BrotherLars

Welcome!

Hello, BrotherLars, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Guilderberg, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JD554 (talk) 14:52, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Guilderberg

I have nominated Guilderberg, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guilderberg. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JD554 (talk) 14:52, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Update / Reasons not to delete:

1. Article had been rewritten with more original content 2. Organization could be an important medium for co-operation between countries and regions. 3. Could improve lives of people around the world. 4. Introduces a new, unique way of asking and granting favours. 5. Could very well be the breeding ground and point of fruition to Emerging_technologies such as WiTricity Environmental_technology Screenless displays and more. 6. Any society which claims to include in its roster of mombers European, Middle Eastern & Asian royal families, CEO’s and founders of the world’s leading corporations, academics from the world’s best universities, artists from music, film and digital media, scientific visionaries, money market insiders, venture capitalists, real estate moguls, successful entrepreneurs, bankers and influential journalists - IS WORTH FOLLOWING and people knowing about it.

Speedy deletion nomination of Guilderberg

A tag has been placed on Guilderberg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JD554 (talk) 14:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guilderberg. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If you now concede that the article should be deleted, you should simply say so in the AfD discussion rather than attempting to delete the page. It need to remain as an archive of the discussion. JD554 (talk) 10:07, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guilderberg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. As I previously stated the page needs to remain as an archive of the discussion JD554 (talk) 10:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)