Talk:Electrically small antenna
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Electrically small antenna redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merge
edit | The contents of the Electrically short page were merged into Electrically small antenna on 30 March 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
You are estroy of the History of ESA!
editDear Caffemac,
Why you deleted my text about History? This is very importent science results. This article include in SCOPUS and she was citised Hansen and other scienties in works. This text was support by Diannaa and Quinton Feldberg. The History of ESA not stopped after Harrington and has now the 4th stage. Wiki-users should be know anout this. Swadim (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- I didn't support anything. My only interest in this page was to remove a copyright violation. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Dear Diannaa, But you didn't change my text about 4 stage of History and my reference. It was very true solution.Swadim (talk) 19:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
The text about the history without reference violates the my copyrights: "In 1960, Harrington.[1] related the effects of antenna size, gain and minimum Q for the near and far field diffraction zones for linearly and circularly polarized waves, and also treated the case where the antenna efficiency is less than 100%" [2]. This text is the full identical citation from pages 116 -117 of IEEE conference [2]. Please stop this copiright problem and include my reference! Swadim (talk) 07:53, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ R.F. Harrington, ‘Effect of Antenna Size on Gain, Bandwidth, and Efficiency,’ J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand., Vol. 64-D, Jan/Feb 1960, pp. 1-12
- ^ a b Slyusar V. I. 60 Years of Electrically Small Antennas Theory.//Рroceedings of the 6-th International Conference on Antenna Theory and Techniques, 17-21 September, 2007, Sevastopol, Ukraine. - Pp. 116 - 118. [1]
- I'm sorry, but my opponent Caffemac didn't answer to my questions and remarks in talk page. The Concept Caffemac for this article is very limited. I'm so sorry that Wikipedia has he as moderator of this article. The Wikipedia is not a personal site and need consider all other points of visions.Swadim (talk) 17:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Nanomechanical magnetoelectric antennas are ESA!
editDear Caffemac,
I strong propose to include in the article this text:
"Principal new type of electrically small antennas are nanomechanical magnetoelectric (ME) antennas. [10] ME antennas have sizes as small as one-thousandth of a wavelength[10]. For example the length and width of the FeGaB/AlN active resonant body of this antenna for 60,7 MHz of electromagnetic waves are 200 and 50 µm, respectively[10]"Swadim (talk) 19:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC).
Starts off too technical
editThis page needs a less technical introductory sentence. I don't feel qualified to make this edit myself, but I suggest something like:
An electrically small or electrically short antenna is an antenna much shorter than the wavelength of the signal it is intended to broadcast or receive. This is typically defined as...