User talk:Adeletron 3030/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Resolving the warned pictures

I have read and understand the issue on these files such as File:Cristian Javier Simari Birkner at 2014 Sochi (cropped).png. I cam here to inform you as I solemnly noticed that I am the author of this work, and I released it under a license. The tag seemed like it didn't, but I followed everything that it takes. On the essential information says if I am uploading a file or image that I have created entirely by myself, you should mark the source field as source=Own work (this is done for you if you use the upload wizard and select "This file is my own work" during the "Release rights" portion of the process). I did this as these files I uploaded says own work, as I am the author of the file. Also on the licensing section, it says s licensing template must be included on the file's description page in order to ensure that the file is freely usable and modifiable under our licensing criteria ("by anyone, for any purpose, even commercially"). If the file's description page doesn't contain a licensing template, it would not sure to meet your criteria, and otherwise in fact a copyright violation. As far as I'm concerned, I did include the licensing template for anyone to reuse it properly, for even commercial use. I hope this will prove that I did everything exactly right. If you still believe that I am incorrect, then reply to me here, or on the talk page.

--Ivan Milenin (talk) 21:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

I marked them as missing proper source information for two reasons:

The file names say "cropped", but there's no indication of what images they were cropped from.
The file type PNG indicates a capture of an already digitized image, not original photographs (which usually use JPG for web uses). And the image quality seems to show signs that the images are stills of videos.

Now, simply declaring that the image is yours and assigning a free license doesn't mean the source information is adequate. It is the uploader's responsibility to provide information to verify that the license is valid. Based on the above concern, you haven't given enough information to show that the images aren't just screencaps of copyrighted broadcasts. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

So if an uploader wants to send in the original photograph, they must have a JPG file? Because I understand these issues, and just to make sure I would not upload these again. --Ivan Milenin (talk) 02:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nope, I did not say that. It's just that a PNG format has a high likelihood of being a screenshot and is a red flag especially when combined with the other issues, so it's more important that you provide more complete source information. Ytoyoda (talk) 05:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

I now understand the issue of these files as it was there and now. Luckily, I have found the original photographs of the athletes who competed at the Sochi Olympics before they were cropped. The original files are not cropped and therefore are in .jpg file types, just to prove that I created these files, so to speak. I just wanted to ask you, before I do this, could I be permitted to upload the original files of these files that I uploaded again? That way, it could find the accurate source from that point on, just to make sure that jpgs are original and where the uploaded pictures are cropped from. If you have an answer, I will understand, and we'll see how it goes. --Ivan Milenin (talk) 17:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Re: Missing permissions

The files DO HAVE permissions, in the form of a small CC-BY icon at the right bottom of the webpages, that can also be found in the HTML code. Some licenses have changed in the meanwhile, but all the files passed the license review when they were uploaded, and this means the permissions exist, otherwise they would have been deleted. --ChoHyeri (talk) 10:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

My uploads

Hi. Why you listed my uploades for delete? If you go to [1], you see that this is said: All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. All my uploads is for tasnimnews. Please remove you requests. GTVM92 (talk) 12:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

@GTVM92: Hi, sorry, I looked at the site and couldn't find the Creative Commons text, but now I do. I've undone the changes - sorry about that. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:46, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your help

Hi, I'm a new Commons contributor. I downloaded two files and I would like to know if the licences are right. Cordially, Flyshitt (talk) 17:46, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

@Flyshitt: Hi, thanks for your uploads. Unfortunately, pictures you find on the internet are almost always copyrighted. The ones that are accepted on Wikipedia are a small percentage where the copyright holder explicitly releases them into the public domain.

The photograph looks like a crop of a photo found here, and there's no indication that the license is compatible. As for the drawing, you can usually give your own work whatever license you want, but if it's a drawing based on a photograph, then the copyright belongs to the photographer, not the artist. So I don't think the photograph can stay, and I'm not sure about the drawing. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:39, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Excuse me

Why did you delete File:Erik Harris.jpg? It's under fair use. The website states that all content on the site is available for use under fair use Leggomygreggo8 (talk) 04:36, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

File:JRW Sumiyoshi Station 2015-09-07 .jpg

File:JRW Sumiyoshi Station 2015-09-07 .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GRuban (talk) 14:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Raheem Sterling August 2012 vs FC Gomel.jpg

Yours sincerely Fæ (talk) 18:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete

Hi Ytoyoda, you marked File:Wendell Lira.jpg to delete, because it hasn't a information about your license. But the license is here, and is in CC 3.0. Mr. Fulano (talk) 16:11, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

@Mr. Fulano Hi, sorry I wasn't clear. The reason I tagged it was, although ebc.com.br publishes its own content under a Creative Commons license, that license does not apply to content it republishes from other sources. The rights to the image belongs to AFP/Getty Images (see here) and EBC cannot change the copyright. I'll go ahead and list this as a deletion request. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Picture

It was already on the arab wikipedia --Captain Awesome (talk) 09:42, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

@Captain Awesome: But that doesn't tell us where the image originally came from. There's no authorship information to help us verify the license. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:08, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Blanking

Hi Ytoyoda, please don't blank category pages. If you want an empty duplicate of a cat to be deleted add {{bad name|correctnameofthecat}} to the page. If it isn't a dupe add simply {{speedy|empty}}. Best, --Achim (talk) 20:40, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Please allow my photo to be used on Wikipedia.

File: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%EB%93%9C%EB%A6%BC%EC%BD%98%EC%84%9C%ED%8A%B8%EC%97%90%EC%84%9C%EC%9D%98_Kei_-_160604.jpg

Thanks for reminding me of copyright issues.
This is my first time of uploading a file to Wikipedia, so I have no idea of copyright policies of Wikipedia.
And my poor knowledge of English makes things worse.
But I'll do my best to follow your policies.

The photo I uploaded came from 'http://flowerkei.com/66'.
The author of the photo allows his photos to be used freely anywhere in this notice(http://flowerkei.com/1).
It's in Korean, so I translated it into English below.

안녕하세요. 꽃케이닷컴입니다. (Twitter : @flower_kei8)
※ 모든 자료에 대한 N차가공 및 로고크롭, 상업적 이용 금지
※ 출처를 밝혀주신다면 어디든 이동가능 (음지성 공간 제외)
※ 문의 및 하실 말씀은 Twitter : @flower_kei 으로 부탁드립니다.

Hello. I am 꽃케이닷컴. (Twitter : @flower_kei8)
※ The secondary or more (Nth) editing, the crop of copyright logo, commercial usage of all data is prohibited.
※ If you give source, you can use them anywhere (but not for malicious purposes).
※ If you want to ask or suggest something, please contact Twitter : @flower_kei.

So, please allow my photo to be used on https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kei.
And if my explanation is not enough, and if there are more things I have to do, please let me know as soon as possible, so I can take further actions.

Thank you very much.

--Eumovate (talk) 15:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Nikolai Laursen PSV.jpg and Nikolai Laursen Brondby.jpg

https://help.instagram.com/478745558852511 and https://help.instagram.com/155833707900388

--Gabriponte (talk) 17:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

@Gabriponte: Neither of those statements tells me the images are in public domain. The copyright belongs to the original uploader unless they release a statement stating otherwise. The second link is to the privacy policy, which has nothing to do with copyright. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:55, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Globe-indonesia-equator-80467.jpg

File:Globe-indonesia-equator-80467.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

—LX (talk, contribs) 17:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

@LX: Hi, so I realize it's not a CC-zero license (that was assigned by the uploader) but it does seem to be compatible with Commons since it allows for commercial and/or derivative use and the only prohibition is resale of the photo itself. Any idea what the appropriate license would be? Ytoyoda (talk) 18:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

https://blog.tookapic.com/tookapic-license-simply-explained indeed explicitly states that "they're not licensed under CC0." The page goes on to say "What I CAN’T do with those photos? ... Redistribute digitally on their own. For example put the photos as available for download / purchase on your own website." In addition to being completely incompatible with Commons:Licensing, that restriction prohibits the essence of what we do here – making individual files available for download. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:29, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Makes sense, thanks for the explanation. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:52, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:JNR 489 Home Liner 2006.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:JNR 489 Home Liner 2006.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

DAJF (talk) 05:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Second Avenue Subway opening 2017-01-01 (31922998201).jpg

File:Second Avenue Subway opening 2017-01-01 (31922998201).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vcohen (talk) 16:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

New York City Subway by year images

I see that you created categories for NYC Subway images for 2016 and 2017. I recently created one for 2015, and I added some "2014 in rail transport in the United States" categories to several of my subway images from that year, knowing you'll want to split that off too. ----DanTD (talk) 22:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I know some "... by year" categories have templates but my Wiki expertise doesn't go that far. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Wheaton Regional Park (25767023573).jpg

File:Wheaton Regional Park (25767023573).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 06:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Wheaton Regional Park (26096926950).jpg

File:Wheaton Regional Park (26096926950).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 06:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Wheaton Regional Park (25767043553).jpg

File:Wheaton Regional Park (25767043553).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 06:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

File:LA Chargers.jpg

File:LA Chargers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Zzyzx11 (talk) 19:33, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

File:CSX 7354 in Rock Creek, Garrett Park, MD 2014-10-21.jpg

File:CSX 7354 in Rock Creek, Garrett Park, MD 2014-10-21.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 07:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Category:UConn Huskies basketball

UConn Huskies basketball has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

–Grondemar 05:14, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Brookside Gardens (26303533371).jpg

File:Brookside Gardens (26303533371).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 00:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

File:UConn Team At White House 2009.jpg

I think it would be best if you removed the deletion notice.

BTW, thanks for your attention to detail.--Sphilbrick (talk) 19:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick: Done. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks.--Sphilbrick (talk) 19:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Gary Bettman in 2016.jpg

File:Gary Bettman in 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 21:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

I have decided to pass the Bettman image. Please see my comments in the DR. I also changed the license. I appear to have made a mistake as this flickr account is affiliated with the US military. I also made a separate comment here. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Crush Korean singer.jpg

Hi. The evidence is on the page itself. The Tistory blog is licenced cc-by, if you scroll down to the bottom of the page, the sign is there on the right hand side, if you hover over it, you will see the licence and if you click on it, it will take you to cc-by-4.0-ko. The page is tagged marked "Posted by 파비안 (Pabian)" on top, who is the owner of this blog. For Korean website licenses please consult someone knowledagble on the topic before tagging as copyvio. Thank you. Teemeah (talk) 18:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

@Teemeah: Sorry about that, thanks for fixing. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Deletion Request

Hello Ytoyoda,

Can you message me about the deletion request you put in for the picture of Candice Galek that I submitted. This is the picture we would like to use for her Wikipedia entry and we have the rights to use it.

Kind Regards!

Devon bikiniluxe@hotmail.com https://www.bikiniluxe.com

Apologies if this is the wrong place to post a message sort of fumbling around in there. Lol

Hi, I removed the deletion tag. Though for that particular image, it might be better if you upload the original photograph than a screenshot of the video (or that's what it looks like). Ytoyoda (talk) 20:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

File:CSX 429 in Kensington, MD on Metropolitan Subdivision 2014-10-20.jpg

File:CSX 429 in Kensington, MD on Metropolitan Subdivision 2014-10-20.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 07:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Kyoto Railway Museum tickets displayed (30562461990).jpg

File:Kyoto Railway Museum tickets displayed (30562461990).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

G I Chandor (talk) 23:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Tsubakuro 2015-10-27 (23368553634).jpg

Yours sincerely, G I Chandor (talk) 08:00, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Trejo

The file of Oscar Trejo is on my own Flickr profile, I don't understand what you want to delete it --Joan Benvegnu (talk) 16:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Based on File:Belottitraining.jpg and File:HenriSaivetAsse.jpg, it looks like you're uploading other people's photos and then pretending they're yours. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

So, I'm french but I will try to speak with you. How can we upload pictures in Wikipedia ? I mean, if the picture that I took from a website is free of rights, I can upload it on Flickr and then on Wikipedia ? --Joan Benvegnu (talk) 16:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

What do you mean a website free of rights? Remember that almost all photos you find on the web are copyrighted so it's unlikely that you'll find a copyright-free image on a website. Flickr is an exception—there are come images that are labeled Creative Commons (though not all CC licenses are allowed on Wikipedia). The way to upload pictures is to either take your own photos or find photographs that are clearly marked copyright-free. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

But my pictures are on Flickr and are on the right I think --Joan Benvegnu (talk) 16:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

@Joan Benvegnu: At least two of the pictures are published elsewhere and the Oscar Trejo photo is posted on another site. It's hard to verify that the photos are actually yours. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Belotti

See this picture : flickr, it is available for Wikimedia ? --Joan Benvegnu (talk) 18:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

It's from an account that's banned here because they post copyrighted images. If you're not sure, you can enter the address on Flinfo and it'll tell you whether you can use it on Wiki or not. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

But this picture, mine, is available concerning your site : Flickr--Joan Benvegnu (talk) 19:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Unless you're Daniele Buffa of Image Sport, it's not your picture. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes but it's à picture CC0 --Joan Benvegnu (talk) 19:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC) And the picture of Di Natale is CC0 too like the picture of Paul Pogba, from the site football.ua that allow cc0 --Joan Benvegnu (talk) 19:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Man all I want it's to make Wikipedia a better place ;) --Joan Benvegnu (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

But it's not. You can't steal someone else's work on the photo and give it a Creative Commons license. We call that Flickrwashing and it'll get your Flickr account blacklisted if you continue to do it. Also, while football.ua's original works are under CC license, they license photographs from other outlets like Getty Images, and those images are copyrighted. Please check the license before taking photos from there. You can make Wikipedia a better place by not taking other people's work and claiming improper license. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

So the the license of Paul Pogba isn't right ? --Joan Benvegnu (talk) 19:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

That one is correct because it's actually from Football.ua, not a licensed photo from Getty Images. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Maybe I repeat myself but how can I have cc0 photos of Belotti or Trejo ? --Joan Benvegnu (talk) 19:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Does filters[term=Thierry%20Henry&filters[primary]=images&filters[secondary]=videos&sort=1&o=17 photobucket] is good ? This photo is available for Wikimedia : [user=21104292&filters[recent]=1&filters[publicOnly]=1&sort=1&o=1] ? Like one of File:Thierry_Henry_2008.jpg Thierry Henry photos --Joan Benvegnu (talk) 19:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

The most straightforward way to get pictures of Belotti or Trejo is to get a camera and take them yourself. That's what many Wikipedia contributors do. And I wouldn't upload photos from Photobucket because almost all photos you find there are copyright violations. There are exceptions, like the Henry pic that you linked to. If you didn't take the photo yourself or don't know the person who took the photo, don't upload from Photobucket. Football.ua and Soccer.ru are good resources but make sure the photos belong to them, not Getty Images or other sources. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Sorry but this photo : File:Thierry_Henry_2008.jpg is right ? --Joan Benvegnu (talk) 19:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Probably? If you're not sure, you can always do a reverse image search and look for the real owner. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

This photo is correct ? http://football.ua/gallery/2593.html --Joan Benvegnu (talk) 20:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

It looks fine (and you can see the photographer credit under the picture). Ytoyoda (talk) 21:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Oh, and when you upload photos from Football.ua, use the following license templates:

For the date, make sure you use the date the photograph was taken, not today's date. And finally, you don't need to add Category:Football to your photos (see Commons:OVERCAT). Ytoyoda (talk) 21:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Flickr

Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0)--Dencey (talk) 16:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

The Janelle Monae photo is not from Flickr. It's a news agency photo. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Uploading pictures

hello, it seems that whenever i upload a picture it's somehow violating the copyright laws/rules. This is become quite inconvenient as there are no clear instructions as to how to upload a picture properly. I always pick a picture that has is on google and is clearly for public use yet it gets removed. Please help and explain what to do since I'm on my final warning. Thanks. AbdulRahman1997 (talk) 22:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

@AbdulRahman1997: Hi, thanks for leaving a message. Like the other user told you, most images you find on Google are under copyright. Sometimes, they're images from photo agencies like Getty Images, and websites pay licensing fees to use those photographs. Other times, the copyright owner may not charge fees, but they still retain the right to determine how they're used. On Commons, the photographer or the agency must release their rights to the image and allow them to be modified or used for any purpose, and most photographers and organizations aren't willing to do that. Photographs you see on Wikipedia are, for the most part, taken by Wikipedia users or transferred from sites like Flickr where some (not all) photographs are released under Creative Commons licenses (though not all CC licenses are accepted - take a look at Commons:Flickr before uploading Flickr photos. I know this is complicated, but I hope you're not discouraged from contributing to Commons. Ytoyoda (talk) 02:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

@Ytoyoda: Well thank you so much for responding and further explaining the situation. I mean I'm just wondering is there a search box of some sort where we can just search for pictures that would be accepted on wiki? cause right now i feel like it's impossible for me to find a picture for my article lol. But again, thanks for your help! AbdulRahman1997

@AbdulRahman1997: There isn't really a search engine specific search engine for Commons-friendly images, but Flickr lets you adjust your search settings to only show images that allow commercial use and modification. I have this saved in my bookmark: https://www.flickr.com/search/?safe_search=3&content_type=1&media=all&license=4%2C5%2C9%2C10&sort=date-posted-desc&adv=1&advanced=1&text=image (just switch the word "image" to whatever you're looking for). And this is also a good place to start: Commons:Free_media_resources/Photography. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Se más detallado por favor

Hola, no entiendo con claridad lo que esta pasando con las imágenes que subí, podrías por favor explicarme en detalle que es lo que está pasando. Barú11 (talk) 05:15, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Brookside Gardens 2016 (26096913280).jpg

File:Brookside Gardens 2016 (26096913280).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 00:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Category:Uploaded with UploadWizard

Category "Uploaded with UploadWizard" has been deleted due to a community decission. Please, don't use it. Ankry (talk) 13:17, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

COM:AN/U#User:Nyttend

Hi Ytoyoda. I just wanted to let you know that I mentioned an edit of yours that was rollbacked by another user in the discussion linked above. --Leyo 22:24, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Ytoyoda, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Block account

Hi Please block this account this user uploading not free image in commons

Reviw

plis, can you reviw this picture. I think its no complety information about [2]. Barú11 (talk) 01:31, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Buffalo in the snow.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 18:11, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Colorado State Stadium panorama 2017-08-18.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Colorado State Stadium panorama 2017-08-18.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Colorado State Stadium panorama 2017-08-18.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Elisfkc (talk) 05:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:CSU Stadium construction cam2.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:CSU Stadium construction cam2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:CSU Stadium construction cam2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Elisfkc (talk) 05:27, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Skyscrapers-387612 1920.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 14:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Marlins Park home run feature.jpg

File:Marlins Park home run feature.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Marlins Park home run feature non-cropped.jpg

File:Marlins Park home run feature non-cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Photo added in Ford Escort NA Category

Hi Ytoyoda! I'm genuinely not sure if mt Escort picture was a EU import or a NA model. I checked on the WP article but I couldn't verify it. I think the distinction is important some car junkies (I'm kind of one myself), so I believe it should remain in a less specific "Ford Escort" category until someone can properly identify it. Would appreciate your thoughts on this. Thanks! Ranged Ranger (talk) 06:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Gotcha. Thanks for letting me know. I figured it was a NA photo so I just assumed. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:09, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Vanesse Hudgens 2014.png

Hi Could you revuew my file ? --Panam2014 (talk) 16:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

@Panam2014: looks good! I changed the license to {{YouTube CC-BY}}, which is the template that’s specifically for YouTube files (though please keep in mind most videos are All Rights Reserved) and added {{LicenseReview}}, which will prompt a reviewer to check the license. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:07, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi for File:Vanesse Hudgens 2014 (2).png who comes from the same video, it has been nominated for deletion and the other has been checked. --Panam2014 (talk) 22:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Administrator?

Hello, firstly best wishes for this new year.

I see you often do various maintenance tasks, included regarding copyright and permissions issues, I wonder if you could be interested to be an administrator. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:53, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

About File:Kruthmedalj.jpg.

No deleting the pic File:Kruthmedalj.jpg. The picture is my work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lager81 (talk • contribs) 13:21, January 28, 2018‎ (UTC)

@Lager81: Whether you took the photograph isn't really relevant. It's a derivative work of a three-dimensional work that was created by someone else. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:43, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Copyright infringements - Nomination for deletion

According to your arguments and your previous nominations, the vast majority of the photographs in Fenerbahce Museum Category here: Category:Fenerbahçe Museum as well as these photos here: File:2016–17 EuroLeague Cup 2.jpg, File:2016–17 Basketbol Süper Ligi Cup.jpg, File:2016–17 Turkish Basketball President's Cup.jpg are blatant copyright infringements. They should be deleted sooner than later. I remind you that Turkey has freedom of panorama "only for public streets, avenues or squares". All these trophies are sculptures and works of art, they are copyrighted, they are not on a public street, avenue or square and need to be deleted. Gtrbolivar (talk) 02:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Cool. Good luck with the deletion discussion. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

No man, you should do the job, I expect you to show the same zest and enthusiasm to protect our project from blatant copyright infringements. All these pictures are copyright violations, I hope you'll act upon the information I gave you. Gtrbolivar (talk) 11:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

You seem to be making a couple of mistakes about how the Wikimedia Project works. First, I don’t have to do jack squat. I make the edits I want, when I want (as long as I’m following policies, obviously). Second, you’re not assuming good faith and taking the deletion discussion personally. It’s not personal—everyone’s had their contribution deleted at one time or another, especially when they’re less experienced. Though the third and biggest mistake you’re making is of not listening: you’ve had multiple editors tell you that w:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS/w:WHATABOUTX is a terribly unconvincing argument. You talk at people instead of engaging in dialog and trying to better understand community guidelines.

So like I said, I make the edits I want, and whether I choose to make one edit has no effect on any other edits I make. If you actually agree with the community consensus on FOP, then nominate those images! If you disagree, don’t be a jerk—leave them alone. But don’t tell me to do something just to make a point. Now, I think we’re done here. You’ve made your point. Please don’t write on my talk page on this topic again. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:21, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

You have no intention of following policies and you don't give a damn about this project or this community in my opinion. It's editors like you who are damaging the project the most. If you had real interest for this project (and not for your own aspirations of becoming an admin or whatever), you would have been deeply concerned by the fact that there are currently hundreds of photographs which are copyright violations in our project. Instead, this doesn't seem to bother you, you just want to delete whichever picture you see fit, whatever the reason. You just want to show that you're doing some maintenance work. I believe that your answer above proves that you have zero real interest for the well-being and the progress of this project. If you had any, you would have responded and acted in a completely different way. That being said, I assure you that it's the last time I'm going to have any discussion with you here or elsewhere. But you are in no position to bark orders to anybody, I will write wherever and whenever I like -including your talk page- and without your permission obviously. Best of luck to you. Gtrbolivar (talk) 13:36, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Bye. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for making my point. Gtrbolivar (talk) 14:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Odakyu 70000 series Romance Car GSE unveiling 2017-12-05.jpg

File:Odakyu 70000 series Romance Car GSE unveiling 2017-12-05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Cfktj1596 (talk) 05:26, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Melissa Fumero 2017.jpg, File:Andy Samberg.jpg

Hi Ytoyoda, your tagging of these 2 image as noderivative suggested that they are under a CC-BY-ND license on Flickr, which is actually not the case. Or did you mean to question the legitimacy of the Flickr-user to release these images under a free license? --Túrelio (talk) 19:55, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@Túrelio: Sorry, it looks like I mis-tagged the images. I meant that it came from a Flickrwashing account (File:Melissa Fumero 2014.jpg was also sourced to the Flickr account). What I meant to add was that they're derivative works of Andy Samberg on Jimmy Kimmel Live and Melissa Fumero on the Steve Harvey Show. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Ah, o.k. Now I understand. I see you've tagged them already for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 20:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:JRE Kiha 100 Pokemon with You 2017 version (35639949094).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:JRE Kiha 100 Pokemon with You 2017 version (35639949094).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JRE Kiha 100 Pokemon with You 2017 version (35639949094).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

File:皮卡丘列車 (36338045321).jpg

Sorry about this, but unfortunately we cannot accept files from Flickr published under the Public Domain Mark 1.0 unless the author has explicitly specified that they grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose. -- DAJF (talk) 03:46, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:皮卡丘列車 (35639882734).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:皮卡丘列車 (35639882734).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:皮卡丘列車 (35639882734).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Again, sorry about this, but we cannot accept files from Flickr published under the Public Domain Mark 1.0 unless the author has explicitly specified that they grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose. -- DAJF (talk) 03:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I was confused why the license wasn’t accepted, but I have no objection to the deletions. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Buses in the New York Transit Museum

I was considering a category similar to the Category:Buses in the New York Transit Museum for quite a while before you added it. Now I'm kind of jealous of you for making it first. I'm still glad you did though. ----DanTD (talk) 15:04, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Kevin Durant - TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2017 - Day 2 (36517991233).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:42, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Messages from User:Laguilar78

Thank you for your collaboration, Ytoyoda

I'm a newbie, so thank you for your warning about File:Carlos_Fernández_Mariño.jpg, Ytoyoda. The copyright statement has been added: Copyright Statement as you requested. I respect you a lot, and I appreciate a lot your work and your contributions to wikimedia, Ytoyoda. I hope everything is ok now. Don't hesitate to contact me if you need anything else to remove the missing evidence of permission template, please, and keep up your good job and effort to make a better wikimedia for all of us. Laguilar78 (talk) 15:12, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

You do an excellent research work, Ytoyoda

However, all the photos of Carlos Fernández Mariño are published under a Creative Commons License, unless otherwise indicated. Here you are his own copyright statement. So I kindly ask you to close this deletion nomination and keep up your good job to make a better wikimedia commons for all of us.

Best regards, and thank you for your early collaboration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laguilar78 (talk • contribs) 20:00, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

I understand perfectly if you don't have the privilege of withdrawing wrong nominations that you have made

So don't worry, I understand that only an admin can take such decisions, not you. Just to let you know that this statement by Carlos Fernández Mariño leaves no room for doubt: Carlos Fernández Mariño's Copyright Statement But there is no problem. If you have the privilege of nominating photos for deletion, but you don't have the privilege of eliminating a wrong nomination that you have made, I mean, I understand if you can not correct your own mistakes, but an admin can do fix it, so there is no problema at all. Keep up your good job for making a better wikimedia commons for all of us. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laguilar78 (talk • contribs) 13:32, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

File:AirTrain Newark interior 2.jpg

File:AirTrain Newark interior 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

File:AirTrain Newark interior 1.jpg

File:AirTrain Newark interior 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Nasty Neck Face.jpg

File:Nasty Neck Face.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Neckface Chinatown.jpg

File:Neckface Chinatown.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:46, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Neckface Allen Street.jpg

File:Neckface Allen Street.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:46, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Joplin Miners Logo

I apologize, did not mean to violate the terms it was unintentional. Thank you for letting me know. Can you please how do I include sports team logos such as this so that it does not violate policies. Syracusestorm (talk) 04:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

@Syracusestorm: The quick answer is that most logos are not allowed on Commons. Exceptions are simple ones consisting of just type or simple shapes. Ytoyoda (talk) 10:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Rupa Johanssen.jpg

File:Rupa Johanssen.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The image date is after June 2017 which means the license is not CC0 or Public Domain.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 06:45, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Laverne Harris.jpg

File:Laverne Harris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 06:45, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Re: File tagging File:RobertoCingolani Novembre2014.jpg

Hi! I tried to insert the link to the webpage containing the CC BY-ND 2.0 license of the image. I hope I inserted it correctly. I put it in the Summary. Thanks. --Larry.europe (talk) 15:50, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

@Larry.europe: Hi, thanks for contacting me and adding the source. Unfortunately, the CC-BY-ND license is too restrictive for Commons because it doesn't allow derivative works (see what happens when you open the {{Cc-by-nd}} license). Ytoyoda (talk) 16:37, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi!

Please could you check this File: File:Copa_movistar.png I think it is maybe a copyright violation. Thanks. Barú Sanchezpérez (talk) 04:01, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Sorry for not checking earlier. It looks like File:Copa movistar.png is simple enough to be considered public domain (though some editors might disagree). Thanks! Ytoyoda (talk) 12:40, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Quel Problème

Bonjour Ytoyoda quel le problème sur ses image dit moi Jolmars (talk) 14:28, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jolmars: Hi, the problem is that you've uploaded images that belong to other people. Only copyright-free or Creative Commons images that without sharing restrictions are allowed on Commons. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:49, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

SALUT OK MERCI Jolmars (talk) 14:33, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Date of File:Guardiola training cropped.jpg

I wanted to know how this picture was taken in the year 2013. The jacket Guardiola is wearing was made for the 2014-15 season. So I think the picture was taken in 2015 not in 2013. This thing is very confusing. Bayernfan2003 (talk) 15:27, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

@Bayernfan2003: The date is based on the original image, File:Guardiola training FCB.jpg and the EXIF metadata from the camera. Though camera data can often be incorrect, so if you know the correct date, then feel free to change it. If that’s incorrect, then I’m assuming dates on other photos from the same Flickr user need to be changed too. Hope that helps. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:12, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Maite Ruiz de Larramendi.jpg

I have copied the photograph from the web guaixe.eus: Aristorena eta Ruiz de Larramendi, Nafarroako txapeldunak. At the bottom of the page there it is specified that all the contents of the web are published under Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license.

Thanks --Xirkan (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

@Xirkan: Thanks for the link. I updated the description and removed the tag. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

MiguelAraujo.jpg

I don't understand. The imagen is by inbox of instagram. Bellenguer 15:03, 05 Jun 2018 (UTC)

@Bellenguer: Not sure I understand what you mean by "by inbox of instagram". Do you mean that it's your Instagram profile photo? Or that someone shared the picture via Instagram DM? Ytoyoda (talk) 20:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Deleted File

Bonjour, tu as supprimer l'image car dit que je n'ai pas le droit mais l'artiste lui même que je connais m'a donné l'autorisation de publier la photo de l'oeuvre pour la création de cette page. J'ai donc mis l'image sous licence en suivant la procédure mais suite à ta suppression je ne peux pas envoyé ma demande pour qu'elle soit republiée. Comment dois- je faire car j'ai vraiment besoin que l'image s'affiche sur la page. Merci — Preceding unsigned comment added by V. F Inès (talk • contribs) 21:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Finalement c'est bon je viens d'envoyé la demande de permission j'attend la réponse merci — Preceding unsigned comment added by V. F Inès (talk • contribs) 21:48, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

@V. F Inès: Hi, thanks for writing. I don’t doubt that you took the picture and the artist gave you permission. The issue is that the artwork is clearly a derivative work of a copyrighted animated character, Ralph Wiggum, whose copyright belongs to the creators of ‘The Simpsons’. In a case like this, the owner of the original character also owns the rights to the derivative works. You can read a fuller explanation at Commons:Œuvre dérivée. Ytoyoda (talk) 23:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Ytoyoda Bonjour. Merci de ta réponse mais je ne comprends toujours pas même après avoir lu les procédures pour ce que je dois faire et comment le faire pour pouvoir publier cette image sur la page. Thank you for your help. V. F Inès (talk) 13:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)V. F Inès

File tagging File:HK Martin - logo.png

Hi, I received the permission to use this picture directly from the club deputy. There is no webpage with license information because we are communicating directly. I have to experience with uploading pictures to wikipedia so please tell me what to do. Think about the fact that this is ice-hockey club. They like if the logo is used publically. Here is the press conference where they publically revealed their logo few days ago (http://www.hokejportal.net/?q=clanok/hk-martin-predstavil-muzstvo-aj-vizie-tim-povedie-trener-spisak/83294). It is in Slovak language unfortunately, but you cannot expect English communication, because it is just a small local club. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.242.35.196 (talk) 08:21, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

@Okorec: It’s okay if they can’t communicate in English. If they send the license declaration to Commons:OTRS in the local language (is it Slovak?), there will be a volunteer who either understand the language or can use machine translation. Ytoyoda (talk) 10:39, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

@Ytoyoda: Sorry but this is too much unnecessary work for me. I just wanted to do something small for community and make the wikipedia page for newly established club. I have no time to be an intermediary for discussions and explanations about this. You can delete the picture and if they want, they will upload it themselves. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Okorec (talk • contribs) 17:14, June 28, 2018‎ (UTC)

Deletion notification

File:FIFA Women's World Cup trophy (16276997353).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Also affected:

File:FIFA_Women's_World_Cup_trophy_(16896079511).jpg

Storkk (talk) 07:50, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

copyright

La imagen File:Estadio Evo Morales Ayma - Ivirgarzama.png es de libre uso

La imagen File:Estadio Municipal de El Alto.jpg no es de ESPN http://www.espn.com.br/noticia/712167_4-095m-acima-do-nivel-do-mar-conheca-o-estadio-de-r-26-5-milhoes-que-sera-um-pesadelo-para-brasileiros-na-libertadores si no que es del periodico La Razon mira http://www.la-razon.com/marcas/Alto-inaugura-moderno-estadio_0_2747725210.html que por sierto tambien es d libre uso

Las otras dos imagenes son de mi propiedad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andres Espinoza Encinas (talk • contribs) 22:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

@Andres Espinoza Encinas: If you disagree with any deletion decision, you can contact the admin who made the decision or make an undeletion request at COM:UD.

File:Estadio Evo Morales Ayma - Ivirgarzama.png - the image was published on another website first, so it requires an COM:OTRS ticket. Also, when you claim that an image is free for use, you have to show evidence of the free license.
File:Estadio Municipal de El Alto.jpg - you’re right that the image doesn’t belong to ESPN. It belongs to Agencia Boliviana de Información, and I don’t see any evidence that ABI images are few.

If you do own the other images, please help reviewers verify the source information. I see that a few of the images come from Facebook. Can you provide the Facebook links? Ytoyoda (talk) 00:00, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

CropTool

In the future, I would appreciate it if you used CropTool to crop images. This tool allows users to crop images already on Commons without having to download the images. It also makes sure that, if necessary, the file has already passed license review. It also properly links the images to one another, in case an issue with them comes up later. Elisfkc (talk) 16:06, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

@Elisfkc: Uh, which image are you referring to? Literally 4 of my 5 most recent uploads are CropTool results. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:08, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Sitora Alieva at Strelka Film Festival by OKKO. CORE OF THE WORLD - 2018.jpg. Someone else used CropTool on it for you. --Elisfkc (talk) 16:10, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

By someone else you mean me. I think you meant to message the original uploader. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:12, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Dezful Sasanid Bridge Night.jpg

Hi, I received the permission issue message for upload this picture. This picture is mine and myself capture it.

Regards

--Mehrx7 (talk) 10:53, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Vanessa Kingori.png

Hi,

We have full rights to this image, I have credited the photographer as well. Please do not delete this image.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivi.chin (talk • contribs) 15:54, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ivi.chin: If the photographer has released copyright, either the photographer or your organization needs to submit a statement to COM:OTRS (you'll see directions there) to verify that this is the case. That process is also required for when a photograph has been previously published elsewhere. Thanks. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:58, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Hunter Pollack picture

That picture I uploaded of Hunter Pollack was taken by me. Just because it's posted on Andrew Pollack's social media doesn't mean I didn't take it. I am the family's photographer/videographer. Please restore the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisrow (talk • contribs) 01:44, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

@Chrisrow: If you're the owner, I'd suggest creating an undeletion request, then verifying your ownership via COM:OTRS. Any image that has been previously published elsewhere needs an OTRS ticket. Ytoyoda (talk) 02:12, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Jeyhun Asgarov.jpg

Why did you claim this (jeyhun asgarov.jpg ) file? It's some kind of mistake. This is my personal file. I'm pictured in the photo myself. I ask you to correct this underdog --AmidAhmad (talk) 10:45, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

I’ve responded on your talk page, but I’ve stated the reason in the deletion discussion that you did not participate in, and you can still contest the decision at COM:UDR. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Logos of the Santa Ana Winds FC soccer club

Communications are now taking place concerning the ownership of the Santa Ana Winds FC marks, logos and variations of them. To reiterate, the copyright ownership lies with the Club and not with the designer who has been informed of this matter, and will reply via OTRS if necessary. I User/Santaniego (alias) am a partner in the Club and uploaded the file with permissions, and did not "find this image on the internet." Santaniego (talk) 06:33, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Foto Yasha Young

Hello Ytoyoda,

the photo is Yasha Young´s own press photo - she has the rights on it. It is used regularly in diverse publications. She personally allowed me to use it and generally provides the photo to events like the one you refer to. If you have any more questions please, I hope I can answer them — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bullitt1964 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

@Bullitt1964: Okay, great, but a couple of things.

If the picture belongs to Yasha, then you can't say it's your "own" picture.
If you received permission from Yasha to license the image for any use or modification, then she needs to contact COM:OTRS with a copyright statement.
Copyright generally belongs to the photographer. Yasha would also have to provide evidence that the photographer has given her permission to distribute the image.
Who is the photographer for File:Yasha Young Speaker Karlsruhe.jpg?

Thanks. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Ok. you got me and us. Yasha and I, we have no time to work all this out. Please be a successful guard of wikipedia - to which I donate really sums of money - and delete the foto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bullitt1964 (talk • contribs) 07:53, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

@Bullitt1964: Really? All you have to do is send a single email to start the process and there’s no rush to the process. It’s actually pretty simple and shouldn’t take more than 15 minutes. If you have time to respond to me and continue to upload images, you have time to do this. Ytoyoda (talk) 10:25, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Oh and I noticed that you’re uploading low-res images. Since you have access to the high-res originals, please upload those instead. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Budd RDC's - Gaithersburg, MD 1991.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:53, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

In case it wasn't clear, this DR doesn't reflect on your generally excellent choice of uploads whatsoever. I didn't notice the credit line until I attempted to upload a duplicate! Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:03, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Removal of Gigi Hadid's photo

Why did you remove my picture? It was allowed to share Brookielovesstroking (talk) 13:30, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

@Brookielovesstroking: I didn’t remove it - I was the one who tagged it because the image came from Getty Images, who rarely releases photographs into public domain. You mentioned that the picture was shared on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram - that’s irrelevant for posting images here, because those platforms don’t require images to be freely licensed, and those publishers are likely paying licensing fees to Getty Images. If you did receive permission from the copyright owner, then you can go through the COM:DR and COM:OTRS processes. Otherwise, there’s not much o can do for you. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:13, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Removal of File File:Carter Cruise.jpg

You recently deleted a photo i uploaded of Carter Cruise. She requested i update her page with that photo so she sent it to me on Twitter. The actual copyright owner Simplyyy G also gave me permission to use the photo which i have provided. and will provide again here.can you please undelete the photo im just trying to help Carter and it's getting to be really frustrating and difficult. File:Prrof.png.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musicoblivion (talk • contribs) 03:34, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

@Musicoblivion: I didn't delete the photo - you can follow the link at File:Carter_Cruise.jpg and see exactly who did. More importantly, I don't have the power to undelete your file and it looks like you already posted at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2018-11#File:Carter_Cruise.jpg and got a response. Bugging other users will not speed up the process.

As for the screenshot, it's not that helpful. First of all, why not link to the tweet instead of a screenshot that can be manipulated? Also, simply saying "It's okay to use the photo" is insufficient. Sumplyyy G needs to provide sufficient evidence that he/she is the rightful copyright owner AND allow the use not only on Wikipedia, but anywhere in the world, for any purpose (that means he/she allows the image to be sold or modified and can't put any restrictions on it).

If you really want to help Carter, you can start by following directions you received many, many, many times on your talk page and following the steps described in COM:OTRS. If you'd followed the steps that have been offered to you, the images wouldn't have been deleted and you wouldn't have been blocked. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

User talk:Adeletron 3030/Archive 2

Resolving the warned pictures

Re: Missing permissions

My uploads

Your help

Excuse me

Notification about possible deletion

Delete

Picture

Blanking

Please allow my photo to be used on Wikipedia.

Nikolai Laursen PSV.jpg and Nikolai Laursen Brondby.jpg

File tagging File:JNR 489 Home Liner 2006.jpg

New York City Subway by year images

File:UConn Team At White House 2009.jpg

File:Crush Korean singer.jpg

Deletion Request

Notification about possible deletion

Trejo

Belotti

Flickr

Uploading pictures

Se más detallado por favor

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Block account

Reviw

Notification about possible deletion

File tagging File:Colorado State Stadium panorama 2017-08-18.jpg

File tagging File:CSU Stadium construction cam2.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Photo added in Ford Escort NA Category

Administrator?

About File:Kruthmedalj.jpg.

Copyright infringements - Nomination for deletion

File:Melissa Fumero 2017.jpg, File:Andy Samberg.jpg

File tagging File:JRE Kiha 100 Pokemon with You 2017 version (35639949094).jpg

File tagging File:皮卡丘列車 (35639882734).jpg

Buses in the New York Transit Museum

Notification about possible deletion

Messages from User:Laguilar78

Thank you for your collaboration, Ytoyoda

You do an excellent research work, Ytoyoda

I understand perfectly if you don't have the privilege of withdrawing wrong nominations that you have made

Joplin Miners Logo

Re: File tagging File:RobertoCingolani Novembre2014.jpg

Hi!

Quel Problème

Date of File:Guardiola training cropped.jpg

File tagging File:Maite Ruiz de Larramendi.jpg

MiguelAraujo.jpg

Deleted File

File tagging File:HK Martin - logo.png

Deletion notification

copyright

CropTool

File:Dezful Sasanid Bridge Night.jpg

File:Vanessa Kingori.png

Hunter Pollack picture

Jeyhun Asgarov.jpg

Logos of the Santa Ana Winds FC soccer club

Foto Yasha Young

Notification about possible deletion

Removal of Gigi Hadid's photo

Removal of File File:Carter Cruise.jpg

Navigation menu

Search