Talk:Ashlar

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Freemasonry Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

◆ WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard":

Improve to Featured Article status
Add content to stubs…
Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc.
Requests
[Watch this list]
- Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable)
Participate in articles listed for deletion
Need images
New Article to be created

Rubble Masonry

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Shouldn't "whereas masonry using irregularly shaped stones is known as rubble masonry" qualify as Cyclopean masonry terms-wise ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.14.207.82 (talk) 11:39, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

All of these terms being unfamiliar to me, I consulted the Cyclopean article, which seems quite different from what is described here. 205.197.242.189 (talk) 07:05, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

It appears to me that ashlar is the finest/most particular grade of stone work, Cyclopean masonry somewhere below it, and rubble masonry somewhere below that. Rubble masonry may include stones that are round, very irregularly shaped, and/or of wildly varying sizes. TooManyFingers (talk) 18:08, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copy

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Ashlar was copied or moved into Palacio de Aldama with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

ovA_165443 (talk) 01:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Quadrilateral?

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The image "Ashlar polygonal masonry in Cuzco, Peru" seems to contradict the sentence "Ashlar is related but distinct from other stone masonry that is finely dressed but not quadrilateral, such as curvilinear and polygonal masonry" in the lead, not being quadrilateral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nø (talk • contribs) 09:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Rough & perfect ashlar, Neolithic period, Mongolian Culture, 粗幼石塊, 新石器時代, 14.7 cm, 01 n 23.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:45, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic