three photos, I apologize and thank you for assistance. I think I will just stick with cleaning up pop culture sections of articles and other small text edits. Misterspaceman (talk) 18:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Misterspaceman: What "wrong info" do you mean? Do you still believe that The copyright holder of this work allows anyone to use it for any purpose including unrestricted redistribution, commercial use, and modification - and if so, on what grounds? Belbury (talk) 18:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:28, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Author died 19 May 1957, file can be undeleted in 2028. Vera (talk) 19:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- As the uploader is absent, he might wanted to mention FOP. In that case, Template:FoP-Switzerland should be added. Enhancing999 (talk) 21:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- The sealing makes it look like this is indoors? Vera (talk) 08:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's in this building in the open entrance hall below this. At least according to photo in the brochure "Züri z’Fuess Unterwegs in Hottingen" showing the same mural with the legend "Ehemaliges Pestalozzi-Schulhaus. Über dem Haupteingang ein Wandbild, Pestalozzi darstellend mit Kindern." Also the description "Die Eingangshalle enthält zwei abstrakte Wandbilder, die ersten dieser Art in Zürich, von Hans Arp (rechts) und Otto van Rees von 1915." .. Rees' on the left would explain the light on the left of the image. Enhancing999 (talk) 15:59, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- It seems there was a same discussion about the second mural: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hottingen Hans Arp 1915.JPG.
- Keep then, per uploader there. Enhancing999 (talk) 05:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's in this building in the open entrance hall below this. At least according to photo in the brochure "Züri z’Fuess Unterwegs in Hottingen" showing the same mural with the legend "Ehemaliges Pestalozzi-Schulhaus. Über dem Haupteingang ein Wandbild, Pestalozzi darstellend mit Kindern." Also the description "Die Eingangshalle enthält zwei abstrakte Wandbilder, die ersten dieser Art in Zürich, von Hans Arp (rechts) und Otto van Rees von 1915." .. Rees' on the left would explain the light on the left of the image. Enhancing999 (talk) 15:59, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- The sealing makes it look like this is indoors? Vera (talk) 08:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi It's "outdoors", not indoors. The entrance area has a roof, but no door. Enhancing999 (talk) 08:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- That's not obvious to me, I don't see this "lack of a door" in the available pictures, so where does the information come from? Gestumblindi (talk) 22:52, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- There is a picture of the entrance in the publication quoted above and added as reference to the image. What lead you to conclude the opposite?
- If I hadn't known about the uploader's absence, I wouldn't have researched it and commented here. Enhancing999 (talk) 04:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Well, I'm going to trust your word on the picture in the publication, so I'm changing my vote to Weak keep. Weak because I'm not 100 % sure that even an open, partially enclosed entrance area qualifies for FoP under Swiss law (but it is likely), as legal commentators assess cases like station halls differently. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:39, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Well, I'm going to trust your word on the picture in the publication, so I'm changing my vote to
- That's not obvious to me, I don't see this "lack of a door" in the available pictures, so where does the information come from? Gestumblindi (talk) 22:52, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi It's "outdoors", not indoors. The entrance area has a roof, but no door. Enhancing999 (talk) 08:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: FoP-Switzerland saves the day. —holly {chat} 20:31, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: these paintings by Lui Shou-Kwan (d. 1975) will not be subject to PD-China until 2026. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3 to allow discussion of COM:DM. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Definitely de minimis. —holly {chat} 20:31, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
I have been unable to locate a death date for artist Sylvestre Kaballa. In fact, it's not impossible that he's still alive (he'd be ~103). The most recent artwork by him that I could find is dated 1978, and even if he died the day after completing that painting, PD-Democratic Republic of the Congo is 50 years PMA and thus the earliest his work would be PD is in 2029. What happens if we can't find a death date? DS (talk) 22:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, it looks to me based on a web search like he is alive. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:11, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- That's intriguing - link? DS (talk) 14:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- No time right now, but I glean that information from seeing several sites that give only his birth information and no site that gives a death date. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, but that's negative information, not positive. It's always possible that people can just drop out of history. DS (talk) 15:46, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Of course, and people can die any day. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- No time right now, but I glean that information from seeing several sites that give only his birth information and no site that gives a death date. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Dit is een foto van mij waarvoor ik geen toestemming heb gegeven om te uploaden 2A02:A213:2B40:4380:C4DC:EE8D:77D6:6E1D 22:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; the person in the photo is unidentifiable, and even if he is, the photo appears to have been taken in a public location, so there can be no expectation of privacy. —holly {chat} 20:33, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Dit is een foto van mij waarvoor ik geen toestemming heb gegeven om te uploaden 2A02:A213:2B40:4380:C4DC:EE8D:77D6:6E1D 22:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; the person in the photo is unidentifiable, and even if he is, the photo appears to have been taken in a public location, so there can be no expectation of privacy. —holly {chat} 20:34, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Dit is een foto waar ik op sta en daar gaf ik geen toestemming voor 2A02:A213:2B40:4380:C4DC:EE8D:77D6:6E1D 22:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; the person in the photo is unidentifiable, and even if he is, the photo appears to have been taken in a public location, so there can be no expectation of privacy. —holly {chat} 20:34, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
The flag of the Count of Benaixin follows the exact standard. Rather than copyright, this painting is a signal flag made of fake and self-made, and the existence of such photographs in public is considered negative. The deletion is a good reason. 220.77.173.83 16:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- File:Flag of Comtat Venaissin.svg should be bundled with this nomination. Veverve (talk) 12:17, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete both File:Flag of Comtat Venaissin.svg and File:DrapèuModerneComtatVenaicin.png: Not educational, but a hoax. Veverve (talk) 12:18, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Veverve: Why is this a hoax? The SVG file is widely used across many projects. —holly {chat} 20:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- It is an user-made original flag, not a reproduction of a historical flag. That is, unless the historical model can be shown. A hoax can be spread on many projects. Veverve (talk) 21:09, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Veverve: Why is this a hoax? The SVG file is widely used across many projects. —holly {chat} 20:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted the .png as it is unused and a fictious flag. Kept the .svg since it is in use, and discussion of the merits of the file must be done at those wikipedias. --Abzeronow (talk) 02:20, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
JPEG basically considers that the recognition is much lower than that of image quality and sensitivity, and I think it is not necessary to preserve it in public compared to other files. 223.62.222.105 17:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep we do not have a better JPEG of this version of the flag, and unless I am mistaken it is a longstanding practice to keep at least the one best JPEG even when there is an SVG. - Jmabel ! talk 17:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a good reason. --DenghiùComm (talk) 19:12, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete File:Flag of the Vatican City.jpg is much better quality of the same flag that has the correct colors. No need to keep this low-quality .jpg rendering when a higher quality of the same flag exists. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 21:33, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This flag is somewhat controversial right now (see [6]), and will likely remain so since the Vatican City is not exactly a country by the usual definition. Well, since a 1928 treaty with Italy, in many ways it has been treated like a country, but it is also a religious institution the Holy See. As I understand it, the Holy See is like the government of the world-wide Roman Catholic Church and of the territory known as the Vatican City.
- The title on this file seems to mix the 2 concepts. Yes, I'm a bit confused right now, but we should keep the file at least until we decide whether it's the flag of the Holy See and/or the Vatican City. Smallbones (talk) 17:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: We have a better .jpg version of that flag. --Abzeronow (talk) 02:22, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't acknowledge the accuracy. Of course, this is also a self-made painting that denies the fact. The Vatican flag must follow the standard. 223.62.222.105 17:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
- This deletion request was made by a troll who has been consistently vandalizing pages on sh.wikipedia with his whatchamacallit project and has been consistently blocked, with his edits revised and hidden. His deletion request per se makes absolutely no sense, but, seeing how I really am the author of this and how (1) this was made a long time ago when the
borderfunction was not available as a means to an end, and (2) it is not used anywhere, I actually agree with the deletion if it is not needed here on the project. But yes, this request was made by an abusive troll who keeps vandalizing our project and the contributions of every user who has reverted his edits (he hada a very active campaign on WikiData as well). Edgar Allan Poe (talk) 17:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The erroneous addition of red to the papal tiara has spread to flag manufacturers and emojis, and originated here on Commons back in 2017 per redditor horizontalhole's post in r/vexillology and the thread from Depths of Wikipedia. gobonobo + c 02:10, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, is anti-educational since it perpuated wrong versions of the flag. --Abzeronow (talk) 02:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
The flag doesn't make sense. Must follow standardization. 223.62.222.105 17:36, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. The erroneous addition of red to the papal tiara has spread to flag manufacturers and emojis, and originated here on Commons back in 2017 per redditor horizontalhole's post in r/vexillology and the thread from Depths of Wikipedia. gobonobo + c 02:13, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This is a perfectly legitimate style of this flag in real use by the Holy See: https://www.vatican.va/news_services/press/documentazione/documents/corpo-diplomatico/corpo-diplomatico_internazionali_elenco_en.html, https://dam.media.un.org/asset-management/2AM9LO46AB5A?FR_=1&W=1920&H=961, and File:Be Apostolic nunciature 01.jpg, etc. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:47, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: on top of the erroneous addition Gobonobo pointed out (see also this CNA article), the resolution is way too small to be of any educational use. Veverve (talk) 08:10, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Only used in a user page, erroneous flag, serves no educational purpose. --Abzeronow (talk) 02:25, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
