Talk:Energia (corporation)

Requested move 15 April 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move to any of the suggested names. The opposing editor only suggested a couple new names but there was no further discussion to support a move to those as well. (non-admin closure) Yashovardhan (talk) 13:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

---

S. P. Korolev Rocket and Space Corporation Energia → RSC Energia – WP:COMMONNAME as can be seen in articles such as this. The full official name is not commonly used. eh bien mon prince (talk) 13:42, 15 April 2017 (UTC)--Relisting. Yashovardhan (talk) 17:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:10, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

• Oppose. No TLAs for obscure topics! Prefer Energia Rocket and Space Corporation or Energia Rocket & Space Corporation, which I see is in frequent use. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:41, 5 May 2017 (UTC) I see that "Energia" (same as it's rocker the Energia) is used as the short name of the corporation. It belongs at the front. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:45, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Google translates the lead of the Russian-language version of this to read: "Rocket and Space Corporation 'Energia' named after S. P. Korolova". So I suppose the question is, is it still named after him, or not? If it's not named after him, then the name should begin with "Energia". In Russian Wikipedia, it's titled that way: Energia (corporation) or Energy (corporation). wbm1058 (talk) 13:55, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

I've been bold and moved the page to Energia (corporation), as there is consensus above that the article should be renamed. The name was far to long, and it's certainly not the common name in English. - BilCat (talk) 08:04, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Energia (corporation) is good. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:20, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Energia (corporation). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130408113510/http://nsc.nasa.gov/SFCS/SystemFailureCaseStudyFile/Download/154/ to http://nsc.nasa.gov/SFCS/SystemFailureCaseStudyFile/Download/154/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:47, 8 November 2017 (UTC)