User talk:Carsten Steger

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Carsten Steger!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:10, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Luftbilder-Wunsch

[edit]

Hallo Carsten, wär das für dich möglich von der Villa Herrenberg (Prien am Chiemsee) zu machen? Die Bilder die man vom Boden und aussen machen kann geben überhaupt nicht den Eindruck der Weitläufigkeit und der wehrhaften Grundstücksummauerung wieder. Das Bild Nr 2 habe ich am Rande der Legalität aufgenommen. 2 Gesamtansichten, von Ost nach West und von Nord nach Süd, wären toll. Dann könnte man das besagte Foto löschen. Herzliche Grüße Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 14:01, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ricarda, vielen Dank für Deine Anfrage. Um ein Luftbild machen zu können, müsste sichergestellt sein, dass das Gebäude gemeinfrei ist, d. h. der Architekt müsste mindestens vor 70 Jahren gestorben sein. Leider habe ich auf die schnelle keinerlei Informationen über das Alter des Gebäudes und dessen Architekten in Wikipedia oder im Netz gefunden. Könntest Du das evtl. recherchieren? Viele Grüße --15:33, 7 August 2022 (UTC) Carsten Steger (talk) 15:33, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe von meinem Prien-Aufenthalt das 3-bändige Heimatbuch mitgebracht. Mal schauen ob da was steht. Grüße --Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 15:56, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Excelsior Geyser (view from the east).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 13:10, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of the Midway Geyser Basin (view from the east).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:09, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Grand Prismatic Spring (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Grand Prismatic Spring (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality and very nice! --Tournasol7 21:09, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Alicudi (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:35, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Filicudi (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:35, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Salina (view from the southwest).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:35, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Panarea (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:35, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Lipari (view from the southwest).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 18:27, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Vulcano (view from the east).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 18:27, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Stromboli (view from the northeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 18:27, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of riserva naturale orientata Isola di Panarea e scogli viciniori (view from the northeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 18:27, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Grand Prismatic Spring (view from the east).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent quality. --Kritzolina 18:45, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Grand Prismatic Spring (view from the west).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:14, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Stromboli and Strombolicchio (view from the northeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:14, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Blue-throated macaw in flight.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Blue-throated macaw in flight.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Aerial image of Grand Prismatic Spring (view from the south).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aerial image of Grand Prismatic Spring (view from the south).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays 2022/2023!

[edit]
Minster of the Holy Cross, Schwäbisch Gmünd. The imposing straw star in the centre is about 5 m tall and has been used every year for decades, thus it is an important part of local Christmas traditions. Happy Holidays, Carsten Steger

Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!

--Aristeas (talk) 14:45, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of the Traunsee (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of the Altausseer See (view from the west).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Aerial image of Stromboli (view from the northeast).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aerial image of Stromboli (view from the northeast).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Aerial image of Alicudi (view from the south).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aerial image of Alicudi (view from the south).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of the La Fossa crater (Vulcano).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates on File:Aerial image of the Untere Orangerie of Schloss Weilburg (view from the southeast).jpg

[edit]

Hi Carsten,

I see you reverted my deletion of coordinates of camera location on files like File:Aerial image of the Untere Orangerie of Schloss Weilburg (view from the southeast).jpg. I deleted them because I think the coordinates of the camera location is wrong. Both the longitude and the latitude are the same, while the coordinate of the object location are complete different. They are about 3000 km apart. The incorrect coordinates are in Kazachstan. Please check.

HenkvD (talk) 11:07, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HenkvD, thank you very much for the information why you deleted the location information! I will fix the coordinates as soon as possible. Best regards --Carsten Steger (talk) 11:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for correcting the coordinates. HenkvD (talk) 15:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Danke!

[edit]

 Thank you.

@Carsten Steger: Vielen herzlichen Dank für deine tollen Luftbilder der Flugplätze in Hochhausen (2023) und Niederstetten (2023) sowie Unterschüpf (bereits 2021).

Mir ist mit dem "Flugplatz Wertheim" in der Umgebung noch ein Flugplatz aufgefallen, von dem bisher weder ein Boden- noch ein Luftbild vorliegt, siehe Wertheim#Luftverkehr bzw. das von mir 2019 angelegte Datenobjekt d:Q63109021 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q63109021).

Interessant ist bei Wertheim auch der 1936 und 1937 angelegte Militärflugplatz auf dem Reinhardshof, der 1945 von den United States Army Air Forces übernommen wurde. Vielleicht sind da heute noch Strukturen zu erkennen.

P.S. Nicht weit davon entfernt liegt die Mülldeponie Wertheim-Dörlesberg (d:Q96475537) oder der de:Steinbruch Werbach (Der einzige nahezu vollständige Aufschluss des Unteren Muschelkalks in Baden-Württemberg). Beides (v.a. die Mülldeponie) ist am Boden nur schwer bzw. nicht öffentlich zugänglich für Bilder vor Ort und wäre aus der Luftperspektive sicherlich interessant.

Vielleicht könnten das interessante Motiv sein, falls du bei einem deiner Rundflüge dort vorbei kommst ;-)

Viele Grüße -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 05:07, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Triple C 85,
vielen Dank für Dein positives Feedback! Es freut mich sehr, dass Du die Bilder nützlich findest.
Vielen Dank auch für Deine Informationen über Bilder, die sich lohnen würden. Ich bin immer für Tipps dankbar und werde versuchen, sie zu berücksichtigen, wenn ich das nächste Mal in der Gegend bin (das kann aber etwas dauern).
Ich habe mich bisher gescheut, Ultraleichtfluggelände zu dokumentieren, da bei vielen davon die Quellenlage eher dürftig ist. Das Ultraleichtfluggelände Wertheim hat aber eine ausführliche Website und es gibt in den Nachrichten für Luftfahrer zwei Meldungen dazu. Außerdem ist es in der ICAO-Karte eingezeichnet, so dass es die Relevanzkriterien erfüllt. Man könnte also einen Artikel dazu anlegen, unabhängig davon, ob es schon ein Foto gibt.
Bzgl. des Fliegerhorstes Wertheim habe ich folgende Seite gefunden: Wertheim: Flugplatz US Army. Dort findet sich ein Satellitenbild von 1977. Wenn ich das Bild mit den aktuellen Bilddaten in Google Maps vergleiche, vermute ich, dass die ehemalige Start- und Landebahn durch die Karl-Carstens-Straße überbaut wurde und die ehemalige südwestliche Rollbahn durch die Gyula-Horn-Straße. An den Stellen, wo früher möglicherweise einmal Hangars waren (westlich der Willy-Brand-Straße), scheinen jetzt Industriegebäude errichtet worden zu sein (Rewe, Technisches Hilfswerk etc.). In Google Maps kann ich leider keine Strukturen des Militärflugplatzes mehr identifizieren.
Viele Grüße --Carsten Steger (talk) 19:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Guten Abend. Sehr gerne! Und Danke für deine Recherche zum alten Fliegerhorst. Ich werde da mal dran bleiben und ggfs. Artikel zum Fluplatz Wertheim sowie zum alten Fliegerhorst Wertheim verfassen.
Viele Grüße -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 19:29, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Triple C 85,
ich habe mal den Artikel Ultraleichtfluggelände Wertheim erstellt und das zugehörige Wikidata-Item überarbeitet und erweitert. Bitte gerne ergänzen. Bitte aber die Koordinaten des Ultraleichtfluggeländes (und alle anderen Daten, die im Wikidata-Item mit der Referenz auf die Nachrichten für Luftfahrer versehen sind) nicht ändern. Die stammen aus der behördlichen Genehmigung und sind damit die amtlichen Koordinaten, auch wenn sie leicht neben dem Ultraleichtfluggelände liegen.
Viele Grüße, --Carsten Steger (talk) 16:31, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Carsten Steger: Super! Vielen Dank! Grüße -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 05:49, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schloss Westerwinkel (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, but I think a longer exposure time in combination with lower ISO would provide more details, the focal length should allow longer exposure times :) --PantheraLeo1359531 19:05, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schloss Nordkirchen (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schloss Nordkirchen (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Iburg Castle (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:06, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Sparrenberg Castle (view from the southwest).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schloss Hünnefeld (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schloss Stadthagen (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of the Aussegnungshalle of Ostfriedhof in Munich (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Friedhof am Perlacher Forst (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of the retirement home St. Joseph in Munich (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schloss Bückeburg (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 18:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Ostfriedhof in Munich (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Luda.slominska 11:18, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Rosenberg Fortress (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Altes Schloss Bayreuth (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Jesuitenkolleg Amberg (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Straubing prison (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Burg Anholt (view from the west).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:18, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of the Kamp Abbey (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:18, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Burg Gudenau (view from the northeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:18, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schloss Gracht (view from the east).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:18, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of the Augustusburg Palace gardens (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:18, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Großer Garten (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 06:12, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Welfenschloss (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:24, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Stadtgarten Stadthagen (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:24, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schloss Neuhaus (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of the northern part of Großer Garten (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:50, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of the Bensberg Castle (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schloss Benrath (view from the east).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I think the bright areas are overexposed a bit --FlocciNivis 17:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you very much for your review! I have uploaded a new version in which the bright areas are darker --Carsten Steger 19:28, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schloss Hundisburg (view from the west).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:14, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Sanssouci (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:14, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schloss Charlottenburg (view from the southwest).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:43, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Spandau Citadel (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schloss Meseberg (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:44, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schwerin Castle (view from the east).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --多多123 18:53, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of the Ehreshoven Castle (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slightly too bright. --Ermell 19:50, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you very much for your review! I have uploaded a new version with a slightly reduced brightness --Carsten Steger 07:09, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image the garden of Schloss Münster (view from the west).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schloss Derneburg (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slighly too bright. WB should be more warm and the saturation icreased, --Ermell 06:13, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you very much for your review! I have reworked the image according to your suggestions. --Carsten Steger 16:52, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Melk Abbey (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:50, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Herzogenburg Monastery (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of the Baroque garden of Schloss Hof (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of the Baroque garden of Schloss Hof (view from the southwest).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Berggarten (view from the northeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --C messier 19:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Arsenal am Pfaffenteich (view from the east).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schloss Bothmer (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schloss Wiesenburg (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 06:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Schloss Drachenburg (view from the northeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 06:49, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Melk Abbey (view from the southwest).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 10:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDaheim 2023 - Gratulation!

[edit]

Hallo Carsten Steger,

danke für deine Beiträge zu WikiDaheim und Gratulation zum 10. Platz beim Sonderpreis Denkmäler mit File:Aerial image of the Baroque garden of Schloss Hof (view from the southwest).jpg! Dein Bild wird automatisch in den internationalen Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments weitergereicht.

Herzliche Grüße, Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) 08:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Devils Garden in Arches National Park (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Burgberg in Meißen (view from the southeast).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 01:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Finsteraarhorn (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 19:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east face (view from the east).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 00:33, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Monte Rosa (view from the northwest).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 00:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial image of Fiescher Glacier (view from the south).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Why ISO 1000 ? --Moroder 09:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
*  Comment: The airplane moves at 50 m/s. I use the relatively high ISO setting to get a very short exposure time to reduce the motion blur as much as possible. I also use aperture priority to operate the lens at its optical resolution sweet spot.
 Support Good quality. I got you, thanks. --Moroder 10:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east face (view from the east).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east face (view from the east).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Aerial image of Finsteraarhorn (view from the south).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aerial image of Finsteraarhorn (view from the south).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]