Advantages of Dermatoscopy - a priori science?

edit

It is pretty poor to claim dermatoscopy is great and refer to studies comparing results from using a dermatoscope with NAKED EYE examination. I do not know ANY dermatologist who does not possess and use a basic magnifier! Why bother doing such a study when the answer is known a priori? More realistic to compare the diagnoses made by users of 10X illuminated dermatoscopes with diagnoses made by users of common 2.5x loupes. The difference will be less.Petlif (talk) 03:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

This page is clearly written by the company selling dermatoscopes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.208.253.93 (talk) 02:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Seems like the start of the section was, but the last sentence provides balance, IMO. In its defense, I imagine a polarized dermatoscope is a very simple instrument, inexpensive to manufacture, and buy so I can't see much reason not to use one. --Elvey (talk) 00:18, 26 November 2010 (UTC)Reply


I wonder if the kind of studies and cost-benefit analyses used for mammography have been or are being applied to digital dermoscopy. --Elvey (talk) 00:18, 26 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

iPhone dermatoscopes

edit

Should talk about the iPhone dermatoscopes! or at least the y-generation of doctors should! 129.180.175.166 (talk) 04:59, 18 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Subjective algorithms

edit

Dermoscopic Algorithms Lack Reliability for Detecting Melanoma. April 2016 " For new dermoscopy users, several simplified diagnostic algorithms exist—such as the ABCD rule, the Menzies method, or the 3-point checklist. In this study, ... compare the diagnostic accuracy of these varied dermoscopic algorithms." could be mentioned here - or melanoma  ?

Wiki Education assignment: Public Writing Fall 2022 F1

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 September 2022 and 12 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Toggle78 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Eilsiz ka, ProbablyOrthogonal, Researcher112233.

— Assignment last updated by Eilsiz ka (talk) 17:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply