Talk:Sunday Night Show
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
- Longest Pradeep ever needs to be added - 15th March 2009. Don't know the length but it was very very long! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.5.228 (talk) 23:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Multiple Issues
editOK, seems that the page has been tagged with multiple issues, which mean that the article could be deleted.
I personally believe that the article should remain, as it is a flagship show on a UK national radio station. However, I do believe that some of the criticism is fair, and needs to be addressed.
It does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve it by citing reliable sources.
In fairness, I can't see much there that can be referenced, bar the odd link to Absolute's website, and maybe a link or two to some of Rob and Paulies pranks that have appeared on Youtube.
It resembles a fan site. Tagged since October 2008.
Not yet it doesn't, but it is going that way. If establishing notability for this article will be a problem, then establishing notability for the regular callers will be a nightmare.
The notability of this article's subject is in question. If notability cannot be established, it may be listed for deletion or removed.
The notability of this article should not be in question. It's consistently linked from the front page of Absolute's website, and is comparable with shows with similar formats such as The Geoff Show
It may need copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone or spelling.
Guilty as charged. Doctorbob (talk) 12:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- If it is a flagship show on an important national station (I didn't recognise Absolute as Virgin Radio), then I suspect you're correct about it being notable. However, it still strictly needs Reliable sources to ensure WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:NOR. I am also more than tempted to remove the sections on regular callers and jokes; It seems unencyclopedic fancruft which is unlikely to have reliable sources. Cheers! DoubleBlue (Talk) 21:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Mr.Naughty
editthat he should simply be added to list of regular callers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kornixz (talk • contribs) 23:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Then add him! Doctorbob (talk) 10:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
I can't, wont let me add new information to the wiki!
How rare. Doctorbob (talk) 21:06, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, how do I go about adding him? as it simply will not let me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kornixz (talk • contribs) 10:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Pending changes
editThis article is one of a number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
 | Many of the articles were selected semi-automatically from a list of indefinitely semi-protected articles. Please confirm that the protection level appears to be still warranted, and consider unprotecting instead, before applying pending changes protection to the article. |
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes" would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:13, 17 June 2010 (UTC).