Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 08 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Westbury railway station MMB 05 158767.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination 158767 at Westbury. Mattbuck 09:47, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Almost perfect! --Steindy 21:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC) The left is leaning out (see the white window) --Christian Ferrer 19:00, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 Support Its ok --The Photographer 11:52, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 21:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Obelisk_of_the_Foro_Italico.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Obelisk of the Foro Italico --Livioandronico2013 20:25, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Not in focus, blurry. --Mattbuck 21:59, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
    Mah...other please --Livioandronico2013 22:45, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Sharpness is ok. However, the obelisque is leaning slightly to the left side. --Cccefalon 06:25, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done Thanks Cccefalon --Livioandronico2013 07:43, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Can you look into the image again? It seems, that there is still a tilt ccw. I made up my opinion at the vertical front edge of the obelisque. --Cccefalon 15:01, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
I try a last time Cccefalon,if isn't good I surrender --Livioandronico2013 15:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 Support It was a little bit tricky, I guess. I tried myself yesterday and found that not all verticals of the stele are real verticals. However, well done, you have my support. --Cccefalon 08:45, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

: Oppose Bad categorization.--Jebulon 16:11, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done Dear Jebulon,see now --Livioandronico2013 18:04, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Better. I'll never give up !!--Jebulon 18:21, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 21:40, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Elephant_on_Santa_Maria_sopra_Minerva,_Rome.jpg

[edit]

File:Carlota_Corday_1889_by_Arturo_Michelena.jpg

[edit]

Someone need learn how work Categories. --The Photographer 07:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
See your talk page. --Livioandronico2013 11:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. Yann 19:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Livioandronico2013 14:13, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Fonte_en_Cedeira_C43.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Fountain of the horses, Cedeira, Galicia (Spain) --Lmbuga 00:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Review
  • The photo was made by Lmbuga which makes only perfect pictures and MUST be just fine. You have to look at not only more accurate. I like it! --Steindy 10:20, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Review: Disturbing people and disturbing objects. I do not know, if the people will be happe, when they are on the Photo. --Steindy 01:47, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination Thank you Steindy for your timely and fraternal review. You're right: I already expected. Thanks--Lmbuga 14:56, 2 December 2014 (UTC) Unwithdrawn and renominated by User:Ram-Man
  •  Weak Support This is by no means the best composition ever, but this image deserves a fair chance at a QI evaluation. If anyone objects to pulling back a withdraw, this is to be considered my (re)nomination for the day. Ram-Man 03:03, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    •  Comment Just you’re not supposed to vote as nominator :-) --Kreuzschnabel 21:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
      • Convenient since Lmbuga has been banned for a week and can't come support my wonderful photo ;-) Ram-Man 21:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Ram-Man--Livioandronico2013 11:06, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Disturbing background, especially the mast of the traffic lights growing out of the fountain top --Kreuzschnabel 21:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support QI. (Shure that's no outstanding composition, but this is QI not FP). --P e z i 23:04, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Disturbing background(s)--Jebulon 18:42, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Livioandronico2013 14:13, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

File:La_vara_rota_1892_by_Arturo_Michelena.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination La vara rota 1892 by Arturo MichelenaEnglish: La vara rota. --The Photographer 17:53, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
    Perhaps I'm missing something, but this does not appear to be a Wikimedian's work. Jakec 03:17, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
What do you mean with this does not appear to be a Wikimedian's work. --The Photographer 08:23, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
What I mean is that obviously a Wikimedian didn't paint this in 1892. Jakec 18:19, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
I did not know that Arturo Michelena was a Commons user. Photos paintings are completely valid. In the description of the image can be read that the author is Arturo Michelena. --The Photographer 09:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Photographs of paintings are OK; I think. Jkadavoor 15:26, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Indeed they are, though I do accept they can be hard to review. Mattbuck 20:22, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support OK. Yann 20:44, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 19:14, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Limni_Preveli_07.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Aquatic plants cover large parts of Preveli Lake (Limni Preveli) in the lower reach of the Megalopotamos river, Crete --Uoaei1 10:33, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:07, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I am afraid, you need to provide information about the plant --Poco a poco 12:15, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
     Info Taxa names for organisms are no longer mandatory. This rule has been discussed and removed recently. --Uoaei1 16:43, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment I still read that here. Furthermore I wonder whether the fact that the taxa is not required means that "plant" is a proper description? Probably the expectation is somewhere inbetween? Poco a poco 20:24, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Sorry, the taxa namings are still a mandatory in categorization.--Jebulon 21:38, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per my statement above. No properly categorized.--Jebulon 18:36, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Livioandronico2013 14:13, 7 December 2014 (UTC)