User talk:Sebring12Hrs
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:46, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Pescarolo-17-Spa-1000km-2009.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Pescarolo-17-Spa-1000km-2009.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Pescarolo-17-Spa-1000km-2009.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 11:48, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Immeuble 12 rue de Pontaniou, Brest (1).jpeg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Immeuble 12 rue de Pontaniou, Brest (1).jpeg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Immeuble 12 rue de Pontaniou, Brest (1).jpeg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 16:25, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Immeuble 12 rue de Pontaniou, Brest (1).jpeg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Immeuble 12 rue de Pontaniou, Brest (1).jpeg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Immeuble 12 rue de Pontaniou, Brest (1).jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 16:25, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
@Jcb: je me suis trompé, c'est une photo personelle. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:45, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- It still needs a license template. Also you must fill in the author field and the source field. (If you are the author, you may write '{{Own}}' in the source field.) Jcb (talk) 21:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Also don't ever again remove problem tags without resolving problem. As I am not going to babysit problem tags, I have deleted the file. Jcb (talk) 22:12, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
File:1 Rue d'Aujou in Figeac.jpg
[edit]Hi Sebring12Hrs! How are you? Thank you for nominate my image File:1 Rue d'Aujou in Figeac.jpg. Unfortunately, it's not good picture enough for Quality image. However, if you would like nominate some my pictures, which are good enough, you can found them here. Have a nice day! :) Tournasol7 (talk) 18:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Tournasol7: Hi ! Sorry for my late response, and for my bad english, I'm french native. I knew that picture was limit because of the overexposed sky. I am a beginner in this project, I usually contribute on the french Wikipedia, but I discover your Albi photos, and I see that you like France and you are a very good photograph. I think it remains some of your pictures that can be promoted as good quality label. I will not nominate all of your pictures, don't worry. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:47, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Si tu veux on peux parler français. Je suis polonais, mais j'habite et je travaille à Rodez dans l'Aveyron. Je voudrais te remercier pour la nomination d'une de mes photos, mais malheuresement cet image n'est pas assez bon pour QI. Et je voudrais te dire que si tu a envie nominer mes images tu peut les trouver ici. Bon, il y a des images des pays diferents, mais les plupart est de France. Je serais ravi si tu m'aide les nominé, meme si ce sera une petite aide. Bref, fait comme tu veux :) Je te souhaite bonne journée! Tournasol7 (talk) 14:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Golden Gate bridge 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Pour VI
[edit]Ok pour la nomination, seul problème le scope qui doit être lié à la catégorie qui contient l'image. Regarde la correction. D'une façon générale le titre des images est bâti comme un scope potentiel. Merci. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Locronan-bâtiment-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Immeuble 12 rue de Pontaniou, Brest (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 4677.Glocke - Chapelle Saint-Gonéry-Plougrescant- Côtes-d'Armor-Bretagne - Steffen Heilfort.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Golden Gate bridge 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Immeuble 55-57 avenue Kléber, Paris 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Demande d'aide
[edit]Bonsoir Sebring12Hrs! J'ai voulais te demander; est-ce que tu voudrais m'aider un peu avec des nominations des photos pour "images de qualité? Merci pour ta réponse :) Bonne soirée! Tournasol7 (talk) 21:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Salut Tournasol7, je vais voir si j'ai un peu de temps et de motivation demain !! Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:20, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, ça marche. Bonne soirée! Tournasol7 (talk) 20:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Merci Sebring12Hrs! Ca me va très bien comme ça :) Tournasol7 (talk) 16:32, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, ça marche. Bonne soirée! Tournasol7 (talk) 20:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Happy holidays 2020/2021!
[edit]- @Tournasol7: Bonne fêtes à toi aussi ! Merry Christmas ! Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Tour Eiffel Nov 2015.jpg
[edit]Bonjour Sebring12Hrs, vous avez proposé pour "Florent AUDEBERT" ce fichier:
- Il avait fait l'objet d'une destruction le 31 Decembre 2016 , car il est bien établi que les images de la tour avec un éclairage nocturne spécial ne peuvent pas être conservées sur les commons.
- Je vous invite à relire la page Deletion requests/File:Tour Eiffel Nov 2015.jpg
- Cordialement à vous.--Pierre André (talk) 23:17, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Pierre André Leclercq: Merci pour l'info, je m'en doutais un peu. C'est quand même dommage, car elle est belle cette tour Eiffel ! Il faudrait la mettre sur Wikipédia du coup. Peut-être pourrait-elle être labellisée FP sur Wikipédia. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 00:50, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tour Eiffel Nov 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
.ok. Ce n'est pas un problème bien grave. Bien cordialement. Pierre André (talk) 13:13, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Bonsoir Sebring12Hrs Il est possible de publier des images dans Wikipedia, la procédure n'est pas trop complexe mais les photos doivent comporter la mention " Vous avez la permission de copier, distribuer et/ou modifier ce document selon les termes de la licence de documentation libre GNU, version 1.2 ou plus récente publiée par la Free Software Foundation ; sans sections inaltérables, sans texte de première page de couverture et sans texte de dernière page de couverture." Je ne pense pas qu'elle pourrait être soumises FP. Bien cordialement, Pierre André (talk) 20:06, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de la Muette - cours Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seehof-Parksicht.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Sainte-Thérèse - Flèche Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Petit Palais, photomechanical print, Exposition Universal, 1900. Library of Congress..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castel Béranger, entrée du bâtiment arrière.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castel Béranger, échauguette.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel Hérouet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Monpelas, 19 avenue Foch, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thank you
[edit]coucou, merci pour ton intervention pour ma photo: c'est cool . bye --Chatsam (talk) 08:42, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Chatsam: Tout le plaisir est pour moi ! Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison des Provinces de France by Armand Guéritte.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grand nu (1907) by Pierre-Auguste Renoir in the Musée d'Orsay.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arc de Triomphe de l'Étoile, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Choir of Abbaye de Saint-Germain-des-Prés.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Théâtre des Champs-Élysées (Champs-Élysées theatre) by Auguste Perret and Antoine Bourdelle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fontaine Médicis, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Hubert Lyautey in Invalides..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 place de l'Odéon, Paris by Marie-Joseph Peyre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 23:53, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bois de Boulogne - grande cascade, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bois de Boulogne - lac inférieur, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Ville, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument à Léon Gambetta, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Augustin de Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pont de l'Alma, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison, 12 rue d'Engueysse, Albi..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alexandre Dumas' monument, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eiffel Tower, photomechanical print, Exposition Universal, 1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 rue d'Aujou, Figeac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lycée Condorcet, 8 rue du Havre, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel des Invalides - the dome, north facade, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tour Saint-Jacques, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais Bourbon - north facade, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Our Lady church in Marvejols 25.jpg
[edit]Salut! Je voudrais te demander de voter sur cette page. Bien sûr je n'insiste pas pour que te voteras "pour", mais selon votre propre opinion. Je au meme temps je voudrais te remercier pour tout ces nomination des images de qualité. Je te souhaite bonne week-end :) Tournasol7 (talk) 16:11, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Merci! :) Tournasol7 (talk) 16:35, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Encore désolé de ne pas avoir voté "pour". Merci pour toutes ces belles photos d'Europe ! --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:44, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Mais c'est pas grave. Tant pis si cette photo n'a pas merité. Et de rien, heureusement on a WikiCommons ou on peux partager nos photos :) Tournasol7 (talk) 11:07, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Encore désolé de ne pas avoir voté "pour". Merci pour toutes ces belles photos d'Europe ! --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:44, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église de la Sainte-Trinité de Paris, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opéra Garnier - principal facade, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grand Palais, photomechanical print, Exposition Universal, 1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Yvette Guilbert par Granié
[edit]Formellement le tableau est au Louvre, mais exposé à Orsay (il a les deux immatriculations); pour un an encore, il est à Albi où je l'ai rencontré par hasard avec le plus grand plaisir. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Toutes mes excuses ! Bien à toi.--Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Notre-Dame de Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sainte-Chapelle - lower chapel, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sainte-Chapelle - interior, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église de la Madeleine, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Louvre - Galerie d'Apollon, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison, 14 rue du Docteur Léon Deglaire, Montgeron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
67 rue de Courcelles, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23 rue des Francs-Bourgeois, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Joseph-des-Nations (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bibliothèque polonaise de Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel d'Aumont, Paris (by Louis Le Vau et François Mansart).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brazilian Embassy, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 place de la Bourse (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for the QI proposal ː)
[edit]here.
Have a good day, ----Benoît (d) 05:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trullo in Alberobello 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bâtiment à Oppède-le-Vieux 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trullo in Alberobello 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trullo in Alberobello 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Building, 4 via Santa Maria la Nova, Naples.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
104-106 rue de Grenelle, Paris by Contant d'Ivry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Building by Fernand Leroy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Louis Vuitton Maison Champs Élysées by Charles-Henri Besnard and Louis-Hippolyte Boileau.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Usine électrique du quai de Jemmapes by Paul Friesé.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bâtiment Octave Gréard, 3 avenue Octave Gréard, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Siège de l'Agence France-Presse, 11-15, place de la Bourse, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Pierre Viole, 36, quai de Béthune, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Auditorium of Opéra Garnier by Charles Garnier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Mayenne, Paris..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flemish retable of Église Saint-Germain-l'Auxerrois de Paris..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Immeuble, 31, 33, 35, 39, 41 rue d'Anjou (Versailles).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Moulin à grains Barrenques.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monastery of the Panayia Chozoviotissa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Personality rights at FPC
[edit]Hi there - you were harsh in describing my argument as 'absolutely ridiculous'. In light of the subsequent discussion, would you like to tone your comment down please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- I deleted it. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:44, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Leu-Saint-Gilles (Paris), 57 bis boulevard de Sébastopol (porte de droite).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 rue de la Paroisse, Versailles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
QI candidates
[edit]Hi, if you have a minute, all five of the files at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#September_26,_2022 are waiting for your response. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 13:47, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, those images aren't in Decline, I'm not the only one able to give an answer. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:31, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Immeuble Lavirotte - porte d'entrée.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Châsse de saint Potentin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Confiserie Debauve et Gallais, Paris..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bâtiment à Oppède-le-Vieux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
94 rue du Bac, ancien commerce d'alimentation, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sainghin en Weppes gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sainghin en weppes gare quais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Acquaviva Coppola by Augusto Acquaviva Coppola in Napoli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8bis, 10 rue de l'Entrepôt, Lille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bâtiment à Oppède-le-Vieux 14 bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 place Champollion, Figeac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel du 120 rue du Bac - porte, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hospice Gantois (bibliothèque).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boulangerie, 155 rue d'Alésia, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Trianon (Paris) - salle de cinéma vue de la scène.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy new year
[edit]![]() |
* Happy New Year 2023, Sebring12Hrs! * | |
|
Best wishes for 2023 and many thanks for your attention to my photos. Velvet (talk) 12:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 rue de la Barre (Lille).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
13 bis rue de Fleurus (Lille).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel d'Hailly d'Aigremont (Lille) - fumoir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel d'Hailly d'Aigremont (Lille) - salon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Préfecture de Lille - salle du conseil général.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel d'Hailly d'Aigremont (Lille), 45 rue de Roubaix (portail).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel d'Hailly d'Aigremont (Lille), 45 rue de Roubaix (façade sur rue).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grands Moulins de Paris de Marquette-lez-Lille (après restauration).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boulangerie, 48 rue Caulaincourt (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de l'Intendance (Lille), jardin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
109 rue de la Bassée (Lille).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de l'Intendance (Lille), cour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de l'Intendance (Lille), salon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel d'Hailly d'Aigremont (Lille), main façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame de Fives, Lille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Galerie Vivienne (Paris), entrée du 4 rue des Petit-Champs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Galerie Vivienne (Paris), entrée du 6 rue Vivienne.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Galerie Vivienne (Paris), entrée du 5 rue de la Banque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison, Boutigny-Prouais 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Sorry for disturb
[edit]Perhaps you might be interested in this discussion [3]. Thank you--109.52.98.243 19:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Very sorry
[edit]I'm sorry to bother again but now he did this [4]--109.52.98.243 21:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison, Boutigny-Prouais 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison, Boutigny-Prouais 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Seconde antichambre du Dauphin du Château de Versailles, cheminée.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel du Lombard (Lille).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maisons, 25-27 place Louise-de-Bettignies (Lille).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
18 rue des Pyramides (Lille).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison, 41 rue de Gand (Lille).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Cassini, portail (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Campanile Saint-Nicolas de Lille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puit, Boutigny-Prouais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison, Boutigny-Prouais 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Portail, Boutigny-Prouais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel Hériot, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Vifs remercîments!
[edit]Merci pour tes nominations sur mes images, surtout pour le label Qualité que je ne fréquente plus beaucoup par manque de temps... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison, Boutigny-Prouais 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Exterior of St. Patrick's Cathedral (Manhattan) 25-08-2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison et champs, Boutigny-Prouais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
La rue des Paradoux
[edit]Pas de métro pour aujourd'hui à Toulouse, mes secrétaires sont dans les embouteillages une journée noire en perspective. Mais surprise : rayon de soleil inattendu la promotion de la Rue de Paradoux grâce à toi. Merci de soutenir mon moral! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Archaeodontosaurus: Ah c'était la grève aujourd'hui à Toulouse ? Oui j'ai vu que tu avais quelques photos prises à l'aide du réflexe qui pouvaient tout à fait postuler pour le label image de qualité. Mais du côté image de valeur, pas de promotion pour la rue de la Pleau. Peut-être un problème de scope. À réessayer ultérieurement. J'ai vu qu'il y avait quelques photos d'Albi (musée Toulouse-Lautrec et cathédrale Sainte-Cécile) que tu n'a pas proposé en VI. J'y jetterais peut-être un coup d'œil. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:27, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison, Boutigny-Prouais 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Lille (ancienne chapelle des Carmes).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Musée Paul Dupuy, façade sur rue de la Pleau, Toulouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Galerie Argentine (Paris), intérieur.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Sorry
[edit]The sign File:Las Vegas (Nevada, USA), Fabulous Las Vegas -- 2012 -- 6263.jpg belongs to a sign in Paradise, not in Las Vegas. --XRay 💬 17:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- @XRay: Lol ! --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:47, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- I also had to marvel. Las Vegas is within easy walking distance from there. --XRay 💬 17:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Grand Colbert, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marché couvert Beauvau.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Annexe du siège central du Crédit lyonnais.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison, Boutigny-Prouais 8-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porte des gendarmes (Versailles).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison, Boutigny-Prouais 8-0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Rue Montorgueil in Paris. Celebration of June 30, 1878 by Claude Monet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Descent from the Cross - Pietro da Rimini - RF 2287.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Lazare Station by Claude Monet, Musée d'Orsay.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]![]() |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Panorama of Naqsh-i Jahan Square, Isfahan at blue hour (2019, edited).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama of Naqsh-i Jahan Square, Isfahan at blue hour (2019, edited).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
![]() |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Les Mystères de la Passion du Christ (Antonio Campi).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Denys-du-Saint-Sacrement, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:18, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria in Vallicella (Rome) - Facade by night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison, 44 rue du Québec, à Brouage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Restaurant La Mia Storia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison ancienne à Trogir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Magasin et restaurant à Trogir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bâtiment dans la vieille ville de Split 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Escalier extérieur de maison à Šibenik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison à Trogir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Split Heals building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bâtiment à Hvar, façade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison à Komiža.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison, 24 rue du Québec, Brouage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Thank you Gampe (talk) 18:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bâtiment à Šibenik 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bâtiment à Šibenik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maisons dans la vielle ville de Split.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pilastre ancien sur un immeuble.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bâtiment à Trogir 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zgrada Šimac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bâtiment à Šibenik 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Island of Hvar
[edit]Hello, thank you for nominating my photos from Hvar among the Quality Images. I am going to Stari Grad on the island of Hvar next week again. Do you have any suggestions for what else should be photographed? Gampe (talk) 10:47, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @Gampe: , your welcome ! I went to Croatia last month for holidays, but I don't know Stari Grad. When I visit a new country or city, or place i like to take photos and I like to promote the best pictures of the cities I visit I can found on Commons. You can take the pictures what you want. As far as I'm concerned, I like to take pictures of such underrated buildings of civil architecture. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:13, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 William, New York City.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sant'Andrea della Valle (Rome) - Façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison de la Tourelle, Le Mans.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
If you are interested you can find more beautiful photos here
[edit][5]. Thank you,bye. 78.211.40.49 22:47, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piazza San Bernardo (Rome) - view from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of San Giovanni Battista dei Fiorentini (Rome) - Facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Temple of Venus Genetrix, Rome.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Joyeux Noël!
[edit]Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Salle à manger du petit appartement de la reine (Versailles).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
[edit]@Tournasol7: Thank you very much, happy new year ! --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison à colombages, 45 rue de Paris, Houdan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison, hameau Les Joncs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria in Aracoeli (Rome), Bell tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Salut! I'm not sure I understood your feedback about the nom above right. You are asking for a new upload of the file as independent image with the original crop. I will do that tonight when I have access to the RAW files. But, does this have something to do with your vote? In this case I don't understand the correlation. If you oppose just because you don't like the square crop and it has nothing to do with the new version uploaded, fine to me. Thank you very much for all your nominations on QIC! Take care, Poco a poco (talk) 06:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: Even if it is allowed, I find that there are generally too many quality images that are modified when they are offered in FP. When it's just brightness ok, but when it's just a huge crop, it bothers me a little. I would actually have preferred that we loaded a new image. Then you do as you want of course. No worries about the nominations, you always take superb photos, I don't know where you get all this time, but congratulations to you! Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 avenue Hoche (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Magny (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Statue du Musée Labit Toulouse
[edit]Alors là bravo, Je suis scotché! Merci beaucoup... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
San Lorenzo in lucina
[edit]Thanks for the nomination of San Lorenzo.....at least someone is thinking of me. Thanks again.🙂 78.210.181.119 10:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Centre de secours Bitche (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal of Sant'Atanasio (Rome).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 place Saint-Urcisse, Cahors.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Pictures of Naples area
[edit]Hello! I saw that you added some notes to 3 images from Herculano/Pompeii: File:Antigua ciudad de Herculano, Italia, 2023-03-27, DD 77-79 HDR.jpg, File:Antigua ciudad de Herculano, Italia, 2023-03-27, DD 39.jpg and File:Antigua ciudad de Pompeya, Italia, 2023-03-27, DD 185-187 HDR.jpg. I just fixed them, thank you! Poco a poco (talk) 18:37, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Very good, thank you ! Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:37, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
QI shall be properly categorized and have an accurate description
[edit]I hope all is well with you. I really appreciate your constructive and knowledgeable reviews and nominations. I have noticed that you have nominated a lot of photos from Pompeii. All photo from Pompeii are missing accurate description. The rule for QI is very clear. QI shall be properly categorized and have an accurate description. And the consensus is very clear here as well. Please consider stopping nominating images without an accurate description. Best regards ArildV (talk) 16:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @ArildV: , I will try do edit those images or I will ask to @Poco a poco: . Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- This is starting to look like a witch hunt, ArildV. Sebring12Hrs, there is no need to edit anything anymore. --Poco a poco (talk) 20:09, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Calling a polite and respectful message a witch hunt is an absurd and offfensive exaggeration Poco a poco. I assumed good faith and that the user had not seen the discussion (as he continued to nominate images without adequate descriptions). Instead of making a big deal out of it, I posted a message here.--ArildV (talk) 20:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 rue Saint-Barthelemy, Cahors.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison d'angle des rues Donzelle et Traversière Donzelle, Cahors.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maisons, 38-40 rue du Millial à Lauzerte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison, 1 rue de la Mairie à Lauzerte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porte et fenêtre d'une maison à Autoire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maisons sur la voie Sainte à Rocamadour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison au 49 Grand-Rue à Puy-l'Évêque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Château de Bonaguil et son village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château Laroque-Maynard, Autoire.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.