This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 December 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.
Latest comment: 19 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This article is riduculously biased and negative. I do not know enough of the subject to make intelligent modifications but this article is of very poor quality.--Elysianfields21:39, 9 October 2005 (UTC)Reply
I believe I've fixed the article by getting rid of most of the content. Everything I removed was pretty much unredeemable. It's at least a solid stub now. --D Monack01:56, 8 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
