Talk:KangaRoos

Latest comment: 9 years ago by BjKa in topic Lemma

NPOV

edit

"KangaROOS were considered the absolute ultimate in athletic footwear"
A little POV don't you think? --unsigned by 70.64.188.255 at 09:41, 20 March 2006

Why don't YOU write it then? --unsigned by User:Valor19 at 09:07, 21 March 2006.
True dat --BjKa (talk) 16:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Dynacoil part is highly NPOV, as is much of the article. --Jmlk17 15:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Then fix it --BjKa (talk) 16:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Company

edit

So, after the resurrection, is it still the same company? Who owned it before? - Who owns it now? --BjKa (talk) 16:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Lemma

edit

The current spelling "KangaRoos" is obviously rubbish. It should either be "KangaROOS", like the company write themselves, or "Kangaroos" if you subscribe to the viewpoint that Wikipedia shouldn't adopt every strange spelling a company will invent for its brandname. I would change it to the oficial brand spelling if that page didn't already exist as a redirection here. (This might involve deletion first. I'm not sure about that.) --BjKa (talk) 16:33, 20 November 2014 (UTC)Reply