Talk:Mian Mir

Latest comment: 4 months ago by RexSueciae in topic Neutrality

Untitled

edit

Nice stub, we should try to add further contents. --Bhadani 15:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mian Mir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality

edit

Aside from the opening stub, the rest of this article is not written in an objective manner describing the man's life but instead entirely of praise. (if that's the right word) Krynh (talk) 20:52, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

It does seem too subjective. I’ll try rewording parts to tone down the praise. Also, the story with Jahangir is way too long and seems like it was adapted almost word for word directly from a source. So that part should also be shortened, I think. Bagabondo (talk) 23:28, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

I see this was already being discussed on the talk page -- a well-meaning (?) editor seems to have recently attempted to introduce some content about his birthplace -- sourced from a low-quality source, alas. I think citing a blog as a source would have been unwise. Not that the article as it stands is perfect; I think we could find a better source than "Story of Pakistan website" which is presently cited 7 times. I have tagged the article for rewrite. RexSueciae (talk) 00:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply