User talk:Koreanovsky

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Byzantine flags

Hi! Please do not revert the Byzantine flags again without prior discussion. The files are widely used across several WP projects, and should be accurate. Uploading new files does not fix that, correcting the existing ones does. Constantine ✍ 15:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Former Yugoslavia 2008.PNG

Hi! I see that you have extensively contributed to File:Former Yugoslavia 2008.PNG. I have some concerns regarding this file. Firstly, Banja Luka is the effective administrative centre of Republika Srpska but the official capital is Sarajevo, as stated in the entity's constitution. Secondly, this entity is seldom called "Serb Republic"; the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which is in English, and the most reputable English-language media call it "Republika Srpska" instead. The other entity, likewise, is neither officially nor commonly called Bosniak-Croat Federation but simply Federation. Thirdly, I am not sure about the merits of displaying subdivisions of Bosnia and Herzegovina alone; it makes the image look quite a bit convoluted and inconsistent. What do you think? Surtsicna (talk) 21:11, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pogled na fakultet i crkvu u Kiseljaku.jpg

File:Pogled na fakultet i crkvu u Kiseljaku.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 14:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pogled s pješačkog mosta preko rijeke Lepenice, Kiseljak.jpg

File:Pogled s pješačkog mosta preko rijeke Lepenice, Kiseljak.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 14:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spomenik hrvatskim braniteljima, Kiseljak.jpg

File:Spomenik hrvatskim braniteljima, Kiseljak.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 14:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spomenik poginulim u borbi protiv fašizma, Kiseljak.jpg

File:Spomenik poginulim u borbi protiv fašizma, Kiseljak.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 14:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unemployment in Croatia 1996. - 2019.png

File:Unemployment in Croatia 1996. - 2019.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 21:17, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HR odblokiravanje

@Koreanovsky u tvom unosu na mojoj HR SzR, si krivo zaključio da neću tražiti odblobiravanje, iako sam eksplicitno napisao sad, a ne da neću nikada. Izvoli otključati moj SzR. --Zblace (talk) 06:18, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Zblace, since we are on commons, I will reply to you in English.

When I blocked your account for one year, because of comments and behavior that clearly violated the civility (WP:CIVIL) policies (part of the UCoC), you had the chance to ask for an unblock. Instead of that, you replied with a reaction that contains even more personal attacks and comments such as: »(...) as if it had been collected by someone with a OCD (...)« (original: (...) kao da ga je skupljao neko sa OCDom (...)) or »Well, until the situation changes significantly - you guys can nice and diplomatic (maybe intimate, warm, wet and dark on Discord) rejoice with each other and work with the boyband. You deserve it in your marked [= the word »marked« cursive] territory.« (original: Zaslužili ste se na svom označenom teritoriju.), that do not only violate our local behavioral policies, but also the Universal Code of Conduct. After this, another sysop blocked you indefinitely and you continued with the same debate about »users being part of a conspiracy« and accusations.

Your user talk page is not your personal journal when you are blocked. If an user is blocked, does not want to request an unblock and continues to violate behavioral policies and/or guidelines, then the user page will be blocked aswell.

Your account and your user talk page remain blocked. In Croatian we have the phrase: »prošla baba s kolačima« (The old lady with cakes has already passed by) – what I am trying to say with this is, you had countless chances to change something in your communication and a lot of things were tolerated way for too long. With such behavior and communication as you have shown it on hr.wiki (but also on other language editions), you are not welcome to contribute anymore.

I am kindly asking you to do not text me anymore about this obvious hr.wiki-case on other projects.

Best regards, Koreanovsky (talk) 17:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OMG @Koreanovsky no worries I will not be contacting you anymore, I just find it paradoxical your quotes, interpretations of rules and procedures + that you made accusations of me as out queer Wikimedian being 'homophobic', but find my accusations of you operating as a group (when you consistently support each other) - that is just typical Croatian Wikipedia tradition. --Zblace (talk) 19:36, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

that you made accusations of me as out queer Wikimedian being 'homophobic'

I have never ever claimed that you are »homophobic« or anything similar! Please tell me, when do you think have I said that? In fact, I literally only wrote that some of your comments are problematic (such as listed above), but I never ever accused you of being homophobic?! --Koreanovsky (talk) 23:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Koreanovsky&oldid=879708666"