Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 24 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Nymphaea_alba.001_-_Breendonk.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Nymphaea alba (European white water lily) in 2018, near from concentration camp of Fort van Breendonk, in the province of Antwerp, Belgium--Drow male 19:05, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 20:08, 19 May 2019 (UTC)}
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. I think some parts are blown --Podzemnik 20:09, 19 May 2019 (UTC)}
  •  Support Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 07:21, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support QI to me. --Ralf Roletschek 14:06, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Very good picture, IMO. If anything is blown, it's a very small area and a realistic look for something white in direct sunlight at 12:58. -- Ikan Kekek 15:11, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support QI to me. -- Johann Jaritz 13:49, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support very good --Stepro 23:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:09, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Pallenis_spinosa_RF.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Spiny starwort (Pallenis spinosa) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:50, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Not enough detail at full res --MB-one 12:41, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment This time I am astonished. I might be wrong, but may we discuss this? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:37, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good quality and good details to me. -- Ikan Kekek 15:14, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose--Tobias ToMar Maier 14:35, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 01:11, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Kagbeni,_Mustang_02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The fascinating and beautiful village of Kagbeni (2840m) on sea level. By User:Nrik kiran --Biplab Anand 09:08, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:47, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree for now. It's quite noisy, it'd be nice to have verticals vertical, and there are some dust spots in the sky --Podzemnik 20:23, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Podzemnik. --Peulle 14:49, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 13:27, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Kagbeni,_Mustang_04.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The fascinating and beautiful village of Kagbeni (2840m) on sea level. By User:Nrik kiran --Biplab Anand 09:08, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  SupportGood quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:47, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice view, but I disagree about the quality. --A.Savin 16:21, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lots of chroma noise and some loss of detail.--Peulle 14:50, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for now per others, but I'd love to support if it could be successfully de-noised. -- Ikan Kekek 15:16, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 13:26, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

File:DnD_Giant.png

[edit]

  • Nomination Giants were among the first monsters introduced in the earliest edition of the game, in the Dungeons & Dragons "white box" set (1974), including the hill giant, the stone giant, the frost giant, the fire giant, and the cloud giant. By User:LadyofHats --Piotr Bart 08:58, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose I think it should be SVG, some sources would be good --Podzemnik 19:45, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  CommentImage is properly sourced. --Piotr Bart 11:23, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Question - What's the copyright status of this image? Is D&D copyrighed? -- Ikan Kekek 07:12, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 13:25, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Teatro_Grande_Brescia_interno.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Internal view of the Teatro Grande in Brescia. --Moroder 05:11, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. It isn't sharp. --XRay 05:19, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
    I disagree, it’s sharp. The moving people is blurred --Moroder 12:13, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - It's not just motion blur. The right side of the ceiling, visible portion of the stage and floor of the pit are unsharp. -- Ikan Kekek 06:59, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose to many unsharp areas.--Fischer.H 16:55, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Impressive image; quality O.K. for me. -- Spurzem 08:40, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. --Peulle 14:52, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 13:24, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

File:DnD_Ogre.png

[edit]

  • Nomination In the Dungeons & Dragons fantasy role-playing game, ogres are a lesser race of giants. By User:LadyofHats --Piotr Bart 08:58, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Would prefer a vector file but still good quality. --MB-one 10:11, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose I think it should be SVG. If PNG, not enough megapixels --Podzemnik 19:45, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
    It has 2.17 megapixels, which is enough. --Piotr Bart 21:33, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support as PNG, as SVG from me contra. --Ralf Roletschek 19:56, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment based on the comment at File talk:DnD Ogre.png it appears that, unless we're dealing with a miniature horse here, the Ogre is way too tall. Should factual accuracy be considered here? --El Grafo 18:33, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:12, 24 May 2019 (UTC)