This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Does anyone know if people were aware how phallic-shaped it looks, during the time it was popular? (the article says from 1920 to 1960) It seems like it's fairly obvious to LDSers now that it's phallic-shaped, so it's hard to imagine how it initially gained popularity as a family-friendly recipe. Or were the less overtly-phallic variants (those without the "dripping wax", perhaps) more common? --Hirsutism (talk) 16:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
A friend of mine served this once to at a dinner party and claimed that her mom, a devout Christian, used to serve this in all seriousness and never noticed the phallic connotations. We all couldn't stop laughing. --Sue Maberry (talk) 17:55, 11 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
