User talk:Bencemac
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:36, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Acmesystems foxboard 4 16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Diannaa (talk) 23:31, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Israel and Gaza -3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Josve05a (talk) 20:37, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Szentirmai Zoltán
[edit]Segítség kellene! Téves az infobox! Lásd, [1]. Vagyis halott az illető! Köszönettel! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 14:01, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Globetrotter19: A PIM és artportal.hu szerint viszont életben van. A linkelt források láthatóan tőlünk lettek másolva, hiteles forrásra lenne szükség. Bencemac (talk) 14:14, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Akkor Tudor987 rosszul mondta? Amúgy az artportál szerint Vecsési Sándor is él, lásd következő kérdést [2]. Tudor987 és szerintem is egyértelmű az artportál adata(i) az elévült(ek)! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 14:22, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Logo of Česká suverenita.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 12:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Törlésre jelölt fájl
[edit]Kedves Bencemac! A DSZC Mechwart András Gépipari és Informatikai Szakgimnáziuma honlapjáról feltöltött fotómat már letörölték, ezért úgy döntöttem, hogy lefotózom én magam a logót, amely az egyik osztályteremben van kirakva, és amit maga az osztály készített hungarocelből. Ehhez képest ezt a fotót, amit másodjára feltöltöttem, szintén törlésre jelölted. Máshogyan nem tudom megoldani a feltöltést, azt gondoltam így már megfelelő lesz, de a fotóra szükség van a Mechwart userbox sablonhoz. Válaszod előre is köszönöm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Totemadam (talk • contribs) 15:48, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Kérj engedélyt a logó használatához. A sablonra pedig szvsz nincs szükség. Bencemac (talk) 15:54, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Could you please, tell me where/how can I find the full list of files affected by this DR and/or how the uploader(s) were notified? (And their names(s)). @Elcobbola: pinging also you as you might be helpful in finding this information (as you seem to be the deleting admin). It is very likely that the files should be restored and the DR reopened. Ankry (talk) 15:28, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Ligeti Jenő.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 20:48, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:09, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
File:US Navy 110721-N-QD416-070 Lt. Hampton Crimm directs a patient to the pharmacy at the Polideportivo medical site in Acajutla, El Salvador, during C.jpg
[edit]Hi Bencemac, as this image is PD-US, I assume that it's a mere courtesy-DR, right? --Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: Yes, indeed. Although, it would not be the first fulfilled request from American soldiers. His concern is that neither of them consented for the photo. Regards, Bencemac (talk) 09:44, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- Ok. Deleted, as there weren't recognizable external uses. Though, it won't help much, as it is also offered as alamy.com. --Túrelio (talk) 10:09, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you! I answered and closed the ticket. Bencemac (talk) 10:16, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- Ok. Deleted, as there weren't recognizable external uses. Though, it won't help much, as it is also offered as alamy.com. --Túrelio (talk) 10:09, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Körmend városközpont terve 01.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Körmend városközpont terve 01.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Körmend városközpont terve 01.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Regasterios (talk) 10:28, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Welcome, Dear Patroller!
[edit]
Hi Bencemac,
You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.
As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.
We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.
If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.
--Didym (talk) 14:56, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Didym: Thank you very much! :) Bencemac (talk) 15:04, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Lil TJ.jpg
[edit]I took this image myself and own the copyright and have the right to give it away. Do not place a speedy tag on images like that. Thank you. Bearian (talk) 13:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Then please send us a permission to confirm that. Bencemac (talk) 14:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Bearian: I mean the Flickr ones in the file history. Bencemac (talk) 18:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- I never made the Flikr one. I only made the very first image from June 2019. The other one is an imposter. I already released my copyright when I uploaded it. Bearian (talk) 22:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I took the image in June 2019, but uploaded it that November. Bearian (talk) 22:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- And it's done, thanks for your patient! Regards, Bencemac (talk) 18:21, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Bearian: I mean the Flickr ones in the file history. Bencemac (talk) 18:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
OTRS notification
[edit]Just a friendly reminder to ask that you do not disclose that a subject has contacted OTRS on-wiki unless given the ok by the subject in question, since communication to OTRS is supposed to be confidential. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:24, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Josve05a: Hello! Please correct me if I'm wrong, but if I know it correctly, indicating that the subject/copyright holder/uploader asks the removal of the file, is acceptable, in order to help administrators without OTRS-access. Of course I do and will not publish any further information, but requests only with a ticket number are usually handled with delay: and I think that is understandable if you don't want to act without context. Please point out if I'm wrong. Regards, Bencemac (talk) 09:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Content in OTRS tickets should remain confidential per [3] (on phab) - that also includes the fact that someone contacted us. We can on OTRS either (a) help guide the sender on how to themself nominate it for deletion; (b) request deletion ourselves without revealing that the subject requested it; or (c) ask the sender for permission to reveal that they wish for the image to be deleted. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for your detailed answer! Sorry about my mistake, next time I'll more prudent. Shouldn't Template:CopyvioOTRS's description be changed according to this? Bencemac (talk) 08:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Content in OTRS tickets should remain confidential per [3] (on phab) - that also includes the fact that someone contacted us. We can on OTRS either (a) help guide the sender on how to themself nominate it for deletion; (b) request deletion ourselves without revealing that the subject requested it; or (c) ask the sender for permission to reveal that they wish for the image to be deleted. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Fazekas Sándor oldala
[edit]Kedves Bencemac!
Elnézését kérem, de a Wikipédia rendszere kissé nehezen átlátható számomra.
Most sem vagyok benne biztos, hogy amit írok, eljut-e Önhöz...
Fazekas Sándor munkatársa vagyok, és az Ő kérésére szeretnék két képet cserélni az oldalán, illetve egy mondatot kihúzni. A most fent lévő képek régiek vagy az oldal témája szempontjából lényegtelenek, a kihúzandó mondat meg nem teljesen felel meg a valóságnak. A fényképeket, mint miniszter úr fotósa én készítettem, de hiába próbálkozom, nem tudom hogyan igazolhatnám ezt hivatalosan saját magamnak, hogy ne kerüljenek törlésre.
Tisztelettel kérem, hogy segítsen megoldást találni erre az "ördöglakatra"!
Köszönettel: Kovács Zoltán Tel: +36209448400 Email: csiposplajbasz@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by HaNGyA145 (talk • contribs) 14:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- A képek használatát az itt leírtak szerint lehet engedélyezni: Commons:OTRS/CONSENT. Érdemes az ott is megtalálható Interactive Release Generator segítségével megírni az e-mailt, hogy semmiféle probléma ne legyen. Üdv, Bencemac (talk) 15:45, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Rezső Metz in 1925.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 17:48, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Merkely Béla fotója
[edit]Szia! Jogos a sablon a File:Merkely Bela RS114981 C19A5899.jpg képen, valóban nem derül ki, hogy a feltöltő készítette a képet, de most tényleg erről van szó: ő az egyetem fotósa, és közvetve az én kérésemre tették fel a fotót. Itt levelezgettem egy másik szerkesztővel, hogy próbáljon képet szerezni, és visszajelzett, hogy tényleg az ő fotósuk volt, aki feltöltötte. Most megkértem, hogy írjanak egy levelet, de ha az előzmények meggyőzőek, akkor talán erre sincs szükség. Palotabarát (talk) 18:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Palotabarát: Szia! Sajnos mindenképp szükség lenne az engedélyeztető levélre, bemondásra nem fogadhatjuk el. Egy kivétel van, amikor a fiók előzetesen már hitelesítve lett (Template:Verified account), ilyenkor nem kell sablon/engedély minden új képre. Ha küldött engedélyt, szólj és megnézem majd. Bencemac (talk) 06:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Móczár Gábor
[edit]Hát Bencemac, ez nem volt szép tőled! Írhattál volna előzetesen egy-két szót és megbeszélhettük volna! Most kínlódhatok az angol fordítóval és indokolhatom meg a dolgokat. Láttad a képek minőségét, nem művészi fotók, munkaközi példányok. A többit majd olvasd el a törlési megbeszélés oldalán. Üdv, Bizottmány (talk) 20:47, 12 December 2023 (UTC) Még egy megjegyzés: Te magad voltál, aki bevetted az engedélyt és elláttad ticket-számmal. Akkor is belegondolhattál volna e ténybe, hogy aggályaid vannak, nem így utólag. Nem vártam tőled ezt az eljárást. Üdv, --Bizottmány (talk) 20:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Sajnálom, hogy kínlódnod kellett a fordítással, de amikor a kolléga jelezte, hogy szerinte nincs rendben az engedély, és a belső levelezőlistán nem érkezett visszajelzés a felvetett engedélyre, befogadóként tisztem volt kiírni ezt a közösségi megbeszélést. Ennek pont az a célja, hogy azok is hozzá tudjanak szólni, akik nem látják a jegyet és nem vettek részt az engedélyeztetésben. Bízom benne, hogy a képek megmaradhatnak, de ez nem rajtam múlik, sajnálom. Bencemac (talk) 07:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Nekem a belső levelezőlistán egy nyikk nem érkezett ez ügyben, csak képen vágtál ezzel a kiírással. Azt hittem, hogy magyar részről ti segítségként vagytok jelen a Commonson. Más országok itteni képviselőitől több segítséget kapok (tisztelet a kivételnek), mint a mieinktől. Ez lepett meg és szomorított el. De nem ragozom a dolgot, menjen a maga útján az ügy, nem foglalkozom tovább vele. --Bizottmány (talk) 21:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- A magyarul beszélő VRT-kezelők levelezőlistáján kértem segítséget, hiszen ők (mi) vagyunk azok, akiknek hozzáférése is van az engedélyező levélhez. Sajnálom, hogy ennyire emocionális síkon értelmezed a dolgot, a törlési eljárás célja, hogy a közösség számára is hozzáférhető módon kerüljön megvitatásra az engedély, aminek felülvizsgálatát kérte egy magyarul nem beszélő kolléga. Azt pedig nem gondolnám, hogy nem segítőként lennék jelen, az elmúlt egy évben 256 jegyet kezeltem, ami a magyar nyelvű levelek jelentős részét (is) jelenti. Elismerést nem várok érte, de legalább a segítőkész címkét ne vedd el tőlem... Bencemac (talk) 07:55, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Nem veszem el tőled a segítőkész jellemzést, tudom, hogy munka mellett végzitek ezt az önkéntes munkát, csak meglepett, hogy mint egy teljesen általad nem ismert szerkesztőnek, idevágtad az általam feltett 25 képre a törlési kérést, még köszönhetem, hogy értesítettél róla. Ne haragudj, de ezt csak emocionálisan tudom felfogni. Amúgy a 25 kép közül 12-nek egyáltalán nincs elérhető képe (még a NÖRI interaktív adatbázisában sem), plusz Koszta József Fiumei Úti Sírkertben volt sírja is csak itt van dokumentálva, mert áttemették Szentesre, Tasner Antal Gerenday cég által gyártott sírja is itt látható, mert rekonstruált, műmárvány sírt készítettek neki. Ezek a felvételek (bár minőségük nem jó), dokumentációs értékkel bírnak, azért is tettem fel őket. De ha a közösség úgy dönt, hogy a kiderített adatokkal és linkekkel ellátott leírásokat és a Photoshoppal javított képeket, valamint az egész engedélyezési eljárásra fordított időmet dobjuk a kukába, ám legyen. Azt hittem, hogy hasznos a tevékenységem, amit képességemhez mérten igyekszem itt ellátni, de ha nem, akkor abbahagyom az erőlködést. Selejtezzétek a képeimet, nem foglalkozom tovább vele. Az is „emocionálisan érint”, hogy egyetlen magyarul beszélő szerkesztő kolléga sem érezte úgy, hogy bele kellene avatkozni (esetleg segítőleg) ebbe a megkérdőjelezett engedély-ügybe. Most majd eltelik a kiírt idő és bármiféle reagálás hiányában törlés lesz belőle. Üdv, --Bizottmány (talk) 08:58, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Tisztáznám, hogy nem odavágtam az értesítést, hanem a törlési eljárások bevett procedúráját követtem, pingelve is téged. Nem látom, hol állította volna bárki is, hogy nem végzel hasznos tevékenységet: én biztos nem. Arról nem tudok nyilatkozni, más miért nem szól(t) hozzá a kérdéshez, de feltételezzünk jóindulatot, lehet nem látták/olvasták. Bencemac (talk) 10:16, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)