User talk:Iaaasi
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 14:05, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Hunyadi janos pecsetje es cimere.gif was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:05, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Radu of Afumati.jpg was uncategorized on 2 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:56, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Nagy Mal.JPG was uncategorized on 29 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Image:HouseCiceu.JPG was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Wallachia1810.jpg was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Banat1700.jpg was uncategorized on 2 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Image:BolbociLake.JPG was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:10, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Iaaasi. You have new messages at Lymantria's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
File source is not properly indicated: File:Radu de la Afumati.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Radu de la Afumati.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 11:21, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
File:HouseCiceu.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 11:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Nagy_Mal.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 11:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
File:MerestiLandscape.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 11:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Noncommercial use
[edit]I'm sorry, but the pictures that you have just uploaded and which are now pending a deletion discussion are currently licensed under some non-commercial use copyrights, which renders them, in this precise wording, unacceptable for hosting on the Wikimedia Commons. Please ask the authors to alter their licenses quickly, because if it does not fall under Commons' scope, that is Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses: "Commercial use of the work must be allowed." then these images may soon be deleted. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 06:41, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:GilauLake.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:GilauLake.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Lymantria (talk) 14:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi! What is exactly the problem with this image? There is cc-by-sa-3.0 licence, there is otrs ticket with the author's permission... - RepliCarter (talk) 12:49, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm asking because of this message: User talk:Tambo#Copyright status: File:Jedlik motor.jpg. Thanks in advance. - RepliCarter (talk) 12:51, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
And there is source as well. - RepliCarter (talk) 12:54, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
The problem is solved. - RepliCarter (talk) 13:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Program
[edit]Best program for map drawing is Photoshop. You open map in Photoshop, then you open an empty layer on that map and draw on that layer. That is what I do, anyway. You can also draw on original map space instead on new layer (which is more easy way), but in that case map that you created will not be 100% your work - it would rather be derivative work from original map. PANONIAN (talk) 10:35, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks, maybe I will try once. In this moment I don't have Photoshop installed Iaaasi (talk) 10:40, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
File:1920HuNewsp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
El Grafo (talk) 12:46, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Great Schism 1054 with former borders.png
[edit]Hi! You updated File:Great Schism 1054 with former borders.png and I'd like to know which was the reason for creating a 100 % Catholic area in Transylvania. Thanks in advance for your answer. 86.127.22.21 07:12, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hi! A lot of maps about this period and this subject show Transylvania (entire) as a 100 % catholic land, and Moldavia-Wallachia as not christian (paganist) lands (see [1] as an example. I draw this map according with the academic historic works. The 100% catholic area in Transylvania is the Szekely lands (sedes) where Vlachs & Slavs were few. Wishes, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 11:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Since Matyas Unger & others, if the actual Szekelys are settled here, it's because this part of a very forested land, had a sparse (magyar, pecheneg, post-avar ?) population and must be better forbidden... Religious maps represent this area as an enclave of the Esztergom bishop included in the Kalocsa bishop's domain. But if you think better to take off this catholic area, I'm ready to do it. --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 07:40, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Reventtalk 10:10, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!
[edit]Dear Iaaasi,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.
In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.
Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Szekelyek big.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Szekelyek big.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Regasterios (talk) 10:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Great Schism 1054.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kun Kipcsak (talk) 17:27, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Radu of Afumati.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kun Kipcsak (talk) 18:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Hunyadi janos pecsetje es cimere.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |