Dkspartan1835

Dkspartan1835, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dkspartan1835! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Worm That Turned (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

undid my revision

Hi, Sorry about undoing your edit without deliberation. I corrected myself. --Golta (talk) 19:32, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Golta

November 2017

Your recent editing history at Book of Joshua shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 15:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Please remove the unsourced material you added

I hope that you want to abide by our policies. As I said in my edit summary, this text "Inlater years of the 20th century, academic analysis tended to be increasingly skeptical of the historicity of the early Israelite military campaigns as described in Joshua. To be sure, scholarship remained somewhat divided with some more deferential to the Biblical account." is sourced to our article.

This text: "Whether through pastoral migration or military conquest, the Israelite settlement cannot easily be pegged to a specific time period. Scholars have argued in favor of the 14th, 13th, and 12th centuries BCE.", added twice today, has a fact tag dated August 2017. WP:VERIFY is very clear: "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source."

Reverting it would be what we call a self-revert and cancel out your 3rd revert today. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 15:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Ah, too late. Doug Weller talk 15:51, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

References

Incorrect revisions

Why are you reverting factually-correct information regarding the Little Caesars Arena capacity? The capacity is not exactly 20,000. That is only an estimation. Every home game has been an announced sell out of 19,515. You don't really think that the Red Wings have fallen exactly 485 short for every single home game this season, do you? Please don't overwrite hard evidence with estimations! (saint0wen (talk) 08:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC))

September 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tucker Carlson, you may be blocked from editing. Your edit summary was nonsensical. Toddst1 (talk) 03:53, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Can we please move to block Dkspartan1835 - because his or her edits clearly partisan and not factual - and reinsert the following paragraph:

In January 2018, American comedian Chelsea Handler suggested that Graham was being blackmailed by the Trump administration because, she said, he is gay and remains in the closet. Graham dismissed the rumors in a statement to the New York Times.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.208.214.146 (talk) 10:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

References

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dkspartan1835. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dkspartan1835. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Aaron Hernandez

You removed a citation needed tag from the Aaron Hernandez article, saying that the citation at the end covered the entire paragraph. There are two citations in this paragraph, and it is not immediately apparent which source supports this statement. I restored the tag. Would you please replace it with the correct citation? Thanks! --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 16:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Removing reliable sources

Where do our source guidelines say that we need to have first-hand sources rather than third-party ones? You are removing sourced information, please stop. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:41, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

March 2020

Hello, I'm Eagles247. Your recent edit to the page Trae Waynes appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 12:32, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

thanks for fixing that thing on the sylvester stallone page. i didn't notice you got it until now or id have said thanks earlier. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DragonJoeWyrm (talk • contribs) 15:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)