Talk:Animal sexual behaviour

Latest comment: 2 years ago by IAmNitpicking in topic Under polygyny

Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment

edit

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Roosevelt University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 15:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment

edit

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Washington University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Fall term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 15:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2018 and 28 November 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Choco Xiu.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:18, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Moles

edit

In the section on moles, it states

"It has also been recorded that certain species of mole will 'rape' new borns of their own species, the biological advantage to this is that when those moles mature and become fertile, they will become pregnant with the sperm of the mole that had mated with them at a very young age."

The problem i see is that can the sperm survive inside the newborns for long enough to them to mature? I am by no means an expert on the subject, and found nothing at a quick glance on the cycle of maturation on moles, but to the best of my knowledge seminal fluid can only sustain the sperm inside the female body for 40 or so hours. That of course as a result of the natural reaction of the female body to destroy the semen immediatly after it enters the vaginal cavity.

As I said, i am no expert on the subject, so I may be far off here, I'm not going to touch it, I'll let someone who knows what they are doing do that, but I felt the need to point this out.

Under polygyny

edit

“ As polygyny is the most common form of polygamy among vertebrates (including humans, to some extent)

Um wat. I was halfway through slapping a citation needed on the claim in parenthesis, and then questioned if I shouldn’t just delete it entirely?

Input appreciated UsersLikeYou (talk) 08:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure what you're objecting to. Human polygyny is historically widespread, among everyone from the Jews during ancient times to Hawaiian kings to Mongolian rulers. Polyandry (women having multiple husbands) is much less common. IAmNitpicking (talk) 15:25, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply