User talk:Marcel Rogge

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Marcel Rogge!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:34, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

File:BoizenburgElbe-Wappen.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:21, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Marcel Rogge⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Marcel Rogge,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

SVG-Wappen

Hallo Marcel, ich sehe mit Freude, dass du qualitativ gute Wappen-SVG erstellen kannst. Allerdings sind mir hier ein paar kleine "Unschönheiten" aufgefallen. Du benutzt eine sehr unübliche Tinktur (eher unheraldischer Extremkontrast). Des Weiteren hat es sich als Standard eingebürgert keinen (oder einen sehr schmalen) Freiraum zu lassen. Siehe dir doch mal de:Wikipedia:WikiProjekt Wappen/Neuzeichnen. Evtl. kannst du dich ja etwas im dortigen WikiProjekt einbringen!? Weswegen ich eigtl. im Speziellen hier bin ist, eine Anfrage betr. der Category:Coats of arms from the Landkreis Ludwigslust-Parchim. Könntest du dort deine Wappen sozusagen updaten, also am besten mit diesem Schild und diesen Tinkturen!? Falls du Fragen hast stehe ich dir gerne zur Verfügung. Freundliche Grüße ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  14:25, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Dankeschön. Ich habe noch die Inkscape-SVGs von den Wappen. Den Rand wegzuscheiden und die Farben anpassen, dürfte einfach sein. Aber alle Wappen auf eine neue Schildform bringen, dauert ein Weilchen. Warum soll es gerade diese Form sein? Ich hatte zwar noch keinen Blick in die Wappenrolle M-V geworfen. Aber die besten Sekundärquellen, die ich finden konnte (Hans-Heinz Schütt: Auf Schild und Siegel, ISBN 3-933781-21-3 + Auf Schild und Flagge, ISBN 978-3-9814380-0-0) zeigen meistens eine Form wie diese. Bei der Erstellung habe ich mich an meine Vorlage gehalten. Das war meistens eine PNG, die schon auf Commons lag. Eine weitere Frage hätte ich dann noch: In meinem BNR liegt schon seit langem ein Entwurf für einen Wappenartikel. Ich hatte den damals gestartet, weil der Designer des Wappens mir damals seine Vektorgrafiken mitsamt Informationen schickte. Den Abschnitt zur Wappenbegründung kann ich nicht mit Quellen belegen. Das sind alles Aussagen des Designers. Reicht der Entwurf für einen fertigen Artikel? Belege für die Registrierung und den Abschnitt Einzennachweise kann ich noch reinnehmen. Mehr fällt mir zu dem Wappen nicht ein. Viele Grüße--Marcel Rogge (talk) 21:29, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Ups* berechtige Frage, ich hatte die falsche Category verlinkt, tatsächlich meinte ich Category:Coats of arms by Karl-Heinz Steinbruch, dieses Schild ist scheinbar das tatsächliche das von Karl-Heinz Steinbruch benutzte.

@Inkscape-SVG: Was meinst du genau damit? Inkscape-propitärer-Code wird eigtl. nur bei Text oder besonderen Formen benötigt!?

@Artikel: Sieht gut, ob er zu speziell für Wikipedia ist, kann ich jetzt auf Anhieb gar nicht sagen. Ich würde ihn höchste Zeit für reif zum Einstellen nennen.

PS: Ich wollte mich jetzt mit der Erstellung/Verbesserung von mecklenburger Wappen herantasten (ich hatte hierzu schon einmal User:Repgow auf seiner Diss angeschrieben, der Heraldiker ist). PPS: Warum setzt du eigtl Zahlen an die Wappennamen? Ist eigtl. auch relativ unüblich. LG

↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  22:43, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Dann werde ich den Artikel mal fertigstellen:-) Inkscape bietet doch die Möglichkeit an als Inkscape-svg oder Standard-SVG abzuspeichern, wobei letzteres im Nachhinein schwieriger zu bearbeiten ist. Meine Zahlennamen stammen auch daher. Standard-SVG bekommt eine 1 und wird hier hochgeladen, das Inkscape-SVG bekommt die 2 und bleibt auf der Platte. Das habe ich mir irgendwie angewöhnt.--Marcel Rogge (talk) 23:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Achso hm*, mir sind jetzt noch keine derartigen Inkscape spezifischen "Möglichkeiten" aufgefallen (für Wappen), mit Ausnahme von Pfadeffekten (native Kreise/Ellipsen werden seit 0.91 unterstützt). Ich habe mir mal erlaubt ein Wappen von dir (als Bsp) in der Weise zu modifizieren (abgesehen von den Giebelköpfen die ich aus dem File: Wappen Strohkirchen.svg entnommen). Oh schon sehr spät. PS: Die breitere Schildkontur wird übrigens auch von besagtem Repgow empfohlen. Bis bald ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  00:29, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Marcel Rogge,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Zarrentin-Wappen1.svg

File:Zarrentin-Wappen1.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mithril DE (talk) 10:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Canon EOS M5 front-left 2017 CP+.jpg

Your edit on File:Canon EOS M5 front-left 2017 CP+.jpg was not correct and thats why I reverted it. It's actually the EF-M 18–150 mm lens that does not have a category yet and since there is only one image so far I don't think it really justifies it's own category right now.
How to know:

• When you compare the imges of the EF-M 18-55mm and the EF-M 18-150mm you see that the length of the crosshatch does only fit the larger one. You can also see the little marking after the "18" that only has the EF-M 18-150mm lens.
• At the front of the lens you can see that the filter size of in the lens in the image is 55mm
  • The EF-M 18-55mm has 52 millimeter
  • The EF-M 18-150mm has 55 millimeter

The EF-M 18-55mm and the EF-M 18-150mm are the only lenses by Canon with the EF-M lens mount that start at focal length 18.
Thereby it's impossible that the lens is anything but the EF-M 18-150mm. It took some good time to figure this out myself before I moved the image into Canon EF-M lenses. Just so you know.
--D-Kuru (talk) 15:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

After seraching on Commons if we may have some more images that would justify a category I noticed that the image literally has the caption "キヤノン EOS M5 + EF-M18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM". Well, could have been easier here...

I noticed that Canon EF-M 11-22mm F4-5.6 IS STM and Canon EF-M 55-200mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM also have only one file in them, but they have at least one other category sorted in them. I'm still searching for images, but I can't find any that could be sorted in Taken with Canon Canon EF-M 18–150mm F3.5–6.3 IS STM

--D-Kuru (talk) 16:10, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

After searching more images I actually found three images of this lens that were just sorted into the wrong category. ... By YOU

Please be more careful and select the correct category!

--D-Kuru (talk) 16:19, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your corrections. I promise to be more careful.--Marcel Rogge (talk) 19:27, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Kreien hat jetzt Wappen und Flagge

Hallo @Marcel Rogge: Ich habe gesehen, dass du schon Wappen hochgeladen hast. Hier ist ein recht neues von Kreien im LK Ludwigslust-Parchim (MV), das es noch nicht auf Commons gibt: [1]. Wenn du es nicht selbst machen kannst/möchtest, an wen gebe ich am besten die Info? Tozina (talk) 13:49, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Tozina, vielen Dank für die Info. Leider habe ich schon lange kein Inkscape mehr benutzt. Daher versuche es bitte lieber im WikiProjekt Wappen. Viele Grüße --Marcel Rogge (talk) 14:35, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Sigma lens images

Hi Marcel,

I just took and uploaded the two images you asked for of my Sigma lenses. They are a little dirty/banged up (because I use them!), so feel free to doctor the images if you wish and are able to clean them realistically to produce a more "mint" lens image (I would have no problem with this).

Hope this helps! I have a few other lenses that I don't believe have photographs here (such as the Voigtländer 10mm f/5.6, and some other Sigma and Canon lenses) which I could also add in the future if that helps out. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 11:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Thx, I answered you on your talk page.--Marcel Rogge (talk) 20:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Thx, I answered you on your talk page.--Marcel Rogge (talk) 20:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC)