Talk:Space Shuttle design process
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Space Shuttle design process article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 years |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Space Shuttle program was copied or moved into NASA Space Shuttle decision with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Possibly helpful video
editEvolution of the Space Shuttle Shape--Craigboy (talk) 06:44, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/File:129.JPG
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Space Shuttle design process. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060812151208/http://caib.nasa.gov/events/public_hearings/20030423/transcript_am.html to http://caib.nasa.gov/events/public_hearings/20030423/transcript_am.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Information Literacy and Scholarly Discourse-2002
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2023 and 18 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Duranandrew6264 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Duranandrew6264 (talk) 01:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
USAF influence on design process.
editIt has commonly been said that Shuttle's delta wings and large cargo bay were the result of USAF and NRO demands. However, this is somewhat of a myth, as those were in fact things that NASA wanted and when "asking" the Air Force about them it was more like "If we build the Shuttle this way, can you use that capability?" The Columbia Accident Investigation Board hearings, namely volume 6, appendix H, go into more detail on this topic. I propose a rework of that section of the article. Hal Nordmann (talk) 13:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Specifically on p224 of Columbia Accident Investigation Board, Vol 6 [1], the following is stated by Bob Thompson (Shuttle Program Manager from 1970 to 1981, during early design Phase B):
- "NASA did not put cross-range in the vehicle because the Air Force forced us to. NASA put cross-range in the vehicle because we thought that was the right way to build the vehicle and it just happened to give the Air Force some capability they wanted. But we wanted it for abort capability during the launch and we wanted to start flying the vehicle right at entry. We didnʼt want to keep the thing above stall all the way down to landing area and then flip it around. So the myth that the Air Force made us do something we didnʼt want to do is absolutely a myth." RebirthNA (talk) 12:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)