Talk:Black Perl
This page was proposed for deletion by 198.176.82.34 (talk · contribs) in the past with the comment: Non-notable poem. Falls far short of WP:GNG. Comment on talk page querying notability dated 2010 shows more than ample time has elapsed without notability being demonstrated It was contested by Kvng (talk · contribs) on 2019-10-07 with the comment: Good indication of notability in book ref and referenced postings indicate there may be more. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editAs far as I know this poem was not written by Larry Wall. The mail that it came out in states, and i quote.
"A person who wishes to remain anonymous wrote the following example of "Black Perl". (The Pearl poet would have been shocked, no doubt.)"
Please correct me if Im wronge
- Larry wrote it... and used that phony cover so that people would wonder. He's admitted this in public many times. --Randal L. Schwartz 18:44, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Execution
editSo what does the programme do when you run it?--ospalh (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- exit. 139.174.58.193 (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- shouldn't the article reflect this? I think the beauty of this piece (and maybe its significance also, is that it is not distinguishable from 'common' poems, yet it is syntactically correct (in Perl 3). The fact that it will not parse under Perl 5 is just of secondary interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.172.148.119 (talk) 10:21, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Significance
editCould we get a bit of context for this page? Why is this bit of poetry important, esp. outside the Perl community? I'm not questioning whether it is important--I'm sure it is. I would just like somebody to frame this better for outsiders who might get linked here. Tarheelcoxn (talk) 17:13, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
syntax highlighting
editThis would be helpful for people who are unfamiliar with perl. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.89.71.42 (talk) 09:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Black Perl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141209171625/http://computer-programming-forum.com/53-perl/03b4ead71f635751.htm to http://computer-programming-forum.com/53-perl/03b4ead71f635751.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Removed misattribution & unverified claims
editI've removed Larry's signature from the body of the poem as well as text in the article claiming that he wrote it. According to Programming Perl 3rd ed., neither of these appear to be true and the author is not known. The cited source did not appear to back this up, either. The specific lines in IRC were "funny thing is, I'm not allowed to just go in and say "I wrote it" and "In a sense everything on wikipedia has to be hearsay. :)". Neither of these, to me, are conclusive.
The sentence that claimed that the headers were forged was also removed, as there is no evidence for it. The book includes a set of headers that were sent with the comp.lang.perl message, and to me, the only thing that appears out of place is that the message has a datestamp of exactly midnight on April 1st, 1990 (what are the odds of that?). 50.201.183.98 (talk) 18:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)