 | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 August 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Untitled]
editWould the 1992 hit "Sweet Lullaby" by "Deep Forest" be considered exotica? Burschik 07:54, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Um, I would say that is more New Age/Electronica. --The lorax 15:05, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- What about Babatunde Olatunji and his Drums of Passion records? There was one of these that was out in the 1960s, and a friend's dad had it and it was a lot of fun to listen to when you were eight or nine years old. -- Smerdis of Tlön 22:03, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Two things the article failed to mention: the considerable Latin influence on exotica (Martin Denny himself in "Incredibly Strange Music" mentioned that his sound was far more Latin influenced, especially in the rhythms, than Polynesian influenced) and the relation between the rise of exotica and the introduction of stereophonic sound.
does anyone else think Exotica is a great album, but sort of screwed up by the cheesy bird calls? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.83.121.172 (talk) 20:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- After six years, I think the answer to your question is "no" - DavidWBrooks (talk) 20:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- after five more years, I'd say that 16 minus 8 is not "six". ;) 66.30.47.138 (talk) 16:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Exotica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100709163227/http://musicology.typepad.com/dialm/files/REP103_05.pdf to http://musicology.typepad.com/dialm/files/REP103_05.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)