User talk:Husky/Archive2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I think you got this wrong. If you follow the link to Flickr, and are signed as a user, you can see that the picture is public and licensed under CC. Flickr has recently changed its access conditions, especially with regard to pictures that contain nudity, so there are numerous pictures you can't access without a login. But that's not a license issue, the image is still within Commons license guidelines. ~ trialsanderrors 02:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind taking a look at this image for me. Its causing a little trouble on en.wikipedia. It stagged with the license {{PD-NL-RVD}} but is the only image here that is. There seems to be a disagreement about whether all reproduction with attribution or only non-commercial reproduction is permitted. Apparently the photo is used on the Dutch wikipedia. I thought you would be well placed to look into the matter- I'm afraid I don't speak the language myself. Thank you for your help. WjBscribe 12:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WJBscribe. I studied the copyright notice on the website of the royal family, and i think the license is not compatible for Wikimedia Commons. The website of the RVD (which distributes the photographs) states that the photographs may be used for private and non-commercial use, as well as 'by the media'. For any other use permission should be requested first. 'By the media' seems to narrow for me to authorize an {Attribution} license, so i guess the picture should be deleted. Fortunately we have a good alternative in Image:Máxima Zorreguieta pregnant.jpg. Husky (talk to me) 19:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for looking into it for me. WjBscribe 03:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

[edit]

I'm not too familar with the system. What I usually do is send Wikimedia commons a copy of the permission to use it under GNU, and then an admin usually archives it. Anything else beyond that I don't know how to do. I clicked on the OTRS thing on my image and it told me that I needed an account to do it?--CyberGhostface 21:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you're right. You can't login to OTRS without an account. However, i see that User:MECU has already added the OTRS link to your picture, so no action is needed from your side. Husky (talk to me) 22:45, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image: Buscando la Luz II

[edit]

Sorry Husky, Ik heb de tekst van 2 uploads door elkaar gehaald. Correcties zijn aangebracht. Hopelijk is de zaak nu in orde. Het zal niet snel nogmaals gebeuren met de nieuwe helppagina van Flinfo (al begrijp ik eerlijk gezegd niet, hoe de tekst van de nieuwe "information" naar het uploadformulier wordt gebracht. Ik tik dat hele verhaal maar opnieuw, alhoewel dat niet de bedoeling zal zijn. Hoe doet een (beginnend) mens dat op zijn pc? groetend--Gerardus 07:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Gerardus. Het Flinfo tooltje is inderdaad niet altijd even eenvoudig voor de beginnende computergebruiker, geen punt dat je dingen door elkaar haalt, het staat er nu gewoon goed op, dus dankjewel daarvoor.
Als je de informatie uit het Flinfo tooltje naar het uploadformulier wilt kopiëren kun je daarvoor gebruik maken van de knippen en plakken opties op je computer. Als je Windows gebruikt: selecteer de tekst uit het Flinfo scherm, gebruik de toetsencombinatie CTRL-C, ga naar het uploadformulier en plak daar de tekst met CTRL-V. Als je nog vragen hebt: stel ze gerust hier. Groet, Husky (talk to me) 12:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Charles Smith photos

[edit]

Sorry with my english, I am spanish and I don't use this language often. I take Charles Smith's photos from Flickr with the tag "Only search within Creative Commons-licensed photos" marked. I am new uploading photos and a wikipedia friend told me that the photos will be correct with this. I also mark the origin of the photos when I upload them. If I can do something to change the situation and turn the photos "legal" for commons, please tell me how (in spanish if is possible, if not in english :P).--Erbarto 00:00, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Erbarto. When you upload photos to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr you always have to provide the source (the exact link to the original Flickr page) and the license of the media. Unfortunately there is more than one Creative Commons license, only two of these (the CC-BY and CC-BY-SA licenses) are usable on Commons. To read more about Creative Commons in Spanish please refer to the Spanish article on Wikipedia. If you need more help in Spanish you could also try one of our users who speaks Spanish by following this link. Husky (talk to me) 12:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help and patience. I put on both photos a comment with the link of the photo from flickr. Can you see it and check if they are correct to stay in commons? The links to the photos in commons are http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Charles_Smith_Cara.jpg and http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Charles_smith.jpg

Thanks for all again.--Erbarto 13:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Erbarto. Unfortunately both photos are licensed under a Creative Commons Non-commercial license, (the icon with the dollar sign), which is not allowed on Commons. You have to upload photographs which are licensed either as CC-BY or CC-BY-SA. Flickr provides a special search engine for these photographs, simply follow this link. If you have any questions in the future, please don't hesitate to ask them here. Husky (talk to me) 15:08, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for all. Users with your patience make Wikipedia and Commons better! --Erbarto 15:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

pics of Kallistratova and others

[edit]

Hello. I uploaded few pics. I tried fo follow the instructions. I could not find a tag which allosw to use copies, but requires to indicate source. Could you help me? Domitori 00:21, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Domitori. I think you already found the tag ({CopyrightedFreeUseProvided}). Husky (talk to me) 15:17, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mpipod_withref_notrans.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 10:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hee Siebrand. De hele iPodLinux wiki valt onder de GFDL, dus dit plaatje ook. Husky (talk to me) 16:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, mogelijk iets te snel op een knopje geklikt :) Siebrand 06:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. It looks like I must have accidentally pasted over the link or something. ShadowHalo 02:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let op auteursrechten! Image:Inkscapesplash.png is gemarkeerd als auteursrechtenschending. Wikimedia Commons accepteert alleen maar vrije media, dat zijn afbeeldingen en andere media bestanden die door iedereen gebruikt kunnen worden, voor elk doeleinde. Voor details over wat geaccepteerd wordt, lees Commons:Licensing (Engels). Vragen over Commons beleid kan gesteld worden in Commons:Helpdesk.

Het bestand zal spoedig verwijderd worden. Als u gelooft dat deze afbeelding geen auteursrechtenschending is, leg dit alstublieft uit op de beschrijvingspagina van de afbeelding.


Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Siebrand 07:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Inkscapesplash.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

D-Kuru 12:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

You forgot to add a license to Image:Rogier van der Weyden - Portret van een Vrouw.jpg (e. g. tag it with a license like {{GFDL}} or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}). --AndreasPraefcke 11:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I tagged it {PD-self}. Husky (talk to me) 22:17, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:Victor Horta Museum Interior.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 17:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:IPhone Cover Flow.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 21:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bouncing ball FP candidate

[edit]

There is a new extremely professional re-edit from my original RAW file by Richard Bartz, and I'd urge you to vote for this instead of my own imperfect Photoshop efforts. Thanks very much to Richard for the work he's put in. Please consider voting or amending your vote at: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bouncing ball - strobe.jpg. --MichaelMaggs 17:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, done. Husky (talk to me) 17:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:New York City at night HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:New York City at night HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 09:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:IPhone_Playing_Music.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Lokal_Profil 13:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Thom yorke radiohead.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Papa November 23:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Thom yorke radiohead2.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Papa November 23:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:IPhone Playing Music.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 06:53, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stradivarius

[edit]

re the images of the stradivari violin images, do you know which it is? sobriquet and/or fabrication date should be included as there are literally 'hundreds' of stradivari violins. --emerson7 | Talk 02:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr license laundrying

[edit]

Hi Husky,

I found a couple of images uploaded by EUA (talk · contribs) (namely Image:Vampire Boris.jpg and Image:Vampire Bóris armour.jpg) that were clear copyvios, having been uploaded first to Flickr, then here. You reviewed them as ok. Please be careful, these images were obvious promo images from some TV show; furthermore (but this you had no way of knowing), the account is a sockpuppet, this user just keeps on creating new accounts and uploading the same pictures. When in doubt, ask around on the Village pump or the administrators' noticeboard. Cheers, Patrícia msg 21:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again,
I just realized I did a terrible mistake and came to apologize. It turns out that the user not only did Flickr laundrying, it also forged the Flickrreview templates, and used your name. I'm very sorry. Patrícia msg 21:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Patricia. No apologies needed. If this user used my name falsely on the Flickrreviewer templates (how rude!) you couldn't know. Husky (talk to me) 22:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I could have checked the page history *before* ranting here ;). Thanks for your understanding :). Patrícia msg 10:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Genesis performing.jpg

[edit]

Hoi Husky, zou je misschien een licentie willen toevoegen aan Image:Genesis performing.jpg? Multichill 20:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

En ook graag aan Image:Han Ten Broeke.jpg. Multichill 20:41, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Goede opmerking :) Template {Wikiportrait} is nu zo aangepast dat er automatisch cc-by / GFDL bij komt. Husky (talk to me) 23:51, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ik denk niet dat dat handig is. Wie zegt dat iedereen die een foto beschikbaar stelt dit onder deze twee licenties doet? Multichill 11:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dat zijn de standaard licenties van Wikiportret. Als je een foto upload op Wikiportret kun je kiezen voor ofwel CC-BY / GFDL ofwel CC-BY-SA / GFDL. Dat laatste is nog nooit gebeurd. Alle foto's van Wikiportret zijn dus tot op heden gelicenseerd onder CC-BY / GFDL. Husky (talk to me) 17:52, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Licence question

[edit]

Hello!

Is it then allowed to upload this image from flickr? It is under the following conditions: Attribution, noncommercial and share alike. -- High Contrast (talk) 07:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, unfortunately not. Noncommercial Creative Commons images are never allowed on Wikimedia Commons. The only two licenses from Flickr that are allowed are Attribution and Attribution / Share-alike. Husky (talk to me) 08:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for help!! -- High Contrast (talk) 09:12, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but Image:Leffenijmegen.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.


čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

|EPO| da: 13:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Santa_usairforce.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

66.31.42.26 15:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello Husky/Archive2!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 17:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No permission

[edit]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jackiechan withfan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jackiechan withfan.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

License here is 'All Rights Reserved.' --Leoboudv (talk) 21:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

7E7

[edit]

Hello,

Would you have any more pictures of the 7E7 model in the Stedelijk Museum?

Is there a place where I could contact you?

Thanks, Mark

Hi Mark. I looked in my archives but unfortunately the only picture i made back then was the one you see here. Sorry :( Husky (talk to me) 22:40, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Isakovsky.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Isakovsky.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Isakovsky.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Alex Spade (talk) 13:42, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr idee

[edit]

Staat op User:Multichill/Flickr ripper. Multichill (talk) 23:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Sander-jan-klerk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sander 198 (talk) 21:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Sander-jan-klerk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.91.202.127 18:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Neptune fountain florence hand.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--- Zil (d) 16:27, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How can this image be licensed the way it is? The photographer is not the author of the image at all, who certainly has not been asked... --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 21:16, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The rights of the original copyright holder have been cleared by the Tropenmuseum, who is the owner of this particular work of art. Husky (talk to me) 08:41, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't think that File:Neon.JPG is really primarily a work of art, more a utilitarian example of the craftsman's work, probably for advertising. I don't think it really fits category Category:Featured art pictures. --Tony Wills (talk) 01:38, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for File:Georges Bizet - Rosabel Morrison - Carmen poster.png, primarily an advertising poster (which obviously contains art work), but not a "work of art" as such, which is I think what that category is for. --Tony Wills (talk) 01:44, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I remember i saw the Neon sign somewhere in a German museum, so it might really be a work of art. For the other poster.. it's a bit difficult to choose what's art and not. E.g. the Alphonse Mucha images were also made for advertising, but are now generally seen as works of Jugendstil art.. Husky (talk to me) 08:42, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I looked at the Neon page to see whether it said where it was photographed (it doesn't), you may be right. I suppose just about any creative work can be classified as art (are the Egyptian pyramids art?). I suppose Andy Warhol blurred the distinction between "industrial" art and art for art sake. Looking at the category contents I was supposing the category was created for what might be called "fine art", or even classical art, paintings, sculptures etc. Maybe art has to be useless for any other purpose to be real art :-). Now I am wondering what use the category is anyway :-). Oh well, if you put those items back into the category I will not object, but I am not sure where the cut off point should be! --Tony Wills (talk) 10:55, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A very old question that still doesn't have a clear answer :) I created the category specifically to makea an 'art' section on the featured picture page. The pyramids do belong there i guess, maybe in an 'architecture' subcategory. Anything that is in an art book could be in the category i guess, so that rules out animals, landscapes, common objects, astronomy, sports, etc.
Work of art?
Sounds good, how about genetically engineered or other man-made animals [1], landscaped classical gardens, common objects like cans of Campbells Soup[2], engravings on man-made satelites, sports like correographed ice skating routines (ballet?)  ;-). I was going to say that the only common factor is 'man-made', but then what about this[3], can they even copyright their works :-). Yes, I think that I will definitely leave it to you to decide :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 20:08, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Art portrait collage.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Art portrait collage.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Anime image appears to be a copyvio. --Ty 14:14, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Somebody removed the source images from the gallery on the image description page. I've reverted them now, the anime image is over here. Husky (talk to me) 18:52, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Husky. One of your edits are being discussed here. Please feel free to comment. --MGA73 (talk) 22:22, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this photo was truly free on 15 August 2005, why don't you type in a flickrpass in your name dated to this day...as Sandstein did for this photo that he uploaded: [4] ? You can do this as a trusted user provided you knew the license was definitely "cc by" Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I just noticed your very pretty logo for m:glam - Thanks! Witty lama (talk) 08:06, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WLANL Emile Bernard

[edit]

The copyright status of:

are not clear. Works by Emile Bernard (1868-1941) are not in public domain, so if his heir or copyright holder has released it under a cc-by licence it should be verified at OTRS. --V.Riullop (talk) 11:31, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright
File:Bottle_hetelfdegebod.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Schlurcher (talk) 12:47, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright
File:Bottle_duchessedebourgogne.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Schlurcher (talk) 12:48, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright
File:Bottle_stbernardus_pater6.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Schlurcher (talk) 12:53, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Interpol.jpg

[edit]

File:Interpol.jpg, I'm afraid, has to be deleted, although from the other images in the sequence this was freely licensed at the time of upload, the Flickr user has changed his permissions to all rights reserved. The other files in this sequence were bot uploaded and have flickr review tags to show that they were free at time of upload, however this one never had a Flickr review so its status at the time of upload cannot now be proven. Which is a pity because this was the best of the bunch, which is why I guess it was the first to be uploaded.KTo288 (talk) 05:15, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should check the history, it was reviewed by the bot. Could you please undo your edits? Multichill (talk) 11:20, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done with pleasure. I missed a trick there didn't think to look at the history. Thankyou for putting me right on this. Now off to fix what harm I've done at our sister projects.--KTo288 (talk) 10:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Art Netherlands

[edit]

Hello,

Could you please clarify the questions I address at Commons:Village pump#Wiki Loves Art Netherlands and no FOP inside museums in the Netherlands. Teofilo (talk) 15:50, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Museum Catharijneconvent Utrecht

[edit]

Hi Husky, ich möchte dich fragen, ob du noch Kontakt zu dem Museum hast. Sie haben wohl das Gemälde "Herr und Knecht", Gemälde eines unbekannten Künstlers, um 1610, 26 x 30,5 cm. Ich wäre an einer Reproduktion hier auf Commons interessiert. Falls das Museum das erlaubt und du da noch ein Foto machen könntest, wäre das super. --Lachender Schelm (talk) 12:10, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

review request

[edit]

hi would you please review the licensee of this and this picture ? thanxz ;) Blueearth205 (talk) 11:03, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, deleted the files. Commercial usage is not allowed according to the license at Flickr. This makes the file not free and not suitable for Commons. Multichill (talk) 14:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 15:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Schroeder House

[edit]

Does your license cover for publishing in a book that I have written on design? Sultony

Hi Sultony. Definitely, as long as you honour the terms of the Creative Commons license (Attribution and Sharealike) you're free to use it any way you want. Husky (talk to me) 09:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

objectif

[edit]

when wil it be objectif news ?

Hello,
could you please draw a Polish-language version of the above mentioned file? We'd like to use it in the Polish part of the Wiki Loves Monuments project. The name of the project in Polish is 'Wiki Lubi Zabytki' (all upper-cased on the logo). Thank you, odder (talk) 22:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Info: Please read Commons:Signatures

[edit]

That's all. Thank you. (It is not important to me, but I think you should know.) -- RE rillke questions? 09:33, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to publish - Schroder House

[edit]

I would like to obtain a hi-res version of this image if you hold the copyright, for a book I have written on interior design. Is that possible please?

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

[edit]
Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Husky,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:16, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Attend the award ceremony of the Dutch Wiki Loves Monuments 2011

[edit]
Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 English | Nederlands | +/−
Dear Husky,

We've already thanked you for your contribution to the Wiki Loves monuments photo contest. But with a contest, there are prizes to win!

The award ceremony will be held in Utrecht on Saturday the 5th of November, at the end of the Dutch Wikimedia Conference at Media Plaza, held the same day. Media Plaza is located next to the Central Station in Utrecht, in the middle of the shopping mall.
Admittance is free from 3pm onwards, just in time to catch the last few presentations at the WCN. Off course you can join us for the full day conference as well and enjoy a day full of information on wiki's and cultural heritage. After the ceremony, our location sponsor generously offers a free drink to everyone!

Remember: in order to make a chance to win, you need a confirmed e-mail address added to your Commons settings.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team and the Dutch Wikimedia Conference team
WCN 2011
Sent by Lucia Bottalk in 23:22, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Real Life Barnstar
WCN 2011 org Vera (talk) 20:50, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You put the AT bar in Chech Republic :) One question: "The left bar is the number of users living in that country" - Wikimedia users? Przykuta[edit] 10:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, sorry. That wasn't very cool. I'll fix it in a few days :) Husky (talk to me) 10:52, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have just one question : Why is this file under copyright? Did the foundation register the trademark?

Regards ! --M0tty (talk) 13:06, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments NL

[edit]

Beste Husky,

Alle winnende foto's van Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 zijn ondertussen gedrukt als kalenders.

Wikimedia Nederland stelt er hier 100 van beschikbaar voor alle uploaders van de afbeeldingen. Geef op de bijgevoegde link je naam en adres en we sturen je kosteloos een exemplaar toe, als dank voor je deelname! Let op: op = op!! Bestel hier één kalender per adres.

Ook dit jaar zal er in september weer een Nederlandse Wiki Loves Monuments plaatsvinden, als onderdeel van de internationale wedstrijd. Meer informatie vind je tegen die tijd op http://www.wikilovesmonuments.nl/.
Ook zoeken wij nog vrijwilligers die het leuk vinden om mee te helpen met het organiseren van de landelijke wedstrijd of van locale evenementen (een "Wiki takes..." in je eigen woonplaats dus!). Meer informatie daarover vind je op de wiki van Wikimedia Nederland.

Sent by Lucia Bottalk in 14:54, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Volumia

[edit]

Hallo Husky, we proberen regelmatig de foto te vervangen van Volumia, maar iedere keer lukt dat niet. Volumia! was een negenmansband uit Maastricht. Op de foto is alleen Xander De Buisonje te zien, da's niet Volumia! Hoe krijgen we dit voor elkaar? Groeten

Pay attention to copyright
File:Klokhuis apples.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Vera (talk) 12:08, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Poken.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Vera (talk) 12:12, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ipod nano box.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Vera (talk) 12:14, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lennon imagine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]