CessnaMan1989

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, CessnaMan1989! Thank you for your contributions. I am HiLo48 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. If you wish to contact me on this page, please use {{Ping|HiLo48}} such that I get notified of your request. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new users
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 22:33, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

1988 United States presidential election in the District of Columbia

Hello, I have removed one of your contributions to the article you recently edited. The paragraph you wrote about Gallaudet University Protest did not clearly explain how the protest affected the election. In the Deaf President Now article, there is no explicit mention of the election, although there is a mention of George Bush. Your contributions still exist in the article history and may be restored if you wish. Wikinights (talk) 10:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

That's original research in violation of WP core policies

Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia core policies. Citing that case for such a broad inference about the Restatements that is not expressly stated therein means you are using WP as a first publisher of original research in violation of WP:NOR, as well as WP:NPOV. That case can be fairly cited on WP only for statements about itself, its exact holdings, or statements of law made within the opinion itself. If you can't find a case that actually makes such a broad generalization, you should be looking for a law review article or a book that does so. --Coolcaesar (talk) 14:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

@Coolcaesar: No, that is not original research because the inference is not broad at all. The statement only requires a single anecdote to hold up, and the example provides just that. CessnaMan1989 (talk) 23:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Just noticed this. In general, supporting a broad generalization with an anecdote is a rather weak kind of argument (which is why most lawyers don't risk it unless they have no choice). Also, the very attempt to use an anecdote to support a broad generalization is original research. Yes, WP:NOR is that strict. --Coolcaesar (talk) 09:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

P vs. NP

In addition to my edit summary here, please note that there is already discussion in the article of the possibility of it being undecidable in ZFC, in the section P_versus_NP_problem#Results_about_difficulty_of_proof, and the Aaronson paper is already cited there. --JBL (talk) 17:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Lutheranism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hermitian matrix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quantum theory.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

World War Two dispute

It appears that you entered the World War Two dispute manually rather than using the interface that is provided. The interface adds control information that is used by the bot that archives the noticeboard, so that disputes that are entered manually confuse the bot. I have removed the dispute, but I encourage you to re-enter the dispute using the interface rather than manually. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:00, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

@Robert McClenon: I'm sorry. I've never had to appeal for dispute resolution before, and I just did so incorrectly. CessnaMan1989 (talk) 01:47, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Nazi-Soviet Alliance (1939–)

Thank you for providing all the high quality and balanced input to the World War II +related articles and discussions. I'll see what I can do to help in this. Cheers!3 Löwi (talk) 11:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Indraji Sabharwal

Hello, CessnaMan1989. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Indraji Sabharwal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Indrajit Sabharwal

Hello, CessnaMan1989. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Indrajit Sabharwal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Indrajit Sabharwal

Hello, CessnaMan1989. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Indrajit Sabharwal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)