User talk:Tamba52
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Tivadar_Monostori_In_T-shirt_of_Dorogi_Banyasz.jpg
[edit]watewrmark info
[edit]You have added watermark info to some of my pictures, it's not watermark, it's the day when picture has been taken, I had canon camera with date system and camera print's the date to my día.--Motopark (talk) 18:26, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
TUSC token 434e2ab6e6d45f49b895b8b5670f9067
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:03, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Szigetköz
[edit]Szia. Láttam, hogy áthelyezted a magyar wikiből a Gyirmótról készült képeimet, ezért köszönet. Ha van kedved, itt: http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Szerkeszt%C5%91:Bahusz/K%C3%A9pek van még egy adag a szigetköz környéki falvakról, meg Erdélyről. Üdvözlettel Bahusz.
File tagging File:DOTE Szívkorház.jpg
[edit]File tagging File:BRONCO.jpg
[edit]Template:Watermark
[edit]Hi. Please stop adding this template to the Mecnarowski's photos. He requires a watermark on them. Thanks, --Trachemys (talk) 17:37, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]Watermark for File:Emma Roberts 2011.jpg
[edit]Thank you for suggesting to remove the watermark but the author requires it for his images--Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 05:53, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
[edit]Some baklava for you! Carrotkit (talk) 09:57, 8 September 2011 (UTC) |
rotate template
[edit]Hallo Tamba52, the rotate template was not needed. Please always look at the small thumbnail inside the rotate template: here. The German and English version of the template contain a purge link which was needed here to fix the image. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 17:55, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Tamba52, die rotate-Vorlage war nicht nötig. Bitte schau dir immer das kleine Thumbnail/Vorschaubildchen in der Vorlage an, nachdem du sie gesetzt hast. In der deutschen und englischen Version der Vorlage ist ein Link zum Purge enthalten, den man hier einfach nur klicken musste, um das Bild zu korrigieren. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 17:55, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo Saibo, ich danke Ihnen, so ich werde machen. Viele Grüße --Tamba52 (talk) 18:32, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Alles klar. Danke! Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 18:57, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
[edit]Dear Tamba52,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Nhờ chỉ dẫn
[edit]Có một số ảnh của tôi bị dán thẻ {Watermark|timestamp}, nhờ bạn chỉ tôi cách tải ảnh lên như thế nào để không còn bị dán thẻ này nữa. Cảm ơn. Bùi Thụy Đào Nguyên (talk) 23:44, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
thanks restoration and categorisation Vera (talk) 23:49, 5 November 2011 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much! Tamba52 (talk) 07:54, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Many thanks for your barnstar
[edit]It was a pleasant surprise--Szilas (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Nagyon jólesik, hogy észrevette valaki...
Üdv--Szilas (talk) 19:48, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Yaslovets castle.jpg
[edit]Thanks for popping all my uploads into the correct category. I've been tearing my hair out trying to get cat-a-lot to do that for me. --Brian McNeil / talk 15:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'm glad that I could help. (A cat-a-lot I do not work well.) Regards Tamba52 (talk) 07:44, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Képek
[edit]Szia! Elnézésedet kérem. Az összes képet javítottam amin kurzor volt. (legalábbis, amiket írtál) A kategóriáknál pedig vigyázni fogok. Bár van olyan benne, hogy a Kispestből automatikusan Bp. XIX kerületet csinál, vagy Pestszentlőrinc, ami 1950-ig szintén önálló település volt. A Pest (Hungary)-t ismeri, de a Buda (Hungary)-t nem. Pedig csak 1873-tól jelentette ugyanazt. Ugyanígy Újpest sem biztos, hogy Budapest. Bővebben megtalálod a szerkesztői lapomon. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 10:43, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Szia! A Deák Ferenc híd összes képét lecseréltem. Ha gondolod, vedd le róla a sablont. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 06:49, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Levettem de azért ne jelöld a nap képének :)) Üdv. Tamba52 (talk) 08:07, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Szia! Feltöltöttem a File:Városligeti tó télen.jpg képet, és utána vettem észre, hogy más néven már megtalálható a Commonsban. Nem tudom, hogyan lehet azonnali törlésre jelölni. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 09:55, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Szia!
A Szeleta-zsomboly is egy barlang, de nem azonos a Szeleta-barlanggal, csak a nevük hasonló földrajzi helyzetükből adódóan. Éppen ezért visszaállítottam a fájl korábbi változatát a szerkesztésed után.--Szenti Tamás (talk) 19:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Vízjel
[edit]Szia! Tettek néhány képemre vízjel sablont. Ez azért van, mert rajta van a képen szereplő neve? Ha levágom, jó lesz? Előre is köszönöm a válaszod. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 13:05, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Categories ...
[edit]Ich kann leider nicht Ungarisch. Vielleicht können wir auf Deutsch kommunizieren.
Warum war es erforderlich zum Beispiel bei Category:Ulli Bäer die Category:Musicians from Austria zu entfernen? Er ist nicht nur Vokalist. Er ist vor allem auch Gitarrist. Category:Diana Lueger ist nicht nur Vokalistin, sie ist auch Schlagzeugerin. --Tsui (talk) 16:46, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
"Unidentified" categories
[edit]Hi! Did you identify this bus or this trolley? If no - why did you remove categories? How another user can identify this vehicles? Kobac (talk) 13:48, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- Because the image is a bus or trolley, and that is not unidentified (I think) Regards:Tamba52 (talk) 17:23, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- Well, and what is its model name? Kobac (talk) 14:38, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- If this is the problem, please restore. I'm sorry! Tamba52 (talk) 17:35, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. )) Kobac (talk) 20:26, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Ránéznél erre?
[edit]Szia! Ránéznél erre? User talk:Magog the Ogre Sajnos nem értem mi a probléma, és nem is tudok angolul. Előre is köszönöm. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 22:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
- Szia! Én sem értem mi a kolléga gondja (szerintem valami botprobléma). Én sem tudok igazán angolul meg nem is foglalkozom forrás meg licenc kérdésekkel. Ha úgy gondolod hogy ez komoly probléma akkor van a magyar wikin olyan szerkesztő aki jól tud angolul és járőr a commonson is Ő biztoan tud segíteni. Üdv. Tamba52 (talk) 09:05, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Grey-headed1.jpg
[edit]Barnstar
[edit]Köszönöm az elismerést! Remélem kitart még a lelkesedésem egy darabig.--Szenti Tamás (talk) 18:26, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:076366.jpg
[edit]User:Tamba52/monobook.js appears in Category:Media needing category review. This is caused by the line summary: selfName + 'Categories are checked and Ok. You can help [[Category:Media needing category review|reviewing]]!',. To prevent this, you should add // <nowiki> in the first line and // </nowiki> in the last line of the page. --Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Done --Tamba52 (talk) 05:50, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo Tamba52, MediaWiki:Gadget-Cat-a-lot.js in Zeile 3 ist ungültiges JavaScript und wird, wenn Du monobook benutzt einen Fehler werfen. Warum kopierst Du dir die gesamten Scripts und nutzt nicht einfach die Einstellungen? Grüße -- Rillke(q?) 17:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
- Storniert. Danke! --Tamba52 (talk) 17:37, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo Tamba52, MediaWiki:Gadget-Cat-a-lot.js in Zeile 3 ist ungültiges JavaScript und wird, wenn Du monobook benutzt einen Fehler werfen. Warum kopierst Du dir die gesamten Scripts und nutzt nicht einfach die Einstellungen? Grüße -- Rillke(q?) 17:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
WLM Russia categorization
[edit]Thank you for your effort, but I am afraid how you do it it has less impact that you expect. There are several problems. First, for Russia the categories of cultural heritage monuments are not maintained. If a file landed into say Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Ufa, and does not have any other categories, nobody would ever find it there and use it. In contrast, Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Russia is monitored by volunteers, including me, and we work on proper categorization of these files. Proper means that the file should be included into the category of the monument if this category exists, or in the appropriate categories (like Category:Buildings in Ufa, Category:Churches in Vologda, and in many big cities also to the street categories - Tomsk is an example of a city with a rather advanced street categorization, and several files which you just sent to Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Tomsk, I will re-categorize into streets, and also buildings/wooden architecture). It will be really much appreciated if you could also add these appropriate categories where possible. Thanks you in advance.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:36, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
- I have understood! Thanks for the information, I try to improve my work. Best regards:--Tamba52 (talk) 17:28, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
- Great, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Locomotiva E.403 Ex ACIT.jpg
[edit]14:40, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Watermarks
[edit]Hi, Tamba. Please, don't waste your time removing watermarks of the pictures I've uploaded. I'm re-uploading all of the photos having WM to replace them without WM and in a higher resolution. So if you see some of them leave them as they are : I'm working on that. Most were uploaded with my old name Week-et-pedia. Have a good day. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 12:22, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
- Right! Regards: Tamba52 (talk) 14:57, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
"Female writers"
[edit]Given that you continue to move people from Category:Writers from the United States to Category:Female writers from the United States, would you please comment on Commons:Categories for discussion/2013/01/Category:Female writers from the United States? - Jmabel ! talk 16:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Kincsem Park
[edit]Szia! Ma akartam javítani a képek kategóriáját, de látom, megelőztél. Köszönöm. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 07:06, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Robert Earl Jones.jpg
[edit]Tirgu Mures
[edit]Szia! Eszem ágában sem volt új kategóriát létrehozni. Mivel nem tudok angolul (sem), gépi fordítással készült. Mire beírtam volna helyette az Erdély kategóriát, Te átjavítottad, amit köszönök. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 07:56, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Szia! Nem értem a sablont, amit rátettél. A képet nem vágtam meg. Megtalálhatod itt is: ITT. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 05:19, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Szia Tambo! A sablon az jelenti hogy el kellene távolítani a keretet. (meg kellene vágni). Ha a sablon Nálad angolul jelenik meg (és azért nem érted) akkor rosszul van beállítva a Commonsos lapod! A Beállítások(Preferences) menüben a felület(Internationalisation:Language) nyelve pontban állítsd be a magyar(hu-magyar) nyelvet és mindent magyarul fogsz látni. Ha jók a beállításaid, akkor elnézést a kioktatásért. Tamba52 (talk) 06:07, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Szia! Kösz! Levágtam, beállítottam. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 07:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Ránéznél erre?
[edit]Szia! File:Timár József.jpg képet azonnali törlésre jelölték, hogy jogsértő. A kép 1934-ben készült. Mivel nem tudok angolul, nem tudom mi a teendő. Segítenél? A szerzői jog tulajdonosa a fotós, aki ismeretlen. Megadtam a forrást ahol pontosan látni ezeket. A darab rendezője miért szerezne szerzői jogot erre a képre? Üdv. Tambo (talk) 11:59, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- Szia! Mire este elolvastam az üzeneted már le lett törölve! Egyébként sem értek a szerzői jogokhoz, licenszekhez és nem is foglalkozok velük. Én csak képek javításával, restaurálásával (ha éppen nem fáradt a szemem) és kategóriákkal foglalkozom. Sajnálom hogy nem tudtam segíteni. Üdv. Tamba52 (talk) 17:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
your categories
[edit]When creating new categories e.g. on buildings in a certain city, you finally should consider to order them sufficiently, so that people can find them, especially when using tools like HotCat or Cat-a-lot. Example. Many thanks in advance, --A.Savin 12:10, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- Danke! Also werde ich tun. Tamba52 (talk) 14:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Köszi
[edit]Nagyon kedves vagy, köszi:) Módis Ágnes VadszederkeMágika 18:31, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Good job restoring File:Martin Luther King Jr NYWTS 6.jpg
[edit]Hello! Good job restoring the file File:Martin Luther King Jr NYWTS 6.jpg! I removed the 12 notes I put on the image to indicate problematic areas. --Bensin (talk) 00:21, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Tamba52 (talk) 05:43, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 07:27, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ludmila Maksimchuk.jpg
[edit]18:19, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Mitino vladimir maksimchuk 2.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Mitino vladimir maksimchuk 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mitino vladimir maksimchuk 2.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
A.Savin 18:20, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Park near Castle Hill in Chyhyryn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 21:46, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
Är du svensk? Hummbis (talk) 12:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
Är du svensk? Hummbis (talk) 12:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much, I'm not Swedish. Tamba52 (talk) 12:56, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
[edit]A cookie for you!
[edit]:) Peace33756 (talk) 01:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC) |
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Tamba52⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Tamba52,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Virginie-lemoine-50th-monte-carlo-tv-festival-O833DL.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jespinos (talk) 22:54, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Zwiadowca 21 08:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Ich denke, jetzt ist gut.Tamba52 (talk) 08:32, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Szia! Miért távolítottad el ezt a kategóriát? Üdv. Tambo (talk) 14:44, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Szia! Azért mert nem szerepelt rajtuk a Városháza Park! Üdv:Tamba52 (talk) 16:11, 26 October 2014 (UTC) Egyébként nem távlítottam el, csak Üres. Üdv:Tamba52 (talk) 05:47, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Tom Baker with hat.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Tom Baker with hat.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
-- Cirt (talk) 00:54, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Category:Women of Hungary
[edit]Szia! Elárulnád, miért vonod vissza a szerkesztésekben? Üdv. Tambo (talk) 20:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Szia! Elárulom! Azért mert a "Actresses from Hungary" a "Women of Hungary" alkategóriája. Üdv:Tamba52 (talk) 15:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Didym (talk) 02:35, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
File:Walmart Carrefour Langelier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ViperSnake151 (talk) 01:22, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Максим Підліснюк (talk) 15:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I've restored the above image. Let me know how I did. Opencooper (talk) 20:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:10. Station03110.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:10. Station03110.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:10. Station03110.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:10. Station03110.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Sarah (talk) 02:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Heart of Jesus Lookout.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Heart of Jesus Lookout.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Heart of Jesus Lookout.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Mlpearc (open channel) 04:07, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Kashchey - Nezhdanova as the Princess.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 23:12, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Kashchey - Yershov as Kashchey.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 14:09, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Amica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 14:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Κοινότητα Πικερμίου.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Glorious 93 (talk) 06:46, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
File:Baidibek2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 11:10, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2017 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Ukraine
[edit]Вітаємо!
Запрошуємо взяти участь у міжнародному фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До 30 вересня включно Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Звертаємо увагу, що завантажені матеріали будуть враховуватися у тій версії файлу, що був на час завершення конкурсу, тож якщо у Вас гарне фото, вантажте його одразу у високій роздільності. З регламентом конкурсу можна ознайомитися тут.
Якщо у Вас дуже багато фото, скористайтеся масовими завантажувачами або зверніться до нас.
Окрім традиційних номінацій за найкращі фото і найбільшу кількість сфотографованих об'єктів, у конкурсі також є спецномінація для Ваших відеоматеріалів про пам'ятки. Якщо у Вас розмір відеофайлу завеликий для конкурсного завантажувача, спробуйте скористатися стандартним завантажувачем, але не забудьте поставити ідентифікатор пам'ятки. Якщо виникатимуть будь-які труднощі — пишіть нам на wlmwikimediaukraine.org.ua
Приєднуйтеся! Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 21:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
File:Hont Ferenc és Buday György emléktáblája Szeged.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 23:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Szenes Zsuzsa Gobelin Mezőtúr 1988.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Szenes Zsuzsa Gobelin Mezőtúr 1988.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Szenes Zsuzsa Gobelin Mezőtúr 1988.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Jenő Janovics színész, rendező szobra.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 13:16, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Also:
Вікі любить Землю 2019 в Україні триває до 31 травня!
[edit]Вітаємо!
З 1 по 31 травня триває сьомий конкурс «Вікі любить Землю» (Wiki Loves Earth), метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Протягом травня ви можете завантажувати власні фото природно-заповідного фонду України та змагатися за призи. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!
Цього року є деякі зміни в правилах, зокрема:
- фотографії пам'яток, які на момент початку конкурсу не мали жодної ілюстрації на Вікісховищі або у Вікіпедії, отримують коефіцієнт 10 в кількісній номінації. Якщо ви маєте фото ще не проілюстрованих пам'яток — це збільшить ваші шанси на перемогу;
- окрема спецномінація для аерофотозйомки (фото з дронів тощо).
Більше інформації про конкурс читайте на сайті конкурсу. Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlewikimedia.org.ua – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in English). 22:28, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
File:1096 (85917001) i vilaghaborus emlekmu 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Globetrotter19 (talk) 14:08, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Clyde Lusk.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:26, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Szervátiusz Tibor 2. vilagháborús emlekmű Pápa 1997.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 19:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Atraxrobustus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Peter coxhead (talk) 05:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Fæ (talk) 10:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine
[edit]Привіт!
З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.
Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.
Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.
Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.
Також вперше проводиться спеціальна номінація «Пам'ятки Подесення», знову пройдуть спецномінації «Відео», «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини», «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» та «Via Regia Ukraine». Для участі світлин у цих спецномінаціях не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.
Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.
Приєднуйтеся!
Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.
Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.
Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:40, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).
If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні триває до 30 вересня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine is on till September 30
[edit]Привіт!
Нагадуємо, що до 30 вересня включно можна вантажити світлини та відео культурної спадщини України до національного етапу міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»!
Зараз Україна посідає 3-є місце за кількістю завантажених світлин, поступаючись Російській Федерації та Німеччині. За першу половину місяця було завантажено світлини пам'яток із усіх регіонів України, але частина із них є дуже погано представлена. Севастополь зараз представлений тільки однією пам'яткою і одним фото, Крим — 12 пам'яток і 51 фото. Детальніше — у таблиці:
Регіон | К-ть пам'яток | К-ть фото |
---|---|---|
Севастополь | 1 | 1 |
АР Крим | 12 | 51 |
Закарпаття | 26 | 96 |
Миколаївщина | 29 | 81 |
Рівненщина | 36 | 186 |
Херсонщина | 36 | 83 |
Житомирщина | 55 | 324 |
Донеччина | 57 | 153 |
Тернопільщина | 62 | 234 |
Буковина | 75 | 220 |
Луганщина | 82 | 90 |
Львівщина | 82 | 351 |
Кіровоградщина | 88 | 181 |
Волинь | 98 | 270 |
Одещина | 115 | 383 |
Сумщина | 129 | 414 |
Дніпропетровщина | 139 | 278 |
Київ | 159 | 248 |
Хмельниччина | 166 | 538 |
Полтавщина | 171 | 594 |
Харківщина | 175 | 625 |
Київщина | 181 | 651 |
Черкащина | 186 | 455 |
Прикарпаття | 240 | 305 |
Вінничина | 242 | 775 |
Запоріжжя | 253 | 317 |
Чернігівщина | 305 | 519 |
Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.
Цього року у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій:
- «Аерофото» — для фото з повітря (зроблені дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо). Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі;
- «Відео» — для відеосюжетів з пам'ятками;
- «Єврейська спадщина» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Млини» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Пам'ятки Подесення» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Via Regia Ukraine» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом 15 населених пунктів, що за цим маршрутом є.
Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.
Приєднуйтеся!
Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).
If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.
File:Train station Sibay.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Trade (talk) 22:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Filbert.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Filbert.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:58, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
File:CentrevilleMsaken.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |