You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:57, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

December 2007

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User:Haresh shimpi , are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. The Evil Spartan (talk) 13:00, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ICFAI

edit

Hi, I believe you work for Symantec in Pune as the IP address points there. However, it seems your case is more like Grapes gone sour. As far as my connection with ICFAI goes, I had earlier also stated that I am in no way presently related with ICFAI. The edits which you are making are totally irrelevant and you are filling up the space with lots of baseless thing. It seems that you and not DEC is the sole authority in India for granting the permission for Distance Learning Courses. Please refrain from making unsubstantiated edits in future or I will have to report you for Vandalism.Shovon 05:08, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Changes you made to ICFAI

edit

Hi, you have said a lot of things in the talk page of the article ICFAI and pasted the same in my user page. In future, if you want to communicate with me, please use my Talk page. I have moved your opinions to my talk page. Regarding the DEC approval, please refer to the regulators site (http://www.dec.ac.in/provisional_recognition.htm/). I will not look beyond the ultimate authority's words on this matter. And regarding the moral high standards you would like to set with the temple sort of thing blah blah, I would like to say this much, "In India, we also respect the teachers as our elders and if a teacher utters words like @#$@$#@%$#$%&^$ ....., which I presume is some expletives and cannot be reproduced in toto, then I would have very scant regards for that kind of teacher, irrespective of his numbers of Ph.Ds. Oh, and by the way, it is well known that in India, you can buy a Ph.D thesis for a meagre sum of Rs. 5,000/-. And your temple like Universities only sell them." As I have stated earlier also, if you have a valid point, with suitable references, then please post it on the Talk page of the article so that relevant changes can be made. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 16:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please Stop

edit

Please sign your comments by using for tildas ~~. BTW, I have always asked you to first talk about the information in the talk pages. But you don't see any reason. Make one more unreferenced edit, and I will report you for Vandalism. Shovon (talk) 07:40, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

You are invited to suggest/comment on ICFAI

edit

Hi, as you have keen interest of ICFAI, I would like to request you to have a look at the ICFAI article which is being rewritten by me. You can see it at User:Shovon76/Sandbox. I am trying to write the article in such a way that it gets at least a B Class on Quality Scale. Please provide me any information which you think is important along with suitable reference. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 10:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

August 2008

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Indian art has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bexample\.com' .

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:29, 22 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

November 2008

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at For Whom the Bell Tolls (Bee Gees song), you will be blocked from editing. Yachtsman1 (talk) 06:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

January 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Nerur has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles; use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Leujohn (talk) 13:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

March 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Haroon Lorgat has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Camw (talk) 08:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

March 2009

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Game (mind game), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Game (mind game) was changed by 202.75.200.19 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-03-19T13:02:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:03, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

May 2009

edit

Your edits to May 27

edit

Dear 202.75.200.19,
  Some of your edits on the page May 27 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 06:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

June 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Cluster (computing) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Fyyer  05:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

August 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (film) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 11:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

November 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Malvani cuisine has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The thing that should not be 14:31, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

October 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Rajiv Dixit do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to Rajiv Dixit was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://witnessmind.blogspot.com/2011/10/rajiv-bhai-dixit.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:40, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

December 2011

edit



Hello, and welcome! I'm a bot created by another Wikipedia editor. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more of the external links you added to the page Narayanpet, because they did not seem to meet our definition of appropriate links. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before adding it again.  
I did this because http://witnessmind.blogspot.com/2011/12/narayanpet-railway-station-proposal.html is probably inappropriate for an encyclopedia. We usually avoid linking to blogs, forums, and social media sites.

We appreciate your help in making Wikipedia better for everyone. If I made a mistake, feel free to undo my edit. If you have any questions, you can ask at the Help desk.

Thank you! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:11, 6 December 2011 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.Reply

January 2012

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Narayanpet do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to Narayanpet was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/groups/narayanpet/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:47, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

March 2012

edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:48, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

March 27, 2012

edit

Please don't add inappropriate external links in Gita article. If you really want to add link of that blogspot account, add it at the bottom, don't add it at the top! In addition you can register an account in Wikipedia!--