Talk:NewBornTown
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 7 March 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ANNLF19271.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Evaluation of page
editWhile I found all the information on the page to be relevant, the way the history section is setup is very distracting. I have never seen a wikipedia page done like this and it looks like someone was just trying to fill space by inserting the history of the company one line at a time. The information that is provided is correct, but since the history timeline stops in 2016, there are a couple of years of information that could be added to the page. Perhaps less information on how much money it made or what awards they achieved, and more information on the actual apps themselves and what they do would be better. When I started to check the references I noticed something odd. Since 7 of the 14 references are from newborn town, this page is very bias. Since citation are from the company itself, it does not make a very good citation. Citation should come from another party other then what the wikipedia page is about. The first reference is to google play to download an app and the third reference has a broken link. All in All, this is a promotion page for newborn town, not a page about the company.Allyvick22 (talk) 05:58, 2 February 2018 (UTC)