Talk:HMS Euphrates (1813)

HMS Euphrates (1813) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 30, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European / Early Modern / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Latest comment: 10 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Euphrates (1813)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 16:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Preamble from Vami

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. My name is Vami, and I will be your reviewer. During this review I may make small edits such as spelling corrections, but I will only suggest substantive content changes in comments here. For responding to my comments, please use

Done,

Fixed,

Added,

Not done,

Doing..., or

Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. As my comments are addressed or rebutted, I will cross them out, and only my comments.

If I have demonstrated incompetence or caused offense, please let me know. –♠Vamí _IV†♠ 16:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Prose review

~~[...] and so more were needed to be built. Seems to me redundant.~~

Removed.

~~[...] Scamander class was one of those put into construction to fill this need. "one of those"? One of those what? I think some specificity or reduction is required here.~~

Removed.

~~As such Alpheus's class [...] whomst~~

Not sure what you mean here?

Alpheus isn't a name used before in the article; is this a ghost from a previous article? –♠Vamí _IV†♠ 01:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Haha I didn't even catch that when reading it through again! Yes, from a previous article for a ship of the class.

~~[...] a woman at Corfu. Suggest "on" Corfu, considering it's an island rather than a city.~~

Changed.

~~Ten days after receiving the first news of Exmouth [...] Suggest "first despatch", as "of Exmouth" here makes him sound like an event unto himself.~~

Reworded.

GA progress

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

@Vami IV: Hi, thanks for reviewing this! I've responded above, with one unactioned point that I've queried. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:47, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Vami IV: Responded above...oops! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 01:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic