User talk:Tuxyso/Archive 8

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potsdamer-Platz-Hochhaeuser-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gendarmenmarkt-Konzerthaus-Franzoesicher-Dom-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:02, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte-National-Galerie-Berlin-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 22:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maxim-Gorki-Theater-Berlin-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --Carschten 23:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptbahnhof-Berlin-mit-Spree-Steigenberger-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsehturm-Berlin-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:19, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Potsdamer-Platz-Hochhaeuser-2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Potsdamer-Platz-Hochhaeuser-2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rombergpark-Herbst-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:38, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rombergberg-Herbst-Gegenlicht-Aeste-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support I'm not shure. IMO QI. Very nice picture and sharp. But there is noise in the shadows and lens flare - typical for this kind of image. --XRay 07:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rombergpark-Kleine-Bruecke-Herbst-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit dark right corner, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 05:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufgang-Baumwipfelpfad-Bad-Harzburg-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:35, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Wonderful holidays

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! --Tremonist (talk) 15:55, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks, Tremonist, for your greetings. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

		* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, George for your greetings. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Aufgang-Baumwipfelpfad-Bad-Harzburg-2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aufgang-Baumwipfelpfad-Bad-Harzburg-2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

QI Tunisia training

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 20:06, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schloss Johannisberg, South view 20140916 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Johannisberg, South view 20140916 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ronald-Mc-Donald-Haus-Winter-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gnadenkirche-Mülheim-Heißen-Nordseite-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 15:35, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baudenkmal-Muelheim-Folkenborntal-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Verticals are leaning out. should not be, when shooting upwards. --Cccefalon 20:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC) IMHO it is OK. It's a very old house. E.g. the carport at the very right is not straight in reality. I used a water spirit level to assign the camera, thus the best way for such old not perfectly engineered houses. --Tuxyso 21:16, 9 March 2016 (UTC) I am lenient in case of old houses, but here, some facts are beyond explanation: The garage wall will collapse with such exclination. And the right window on the front cannot be closed under the given circumstances. --Cccefalon 21:29, 9 March 2016 (UTC)  Done --Tuxyso 21:43, 9 March 2016 (UTC)  Support reasonable improvement! --Cccefalon 08:21, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte-Post-Mülheim-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:08, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Synagogenplatz-Alte-Post-Hajek-Brunnen-Mülheim-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:34, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptbahnhof-Mülheim-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Image gives me a good impression of the central station, it has got a lot of objects that all need a different focus, good perspective, sharp enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:13, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus-der-Stadtgeschichte-Mülheim-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel-Arosa-Ruttenscheid-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:05, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rüttenscheider-Straße-Franziskastraße-Hotel-Arosa-Frühjahr-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel-Handelshof-Muelheim-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche-St-Anna-Ratingen-Lintdorf-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruettenscheider-Straße-Martinstraße-Frühjahr-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --SAplants 07:58, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrichskothen-Ratingen-Lintdorf-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --SAplants 17:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Evangelisches-Krankenhaus-Muelheim-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theater-an-der-Ruhr-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 14:06, 10 April 2016 (UTC) Christian, I've uploaded a new version, please take a look if you are still fine with it. Thanks. --Tuxyso 14:27, 10 April 2016 (UTC) fine, it's an improvement --Christian Ferrer 15:09, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raffelbergpark-Frühjahr-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafe-Plati-Frühjahr-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Raffelbergpark-Frühjahr-2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Raffelbergpark-Frühjahr-2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solbad-Raffelberg-2016-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Small Size, but OK --Xicotencatl 21:16, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solbad-Raffelberg-2016-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 18:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gruga-Mustergärten-Bee-Home-Garden-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:50, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulpenfelder-Neuss-Kapellen-01-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:15, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulpenfelder-Neuss-Kapellen-02-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:20, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tulpenfelder-Neuss-Kapellen-01-2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tulpenfelder-Neuss-Kapellen-01-2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ron-Zacapa-XO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:55, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AI-Micro-Nikkor-55mm-f2.8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:08, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ron-Zacapa-XO.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ron-Zacapa-XO.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grote-Kerk-Harderwijk-2016-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:54, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grote-Kerk-Harderwijk-2016-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grote-Kerk-Harderwijk-2016-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grote-Kerk-Harderwijk-2016-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

QI image

Hi, I have fixed my image at QI candidates, could you review it? Thanks in advance, --Elisardojm (talk) 18:51, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

done, Elisardojm. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:21, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! --Elisardojm (talk) 21:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campuseroeffnung-HRW-MH-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:56, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campuseroeffnung-HRW-MH-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:56, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campuseroeffnung-HRW-MH-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campuseroeffnung-HRW-MH-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campuseroeffnung-HRW-MH-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademie Mont-Cenis-Sonnenuntergang-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Yeah! --XRay 17:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademie Mont-Cenis-Sonnenuntergang-2016-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Yeah! --XRay 17:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wild-Pearls-SPD-Familienfest-Oberhausen-2016-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough, I think. Composition is good and focus decent. A bit of noise but not too much. --Peulle 21:47, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Akademie Mont-Cenis-Sonnenuntergang-2016-02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Akademie Mont-Cenis-Sonnenuntergang-2016-02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Akademie Mont-Cenis-Sonnenuntergang-2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Akademie Mont-Cenis-Sonnenuntergang-2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheerleader-Pearls-SPD-Familienfest-Oberhausen-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Camera gear

Looks like I went the exact same route as you! I just upgraded from my D7000 to a D750. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Correct observation, King of Hearts. But I've updated from a D7100. Are you happy with your D750? I am, but I think for documentary macro or wide angle shots a full frame camera is not necessarily required:

• Shot with A5100 and SE 10-18: File:Grote-Kerk-Harderwijk-2016-01.jpg, File:Grote-Kerk-Harderwijk-2016-04.jpg (the last one has IMHO a very high IQ at 10mm (APS-C)
• Shot with D750 and Tamron 15-30: File:Grote-Kerk-Harderwijk-2016-02.jpg, File:Grote-Kerk-Harderwijk-2016-03.jpg

My main consideration were low light capabilities, excellent AF system and especially a more shallow DoF for people shots.

Which lenses do you prefer at the D750? --Tuxyso (talk) 08:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Dynamic range example: [1] vs. [2] --Tuxyso (talk) 08:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

I determined you were using a D7000 from File:Rocks at 17-Mile Drive 2013 02.jpg. There are several reasons I got it:

• Resolution (it's hard for DX lenses to resolve 24 MP, I've seen how bad the D7100 looks with a kit lens in the corners)
• 1 1/3-stop better ISO performance (now featurable interior shots without a tripod are possible in a pinch)
• Building up a collection of old Nikkors, and being able to use them at the focal lengths they were designed for

Dynamic range is actually not that big a deal for me, because the D7000 is already very good and much better than Canon (including full-frame), and is partly why I've stuck to Nikon (I'm jealous of their 11-24, just like they used to be jealous of our 14-24, as well as their slightly better 24-70). For my main lens I am just using the kit 24-120 f/4 VR; I decided not to get the 24-70 f/2.8 or 24-70 f/2.8 VR because for the former, I'd like to have VR, and for the latter, it uses weird and expensive 82mm filters and is reportedly not as sharp in the corners at f/8 as the other two. Sharpness is phenomenal (I've always struggled with corner sharpness on my D7000, and dreaded being at a beautiful scene without my primes). At only $500 extra for the kit, it was an easy decision. The only drawback is vignetting; I can't even stack two filters together without a noticeable effect. I am also using the 50 f/1.8G and the manual focus 80-200 f/4, as well as the Tokina 12-24 f/4 DX, which actually is fine on FX starting at 18mm, while I'm waiting for the 14-24 to go on sale. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:42, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hervormde-Kerk-Bruinisse-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tilted CW (see the right side of the church) --Halavar 20:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC). imho  Done, better? --Tuxyso 20:26, 24 October 2016 (UTC)  Support Yes, better now. QI for me --Halavar 23:53, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nieuwe Kerk Zierikzee-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:32, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renesse-Sint-Jacobus-church-01-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 23:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenkstaette-KZ-Hinzert-02-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 20:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenkstaette-KZ-Hinzert-01-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:35, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wasserfall-Saarburg-Amueseum-2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wasserfall-Saarburg-Amueseum-2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duenen-Ouddorp-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 21:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renesse-Schild-Santiago-Jakobsweg-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GC Ezarate 22:47, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stadtansicht-Saarburg-Leukbach-2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stadtansicht-Saarburg-Leukbach-2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renesse-Stadtansicht-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:29, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Nodal Ninja Rotator RD16 II

Hallo Tuxyso, ich überlege, mir den RD16II zu kaufen, damit ich mit meinem Nodal Ninja 3 Mark II auch Panoramen mit dem 85mm-Objektiv machen kann. Ich meine mich erinnern zu können, dass Du ähnliches schon gemacht hast, vielleicht kannst Du mir etwas über Deine Erfahrungen damit berichten? Lohnt sich die Anschaffung? Grüße! --Code (talk) 10:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Code! Ich habe den Nodal Ninja 4 with RD16-II rotator and EZ Leveler II im Einsatz. Diese Kombination habe ich auch schon in Verbindung mit einem 85mm-Objektiv genutzt. Zum NN 3 scheint der RD16 auch kompatibel zu sein. Mit dem RD16 bin ich sehr zufrieden, die Verarbeitung ist auf hohem Niveau. Der RD16 ist allerdings relativ teuer. Der RD16 vereinfacht vor allem das Handling beim Fotografieren und beim Einrichten des Rotators. Zwingend notwendig ist dieser, z.B. im Vergleich zu den integrierten Rotatoren, nicht unbedingt. Ich hätte allerdings wenig Lust mit den kleinen Scheibchen bei den integrierten Rotatoren zu hantieren, deswegen habe ich mir den RD16 gekauft. Welchen Rotator hast du am NN 3 aktuell im Einsatz? Was geht damit in Kombination mit einem 85mm nicht? Passt die Rasterung nicht? Tipp: Schau mal bei [3] vorbei - die sind meist günstiger als der von dir genannte Shop. --Tuxyso (talk) 22:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank. Ja, mir geht es vor allem darum, dass der integrierte Rotator nicht genügend Klicks für das 85mm-Objektiv hat. Man kann natürlich die Scheibe rausnehmen und sich nur noch visuell an den Markierungen orientieren, aber das erfordert natürlich viel höhere Präzision, als wenn man einen Rotator mit entsprechenden Klicks hat. Wozu man den Leveler braucht, habe ich bislang noch nicht ganz verstanden. Ich benutze den NN3 auf einem Kugelkopf, da kann ich ihn doch darüber super ausrichten, oder verstehe ich da etwas falsch? Bei Thaler kostet der RD16II übrigens das gleiche, wie bei Traumflieger. Teuer ist er aber in der Tat, das lässt mich im Moment noch zögern. Zumal ich nicht weiß, wie oft ich wirklich Panoramen mit dem 85mm-Objektiv machen werde, das ist momentan eher so eine Idee. Könnte sein, dass das in Sachen DoF am Ende gar nicht gut funktioniert, z.B. in Kircheninnenräumen. --Code (talk) 06:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Code! Hast du dir die diversen Gradscheiben [4] [5] mal angeschaut? Ggf. kannst du damit die gewünschte Funktion für kleines Geld bei deinem aktuellen Rotator ergänzen. Oder passen die nicht?
Warum Leveler: Erst mal sieht er gut aus :) Scherz beiseite: Die Konstruktion mit Kugelkopf - NN3 empfinde ich gefühlt als eher instabil (s. [6]). Die Konstruktion NPA, Kamera, Objektiv wiegt schon ganz ordentlich. Zumindest meinem Kugelkopf (Preisklasse: 80 EUR) traue ich in dieser Hinsicht nicht besonders viel zu. Ich meine dass die Verwendung mit Nivelliereinheit das solidere Gesamtpaket bietet, ist aber Geschmackssache. Richtig interessant sind dann Stative mit integriertem Nivellierkopf: [7] Leider nicht für kleines Geld zu haben. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserfall-Saarburg-Amueseum-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:23, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muelheim-Schlossstrasse-Kaufhof-Kiosk-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1--Michielverbeek 19:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leineweberstraße 21-25-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:49, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Messe-Essen-Eingang-Sued-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:17, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koala-Zoo-Duisburg-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 21:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koala-Zoo-Duisburg-2016-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 19:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:38, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dom-Essen-mit-Burgplatz-und-Rathaus-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City-Tower-Essen-Umbau-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 15:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

		* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heissen-Alte-Buergermeisterei-Seitenansicht-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heissen-Alte-Buergermeisterei-Seitenansicht-Wahlplakate-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neubaugebiet-Muehlengrund-Wilma-Bau-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Tuxyso, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gruga-Park-Eingang-Mustergaerten-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:00, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grugapark-Waldsee-mit-Wasserfall-Alpinum-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rollschuhbahn-Grugapark-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There are kids in the photo, there should be a personality warning.--Peulle 18:03, 20 May 2017 (UTC) Really? Such tiny, imho not really recognisable / only Beiwerk Which template should I use? --Tuxyso 18:02, 20 May 2017 (UTC)  Comment - I find the mother who's sitting down quite recognizable, and the girl in the pink blouse in particular would be quite recognizable to anyone who knew her. -- Ikan Kekek 11:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)  Done by User:W.carter --Tuxyso 18:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)  Support - Good quality. Peulle, do you agree? -- Ikan Kekek 08:22, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raadhuis-Ouddorp-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landesarchiv-NRW-Duisburg-02-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landesarchiv-NRW-Duisburg-01-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinbruecke-Neuenkamp-Sperrung-08-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --PtrQs 21:16, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)

			* Happy Holidays 2018, Tuxyso! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Tach auch

Kennst Du https://afd-muelheim.de/impressum/ den Header? Sieht mir schwer nach Deinem https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BClheim_an_der_Ruhr#/media/File:Panorama_M%C3%BClheim_an_der_Ruhr_vom_Bismarckturm_2015.jpg aus - bisschen vernebelt und beschnitten, aber .... Vielleicht dürfen die das ja, aber im Impressum steht da nix von. Denke, Du solltest das wissen, denn die PARTEI ist ja nicht so jedermanns Sache.. Mit Mülheimer Grüßen --188.109.98.96 19:26, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Man mag über die Partei denken was man will, aber der Bildnachweis ist vorbildlich: https://afd-muelheim.de/impressum/bildnachweise/ --Tuxyso (talk) 19:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

oha, die 13578 ist ja ein Mini-Ausschnitt von Deinem Panorama - das hatte ich übersehen. Nix für ungut - ist mir nur aufgefallen und wer nicht fragt, bleibt dumm :-) --188.109.98.96 20:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für deine Achtsamkeit und Info. Leider gibt es sehr viele Fälle von dreisten Bildverwendungen. Wenn man die Seitenbetreiber freundlich anschreibt, zeigen sich die meisten einsichtig und ergänzen einen entsprechenden Hinweis. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Nikon Snapbridge

Hallo Tuxyso,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass du die Nikon D750 nutzt und in deinen EXIF-Daten auch entsprechende Geokoordinaten hinterlegt sind. Machst du das über einen externen Geotagger oder nutzt du Snapbridge? Ich habe seit einen Wochen die D850 und versuche ebenfalls die Einbindung der Geodaten via Snapbridge zu realisieren. Allerdings klappt das nicht sehr zuverlässig. In diesem Bild File:Germanuskirche in Brombach bei Nacht Panorama.jpg vom letzten Wochenende weichen die Geokoordinaten vom tatsächlichen Standort gute 200 Meter ab und bei der Höhenangabe steht einfach mal 0, obwohl es dort tatsächlich ca. 350 Meter ü.d.M. sein dürfte. In rund einem drittel der Bilder steht auch eine Höhenangabe, aber in etwa zwei Drittel tut es das nicht.

Hast du Erfahrung mit Snapbridge oder wie realisiert du das? Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:05, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Wladyslaw! Ich nutze zum Geotagging ganz koventionell ein Dakota 20, d.h. in zeichne den GPS-Track auf, übertrage den Track per USB und tagge die Fotos im Nachgang mit Lightroom. Das funktioniert, sofern die Zeiten von GPS und Kamera synchronisiert sind, sogar für eine große Anzahl Tracks und Zeiträumen von mehreren Wochen, sehr gut. Mit Snapbridge habe ich mich nie beschäftigt. Zu deinen Abweichungen: Ich habe mal gehört, dass die Nikon-eigenen Tagger auch ohne Empfang "funktionieren". D.h. wenn du in ein Gebäude gehst, wird die letzte bekannte GPS-Koordinate für jedes folgende Foto verwendet. Vielleicht gab es in dem von dir genannten Fall Empfangsprobleme und es wurde auf eine alte Position zurückgegriffen. Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 21:45, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss-Beck-Aussen-2018-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss-Beck-Aussen-2018-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss-Beck-Innen-2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)

			* Happy Holidays 2019, Tuxyso! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Nikon upgrades

I was just browsing random featured pictures, and came to the realization that our upgrade paths were really, really similar. It looks like you transitioned from D7000 → D7100 → D750. Not including previous cameras which were lent to me, I started out with the D5100 in January 2013, switched to the D7000 in October 2013, and finally the D750 in October 2016. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi User talk:King of Hearts! Your observation is accurate but you forget the D60 :) I transitioned from D60 -> D7000 -> D7100 -> D750. The switch from D60 to D7000 was a quantum jump! My most productive time for COM was with the D7000. For my camera and lenses there is an opposing trend: The better my cameras and lenses became in the past the less time I have to use them to contribute for COM. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:53, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ouddorpse-Reddingsbrigade-02-2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Verum 22:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ouddorpse-Reddingsbrigade-01-2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 23:35, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandhuegel-Strandpaviljoen-Paal-10-Ouddorp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strandpaviljoen-Paal-10-Ouddorp-Duinen-Aussichtsturm-2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strandpaviljoen-Paal-10-Ouddorp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Strand bij Ouddorp

Heb je toevallig ook een meer algemene foto om "het strand" te illustreren op nl:Ouddorp? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 14:28, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Alexis Jazz! I REALLY like this "more general" photo (beach + dunes):

File:Duenen-Ouddorp-2016.jpg. Other photos: File:Strandpaviljoen-Paal-10-Ouddorp.jpg, File:Strandpaviljoen-Paal-10-Ouddorp-Duinen-Aussichtsturm-2018.jpg, File:Sandhuegel-Strandpaviljoen-Paal-10-Ouddorp.jpg. Does one of these fit your requirements? --Tuxyso (talk) 19:06, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Duenen-Ouddorp-2016.jpg shows the dunes, it is a nice photo though and a possible candidate.

File:Sandhuegel-Strandpaviljoen-Paal-10-Ouddorp.jpg shows primarily the sandhills.

File:Strandpaviljoen-Paal-10-Ouddorp-Duinen-Aussichtsturm-2018.jpg doesn't really show how big the beach is.

File:Strandpaviljoen-Paal-10-Ouddorp.jpg shows the pavilion, not the beach.

I think I'll go with File:Sandhuegel-Strandpaviljoen-Paal-10-Ouddorp (cropped).jpg. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 19:47, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Alexis Jazz, I've uploaded a new photo from 2017: Strand-Ouddorp-Oosterduinpad-2017.jpg What about that? --Tuxyso (talk) 19:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wijnhoeve-De-Kleine-Schorre-2018-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:32, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strand-Ouddorp-Oosterduinpad-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss-Broich-Straßenseite-mit-Eingang-2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:27, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss-Broich-Straßenseite-mit-Mauer-Baustelle-2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:27, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss-Broich-Straßenseite-2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Paris Orlando 18:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss-Broich-Eingang-Vorderfront-2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:37, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wijnhoeve-De-Kleine-Schorre-2018-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs cleanup of dust spots --Poco a poco 21:32, 13 February 2019 (UTC)  Done, please take another look, Poco a poco --Tuxyso 19:18, 14 February 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:11, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Tuxyso,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020!

		* Happy Holidays 2020, Tuxyso! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:25, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

FYI

Dein Foto. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 16:48, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Ara-Zoo-Muenster-2013-02.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss-Landsberg-Ratingen-2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Mettmann-Stadtwald-2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaiserpflaz-Kaiserswerth-2020-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:25, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaiserpflaz-Kaiserswerth-2020-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:25, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klemensviertel-Kreuzberg-5-2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus-Kaiserswerth-2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:33, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus-Cloppenburg-2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:21, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloppenburg-Landessparkasse-Oldenburg-2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 13:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020/2021!

		* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Tuxyso! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinkniebruecke-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polizeipraesidium-Duesseldorf-Haroldstrasse-5-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portobello-Haus-Strassenseite-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 16:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portobello-Haus-von-Buergerpark-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 16:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadttor-Duesseldorf-2021-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 12:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landtag-Duesseldorf-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buergerpark-Portobello-Haus-Stadttor-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochwasser-unter-Rheinkniebruecke-von-Apollo-Rondell-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VHS-MH-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VHS-MH-Eingang-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes-Rathaus-Stadtquartier-2021-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes-Rathaus-Stadtquartier-2021-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:17, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruhrquartier-Rathausturm-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:17, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtquartier-2021-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander Novikov 16:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotunde-Hinterausgang-Rathaus-Rathausturm-MH-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander Novikov 16:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotunde-Hinterausgang-Rathaus-MH-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:47, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick-Leineweberstraße-Richtung-MH-City-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadthalle-MH-Eingang-von-Bergstrasse-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:47, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruhrquartier-2021-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. You may consider to clone out the branch popping up in the upper left corner, but this is a minor detail of subjective importance. --Lion-hearted85 11:32, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruhrquartier-2021-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theodor-Heuss-Platz-Stadthalle-MH-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A bit crowded. Welcome back! --Moroder 12:37, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TripleZ-G10-Pruefstand-Strassenseite-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 20:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TripleZ-G10-Pruefstand-Parkplatz-2021-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TripleZ-G10-Pruefstand-02-2021-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:13, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomaskirche-Stoppenberg-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:49, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathausgalerie-Rathaus-Essen-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 00:45, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Essener-Muenster-mit-St-Johann-Baptist-Kirche-Essen-2021-v2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 00:44, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemalige-Essener-Creditanstalt-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deutschlandhaus-Essen-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:08, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Essener-Muenster-mit-St-Johann-Baptist-Kirche-Essen-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:59, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus-Essen-Schuetzenbahn-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:08, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TripleZ-G10-Pruefstand-01-2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit too dark IMO. --Ermell 07:41, 5 April 2021 (UTC) Thanks, Ermell for the review and the hint.  Done Please take another look. It's a trade-off here between nice contrasts and uniform brightness. I would like to preserve the beautiful late noon sun on the right building thus more brightening would destroy the mood of the photo. --Tuxyso 20:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. Thanks. --Ermell 19:47, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)