User talk:Andrzej 22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Andrzej 22!

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:36, 14 June 2011 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:38, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

wersje pliku

[edit]

Mechanizmy Wikipedii nie ma żadnego wpływu na to, którą wersję którego pliku z Twojego dysku wysyłasz. To ty wskazujesz ścieżkę, najczęściej coś w rodzaju C:\Moje dokumenty\Moje obrazy\nazwapliku.jpg i Wikipedia nie jest w stanie pobrać z Twojego dysku czegokolwiek innego, niż wskazałeś.

Innymi słowy, nie ma najmniejszej wątpliwości, że zamierzając wysłać inną wersję, w rzeczywistości wysyłałeś tę samą. Być może nawet nazwana była inaczej, ale zawartość była identyczna. Cudów nie ma.

Pozdrawiam

Julo (talk) 07:11, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, że się wtrącam ale wygląda mi to na to, że prawdopodobnie nie został odświeżony jakiś cache przeglądarki/serwera proxy/serwerów pośredniczących/etc. Prosty sposób na taki problem jest nacisnąć zakładkę "historia i autorzy" danego pliku i w pasku adresu przeglądarki zastąpić na końcu linku wpis "action=history" przez "action=purge" (i załadować stronę) co wymusi odświeżenie strony. Powinno od razu pomóc choć czasami niestety także nie działa i ta metoda i trzeba po prostu cierpliwie poczekać (czasami dość długo, nawet do kilku godzin - kilku dni) aż jakiś cache serwera pośredniczącego zostanie przeczyszczony. Też tak mam od czasu do czasu...
Aha, jeszcze dodam dla jasnoności, że oczywiście jeśli załadujesz nową wersję obrazka to fizycznie na serwerze Commons będzie już ta nowa wersja ale w jakimś cache'u będzie siedzieć stara (i to ona będzie pokazywana przez przeglądarkę) co właśnie daje taki efekt, że wydaje się, że załadowaliśmy starą wersję. Pozdrawiam Electron   13:15, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nic nigdzie nie ma powodu zgłaszać. Napisałeś do mnie, że ładuje ci złą wersję pliku. Teraz okazuje się, że ładowanie było w porządku, a tylko wyświetlanie było nie takie. To zasadnicza różnica.
Cudów nie ma: mechanizmy commons nie mają wpływu na to, co ty ładujesz. Decydują jedynie o tym, co oglądamy. A konieczność odświeżania (purge) lub w ostateczności zwykła cierpliwość po to, żeby wyświetlanie było prawidłowe jest - w Wikipedii, która działa w oparciu o serwery rozmieszczone w kilku miejscach świata na trzech kontynentach - powszechnie znana. Julo (talk) 22:33, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Być może masz rację. Mi taki efekt się pojawiał zwykle gdy ładowałem nową wersję na niedawno (tego samego dnia) załadowany przez zemnie plik. Nie pojawiał się natomiast gdy nadpisywałem jakiś stary plik załadowany przez kogoś innego. Czasami trzeba było poczekać kilka dni aż wszystko się przeczyściło i było OK. Electron   17:51, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

rotation tag

[edit]

Hallo Andrzej 22, you had requested rotation at File:20070907 sejm rp 100B6010.jpg and File:20070907 sejm rp 100B6273.jpg - but by the wrong 90°. I have corrected it now. Can you tell me if you had problems using the rotate request function? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:20, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake. / Andrzej 22 (talk) 03:26, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. :) I am helping with programming this rotation feature - therefore I am interested to know if there are problems with using it. Did you not see the picture correctly because it is small? Or did you not understand the text? It should be available in Polish if you set your interfact language to Polish. Just reply here if you like. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:31, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Andrzej 22, please note that I have reverted you in http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Vanilla_6beans.JPG&action=history per our widely accepted overwrite guidelines. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 00:59, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. New file for plWiktionary – File:Vanilla 6beans (rot. 90 deg.).JPG.
/ Andrzej 22 (talk) 04:18, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, fine. Commonly it would be referred to 270 deg. since the rotation is thought of clockwise. :-) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 15:31, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I noticed some files which were rotated wrong - eg. File:Catedrala Romano-Catolică Sfântul Mihail 13.jpg. Can you tell me what your problem there was? I mean - just rotate the small thumbnail in the popup until it is upright. Where is the problem? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 15:39, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Saibo, I think there are two problems. Andrzej does not speak much English, and the EXIF rotation is very confusing. For example how should File:Catedrala Ortodoxă Cluj 10.jpg be rotated so it show up properly? The rotation tool is not helpful in those cases. --Jarekt (talk) 05:49, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Jarekt, thanks for joining. Two comments: my questions are really not meant as accusations. I just want to know what is difficult to improve. :-) Second: the rotation gadget has a Polish translation - so at least everything in the Gadget itself should be understandable if Andrzej 22 uses the Polish user interface. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 20:49, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexanderplatz_Dom_Fernsehturm_Berlin_view.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 07:55, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


-- Saibo (Δ) 14:52, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Instant.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Acather96 (talk) 14:22, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Regards Psychonaut (talk) 16:18, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:1000 drachma.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 08:37, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alpha Capricorni (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lithopsian (talk) 19:51, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:PanamaHatHarryTruman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Huntster (t @ c) 18:30, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]