User talk:1992 FARHAAD

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 1992 FARHAAD!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:10, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hawaii Desktop Environment--AppChooser.png

File:Hawaii Desktop Environment--AppChooser.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Atlasowa (talk) 21:58, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parole Media Player v0.8.1.png

File:Parole Media Player v0.8.1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ViperSnake151 (talk) 04:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evince running on GNOME.png

File:Evince running on GNOME.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Peter James (talk) 19:40, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Firefox--customized font colours.png

File:Firefox--customized font colours.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:37, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but

Hi! Please be patient when moving categories. As soon as the command is set for the Commons Delinker bot, the request is removed. Too much chaos otherwise. Thanks for keeping an eye on the shop and adding the move requests! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 21:38, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

File:GNOME Flashback with Applications menu on Ubuntu 18.04.png

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:03, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:04, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Safety Last!.webm

Are you sure these are the same quality? I'm not good at evaluating video quality. Is there some metric for measuring this we can use or are you just eyeballing it? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 13:17, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 13:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies Justin, I just deleted it. Please have both a look at the subsisting file and let me know. If you are still in doubt, I shall undelete it

. — Racconish ^💬 13:24, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am simply unsure--it seemed like my video was higher quality but I just don't know. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 13:29, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I am not completely sure myself. I have temporarily undeleted it and shall ask for uninvolved comments. — Racconish ^💬 13:33, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Justin, I checked. Your version "useful" part is about 974 x 720, while mine is 488 x 360. On the other hand, yours is slightly distorted relative to the 4:3 format you would expect for such files (see here). I suggest we should keep both at this point, although I shall try to improve the resolution of mine. — Racconish ^💬 17:42, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: Thanks. Agreed. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:59, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Justin, as the file is up for MOTD today, I will upload the better version tomorrow and come back to you. — Racconish ^💬 19:08, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Vandalism in Wikipedia in the style of Revert war, also called Edit war.jpeg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Vandalism in Wikipedia in the style of Revert war, also called Edit war.jpeg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 10:41, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:GtkHeaderBar on GNOME Files.png

Copyright status: File:GtkHeaderBar on GNOME Files.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:GtkHeaderBar on GNOME Files.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 20:42, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:APHONNIC - Ombligos.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:James Hetfield with Metallica -- 7 October 2004.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:James Hetfield with Metallica -- 7 October 2004.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic renaming

File:Tribute in Light (10092).jpg → File:Tribute in Light on top of the Battery Parking Garage in September 2018.jpg is not an uncontroversial rename. The original wasn't meaningless -- you just added more information. Also, you just simply removed the standard index I use in literally all my files. When adding information, please only move when the original name is meaningless, and retain naming conventions, etc. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhododendrites: Hello Mr. Rhododendrites, "Tribute in Light (10092)" wasn't meaningless, but it hadn't information about the year it was taken, now I think the " on top of the Battery Parking Garage in " part is overplus and unnecessary, so if you are agree I want to move it to "Tribute in Light, September 2018", or if you still prefer and want your original title, please tell me. Thanks for the image and your hint.Editor-1 (talk) 14:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Typically we shouldn't change filenames just to add information unless the original was "meaningless or ambiguous". In this case, I do not feel strongly about whether the title includes "September 2018" or not. I don't put dates in filenames because everything I upload is dated and in date-based categories (this image is in the Tribute in Light category as well as September 2018 in New York City). The biggest problem is that "(10092)" is missing. I use that to easily reference RAW files in case I need to make edits in the future. I will go ahead and move it. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:20, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhododendrites: How about renaming it to "Tribute in Light, 2018--(10092)" or "Tribute in Light, 2018 -- (10092)"? because repeating "in" twice in a short title is not good and beautiful.--Editor-1 (talk) 14:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

not good and beautiful - you are right that it is not beautiful, but in looking for beauty you have higher standards for filenames than most people, I think. :) I'll replace it with a comma per your request, but typically we just want filenames to convey some meaningful information -- high-quality writing is better for the description IMO. More punctuation in a filename means more opportunities for errors when various programs parse them. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhododendrites: "In this case, I do not feel strongly about whether the title includes "September 2018" or not. I don't put dates in filenames because everything I upload is dated and in date-based categories (this image is in the Tribute in Light category as well as September 2018 in New York City)." I added the date so the people including me who save the image no longer need to add it manually to the saving/saved file, or check the image metadata to see its year, also the "Tribute in Light" category is not categorized per year so finding new images requires checking the images pages one by one, by having/adding the date to images titles, these use cases are addressed/solved.--Editor-1 (talk) 15:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revdel copyvio tag

Hi. Please don't mark revision deletion requests with a copyvio tag. Better to use a full DR. It is too easy for the closing administrator to delete the whole file with no trace if you tag it as a copyvio. Thanks. Storkk (talk) 13:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Skyline of the Central Business District of Singapore with Esplanade Bridge in the evening.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skyline of the Central Business District of Singapore with Esplanade Bridge in the evening.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Nowruz

Happy Nowruz! --Ruwaym (talk) 11:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruwaym: سلامٌ علیکم رُوَیْمْ. Thanks for your attention and congratulate, but it is a very awful song! happy Nowruz too 🍀 -- FMM-1992 (talk) 01:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But i am a fan of her. Ok, I hope this one make you smile. --Ruwaym (talk) 04:08, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruwaym: this one was much better, thanks; I am totally not interested at Persian music, just Western, Arabic, and a little Hebrew. Good luck. -- FMM-1992 (talk) 06:18, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hokem

Hokem ruined me for playing euchre. Just so you know.--RaboKarbakian (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Germann with Sircar and McGinley 2022 (edited).png

Copyright status: File:Germann with Sircar and McGinley 2022 (edited).png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Germann with Sircar and McGinley 2022 (edited).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:1992 FARHAAD

Contents

File:Hawaii Desktop Environment--AppChooser.png

File:Parole Media Player v0.8.1.png

File:Evince running on GNOME.png

File:Firefox--customized font colours.png

Thanks, but

Image without license

File:GNOME Flashback with Applications menu on Ubuntu 18.04.png

File:GNOME Panel--Properties-Dialog-Menu--Ubuntu 18.04.png

File:Safety Last!.webm

File source is not properly indicated: File:Vandalism in Wikipedia in the style of Revert war, also called Edit war.jpeg

Copyright status: File:GtkHeaderBar on GNOME Files.png

Important message for file movers

MOTD Notification

FP Promotion

Problematic renaming

Revdel copyvio tag

FP Promotion

Happy Nowruz

hokem

Copyright status: File:Germann with Sircar and McGinley 2022 (edited).png

Navigation menu

User talk:1992 FARHAAD

Thanks, but

Image without license

File source is not properly indicated: File:Vandalism in Wikipedia in the style of Revert war, also called Edit war.jpeg

Copyright status: File:GtkHeaderBar on GNOME Files.png

Important message for file movers

FP Promotion

Problematic renaming

Revdel copyvio tag

FP Promotion

Happy Nowruz

hokem

Copyright status: File:Germann with Sircar and McGinley 2022 (edited).png

Navigation menu

Search