User talk:Crazy1880

English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Crazy1880!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 18:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Crazy1880,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Categorization

Hi, Crazy1880, I noticed your edit. Question: no more need for birth dates now? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 12:48, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello Lotje, yes so it is. With the new template "Wikidata Infobox", there comes categories for birth- and death-dates and given and surnames. Planned is for more. Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 15:12, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Well, Crazy1880, that is very good news. Looking forward to what is coming more. Thank you! Lotje (talk) 15:16, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Crazy1880,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2018-09-27 Infotafel Peter und Paulskirche.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2018-09-27 Infotafel Peter und Paulskirche.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:57, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Recent categorization edits

Crazy1880, please note that Category:People is an overly broad category. Most images of people should be at least placed into one of subcategories of Category:People by country‎ or even Category:People by occupation by country‎. Read more about categorization at Commons:Categories. —⁠andrybak (talk) 17:33, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Moin Moin andrybak, thank you for pointing that out. Until a few weeks ago this category was very full and you could add it there. I now try to classify the categories accordingly. I know the rest, although I'm new here, I'm an old hand in wikis. So thanks --Crazy1880 (talk) 17:39, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Question ⁠andrybak: Do you know a tool or script that can make visible whether an image is associated with a Wikidata object? That would be useful for me for Category:Media needing categories. Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 17:44, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

None that I know of. Consider asking at COM:VP. —⁠andrybak (talk) 17:58, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Infobox

Servus nach WF, kurz und knapp gefragt: Warum lässt Du die {{Wikidata Infobox}} nicht einfach bei den Gallery-Seiten stehen? Ich finde die IB klasse und sinnvoll für so etwas. mfG, --Mateus2019 (talk) 14:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Moin Moin Mateus2019, weil sie mit Wikidata verknüft werden soll, und da sind die Themen zu den Category-Seiten zugeordnet. Sollte man es anders wollen, dann müsste man zum selben Theme die qid-Parameter befüllen. Das ist dann aber eher missbräuchlich, wenn die Info schonmal vorhanden ist. Und eine reine Anlage als Gallery-Page auf Wikidata würde ich dazu nicht empfehlen. Und damit all dass dann keine Error erzeugt, wird es herausgenommen. Wenn du magst, kannst du dich an der Abarbeitung von Category:Uses of Wikidata Infobox with no item (ca. 89.000 Seiten) beteiligen. mfg --Crazy1880 (talk) 16:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Category:Antonis Michaloglou

Category:Antonis Michaloglou is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD C2 (unuseful empty category) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ ^{🩺 • 💉} 05:17, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Geocoordinates

I'm not aware of any consensus to remove geocoordinates from categories simply because they are also in the Wikidata Infobox, as you did at [1]. Can you point me to a discussion where that consensus was reached? Last time I remember it being discussed, I don't remember any such conclusion. - Jmabel ! talk 05:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Moin Moin Jmabel, thanks for the question. At the moment I don't find the right point. But I remember a discussion from template Wikidata Infobox where the question was, when the Infobox holds all the informations, like maps, NHRP-ID or some other points, which sense is makes, so let the other templates in a category or site. And I mean the result was to remove it. Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 09:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Commons:Structured data/Reconciliation indicates that what you are doing is "controversial". I don't see anything saying otherwise, and I looked. - Jmabel ! talk 16:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

@Jmabel, I looked and read again, the story is from 2018, when the Wikidata Infobox came up. This discussion i guess: Template talk:Wikidata Infobox/Archive 1#Do we want to auto-remove other templates?, so there you have to look. But in fact, not every template is in this talk. And we talk here about facts what are in two templates on one side are. Like the location, NRHP or others for monuments or authority control. So i think in a category-side only one point you look at is enough. The discussion you bring me is for Structured data from a file, when you will have there more templates, please, but i thought even there is should be more and more less template and more structured data. For me its equal, perhaps you have a good side or good community where we can discuss this again? Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 18:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Yes, that is one of many discussions there have been, but it is not a policy document, just one of many discussions. What I'm saying is that over time there has not been a consensus on this. - Jmabel ! talk 06:09, 4 November 2024 (UTC)