If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia'sXFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
In the event of vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for your agency or facility's administration to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time and abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for further investigation.
Some government IP addresses are considered sensitive. If blocking this IP address, determine if Wikipedia:SIP applies; if so, follow directions.
Officials and network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello 138.162.0.44!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (138.162.0.44) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This IP address is one of those used by the proxies associated with the US Department of the Navy (incl Marine Corps) via NMCI. As such, there is a very, very large range of people who use this address. It does not excuse whatever happens, it is just here for your information.
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I have noted that you edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky or even vandalizing. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini20:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Ford Crown Victoria, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Leafyplant16:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Your change was determined to be unhelpful and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. - Mike Rosoft17:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Niquetalk02:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Nunquam Dormio07:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to LeBron James, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Onorem♠Dil17:04, 26 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Ashworth University. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. NAHID18:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Charles J. Colgan, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Icestorm81521:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The New York Times, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Fullobeans (talk) 21:00, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to VP-26, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: VP-26 was changed by 138.162.0.44(u)(t) deleting 33231 characters on 2009-04-03T18:44:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:44, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jason Campbell, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jauerbackdude?/dude.16:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dlohcierekim 14:08, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Brenda Song, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. ~DCWe Can Work It Out17:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Photo booth has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://vigorotaku.blogspot.com/2010/11/photo-booth.html. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:39, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Culture of Bahrain, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenatortalk15:25, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Worth County High School, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Wiki13 (talk) 16:03, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Adam Yauch, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 18:44, 4 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Chester W. Nimitz, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yaush (talk) 22:16, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Hi, 138. I saw your post on Jimbo's page, and I don't know about anyone else, but I do want to investigate this, so I'm cross-posting this on your talk page from Jimbo's. My initial thought is that you're misreading the edit history, but please correct me if I'm wrong. The thing is that the IP does have a post between F&A's and Resolute's, but you can see from the edit summary that the post was made to the section called "Electoral Commission RfC Closure", right above "Wikipedia:Bold". If you go to that section, you can see that the IP's comment is still there. I guess my question is: did you actually see the IP's comment in "Wikipedia:Bold", or are you just going on the edit history? If the latter, then I think the IP's edits are all accounted for, but if the former, then some dev somewhere has some 'splaining to do. (And of course, one way or another, it's neither your nor the original IP's fault!) Writ Keeper⚇♔21:25, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
No problem and I am glad to ses that someone appears to be taking the issue seriously rather than assuming that I am just some IP that doesn't know what I am talking about. Just as a general note, this is a proxy used by about 2/3rds of the US navy so if there are some bizarre edits or something strange appearing thats likely why. I clearly see the edit history and the string of about 25 revisions that Risker deleted. All of which are apparently missing from the associated discussions on Jimbo's talk page but of course I cannot prove that because I do not have access. All I know is that earlier today I saw a comment from another IP that caught my eye and then was gone so when I looked at the history I could see where Risker deleted it. The IP posted twice. Once to the "Electoral Commission RfC Closure" section and again to the "Wikipedia:Bold" section. You are correct that the IP does have a couple comments there but not enough. If you look at the page history and count the times that the IP edited, the number doesn't match the posts in the discussion. To answer your question more directely, yes I actually saw the edit and I can also tell by the edit history that there are things missing by counting the number of posts by section for the user. I also want to note that Jimbo's page is just a very high visibility example. It happens whenever a rev del is perfomed across multiple revisions that affects multiple discussions.
Basically the rev del tool is crap, it always has been and needs to be redesigned. When its used to delete a single revision it works pretty well but when its used to delete multiple revisions as was done on Jimbo's page it generally also causes collatoral damage to other discussions and comments that were done in between. When a rev del is performed the performer needs to review the edit history and restore the comments that do not meet the violation in a followup edit, but this rarely happens and isn't required. To answer the likely bewilderment in your thoughts, Yes I have edited for a long time, yes I am familiar with how these tools work, no I do not want to start editing actively again and no I do not want to login or create a new account. The only reason I even brought this up is because I have seen it a number of times and no one has mentioned it and I got tired of seeing nothing being done to fix it. 138.162.0.42 (talk) 21:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Okay, I believe you. Sorry for explaining in what's probably far too much detail for you at Jimbo's talk page; I assumed, and you know what they say when you assume. :P I gotta run this moment, but I'll take a closer look, comparing bytecounts and the like, when I next get a chance. Writ Keeper⚇♔21:52, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
No problem thanks for looking into it. Like I said I really don't have a dog in the fight (to pun Michael Vick) but thought I would bring it up. Frankly if I had known it would require this much an investment in time I probably wouldn't have. 138.162.0.46 (talk) 22:00, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, I'm EricSerge. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jeremy Michael Boorda without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! EricSerge (talk) 02:22, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Explosive have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Explosive was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://cocommonlaw.wordpress.com/colorado-revised-statutes/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hampton University has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.
Officials and network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Kelly (politician) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Petrb (talk) 19:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
To edit, please log in.
