Talk:140 William Street, Melbourne

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Melbourne Low‑importance

	Australia portal 140 William Street, Melbourne is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Copyvio

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The recent additions to this article seem still to involve direct copying or unacceptably close paraphrasing of copyrighted sources, including the following:

The Victorian Heritage Database entry "Former BHP House". Examples: Much of the "Historical Significance" subsection, along with most of the fourth paragraph of the "Construction" section.
Goad's Melbourne Architecture, as quoted on [http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=632933 this page] (itself a copyvio), for example. Examples: Most of the first, third, and fifth paragraphs of the "Construction" section; some of the fourth paragraph as well.

I suspect that the material sourced to the magazine Architecture in Australia may also violate copyright, though I don't have access to the source to be sure. None of this material should be readded unless it can be confirmed to be expressed in a fashion that does not violate the copyright of others. Deor (talk) 16:27, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic