Wikipedia

Software Guard Extensions

Intel Software Guard Extensions (SGX) is a set of instruction codes implementing trusted execution environment that are built into some Intel central processing units (CPUs). They allow user-level and operating system code to define protected private regions of memory, called enclaves.[1][2] SGX is designed to be useful for implementing secure remote computation, secure web browsing, and digital rights management (DRM).[3] Other applications include concealment of proprietary algorithms and of encryption keys.[4]

SGX involves encryption by the CPU of a portion of memory (the enclave). Data and code originating in the enclave are decrypted on the fly within the CPU,[4] protecting them from being examined or read by other code,[4] including code running at higher privilege levels such as the operating system and any underlying hypervisors.[1][4][2] While this can mitigate many kinds of attacks, it does not protect against side-channel attacks.[5]

A pivot by Intel in 2021 resulted in the deprecation of SGX from the 11th and 12th generation Intel Core Processors, but development continues on Intel Xeon for cloud and enterprise use.[6][7]

Details

edit

SGX was first introduced in 2015 with the sixth generation Intel Core microprocessors based on the Skylake microarchitecture.

Support for SGX in the CPU is indicated in CPUID "Structured Extended feature Leaf", EBX bit 02,[8] but its availability to applications requires BIOS/UEFI support and opt-in enabling which is not reflected in CPUID bits. This complicates the feature detection logic for applications.[9]

Emulation of SGX was added to an experimental version of the QEMU system emulator in 2014.[10] In 2015, researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology released an open-source simulator named "OpenSGX".[11]

One example of SGX used in security was a demo application from wolfSSL[12] using it for cryptography algorithms.

Intel Goldmont Plus (Gemini Lake) microarchitecture also contains support for Intel SGX.[13]

Both in the 11th and 12th generations of Intel Core processors, SGX is listed as "Deprecated" and thereby not supported on "client platform" processors.[6][14][15] This removed support of playing Ultra HD Blu-ray discs on officially licensed software, such as PowerDVD.[16][17][18]

List of SGX vulnerabilities

edit

Prime+Probe attack

edit

On 27 March 2017 researchers at Austria's Graz University of Technology developed a proof-of-concept that can grab RSA keys from SGX enclaves running on the same system within five minutes by using certain CPU instructions in lieu of a fine-grained timer to exploit cache DRAM side-channels.[19][20] One countermeasure for this type of attack was presented and published by Daniel Gruss et al. at the USENIX Security Symposium in 2017.[21] Among other published countermeasures, one countermeasure to this type of attack was published on September 28, 2017, a compiler-based tool, DR.SGX,[22] that claims to have superior performance with the elimination of the implementation complexity of other proposed solutions.

Spectre-like attack

edit
Main article: Spectre (security vulnerability)

The LSDS group at Imperial College London showed a proof of concept that the Spectre speculative execution security vulnerability can be adapted to attack the secure enclave.[23] The Foreshadow attack, disclosed in August 2018, combines speculative execution and buffer overflow to bypass the SGX.[24] A security advisory and mitigation for this attack, also called an L1 Terminal Fault, was originally issued on August 14, 2018 and updated May 11, 2021.[25]

Enclave attack

edit

On 8 February 2019, researchers at Austria's Graz University of Technology published findings which showed that in some cases it is possible to run malicious code from within the enclave itself.[26] The exploit involves scanning through process memory in order to reconstruct a payload, which can then run code on the system. The paper claims that due to the confidential and protected nature of the enclave, it is impossible for antivirus software to detect and remove malware residing within it. Intel issued a statement, stating that this attack was outside the threat model of SGX, that they cannot guarantee that code run by the user comes from trusted sources, and urged consumers to only run trusted code.[27]

MicroScope replay attack

edit

There is a proliferation of side-channel attacks plaguing modern computer architectures. Many of these attacks measure slight, nondeterministic variations in the execution of code, so the attacker needs many measurements (possibly tens of thousands) to learn secrets. However, the MicroScope attack allows a malicious OS to replay code an arbitrary number of times regardless of the program's actual structure, enabling dozens of side-channel attacks.[28] In July 2022, Intel submitted a Linux patch called AEX-Notify to allow the SGX enclave programmer to write a handler for these types of events.[29]

Plundervolt

edit

Security researchers were able to inject timing specific faults into execution within the enclave, resulting in leakage of information. The attack can be executed remotely, but requires access to the privileged control of the processor's voltage and frequency.[30] A security advisory and mitigation for this attack was originally issued on August 14, 2018 and updated on March 20, 2020.[31]

LVI

edit
Main article: Load value injection

Load Value Injection[32][33] injects data into a program aiming to replace the value loaded from memory which is then used for a short time before the mistake is spotted and rolled back, during which LVI controls data and control flow. A security advisory and mitigation for this attack was originally issued on March 10, 2020 and updated on May 11, 2021.[34]

SGAxe

edit

SGAxe,[35] an SGX vulnerability published in 2020, extends a speculative execution attack on cache,[36] leaking content of the enclave. This allows an attacker to access private CPU keys used for remote attestation.[37] In other words, a threat actor can bypass Intel's countermeasures to breach SGX enclaves' confidentiality. The SGAxe attack is carried out by extracting attestation keys from SGX's private quoting enclave that are signed by Intel. The attacker can then masquerade as legitimate Intel machines by signing arbitrary SGX attestation quotes.[38] A security advisory and mitigation for this attack, also called a Processor Data Leakage or Cache Eviction, was originally issued January 27, 2020 and updated May 11, 2021.[39]

ÆPIC leak

edit

In 2022, security researchers discovered a vulnerability in the Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller (APIC) that allows for an attacker with root/admin privileges to gain access to encryption keys via the APIC by inspecting data transfers from L1 and L2 cache.[40] This vulnerability is the first architectural attack discovered on x86 CPUs. This differs from Spectre and Meltdown which use a noisy side channel. This exploit currently affects Intel Core 10th, 11th and 12th generations, and Xeon Ice Lake microprocessors.[41][42]

Extraction of the private key

edit

The code signature is generated with a private key that is only in the enclave. The private key is encoded via “fuse” elements on the chip. In the process, bits are burnt through, giving them the binary value 0. This private key cannot be extracted because it is encoded in the hardware. Mark Ermolov, Maxim Goryachy and Dmitry Sklyarov refuted the claim to trustworthiness of the SGX concept at https://github.com/chip-red-pill/glm-ucode#.

SGX malware arguments

edit

There has been a long debate on whether SGX enables creation of superior malware. Oxford University researchers published an article in October 2022[43] considering attackers' potential advantages and disadvantages by abusing SGX for malware development. Researchers conclude that while there might be temporary zero-day vulnerabilities to abuse in SGX ecosystem, the core principles and design features of Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) make malware weaker than a malware-in-the-wild, TEEs make no major contributions to malware otherwise.

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ a b "Intel SGX for Dummies (Intel SGX Design Objectives)". intel.com. 2013-09-26.
  2. ^ a b johnm (2017-08-08). "Properly Detecting Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) in Your Applications". software.intel.com. Retrieved 2019-02-15.
  3. ^ "Intel SGX Details". intel.com. 2017-07-05.
  4. ^ a b c d "Researchers Use Intel SGX To Put Malware Beyond the Reach of Antivirus Software - Slashdot". it.slashdot.org. 12 February 2019.
  5. ^ "Intel SGX and Side-Channels". intel.com. 2020-02-28.
  6. ^ a b "New Intel chips won't play Blu-ray disks due to SGX deprecation". Retrieved 2022-01-17.
  7. ^ anrilr (2022-01-20). "Rising to the Challenge — Data Security with Intel Confidential Computing". community.intel.com. Retrieved 2022-04-20.
  8. ^ Intel Architecture Instruction Set Extensions Programming Reference, Intel, AUGUST 2015, page 36 "Structured Extended feature Leaf EAX=07h, EBX Bit 02: SGX"
  9. ^ "Properly Detecting Intel Software Guard Extensions in Your Applications". intel.com. 2016-05-13.
  10. ^ "Intel SGX Emulation using QEMU" (PDF). tc.gtisc.gatech.edu. Retrieved 2018-11-02.
  11. ^ "sslab-gatech/opensgx". GitHub. Retrieved 2016-08-15.
  12. ^ "wolfSSL At IDF". wolfssl. 2016-08-11.
  13. ^ "Intel® Pentium® Silver J5005 Processor". Retrieved 2020-07-10.
  14. ^ "11th Generation Intel Core Processor Datasheet". Retrieved 2022-01-15.
  15. ^ "12th Generation Intel Core Processors Datasheet". Retrieved 2022-01-15.
  16. ^ Mary Stone (January 21, 2022). "Intel discontinues support for UHD Blu-ray discs in its newest PC chips". whathifi.
  17. ^ "CyberLink Support Center".
  18. ^ "CyberLink Support Center". www.cyberlink.com. Retrieved 11 September 2024.
  19. ^ Chirgwin, Richard (March 7, 2017). "Boffins show Intel's SGX can leak crypto keys". The Register. Retrieved 1 May 2017.
  20. ^ Schwarz, Michael; Weiser, Samuel; Gruss, Daniel; Maurice, Clémentine; Mangard, Stefan (2017). "Malware Guard Extension: Using SGX to Conceal Cache Attacks". arXiv:1702.08719 [cs.CR].
  21. ^ "Strong and Efficient Cache Side-Channel Protection using Hardware Transactional Memory" (PDF). USENIX. 2017-08-16.
  22. ^ Brasser, Ferdinand; Capkun, Srdjan; Dmitrienko, Alexandra; Frassetto, Tommaso; Kostiainen, Kari; Müller, Urs; Sadeghi, Ahmad-Reza (2017-09-28). DR.SGX: Hardening SGX Enclaves against Cache Attacks with Data Location Randomization. ACSAC '19: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference December 2019. pp. 788–800. arXiv:1709.09917. doi:10.1145/3359789.3359809. S2CID 19364841.
  23. ^ Sample code demonstrating a Spectre-like attack against an Intel SGX enclave., 19 December 2021
  24. ^ Peter Bright - Jul 10, 2018 9:00 pm UTC (2018-07-10). "New Spectre-like attack uses speculative execution to overflow buffers". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2018-11-02.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  25. ^ "CVE - CVE-2018-3615". cve.mitre.org. Retrieved 2022-10-17.
  26. ^ Schwarz, Michael; Weiser, Samuel; Gruss, Daniel (2019-02-08). "Practical Enclave Malware with Intel SGX". arXiv:1902.03256 [cs.CR].
  27. ^ Bright, Peter (2019-02-12). "Researchers use Intel SGX to put malware beyond the reach of antivirus software". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2019-02-15.
  28. ^ Skarlatos, Dimitrios; Yan, Mengjia; Gopireddy, Bhargava; Sprabery, Read; Torrellas, Josep; Fletcher, Christopher W. (2019). "MicroScope". Proceedings of the 46th International Symposium on Computer Architecture. Isca '19. Phoenix, Arizona: ACM Press. pp. 318–331. doi:10.1145/3307650.3322228. ISBN 978-1-4503-6669-4.
  29. ^ "[PATCH] x86/sgx: Allow enclaves to use Asynchrounous Exit Notification". lore.kernel.org. Retrieved 2022-10-17.
  30. ^ "Plundervolt steals keys from cryptographic algorithms". Rambus Blog. 2019-12-11. Retrieved 2020-03-20.
  31. ^ "CVE - CVE-2019-11157". cve.mitre.org. Retrieved 2022-10-17.
  32. ^ "LVI: Hijacking Transient Execution with Load Value Injection". lviattack.eu. Retrieved 2020-03-12.
  33. ^ "Load Value Injection". software.intel.com. Retrieved 2020-03-12.
  34. ^ "CVE - CVE-2020-0551". cve.mitre.org. Retrieved 2022-10-17.
  35. ^ "SGAxe". sgaxe.com.
  36. ^ "CacheOut". cacheoutattack.com.
  37. ^ "Towards Formalization of Enhanced Privacy ID (EPID)-based Remote Attestation in Intel SGX".
  38. ^ "SGAxe & CrossTalk Attacks: New Intel SGX Vulnerability Leaks Data". Hack Reports. 2020-06-12. Retrieved 2020-06-12.
  39. ^ "CVE - CVE-2020-0549". cve.mitre.org. Retrieved 2022-10-17.
  40. ^ "Intel SGX: Not So Safe After All, ÆPIC Leak". The New Stack. 2022-08-16. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  41. ^ Wilson, Jason R. (2022-08-11). "ÆPIC Leak is an Architectural CPU Bug Affecting 10th, 11th, and 12th Gen Intel Core CPUs". Wccftech. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  42. ^ "ÆPIC Leak". aepicleak.com. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  43. ^ Küçük, Kubilay Ahmet; et, al. (October 2022). "SoK: How 'Not' to Architect Your Next-Generation TEE Malware". Hardware and Architectural Support for Security and Privacy (HASP) 2022. Retrieved 2023-04-17.
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Software_Guard_Extensions&oldid=1258084403"