User talk:Another Believer/Archive 34
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Another Believer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 30 | ← | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | → | Archive 40 |
This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Administrators' newsletter – February 2021
Extended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).
|
Orphaned non-free image File:Love Is Here to Stay - Tony Bennett and Diana Krall.jpeg
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC) |
You're invited! Coronavirus in New York City: Translate-A-Thon - ONLINE - February 6
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
.jpg)
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
I don't understand Russian, but a GA in another language Wiki does not mean the song itself is notable. Judging from the content of the Russian wiki, I believe the only notable thing about the song is the music video, which barely does anything to do with the song's significance/structure/lyrics etc. HĐ (talk) 01:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
The Liquor Store
Your GA nomination of The Liquor Store
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Liquor Store you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Liquor Store
The article The Liquor Store you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:The Liquor Store for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 08:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: January 2021
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
GOCE copy edit of Delta Cafe
 | Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Delta Cafe at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Dhtwiki (talk) 23:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC) |
- Thanks so much! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Equestrian statue of William Henry Harrison
Hey, as you know I just made the page List of public art in Cincinnati and in working on that page, I noticed the page Equestrian statue of William Henry Harrison (Cincinnati), which you created a few months ago. I recently moved it to Equestrian statue of William Henry Harrison, as it appears to be the only equestrian statue of the man I can find, and if not the only one, at least the most notable one. If I'm incorrect or there's an issue with this, please let me know. I'm going to try to significantly expand that page and just wanted to let you know and say good work on the public art pages! Regards, -JJonahJackalope (talk) 22:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- JJonahJackalope, No problem! I'm not sure if there are other equestrian statues of Harrison, but seems to be the only one with a Wikipedia article, so works for now! Thanks for the heads up. Big fan of your work on public art articles -- keep it up! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
GOCE copy edit of Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon)
| | Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Dhtwiki (talk) 22:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC) |
- @Dhtwiki: Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- A couple of additional comments. I'm ambivalent about having removed "United States" from both this and "Delta Cafe" articles. I know where Portland is, but having the country name there might not hurt for others. However, having the present arrangement of locales in the lead (<neighborhood>, <city>) is better, if US is put at the end (rather than <city>, <neighborhood>, <country>).
- In this article only, I was tempted to move the "Closure" subsection of "History" to be its own section after "Reception", because it seemed odd to have reviews of the new menu coming before those of the old. I left it as it was, but, again, but with some ambivalence. Dhtwiki (talk) 19:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Björk articles
Extended content
|
|---|
 A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Björk articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
|
"2 Tuxedos" listed at Redirects for discussion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
|
WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge award (fourth year)
|
The Bronze Maple Leaf Award | |
| This maple leaf is awarded to Another Believer for creating eight articles on music, historic buildings and drag performers during the fourth year of The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 19:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC) |
- @Reidgreg: Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- You're welcome! About three months later than usual, but I finally got around to it. – Reidgreg (talk) 20:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Gigi Goode
Your GA nomination of Gigi Goode
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gigi Goode you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Benmite -- Benmite (talk) 09:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Congrats on this passing! Armadillopteryx 22:11, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Armadillopteryx, Thanks! And of course credit goes to User:Kbabej as well. I've enjoyed the collaborations lately, and expanding the WikiProject RPDR trophy case! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:13, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, congrats to Kbabej as well! That was a big review, and you guys put together a really nice article! Definitely hope to see more collaborations in the future. Armadillopteryx 03:59, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Armadillopteryx Thanks, much appreciated! —Kbabej (talk) 04:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gigi Goode
The article Gigi Goode you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gigi Goode for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Benmite -- Benmite (talk) 23:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 7, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hello Jason, I hope all is well with you. I am curious to know if you had any plans to bring the above article to GA status. I see you are the primary contributor, and I am interested in assisting if you had any current intentions. "April Fools" is my favorite Rufus Wainwright song and the music video is a great one. Let me know and thanks, Carbrera (talk) 17:37, 20 February 2021 (UTC).
|
Good article drive notice
 | Good Article Nomination Backlog Drive The March 2021 GAN Backlog Drive begins on March 1, and will continue until the end of the month. Please sign up to review articles and help reduce the backlog of nominations! |
-- For the drive co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 8, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Concern regarding Draft:Wiki Loves Pride
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC) |
Writing Black History of the Pacific Northwest into Wikipedia - Editathon 2021
 |
|
Cascadia Wikimedians placed this banner at 03:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC) by using the Wikipedia:Meetup/Portland/Participants list.To subscribe to or unsubscribe from messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Portland, please add or remove your name here.
Publicity for April project
Hey, do you think we should try to get more people onboard for wp:420 this year? I didn't ask the EiC if this is suitable, but there's probably still time to write up a blurb for the March Signpost if you were in a mood. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Bri, I'll give this some thought. I'd love to see much more participation, but my WikiProject outreach and even WMF blog blurb in the past haven't resulted in much interest, unfortunately. Considering WP:420 spans culture, geography, history, law, medicine, politics, sociology, etc, I'm always surprised more editors don't sign up. --Another Believer (Talk) 18:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021 at Women in Red
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
The Signpost: 28 February 2021
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Overlinks
Hi. We don't have to tell people what country a city is in when it is obvious, like San Francisco, California. Thanks. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 22:23, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I know. Any particular reason you're sharing? ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:10, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
.jpg)
Your GA nomination of Bridges Cafe
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bridges Cafe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 02:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2021
Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021). 
|
WikiCup 2021 March newsletter
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews. Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:25, 1 March 2021 (UTC) |
.svg){kind=small}
Improve Citing Sources in Articles
Hello, on 02:21, 2 March 2021, you added 2 sources to the article Age of Samurai: Battle for Japan. However, these are just plain links. Please also add the name of the author, the title, website (publisher), and date. Optionally, you can add an archive-url. See here for an example of citing sources. -Artanisen (talk) 00:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- I added sources to an unsourced article. I'd call that an improvement. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:41, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Conversion. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:50, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bridges Cafe
The article Bridges Cafe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bridges Cafe for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 07:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
XLB (Portland, Oregon)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article XLB (Portland, Oregon) has been completed.
You'll notice I masked a lot of text in the "Reception" section. It's out-dated and made the article read like an entry in a travel guide. I feel it's inappropriate in a Wikipedia article, but it's easily restored if you disagree.
Regards,
- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Re. a Wikiproject you're involved in
You seem to be the most experienced editor in that, so I think your opinion on the discussion located at Talk:RuPaul's_Drag_Race_UK_(series_2)#Ground_rules would be helpful. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:40, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- RandomCanadian, Thanks for the heads up. I will try to take a look soon, but I've been avoiding the Series 2 article and talk page because I don't want to read any spoilers (as I am currently watching the season). ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- RandomCanadian, I would recommend posting a note at WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- Shouldn't have to worry too much about spoilers. Anyway, I left a message there about a week ago, right here; but apparently very few people have seen it and it did not prevent yesterday's disruption. Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
AfD
Nomination of Reality Stars: The Musical for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reality Stars: The Musical until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
|
Nomination of PharmaRusical for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PharmaRusical until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
|
Nomination of Social Media Kings Into Queens for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Media Kings Into Queens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
Nomination of Madonna: The Unauthorized Rusical for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madonna: The Unauthorized Rusical until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
|
Nomination of Divas Lip Sync Live for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divas Lip Sync Live (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
to add, genuinely I'm sorry - I didn't realise were personally involved in all of them. I could have asked on the project page if there were plans to expand them first I suppose :/ ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 19:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 10, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Davis Street Tavern
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Davis Street Tavern has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Twofingered Typist, Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: February 2021
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Live at the World Cafe
Orphaned non-free image File:Live at the World Cafe Volume 9 album cover.jpg
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC) |
Orphaned non-free image File:Live at the World Cafe Volume 15 album cover.jpg
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 11, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Statue of Liberty replica (Oklahoma City)
,_2019.jpg)
- File:Statue_of_Liberty_replica_(Oklahoma_City),_2019.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Look at Commons:Category talk:Strengthen the Arm of Liberty. That image is not subject to copyright. --evrik (talk) 18:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Evrik, OK, so what are you suggesting? ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:04, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- ask an admin to restore the original file and move it to the commons. --evrik (talk) 20:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Evrik, I don't know how/where to do that, but if you do, feel free! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Okay. --evrik (talk) 20:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Denali's college degree
Found a reference to his degree in a Program for a Christmas Ice Program he did at a Casino. It isn't directly accessible, but is downloadable. Let me know if you want more information on accessing it to improve the reference.Naraht (talk) 15:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:02, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Frock4Life
Your GA nomination of Frock4Life
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frock4Life you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Frock4Life
The article Frock4Life you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Frock4Life for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Frock4Life
The article Frock4Life you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Frock4Life for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 19:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 12, 2021)
ResolvedExtended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Books & Bytes – Issue 42
Extended content
|
|---|
|
 Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC) |
April editathons from Women in Red
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Vance Monument
Have you heard the latest development? Sad.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:12, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Vchimpanzee, Sad? Not sure we need a monument commemorating Vance, considering his views. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- I'm thinking about the obelisk. It's a big part of Asheville and I was hoping another meaning could be found for it.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Vchimpanzee, This is what museums are for. :p I, too, am a big fan of pubic art and monuments, but I'm glad we're reconsidering some of them. No need to be commemorating racists in public spaces. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Do you want to add anything? In addition to the final vote and one more detail, I included a Vance quote that has been in several stories and wasn't already there.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Vchimpanzee, This is what museums are for. :p I, too, am a big fan of pubic art and monuments, but I'm glad we're reconsidering some of them. No need to be commemorating racists in public spaces. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- I'm thinking about the obelisk. It's a big part of Asheville and I was hoping another meaning could be found for it.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
RPDRDU
Hi AB, I've re-added the Television controversies category as the Guardian article discusses the fact that the contestants weren't dismissed from the show. Put a discussion on the talk page Talk:RuPaul's_Drag_Race_Down_Under#Television_controversies_in_Australia if anyone disagrees.
Hope you're well ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Lil-unique1, Thanks, but I don't think the categories should be applied. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough your notion of "I reverted therefore you have to build the consensus" isn't correct necessarily. But I'm not interested in arguing. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 23:08, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Lil-unique1, Yes, sorry, I do not wish to fight but I also think the category should be left off until more editors can weigh in and decide to add or not. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:42, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough your notion of "I reverted therefore you have to build the consensus" isn't correct necessarily. But I'm not interested in arguing. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 23:08, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
La Carreta Mexican Restaurant
Your GA nomination of La Carreta Mexican Restaurant
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article La Carreta Mexican Restaurant you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 06:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of La Carreta Mexican Restaurant
The article La Carreta Mexican Restaurant you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:La Carreta Mexican Restaurant for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 02:01, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:39, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
"Seeking Sister Wife" listed at Redirects for discussion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
|
Hail to the Rhythm
I've just created In Performance at the White House, there seems to be so much scope for expansion, but I'm sure how to avoid it becoming a list article or just a block of performers names. I know you're the doyen of popular culture articles, and an editor I really admire, so any advice would be grateful! No Swan So Fine (talk) 11:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- No Swan So Fine, Thanks! I think this entry is a great start. I notice you use "series" throughout. If sources use this term, that's no problem, but usually Americans use "season" over "series" for television programs. Otherwise, I think this is a good foundation for editors to build on moving forward. You might post notes at WikiProject Television and WikiProject United States to see if any other editors wish to leave some feedback. Thanks for the note, and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:25, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 March 2021
- News and notes: A future with a for-profit subsidiary?
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Monuments
- In the media: Wikimedia LLC and disinformation in Japan
- News from the WMF: Project Rewrite: Tell the missing stories of women on Wikipedia and beyond
- Recent research: 10%-30% of Wikipedia’s contributors have subject-matter expertise
- From the archives: Google isn't responsible for Wikipedia's mistakes
- Obituary: Yoninah
- From the editor: What else can we say?
- Arbitration report: Open letter to the Board of Trustees
- Traffic report: Wanda, Meghan, Liz, Phil and Zack
This week's article for improvement (week 13, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Chi Chi DeVayne
Your GA nomination of Chi Chi DeVayne
.jpg)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chi Chi DeVayne you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 08:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Chi Chi DeVayne
The article Chi Chi DeVayne you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chi Chi DeVayne for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 08:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Chi Chi DeVayne
The article Chi Chi DeVayne you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chi Chi DeVayne for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 19:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Armadillopteryx: Congrats! Glad we could collaborate here. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, same! Congrats :-) Armadillopteryx 19:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Btw, do you mind if I nominate the article for DYK? Armadillopteryx 01:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Armadillopteryx, Not at all! Thanks, ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Bust of Vasil Levski for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bust of Vasil Levski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
Serpent coaster article
Greetings! I noticed you reverted the recent changes I made to Serpent (roller coaster). It is basically a duplication of what already exists in the primary Six Flags AstroWorld article minus the coaster's specs, which are insignificant. This is a junior coaster, of which hundreds if not thousands exist around the world. Am I missing the justification for preserving the article as opposed to changing to a redirect? Many AfD discussions in the past have resulted in redirect or delete (in fact, there's a similar one now on the chopping block: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Branson Coaster, only that one doesn't have redirect as an option). Thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 19:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you
|
A cup of tea for you. Thank you for getting the page protection on that article! WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC) |
- @WomenArtistUpdates: Thanks, and no problem! Happy to help, ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2021
Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).
|
This week's article for improvement (week 14, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Concern regarding Draft:Lesley Wolf
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC) |
The Original Dinerant
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article The Original Dinerant has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
It's academic since the article was reviewed and promoted to GA but I find the "as of"s that are scattered throughout the article suggest that it needs updating. I tagged one quote in the Reception section because it was unclear what "prize" is being suggested. The Menu section is out-of-date and comes close to sounding like an advertisement. There were a lot of links to common terms that I removed because they were unnecessary in my opinion.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Twofingered Typist, Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Lorna Breen for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorna Breen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
TFL notification
Hi, Another Believer. I'm just posting to let you know that Grammy Award for Best Jazz Fusion Performance – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for April 30. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 20:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Giants2008, Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:01, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: March 2021
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
This week's article for improvement (week 15, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
See You in My Nightmares talk page
I moved the hip hop music WP to being in a different placement as you can see an explanation for in my edit, also shouldn't you have created a talk archive per the review being archived? --K. Peake 17:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Kyle Peake, I order WikiProject banners alphabetically, not based on relevance, which is subjective. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:06, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Kyle Peake, Also, no Talk archive is not necessary because there's a link to the archived review in the 'article history' template. But, no harm in adding Talk archive as well, which I've done! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:21, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Veronica Green
Sorry about that, I deleted the wrong tag... you knew what I was trying to do. They're definitely still alive though! Richard3120 (talk) 14:08, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Richard3120, Yup!, no prob! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Republic Cafe and Ming Lounge
Hello:
The second GOCE copy edit of the article Republic Cafe and Ming Lounge has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Congratulations on the GA.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:35, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Twofingered Typist, Your edits look great. Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:35, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
.jpg)
Mass mss. request
Hello Another Believer, could you mass message members of WikiProject Wikipedia Awards, or at least the most active members about the discussion "Possibly splitting WP:BARN"? Thank you! Jerm (talk) 23:58, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- Jerm, I'm really only comfortable using mass message for initiatives I'm spearheading or co-organizing. I don't follow WikiProject Awards closely or know which members are active, but hopefully your talk page comment gets participation. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- I understand, thanks anyway, Happy editing & cheers! Jerm (talk) 00:56, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Masia (restaurant)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Masia (restaurant) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 02:41, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
- From the editor: A change is gonna come
- Disinformation report: Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise
- In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby
- Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct
- Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way
- Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia
- Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles
- Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty
- News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
This week's article for improvement (week 17, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Nomination of Statue of Christopher Columbus (Chula Vista, California) for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statue of Christopher Columbus (Chula Vista, California) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
|
.jpg){kind=logo}
The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.
We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.
More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Masia (restaurant)
The article Masia (restaurant) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Masia (restaurant) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 22:21, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Whiteguru, Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:46, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
DYK for Chi Chi DeVayne
On 29 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chi Chi DeVayne, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the BBC described Chi Chi DeVayne's lip sync to "And I Am Telling You I'm Not Going" as "iconic in Drag Race history"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chi Chi DeVayne. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chi Chi DeVayne), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
WikiCup 2021 May newsletter
Extended content
|
|---|
|
The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures. Our top scorers in Round 2 were:
Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 18, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Nomination of Gregory Gourdet for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Gourdet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
- Eye roll... Try Google. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2021
Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).
|
GOCE Copy Edit of Papi Chulo's
| | Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Papi Chulo's at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! audreyw (talk) 21:20, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:22, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Author Requesting a New Article
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hello User:Another Believer. I am a COI/paid editor, and I too live in Portland. Earlier this week, I received an email from an author who would like an article on herself. She has written 4 books, and from a cursory Google search, it appears to me she is notable. She identifies as Black, and I was thinking that rather than taking her on as a client, she may be better served by working with a volunteer editor or volunteer project group that is trying to broaden the representation on Wikipedia - more women, more POC, more LGBTQ, etc. I was wondering if you would be interested in working with her, or might know a group or volunteer who would. Then I could connect her with the appropriate people/person to discuss the project. I'm speaking to her on Tuesday and would love to be able to tell her that someone would like to help. Can you give me your thoughts on the above? I'd greatly appreciate it. Best LeepKendall (talk) 22:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Teddi Mellencamp Arroyave
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
A tag has been placed on Teddi Mellencamp Arroyave requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. (Side note: I mentioned in my edit summary the source was unreliable. I mistakenly misread the IMDb external link as a citation instead of the Entertainment Tonight article, which is a reliable source. I can't alter edit summaries, but I would have nominated the article regardless of that. ) 51.37.97.190 (talk) 21:06, 8 May 2021 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 19, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Books & Bytes – Issue 43
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC) |
"Lost and Found" (Chris Brown song)
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
No, there shouldn't, because all the chart positions are fake – check them yourself. Most of the other sources don't mention this song at all. The sock keeps restoring this article full of fake information. Richard3120 (talk) 14:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
|
This Month in GLAM: April 2021
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Hey Jason, how are you? Can you help with this article, please? An IP keeps reverting my edits for no reason. I am not sure what to do. GagaNutellatalk 17:13, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 20, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 The article East Portland Community Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Orphaned non-free image File:Oregon Humanities logo.jpg
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 17 May 2021 (UTC) |
Nomination of Radiant Fountains for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radiant Fountains until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
Southeast Grind
Hello: The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Southeast Grind has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:11, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Sia articles
Should Category:Sia articles by importance and its subcategories be deleted since the importance levels are being categorized under Category:Sia Furler articles by importance? Thanks. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:33, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, Sure! Not sure when or why this changed or was not fixed at the time. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sia articles by importance
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
A tag has been placed on Category:Sia articles by importance indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:48, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
|
DYK for Statue of Billie Holiday
On 23 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Statue of Billie Holiday, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the statue of Billie Holiday in Upton, Baltimore, also depicts a crow eating a gardenia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Statue of Billie Holiday. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Statue of Billie Holiday), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
This week's article for improvement (week 21, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article Statue of Jeff Goldblum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
June 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
This week's article for improvement (week 22, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
.jpg)
,_2019.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
,_2019.jpg){kind=link}
,_2019.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
,_2019.jpg){kind=link}
,_2019.jpg&action=watch){kind=link}
