| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Milan Kučan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Political motivated vandalism?
editI removed changes by User:Avala once again. Please see Talk:Janez Drnovsek for reasons. --Romanm 07:49, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
The sam thing I said in Drnovsek talk I will in here. What is your problem??? It`s the only question I will ask. That website is publishing daily news so of course you can not see it anymore! Courts that are going to process this are courts of Serbia and courts in Slovenia. I said in 2004. AND AT THE AND IF YOU HEAR SOMETHING FOR THE FIRST TIME, IT DOESN`T MEAN IT IS COMPLETE MADE-UP. I will of course find an article about this and then you will be ashamed and redfaced. Avala 08:32, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
YES I THINK YOUR VANDALISM IS POLITICAL MOTIVATED
Here is the picture you need! It is the scan from newspapers! The only thing that you will desperately try to do now is to prove that this scan is copyrighted :( It`s sad what can I say.
Avala 08:51, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
Protection
editSorry, I just realised I accidently protected this earlier. I didn't actually mean to. It's unprotected now. Angela. 20:44, May 2, 2004 (UTC)
WHAT?
editWhat? How is it propaganda if someone sues somebody? It was in the news so stop beeing blind! It is not your problem are they guilty or not! Court will decide! Here we will just put some info whether we like it or not! OK? If you say we should delete this info I will say that you support shooting of 40 unarmed man. It would be like if I delete part of ICTY in Milosevic article and say -NO NO DELETE IT DELETE IT STOP PROPAGANDA Avala 09:10, 3 May 2004 (UTC) BTW GeneralPaton you can call this silly but I don`t understand how can it be silly if 40 people dies?
Cooperation among editors
editPlease avoid personal remarks like:
- What is your problem ... stop being blind ... you call this silly ... you will be ashamed
- you support shooting unarmed men
Then we can see clearly to decide how to handle the claims of mass murder. I know that it's hard "to be calm when you've found something going on," [1] as singer-turned-Muslim Cat Stevens sings. Let's work together to find a way to describe this controversy, instead of just "reverting vandalism". --Uncle Ed, a member of the Mediation Committee and a volunteer Member Advocate.