Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/03/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 24th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not the file i wanted upload Gadawie (talk) 03:06, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request & F10. --Achim55 (talk) 07:20, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rajabhojgupta RajaBhojGupta (talk) 03:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 07:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of nude photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, by Túrelio. The photo is quite strange, but in my opinion deletion is justified due to weak educational value. Taivo (talk) 12:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of nude photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, by Túrelio. In my opinion deletion is justified due to weak educational value. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake CringeMaster113 (talk) 07:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:33, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without educational use / copyvio Drakosh (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hfhgfcfvgg Bastianmexice (talk) 18:35, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 19:02, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yhggggyyy Bastianhoney (talk) 19:54, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hhhhhhggggg 2607:FB91:1928:C6C1:AC39:60F1:812B:930C 17:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Known vandal from Florida. --Achim55 (talk) 18:45, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Niksmathpal (talk) 18:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Test or nonsense by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 19:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright 2001:448A:11A8:13D1:CD82:2AC2:D142:175E 11:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 23:57, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All other uploads by this user appear to be copyright violations (they come from Google or random websites, per the uploader's own provided info). This one is tagged as "own work" but is likely a copyright violation as well. IagoQnsi (talk) 02:00, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the photo is in en.wiki as fair use (en:file:Joseph Augustus Zarelli.jpeg), which is prohibited in Commons. Also I deleted the uploader's all other contributions as different kind of copyvios and warned him/her not to upload more. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ereur please suprimé — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arckhgfuyi (talk • contribs) 21:02, 23 March 2023‎ (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, small photo without metadata, the user's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 02:48, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I deleted the file speedily. In my opinion this is an attack image. The uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I couldn't find any indictation of a free license in the source (https://www.bandsintown.com/a/15483773-muni-long) FromtheEndofElo (talk) 03:08, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the one who initially uploaded the image for the page I am creating on Raghav Kaneria. But since then have decided to use different image. Kindly delete the two versions of this image Girishpparmar (talk) 03:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Also most likely copyright violation, at least not own work. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:28, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, I'll delete very similar file:포피소대.png due to same reason. These are the user's last remaining uploads. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist Wan Chai North died in 1980. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Ellin Beltz. --Rosenzweig τ 09:35, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was mistaken about this being licensed when uploading, only some of the collection I'm looking at is freely licensed Carlinmack (talk) 19:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:34, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement - picture found on the Internet Pugilist (talk) 22:00, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 09:34, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Borrar pls 186.172.40.108 23:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: obvious copyvio, grabbed from the web. --Rosenzweig τ 09:33, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Borra esta chica. 186.172.40.108 23:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: obvious copyvio, grabbed from the web. --Rosenzweig τ 09:33, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph is available all over the internet. It is not clear who the author is, and the license stated (PD) is questionable. HeminKurdistan (talk) 09:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining uploaded photo. Used only in declined draft. License review failed. Taivo (talk) 13:08, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toy. https://dinotoyblog.com/prehistoric-marine-tube-collecta/ FunkMonk (talk) 09:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, in addition, small photo without metadata, own work is unlikely. Taivo (talk) 13:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted photo Onel5969 (talk) 11:50, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 14:45, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian: un-used: Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 13:58, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as obvious attack-image. --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the person not like Jahaanaa (talk) 12:41, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

She not like 2405:201:F00F:6109:DCB5:3D78:9410:1528 17:08, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, the user's only upload. Small photo without metadata. Courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, no proper resolution. Questionable own work. Also out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:00, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, low resolution. Questionable own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also almost-copy file:احمدعلی مقیمی.jpg due to same reason. These are the user's only uploaded photos. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image obtained from the internet HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment From nasrnews.ir? Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9   14:55, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 15:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. In addition, in my personal opinion what is written in the file is wrong. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS personal photo by non-contributor Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed to be "own work" but uploaded by Wendy Sharpe's assistant, not Wendy Sharpe https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wendy_Sharpe&diff=1141496935&oldid=1141390834 Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 15:57, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of Romanticization (talk · contribs) are copyright violations on one way or another and I'll delete them all. Really, most of them are already nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal reflections/comments about a movie; outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 16:40, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, in addition, permission is "not allowed to copy". This is not acceptable in Commons. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Als Eigentümer des Hauses bitte ich um Löschung. Peanuts24 (talk) 16:42, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sieben Jahre, nachdem du das Foto hochgeladen hast? Merkwürdig. --Achim55 (talk) 18:37, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small photo without camera data, the user's only upload. Author is "SH" (look metadata). Uploader's request, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1984 Russian photograph. Won't be public domain in Russia for some time. Abzeronow (talk) 16:42, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF authorship ("Martin Granger") does not match uploader name. Belbury (talk) 11:28, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation. --Wutsje 01:34, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Typical bad COM:PENIS pic Dronebogus (talk) 09:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]



 Kept, not so bad. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random low quality penis photo, I don't think this is good quality or has anything special, it is slightly blurred A1Cafel (talk) 16:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete the author even admits it’s boring. I don’t know why Taivo was insistent on keeping some of these things. Dronebogus (talk) 14:51, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 03:29, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and/or copyright violation IagoQnsi (talk) 02:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Self-uploaded photo of a non-noteworthy author; Spanish Wikipedia article slated for speedy deletion. IagoQnsi (talk) 02:42, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The odd compression and black bar at the top suggest that this is a screenshot and may not be the uploader's own work. Also may be out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 02:53, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. The uploader's other two stadium photos were copyright violations found elsewhere on the internet; it seems likely that this one is as well. Google reverse image search shows results on mettanews.id, a website that is no longer online. IagoQnsi (talk) 02:55, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Uploader attributed the photo to Mikhail Yunoshev, but since he appears in the photo he probably did not take it. Might be a reupload; see Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Mikhailyunoshev.jpg IagoQnsi (talk) 03:38, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 03:41, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 03:52, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Does not appear to meet any of the requirements listed in the Venezuela PD tag that is currently on the image page IagoQnsi (talk) 03:54, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 03:54, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope and/or copyright violation IagoQnsi (talk) 04:08, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is not for text content IagoQnsi (talk) 04:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality upscaled image, unlikely to be uploader's own work IagoQnsi (talk) 04:27, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation; photo of someone who died in 1993 tagged as "own work". New user with several other uploads confirmed to be copyvios. IagoQnsi (talk) 04:46, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. New user with several other copyvios uploaded (confirmed by Google reverse image search). IagoQnsi (talk) 04:48, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has a white border and appears to be low-quality (possibly upscaled), suggesting that this might be a screenshot and might not be the uploader's own work IagoQnsi (talk) 04:53, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A copyrighted coin of Australia is depicted. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:53, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Used only in declined draft, probably out of project scope as well. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

VRT-permission from author Capplannetta is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian: un-used: Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 13:58, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian: un-used: Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 14:38, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the source website: "Disclaimer: I've been collecting pictures long before I decided to make a webpage. Some of these pictures might be from web-sites that prohibit using of their pictures." Should be deleted per COM:PCP Abzeronow (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jean-Marc Volta is a living person, and the source site has a copyright notice on the page. Would need VRT permission to stay here. Abzeronow (talk) 16:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per https://copyright.lib.harvard.edu/states/missouri/ "Copyrightable by statute "any photograph, written work, art object, or any product created of the capitol or capitol grounds" ". Would need VRT permission from Rowden's office. Abzeronow (talk) 16:33, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1928 published American photograph. Source doesn't list where it was published so it might not be public domain until next year. Abzeronow (talk) 16:40, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

-- Restored after searching for renewals and not finding it under renewals. Abzeronow (talk) 20:47, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist Wan Chai North died in 1980. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist Wan Chai North died in 1980. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This painting has a signature in corner, but it is not attributed to author. It is certainly not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liu_Guosong is still living Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liu_Guosong is still alive Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not attributed to author, not work of Wan Chai North. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like the work of someone not the photographer but which is incorrectly credited. Perhaps Chagall? Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent Asian painting, no attribution. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tineye found "www.piterburger.ru news/v-mire - First found on Nov 4, 2017 Filename: siriya-2-144x109.jpg(144 x 109, 5.5 kB)" Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At this size, lack of quality and obviously a red-carpet shoot, it's doubtfully own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a crop from a red-carpet-shoot without source or attribution. Too small and reproduced too many times to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work, no metadata, low quality image of non-notable female in unknown location. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a profesional shoot (see the light box reflections in eyes) not own work. It's smaller than facebook size, and has no useful metadata . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This painting in Sweden has no information about the artist. "STAL" is not the artist, that is the name of the company the subject founded. The copyright status does not depend on if the painting is "old" but when the artist died. Thuresson (talk) 21:05, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unknown subject IagoQnsi (talk) 22:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unknown subject IagoQnsi (talk) 22:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page created as advertisement (G10). --Karim talk to me :)..! 01:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 08:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not creative commons and not "Eggybreadcool"'s own work. Strugglehouse (talk) 18:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged for speedy deletion as an obvious copyvio. XAM2175 (T) 18:04, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 08:00, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this batch of night satellite photos consist of poorly calibrated, blurred and very dark images without any educational value (compared e.g. to this nicely sharp photo)

— Draceane talkcontrib. 08:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:46, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

another blurred photos (of Earth + aurora), poorly calibrated, blurred and very dark images without any educational value

— Draceane talkcontrib. 09:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd keep
They are not ideal, but it's recognizable and if that's the way it looks from space .. Enhancing999 (talk) 10:53, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Enhancing999: To be fair, it only looks that way from space if you're using an unfocused camera, so I'm still unsure of the value here. Huntster (t @ c) 16:27, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure most of my cameras in 2003 wouldn't have done it better. Enhancing999 (talk) 05:17, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of TheRoobo

[edit]

TheRoobo (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:56, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Nsnape.m

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Nsnape.m (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos, only one has metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Kadaanbourdeau

[edit]

Kadaanbourdeau (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Spam. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ukraina12

[edit]

Ukraina12 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Mostly small photos without metadata, different resolution. Uploader is globally locked as spam-only account. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:59, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Yuminerva

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Yuminerva (talk · contribs):

With one exception, metadata is missing. Different resolution. I suspect different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 19:00, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Caza28

[edit]

Caza 28 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Mostly small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 19:00, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of LiooLi Mixturas

[edit]

LiooLi Mixturas (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Derivative work of photo of Soviet cosmonaut with dubious origin, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 19:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Zazaphoto1

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of Zazaphoto1 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without camera data, one file comes from Facebook. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 19:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FLAVIA BRILLI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos and some personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Look at her bio here. I'm not so sure she's out of scope. On the other hand, she claims all these photos are own work, doesn't she? The first one is not, the second one shows James McAlistair as the author in the EXIF, the third one is not, the fourth one is not, the fifth one is not...so if none of them are selfies, then the photographer needs to give permission. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:11, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks Flickrwashed, Flickr user only has two photos, both uploaded the same day that this was uploaded to Commons. Same image appears in monochrome on the subject's press page at https://www.rubydhal.com/press Belbury (talk) 15:37, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope – irrelevant person Codc (talk) 15:39, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:46, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely license violation (no free content); No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:37, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:57, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 12:01, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:56, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 12:01, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:56, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 12:01, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:56, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

png render of File:Zirid Dynasty (orthographic projection).svg, pointless Nutshinou Talk! 12:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small png render of File:Apple logo black.svg, pointless Nutshinou Talk! 12:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the persons in the portrait and I ask the photos to be removed from the web and the wiki page. I do not authorize them Evasangiorgi (talk) 07:28, 5 March 2023 (UTC) Cryptic-waveform (talk) 12:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from File talk:Eva Sangiorgi Viennale 2018 Sommer-Pressekonferenz 11.jpg Cryptic-waveform (talk) 12:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The photo was taken at a public event, and it's in use in a Wikipedia article. Sorry, but to my understanding, you don't have the power to force the image off the site by withholding authorization. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I took the picture. As always when I get notified onwiki or elswhere by people I took pictures of, that they'd prefer to see a picture removed (which does not happen too often luckily): Yes, please delete!
While I am aware that in our reglemenatations the photo is ok (official press event, accreditation, portrayed person was aware of me doing it ...), I also always want to respect the wishes of the people depicted. So it is absolutely no problem at all for me if it is deleted! Additionally, to respect such wishes is good in the sense that I want to ask institutions like Viennale for the opportunity to take pictures there in the future again. Actually this is one of my main dates for taking pictures for Wikipedia etc annually. It's a matter of mutual respect that "we", meaning the few people here at Commons who decide on it, do not only think of our aim to collect pictures no matter what, but also recognize such wishes (and the fact that these are pictures of living persons, of humans, not some (virtual) objects). Thank you all for considering this as well! --Tsui (talk) 08:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 22:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

for COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 12:39, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

De minimis does not apply HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:43, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image by non-contributor. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 12:46, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Testseyedali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two out of scope personal pictures and the rest taken from the internet

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable own work claim. No metadata, low resolution HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I deleted the user's other upload speedily due to failed license review. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per watermark, this file was published on www.alkathiri.net. Date and author information is likely wrong. Is this a copyright violation? Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:44, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:51, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is close enough to the original to be useful here, it's a copyright infringement. If not, then it's out of scope. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:03, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Looks like copyright violation and out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:51, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Aliyeganeh0912

[edit]

These files look like screenshots or still pictures from television sets. And if we believe that the user is the subject of the photographs, they're unlikely to be the photographer as well. --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. In addition, all unused, educational value is not shown. Taivo (talk) 11:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:51, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE, possibly a copyright violation Nutshinou Talk! 14:10, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image by non-contributor. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a com:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 14:23, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nutshinou FYI these can be nominated for COM:CSD F10. Uhai (talk) 14:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
my bad, I'll keep that in mind Nutshinou Talk! 15:08, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

keine Autor*in angegeben, zeitgenössisches Foto Carl Ha (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope – irrelevant person Codc (talk) 15:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JohnJon787 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

probably 3 fair-use (low resolution, no exif)

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Looks like copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons is not an amateur porn site IagoQnsi (talk) 03:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  • The use of the word "teen" is no proof whatsoever that this is not an 18- or 19-year-old man, so it wouldn't make sense to say that the filename is evidence of a crime. However, we can't be sure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:47, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not reasonably useful for educational purposes; Commons has much better pictures of this subject; age of subject not clear. --Wutsje 01:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Isopropyl acetate 200.svg as high-quality vector replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:17, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Biosynthesis of vitamin K1 (EN).svg and File:Biosynthesis of vitamin K1 (DE).svg. Leyo 22:03, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 07:37, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-identified draft/working-plans from over a decade ago. The various pieces are each available in Category:Titanium disulfide DMacks (talk) 08:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 17:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 08:43, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 17:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 08:44, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 17:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing. 2023 flickr account with 0 followers

Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 17:53, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All PTI images are copyrighted. Check [1] - hako9 05:32, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete along with the crop COM:F1 and COM:NETCOPYVIO -- DaxServer (talk) 14:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ogornne

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Ogornne (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:43, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Bennyy87

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Bennyy87 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate-format container for File:Battery TiS2.png DMacks (talk) 08:52, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Primetals

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Primetals (talk · contribs):

Small files without metadata, text on drawings is almost not readable. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cecil Beaton died in 1980, Undelete in 2051 when this will be public domain in the UK. Abzeronow (talk) 20:10, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ericddd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host.

Achim55 (talk) 22:12, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Per the nominator. Plus there might possibly be copyright issues around images of the interfaces of the apps. Although I think the images being out of scope is enough to justify their deletion regardless. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:05, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:45, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ericddd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 20:46, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry BakuFromAus (talk) 14:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no reason to delete. it is a useful file. C.Suthorn (talk) 01:58, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, actually the photo is too blurry. In addition, all depicted people are unidentified. Taivo (talk) 07:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Giuseppe Viggiani (Q76293707) died in 1962, which is less than 70 years ago. Thuresson (talk) 00:06, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Agreed that this is not in public domain. However this painting and all "anni.jpg" paintings uploaded by ‎María Isabel Viggiani Rocha were offered to her by the painter, her grandfather. This makes her the owner of the painting and she can release them under a free license. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 03:05, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, not really. Mere ownership does not include the copyright of a still copyrighted work. However, if the uploader is really the granddaughter of the painter, she eventually may have inherited the works and the copyright, provided there is no other remaining higher ranking heir. Absolutely requires permission-procedure through OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 13:33, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@María Isabel Viggiani Rocha: Please see Túrelio's comment above. You would need to follow the steps in Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/es to release the rights to your grandfather's work. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:47, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, VRT-permission from heir is needed to restore the file. I'll delete most uploads of María Isabel Viggiani Rocha (talk · contribs) due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for sculptures in Russia, and the sculptor has died in 1997.

Дима Г (talk) 00:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, will be undeleted in 2072 (74+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 09:16, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Big central watermark: Suspected CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 00:48, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:28, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Photo is not old enough to be public domain, and the author is unknown. IagoQnsi (talk) 02:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Photo is not old enough? I do not understand that part, also did anyone contact you because this violated the copyright? Andro Keshelashvili (talk) 13:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Old enough photos are generally published before 1917 or created before 1903. There are exceptions, though. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
this can't be a good reason for deletion, no matter how old the photo is. I couldn't find the owner and the site I got it from doesn't state that they have copyright, I might have found maybe something. Under all of the photos I uploaded it said "GARF", I don't know what that is but perhaps its something to do with copyright. Andro Keshelashvili (talk) 17:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikimedia Commons only accepts files that are definitively known to be free to use. Under copyright law in most countries (those that have signed the Berne Convention), all creative works are automatically protected by copyright, even if the owner doesn't include a copyright notice. Therefore, Commons only accepts files either if the copyright holder has released the work under a free license, or if the file has entered the public domain. See Commons:Licensing for more info. –IagoQnsi (talk) 00:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, no author data, no evidence of anonymous work, no first publication data. That way the photo can be restored in 2066 (120+1 years from creation). Taivo (talk) 09:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Screenshot from video and not own work by uploader. Bookish Worm (talk) 02:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:03, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. This appears to be a screenshot of an existing map with additional details drawn on, rather than an entirely original creation of the uploader. IagoQnsi (talk) 02:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it's not allowed right? Andro Keshelashvili (talk) 17:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karrgo9224! (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyright violations. Three of this user's uploads (not included in this deletion request) are confirmed copyright violations, as they were found elsewhere with a Google reverse image search. The images in this DR could not be found with Google, but given that they are all very different images, it is unlikely that they were all created by the uploader.

IagoQnsi (talk) 04:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal foto 186.174.113.62 17:44, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 20:05, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a good quality image to illustrate male reproductive organs, it is slightly blurred A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted as copyright violation. Small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission no source copyvio from https://www.made-in.be/vlaams-brabant/ceo-van-bij-ons-nieuwe-voorzitter-investeringscomite-bja/ Hoyanova (talk) 08:55, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, there is no permission of the publisher (BDÜ Fachverlag) to upload/show this book title Alabasterstein (talk) 09:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a copyright violation, the claim that this is the uploader's own work is implausible. Sandstein (talk) 09:41, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, only used in a promo WP article that is up for deletion Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why did you request for deletion of this file? This image is an image of an artist from abuja Nigeria. Visit his blog to see more about him visit Badeditor22 (talk) 15:46, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • 22 followers on Twitter, 8 subscribers on YouTube, 135 followers on Instagram. As a fellow musician, I wish you luck, but you are not notable, and Commons is not the host of images of every little-known musician in the world. Sorry. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, this is the user's last remaining upload. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photographs was posted on Facebook before upload here (https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=241011309432625&set=a.263088835924252) and lacks metadata or proper size. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:09, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the uploader also has a bad record on copyright issues. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:12, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:53, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user says that the author is someone else (" عکاس مجتبی غلامرضی هست واجازه نشر این عکس را داده اند") but tags it as own work. No permission. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says "Copyright holder: Colin Darbyshire" which does not match the attribution given by the uploader. Image appears at the same resolution at https://www.berlinmva.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Colin-Darbyshire-1.jpg Belbury (talk) 11:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:32, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:32, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:32, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:32, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:33, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:16, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:16, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:16, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:16, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:16, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely license violation (no free content); No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Likely license violation (no free content); No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:37, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:21, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:21, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:21, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:21, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:21, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No education value of an edited video. Please do not test here, as pointed out before. Malyacko (talk) 11:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted per en:File:Second_Revolutionary_Government_Junta_of_El_Salvador.jpg Geohakkeri (talk) 12:12, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File obtained from the internet, Fars is not the author HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Habibillah Bourbour.jpg. HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, this is the user's last remaining upload. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thumbnail of professional image. Unlike that own work. However, the other uploading by this user may be OK Estopedist1 (talk) 13:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, only 120×142 pixels. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Belgium (civil).svg. Fry1989 eh? 13:42, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in this category have multiple issues. Some are copyright violations and falsely tagged with a free license (like File:Jomei roohallah.jpg and File:Jomei1.jpg), while others are suspiciously claimed to be own work. These files are variously without metadata, or taken with several camera models (Canon EOS 5D Mark II, NIKON D100, Canon EOS 7D). Also, from the way pages in several Wikipedia languages are created for this relatively unknown local politician in Iran (whose article is deleted in his native Persian Wikipedia), we are apparently witnessing a case of abusing the project for promotion.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:12, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, there exists and article about depicted person in multiple languages, including English Wikipedia, and half of the photos are used in these articles, so obviously he is in project scope. All deleted as copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 07:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see en:File:First Revolutionary Government Junta of El Salvador.jpg Geohakkeri (talk) 14:47, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, photos from Salvador are copyrighted until author's death and 70 years further. Taivo (talk) 07:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private logo of Yeshiva; non-free logo Euro know (talk) 15:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of The Little Mermaid in Copenhagen is subject to copyright because the creator Edvard Eriksen (* 1876; † 1959) died less than 70 years ago. Dannebrog Spy (talk) 16:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, will be undeleted in 2030 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 07:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao non ho capito la tua richiesta di cancellare la mia copertina del mio disco. Sulla copertina è raffigurata mia figlia, soggetto della canzone che io stessa ho scritto e interpreto, la foto è stata scattata a casa sua a Losanna dal suo telefonino, è la prima volta che provo a pubblicare un mio lavoro su Wikipedia in qualità di cantante/Artista, non ho ancora ben capito come funziona il tutto. Dov’è il problema in questa foto? Perché devo cancellarla? Grazie per una spiegazione. Cordiali saluti Maria Dalla Bona (talk) 07:26, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Grazie per la risposta. Di solito segnalo la copertina degli album per la cancellazione quando non è chiaro chi ne detiene i diritti. Grazie per l'argilla. Intanto anche se non sono convinto della notabilità dell'opera, come da regole di Commons: [2]. Vedo anche che ci sono libri con copertine sicuramente protette da copyright. Non so se la loro integrazione sia accettabile per legge. Lascerò decidere ad un amministratore, ma non mi opporrò al mantenimento dell'immagine. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, complex album covers can be in Commons only with VRT-permission (Italian version COM:Volunteer Response Team/it). But permission from book authors is not needed, because the book covers are here very small and badly seen. After receiving and accepting the permission the file will be restored, don't re-upload the cover yourself. Taivo (talk) 08:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hsarrazin as Copyvio (copyvio)

Excerpt from a 1966 book. Not public domain in France yet. Soonest this could possibly be hosted on Commons is 2037 Abzeronow (talk) 16:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, seems like Mustapha Khayati was still living in 2001, so the file cannot be in public domain before 2070. Real restore date is currently unknown. Taivo (talk) 08:21, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Company logo is not free media; no indciation uploader has rights WikiDan61 (talk) 16:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 08:26, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by IagoQnsi as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not public domain until 2028 Files affected by URAA but possibly public domain in country of origin should not be put into speedy deletion. Converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 16:20, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, USA demands 95 years from publication – until 2027. But source country Spain demands 80 years from author's death. Can be restored in 2038 (80+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 08:31, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in UAE. Building design is protected by copyright. 25stargeneral (talk) 16:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Abzeronow (talk) 16:56, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower resolution version and duplicate of File:House and Senate GOP Caucus Pre session Lunch (31407544244).jpg Y2hyaXM (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. The file cannot be deleted on that reason, because it is used. In addition, the file has crop, which is also used. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Deleted as copyvio. I'll deleted crop file:Seth and hogan (cropped).jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 08:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to Unsplash. The image was published July 8, 2019 on Unsplash which is after the 4 June 2017 date when Unsplash changed to a license that was insufficiently free. Whpq (talk) 17:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False author stated. Author of the scan of the photo is claimed to be the author and not the actual photographer. No mentioning of the original copyright owner. This is the only upload of this author. And after this one-time upload account was used to add this photo another user User:Brunei stared to do extractions of the parts of the image. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The author is identified both on the picture itself and in the description. His name is Frolov (unfortunately a very common name), and the second word is likely a name of one of the frequently renamed organisations of 1920s. In early 1920s copyright systematically belonged to an employer and not to an individual photographer, so the second word is most likely the name of the institution Frolov worked for. As the duration of such copyright cannot exceed 70 years in Ukraine (and even less for earlier works), and that this work is also in PD in the US (95-year rule), there is no reason to consider this work is still copyrighted — NickK (talk) 22:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per NickK. Ruthven (msg) 19:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo contains enough information about the author (last name Frolov and the location of the photo workshop on Bolshaya Zhitomirskaya street in Kyiv) to identify the author's identity with a known date of production of the photo. While the fate of the author is unknown, the claim that he died before 1951 is unfounded. Thus, there is no sufficient reason to claim that this photo is in the public domain in the country of origin (Ukraine), although it is in the public domain in the United States, as published before 1928. Yellow Horror (talk) 19:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • At the beginning of the 20th century, there were not so many professional photographers in Kyiv. One of the known names is Alexander Frolov (ru: Александр Фролов), who for some time collaborated with Kornely Vladislavovich Blonevsky (ru: Корнелий Владиславович Блоневский) at 15 Lvovskaya Street before the 1917 revolution. However, I cannot find any connection between Alexander Frolov and the Bolshaya Zhitomirskaya address, so i am in doubt that he is the same Frolov because of the time gap until 1923/1924 and the widespread of the surname Frolov. I also could not find information about the fate of the photographer Alexander Frolov in open sources.--Yellow Horror (talk) 08:08, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Despite the negative result of my superficial search, I am sure that this work cannot be considered anonymous. The author clearly believed that he had given enough information so that anyone who saw the photograph shortly after it was made could understand who made it (and where to go to meet him). Probably, at that time he had no competitors with the same surname.--Yellow Horror (talk) 08:14, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Banned user socking. --Yann (talk) 07:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo contains enough information about the author (name Frolov and the location of the photo workshop on Bolshaya Zhitomirskaya Street in Kyiv) to identify the author with a known date of production of the photo. So far, we do not know the fate of the author, but the claim that he died before 1951 is unfounded. Thus, there is no sufficient reason to claim that this photograph is in the public domain in its country of origin (Ukraine), although it is in the public domain in the United States, since it was published before 1928. Yellow Horror (talk) 12:57, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 14:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license. The source indicates that this is a photograph from the 1920s, therefore it could not be published before November 7, 1917. The statement about the publication before 1928 is also unsubstantiated, as is the statement about the death of the author more than 100 years ago. Yellow Horror (talk) 20:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Banned user socking. --Yann (talk) 07:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license. The source indicates that this is a photograph from the 1920s, therefore it could not be published before November 7, 1917. The statement about the publication before 1928 is also unsubstantiated, as is the statement about the death of the author more than 100 years ago. Yellow Horror (talk) 12:41, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Previous removal request was not considered on the merits due to the erroneous accusation of me being a sockpuppet.--Yellow Horror (talk) 12:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep PD-Russia, I changed from "1920" to "circa 1920". --RAN (talk) 21:01, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Please note that the PD-Russia license for anonymous works is based on the date the work was made public, not the date it was created. This license does not apply to unpublished and newly released works.--Yellow Horror (talk) 14:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This photo should have been taken in Ukraine in the 1920s and was probably published for some jubilee of the scientist (he was 60 in 1928, and here he looks younger). As the author is not known we can use PD-US now or with better assurance - in January, 2024, in 4 months.--Brunei (talk) 13:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Wikimedia Commons' policy requires that creative work be free from copyright restrictions in both the United States and its country of origin. For now, there is no evidence that this photo was made public before 2015, and its author is not known, so it may be copyright-protected in Ukraine until 2086. And in US, as first published after 2002, it may be copyright-protected for 120 years after creation, so until about 2050. The claim that the photo was "probably" made public in connection with the anniversary of Stepan Vasilievich Korshun in the 1920s for now is unfounded.--Yellow Horror (talk) 20:18, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PCP, no publication information on this circa 1920 photo, Undelete in 2041. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SDG7}} KetefHinnomFan (talk) 17:20, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file has not yet been deleted. Sometimes it just takes awhile. Marbletan (talk) 12:21, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and unused COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:43, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete we have enough of this Dronebogus (talk) 05:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. plicit 03:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Terrible quality COM:PENIS photo Dronebogus (talk) 13:17, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:22, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, not being used outside user namespace A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete we have enough of this Dronebogus (talk) 05:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 13:12, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo, only being used on a talkpage by an IP A1Cafel (talk) 02:46, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - just another lo-res run-of-the-mill penis like there are already so many on Commons. --Wutsje 09:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful, unused outside usertalk namespace A1Cafel (talk) 05:57, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it were "special" enough, a penis is never educationally useful, you can't use it as a pen or pencil... Delete. 186.173.202.52 23:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Kakabelle

[edit]

Kakabelle (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

They are not own work. Maybe they violate photograpgers' copyright. Who are the photographers, when they died and when the photos were first published? Taivo (talk) 07:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But USA demands 95 years from publication ... Taivo (talk) 11:55, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - copyrighted in the USA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Fides11

[edit]

Fides11 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

No source. That way we even cannot be sure, that depicted people are who they are claimed to be. Taivo (talk) 08:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Overexposed variant of File:ISS007-E-16917 - View of Queensland.jpg — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:56, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Maybe it's useful, because you can see details of the spacecraft in this photo and details of the Earth in the other. And if you look at the timestamps carefully, you'll see that the photos were taken 21 seconds apart. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:08, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - per Ikan Kekek. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a poor scan of a blank page. Please also consider the worth of keeping any other file in Category:British army medical staff in Malta hospital records 1822 - these are a few poorly scanned pages from what looks to be an extensive collection of notes. -- Deadstar (msg) 10:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: possibly delete this one File:British army medical staff in Malta hospital records Wellcome L0025860.jpg that has no text. The text on the remaining pages might be useful to keep for someone research purposes or to illustrate water damage to old documents. Ww2censor (talk) 12:33, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jfinfluencer

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Jfinfluencer (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jimrichard kagimu

[edit]

Here are all files, uploaded by Jimrichard kagimu (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, different size. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - also DWs. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of ROBINSON P. FERNANDEZ

[edit]

Here are both uploads of ROBINSON P. FERNANDEZ (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of MFCG

[edit]

Here are all contributions of MFCG (talk · contribs):

MFCG claims to be both Rose Rongac and Carlos Garcia (look metadata). No evidence, that MFCG is any of them. Maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Mublat

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of Mublat (talk · contribs):

Small photos, only one has metadata. I suspect not own work, but different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Maquia26

[edit]

Maquia26 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Small photos. If camera data exist, then mostly different. I suspect not own work, but different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm honestly not sure if this ceramic design by living artist Alias PA-418 is subject to copyright. If it is, then yes, it needs to come down as copyvio. DS (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I laughed. For me, this art was very funny. I am not totally sure as well, but probably copyrightable and should be  deleted. Taivo (talk) 11:25, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Art Is Boring (65828433).jpeg - Nothing copyrightable here, as far as I can see. Darwin Ahoy! 21:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep
  1. File:Art Is Boring (65828433).jpeg
  2. File:Berlin (4163599852).jpg
  3. File:Berlin (4163600024).jpg
  4. File:Berlin (4163600650).jpg
  5. File:Un Jardin d'Hiver Marcel Broodthaers.jpg
I honestly fail to see how these images could be copyright violations. Is a 2-color wall copyrightable? Some random plants? I didn’t check all of the “Berlin Hamburger” files, but some of them seem to be really below the threshold of originality. Or is Germany like the United Kingdom, where any minor effort is copyrightable? Please ping me if answering. Best regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:27, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RodRabelo7 COM:TOO Germany for threshold of originality guidance. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. So things are more complex than I first thought. My comment should then be ignored. Sorry! RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I used the wrong file name when I uploaded the file and now that the file has been moved to the correct name, I don't want the redirect with the wrong name to remain. 忒有钱 (talk) 18:42, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plaque at bottom of photo implies painter died in 1980. Not free yet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source? Is the license correct? Xocolatl (talk) 20:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xocolatl,
The source for this image is the Vermont Judiciary, and can be found on the Judiciary Website here: https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/news/historic-vote-senate-confirms-nancy-waples-vermont-supreme-court. It appears that that local news sources such as VT Digger pulled the image from the Judiciary website. Because of this, I think the current licensing classification is correct. Thanks! Robert.lydon,jd (talk) 19:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - source site has " © 2021 Vermont Judiciary. All rights reserved. ". .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains image from Photodisc under copyright. SelfCloak (talk) 22:01, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded under fair use to en:File:Third Revolutionary Government Junta of El Salvador.jpg Geohakkeri (talk) 15:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The PD template claims that the photo was in the public domain in its home country on the URAA date. Well, was it? Or rather, why was it? I have no idea and it’s better to be safe than sorry. --Geohakkeri (talk) 12:02, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It sounds like neither of us is an expert on relevant Salvadorian law. In such situations, I would tend not to request deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Per COM:El Salvador, the photo is copyrighted until photographer's death and 70 years after that. Taivo (talk) 11:29, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Are there no exceptions to that for official governmental photos? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Block evasion isn't a reason to delete useful files. If there is another similar image, we could regard it as superseded, but that's it. Of course, if somebody is blocked for copyright violations, we might not tend to assume good faith, but here nobody claims own work.
Was the 70 years pma retroactive? In the 1993 law the term is 50 years pma. I don't know what it was in 1980.
LPfi (talk) 11:48, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is also the article 87: "Where the State is made the heir, legatee or donee of copyright and fails to avail itself of the rights within five years of the transfer taking place, the work shall fall into the public domain." I don't know whether it applies to this photo. –LPfi (talk) 12:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move LTA sock disruptive editing and troll.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 11:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Photo is under the Copyright law of Geermany. This is my car and and I have taken this photo. I never agree for free using! If it will not be deleted I will ask me lawer for assistance! 2001:9E8:CF2A:C800:10CC:D202:1C32:59E3 19:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • This looks like a  Speedy delete. The uploader has no contribution other than uploading this photo in 2015, so I don't think they are going to try to contradict this statement. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:30, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:10, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate picture Jan Trejbal (talk) 19:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 12:47, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower resolution duplicate of File:The Lost World (1925).webm — Racconish💬 12:38, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. If it becomes unused, please renominate. --Yann (talk) 16:54, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 2001:4455:2D6:9C00:86B:E186:7D16:72F8 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: the keys are above TOO. Long-standing, widely used logo, should be discussed. King of ♥ 17:48, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, the three keys logo was first published not later that 1938 by SBC. How does Switzerland handle corporate authorship? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:18, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} in Europe. {{PD-textlogo}} in USA. --Yann (talk) 16:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has recently uploaded two likely copyvios which were also tagged as "own work". It is unlikely they took this photo themselves. IagoQnsi (talk) 04:32, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This has camera EXIF and there are no hits on TinEye, I don't see evidence this is a stolen photo. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Műalkotások, ha a szerző ismeretlen, a Commonsra csak az első megjelenés utáni 120 évvel tölthetők fel. Ez itt még nem telt el. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 11:53, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Miért kell annyira sietni ? Ott a teljesen ismeretlen szignó a jobb alsó sarokban. Capisco ? --Elekes Andor (talk) 13:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jóember, te magad írtad be, hogy a szerző ismeretlen. Akkor nem láttad, hogy mi van a jobb alsó sarokban? Ismeretlen a szerző vagy nem ismeretlen? Ha ismeretlen, akkor a kiírásnak megfelelően törlendő a fájl, ha ismert, akkor be kell írni, hogy ki az. Kapisi? Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hozzáállás kérdése. Van aki maga alatt vágja a fát, ott árt ahol tud magának és másoknak. Van aki türelmesebb, felfogja a saját érdekét és talán mások érdekeit is jobban megérti. A festmény festője teljesen ismeretlen. Ha valaki mégis felismerné, akkor előre fogunk lépni. Azt is fel lehetne fogni, hogy a festmény jelentős helytörténeti értékkel bír Balatonfüred vonatkozásában. Fontos a főorvos is. Családtörténeti jelentőséggel is bír. Schmidt jelentős közéleti személyiség volt. Több mint valószínű hogy baráti kapcsolatban volt Perkedi Ottó MÁV főorvossal, akinek hagyatékát képezte valamikor ez a festmény. Persze, ha a kovácsi úton járunk, akkor azt kell megoldani, hogy a hasonló festmények a szemétben tűnjenek el. Jobb esetben filléreként jussanak nyugatra. Az nem megy, hogy máshol, mások minden vackot feltöltenek a wikire, a magyar tartalom pedig nem tud feljutni. Számomra ott kezd izgalmassá válni a dolog, amikor mondjuk kiderül majd, hogy a festményt Perkedi Ottó főorvos festette Schmidt részére, de valamit miatt nem tudta átadni. Gondolom nem érted. Elekes Andor (talk) 14:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Az egész handabandázásodban egyetlen egy értelmes megállapítás van: "A festmény festője teljesen ismeretlen.". A hozzászólásod többi része csak feltételezés, irreleváns és/vagy személyeskedés (amúgy rajtad kívül más is tudja, mi a frász az a "kovácsi úton járás"? Mert neked nagyon tetszik ez a kifejezés, de gyanítom, a buksidon kívül nem létezik), így azokra nem is reagálok.

Mivel "A festmény festője teljesen ismeretlen." így az vonatkozik rá, hogy az első megjelenés után 120 évvel tölthető fel a Commonsra, addig törlendő. Ha bizonyítást nyer az a hihetetlenül izgalmas dolog, hogy Pekerdi Ottó festette, akkor majd aszerint kell eljárni a képpel. Újra feltölteni vagy visszaállítani. De addig sem indokolt fent hagyni, attól ugyanis nem derül ki könnyebben, hogy ide fel van töltve. Ja, és a bizonyítást nyer nem egyenlő azzal, hogy Elekes Andor azt állítja. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 15:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. This 1915 painting which is signed but not legible can be undeleted in 2036. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:09, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; no freedom of panorama

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I claim I took pictures (in the list only the 0143 is by me) of the building as a building, not of the art displayed. As a building I think fop should be accepted. That seems to be the case at the category a rank lower, "Historische Halle, Hamburger Bahnhof (Berlin)". On the other hand, I do not care much. And did you see the art in the sub-categories? You have a lot of deleting on your hands. Dosseman (talk) 20:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We should already have installed a ban for users that don't know to request deletion.
Explain one by one what are the copyvio, starting by:
go! explain
-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 19:37, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I'm all for deleting images that don't qualify for FoP myself and pictures of artwork inside of German museums in clearly don't pass the bar. That said, I have no idea exactly what would be copyrighted in images like this one. Fans aren't copyrightable. What in that image is then? The carpet? Obviously not. Anyway, the point is that the subject of the image still has to be copyrighted. You can't just say an image of a generic, brown floor is copyrighted simply because it's an a museum. There's still other laws to consider like the threshold of originality. Images like this one might be copyrighted because they display the interior design of the building, but it was built in 1884. So there isn't really an argument for it being copyrighted. Although I will say this image should probably be deleted, but that's about it. IMO with the other works of art we'd have to know the dates of creation and who the artists were for the other works of art to justify deleting the images in those cases. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Most since the works appear to be still in copyright. Kept the windows since they appear to have been installed in the 19th century, fans are not copyrightable as they are utilitarian objects, the tram is a utilitarian object. The glassware looks old enough to be PD to me, and the last photograph has a sculpture but it's de minimis to me as the subject is the building interiors. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:17, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. Also added:

P 1 9 9   18:47, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The first two photos are out of scope, and the last two are of such poor quality that they're not useful as documentation of Halloween costumes. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]